When Direct Oral Anticoagulants Should Not Be Standard Treatment: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Discontinuation of Anticoagulants and Occurrence of Bleeding and Thromboembolic Events in Vitamin K Antagonist Users with a Life-limiting Disease

Data on risks and benefits of long-term anticoagulants in patients with a life-limiting disease are limited. This cohort study aims to describe (dis)continuation of anticoagulants and incidences of bleeding and thromboembolic events in vitamin K antagonist (VKA) users with a life-limiting disease.Data from five Dutch anticoagulation clinics were linked to data from Statistics Netherlands and the Netherlands Cancer registry. Prevalent VKA users diagnosed with a pre-specified life-limiting disease between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019 were included and followed until December 31, 2019. Bleeding and thromboembolic events were identified by hospitalization data. Cumulative incidences of anticoagulant discontinuation, accounting for death as competing risk, and event rates for both anticoagulant exposed and unexposed person-years (PYs) were determined.Among 18,145 VKA users (median age 81 years [IQR: 74-86], 49% females, median survival time 2.03 years [95%CI: 1.97-2.10]), the most common life-limiting diseases were heart disease (60.0%), hip fracture (18.1%), and cancer (13.5%). One year after diagnosis, the cumulative incidence of anticoagulant discontinuation was 14.0% (95%CI: 13.5-14.6). Over 80% of patients continued anticoagulant therapy until the last month before death, with median 14 days between discontinuation and death. Event rates per 100 PYs (95%CI) were comparable during anticoagulant use and after discontinuation for bleeding 2.6 (2.4-2.8) versus 2.1 (1.5-2.8), venous thromboembolism 0.2 (0.1-0.2) versus 0.4 (0.2-0.7), and arterial thromboembolism 3.1 (2.9-3.3) versus 3.3 (2.6-4.2).Most VKA users with a life-limiting disease continued anticoagulant treatment during their last phase of life, with similar rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events during use and after discontinuation.

Choosing the optimal oral anticoagulant for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: direct oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have replaced vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in many patients with atrial fibrillation, but VKAs may still be preferred in some situations. We use a case-based approach to present the evidence for the possible use of a VKA in preference to a DOAC in patients with atrial fibrillation and rheumatic mitral stenosis, high body mass index, frailty, and breakthrough stroke despite being prescribed a DOAC.

Use of Oral Anti-Xa Inhibitor in Prosthetic Mechanical Aortic Valve with Warfarin Hypersensitivity Due to the FIX p.(Ala37Thr) Propeptide Variant: Case Report and Literature Review

Bleeding is the most common side effect during treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Sometimes, VKA use causes bleeding episodes due to rare variants in the factor IX (FIX) propeptide that modify the affinity of FIX propeptide to the binding of γ-glutamyl carboxylase. We report on a 51-year-old patient who presented with recurrent spontaneous and severe intramuscular and cutaneous bleedings during VKA (warfarin) treatment for the presence of a prosthetic mechanical aortic valve. Laboratory evaluation revealed INR within the therapeutic range with markedly prolonged aPTT and a large reduction of FIX levels. Laboratory parameters significantly improved when warfarin was switched with low-molecular-weight heparin. Next-generation sequencing analysis revealed the variant p.(Ala37Thr) in the F9 gene, which has been previously associated with VKA sensitivity. As an alternative to warfarin, apixaban 5 mg twice daily and aspirin 100 mg daily were started, with no thrombosis or recurrence of hemorrhage and normalization of INR, aPTT, and FIX levels, at 12-month follow-up. We also performed a literature search across PubMed and Scopus, until January 2025. The analysis evidenced five case reports and two case series. The mechanisms of this rare VKA hypersensitivity have also been reviewed. In conclusion, while VKA hypersensitivity is a rare phenomenon, awareness of this complication and the current accessibility to molecular testing make it important to identify patients at risk. The efficacy/safety of direct thrombin or factor Xa inhibitors in patients with a mechanical heart valve and VKA hypersensitivity due to the F9 p.(Ala37Thr) variant deserves more attention and further investigation.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: A prospective observational analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome remains uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study on APS patients with VTE treated with VKAs or DOACs in a tertiary hospital from 2010 to 2023. Clinical characteristics, recurrent arterial or VTE events, and hemorrhagic complications were analyzed over a one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty APS patients were included: 31 (62%) treated with VKAs and 19 (38%) with DOACs. Thrombotic recurrences occurred in 5 VKA patients (16.1%) and 3 DOAC patients (15.8%). Major bleeding occurred in 2 VKA patients (6.45%) and none in the DOAC group. There were no significant differences in thrombotic recurrence (OR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.19-5.46) or major bleeding (OR 1.09; 95% CI: 0.14-8.52) between groups.

CONCLUSION

In APS patients with VTE, DOACs showed similar rates of recurrent thrombosis and major bleeding compared to VKAs. Future studies should therefore focus on the role of DOACs in APS patients with varying clinical and serological profiles.

Direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin in patients with left ventricular thrombus after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a pilot trial and a prespecified meta-analysis of randomised trials

BACKGROUND

The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the treatment of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains uncertain.

AIMS

We aimed to compare the effect of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with STEMI complicated by LVT.

METHODS

Adult patients with STEMI and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography showing LVT were assigned to rivaroxaban (15 mg once daily) or warfarin (international normalised ratio goal of 2.0-2.5) in an open-label, randomised clinical trial (RCT). A prospective pooled analysis was planned comparing DOAC- versus warfarin-based anticoagulation for the same indication. The main outcome of the RCT was complete LVT resolution at 3 months, determined by a blinded imaging core laboratory. Complete LVT resolution and bleeding were investigated in the pooled analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients (median age: 55 years, 18% females) were enrolled from June 2020 to November 2022. Three-month complete LVT resolution occurred in 19/25 (76.0%) patients assigned to rivaroxaban and 13/24 (54.2%) assigned to warfarin (relative risk [RR] 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-2.15; p=0.12) with no thrombotic or major bleeding events. Pooled analysis showed numerically better complete LVT resolution with DOACs (rivaroxaban and apixaban; 93/115 [80.8%] vs 79/112 [70.5%], RR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.98-1.32; p=0.08) and less major bleeding (2/116 [1.7%] and 9/112 [8.0%], risk difference -0.06, 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.00; p=0.05) than with warfarin.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the findings are limited by a small sample size, the results suggest that DOACs are safe with at least similar outcomes concerning LVT resolution and major bleeding compared with warfarin. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05705089).

Factors related to the choice of warfarin for treating newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are associated with safety outcomes during anticoagulation: A new-user, active-comparator, retrospective cohort study

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF); however, warfarin is still used. This study examined why physicians may choose warfarin over DOACs and the associated safety outcomes in patients with NVAF.

Methods

We conducted a new-user, active-comparator cohort study in newly diagnosed patients with NVAF to assess safety outcomes after the introduction of DOACs in Japan.

Results

The median observation period was 1120 days; 1428 patients started anticoagulation therapy with warfarin and 1551 with DOACs. Warfarin was chosen for patients with lower creatinine clearance and left ventricular ejection fractions and those using aspirin and verapamil. The unadjusted risk of major bleeding was considerably higher in the warfarin group but was nonsignificant after adjusting for variables associated with the choice of warfarin, in addition to age and sex. The risk of death was higher in the warfarin group, even after adjustments for relevant variables. However, high-risk subgroups, including those with older ages and multiple comorbidities, such as renal impairment, for whom warfarin was more likely to be selected, had severely compromised prognoses with either anticoagulant. The risk of stroke/systemic embolism was not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions

Warfarin is often chosen for older patients with multiple comorbidities characterized by reduced renal function, which is associated with a higher risk of major bleeding and mortality. These high-risk patients seem to have a poor prognosis regardless of the type of anticoagulant used. Thus, safe anticoagulant therapy remains a challenge for such patients.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Left Ventricular Thrombus After Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis

Left ventricular (LV) thrombus formation remains a post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complication even in the modern era of early reperfusion. The optimal anticoagulation regimen in this clinical scenario is poorly defined. The present meta-analysis sought to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the management of LV thrombus after AMI. A systematic literature review was conducted in electronic databases to identify studies reporting efficacy and safety outcome data regarding the use of DOACs versus VKAs for patients with LV thrombus after AMI. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize pooled ORs. Eight studies comprising a total of 605 patients were included. DOACs were associated with an almost twofold higher likelihood of thrombus resolution compared with VKAs (pooled OR 1.95 [1.25 to 3.04], p = 0.003, I2 = 0%), and decreased the risk of systemic embolism by 70% (pooled OR 0.30 [0.12 to 0.75]; p = 0.01, I2 = 0%). The use of DOACs was associated with a 54% lower risk of bleeding compared with VKAs (pooled OR 0.46 [0.26 to 0.84], p = 0.01, I2 = 0%). Overall, patients receiving DOACs had a 63% lower risk of reaching the composite outcome of safety and efficacy compared with patients using VKAs (pooled OR 0.37 [0.23 to 0.60], p <0.0001, I2 = 0%). In conclusion, DOACs appear to have a more favorable efficacy and safety profile compared with VKAs for the management of LV thrombus related to AMI.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Quick Primer on When to Use and When to Avoid

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have transformed the landscape of antithrombotic therapy in the past two decades. However, there is uncertainty about when they should or should not be used for treatment or prevention of thromboembolic events. DOACs have largely replaced warfarin for many patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism who require anticoagulant therapy. In addition to noninferior efficacy, fewer drug-drug and food-drug interactions and improved convenience; DOACs have been shown to reduce the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. They have also received new indications compared with warfarin, such as cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with stable atherosclerotic diseases. However, there are some scenarios in which DOACs are associated with inferior efficacy or worse safety compared with standard treatment, such as warfarin. These include patients with mechanical heart valves, thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, and others. Although DOACs offer a streamlined and convenient option for the management of many patients with or at risk of thromboembolic events, their use should be avoided in certain high-risk scenarios. This minireview summarizes such conditions and those in which there is uncertainty for use of DOACs for particular diseases or particular patient subgroups.

Reversal of dabigatran and apixaban-induced coagulopathy using idarucizumab, fibrinogen, and prothrombin complex concentrate: A case report

This case report examines the combined use of fibrinogen concentrate, four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), and idarucizumab, a specific antidote for dabigatran, to reverse the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran and apixaban-induced coagulopathy. An 86-year-old patient, receiving apixaban therapy, presented to the Emergency Department after intentionally ingesting 50 tablets of dabigatran. The combination therapy contributed to the rapid normalization of coagulation parameters and stabilization of the patient's clinical status without subsequent thromboembolic complications. This case adds to the limited evidence on the effectiveness and safety of combining PCC with idarucizumab in cases of multiple anticoagulant intoxication.

A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of asundexian: a novel factor XIa inhibitor for stroke prevention

INTRODUCTION

Antithrombotic therapy is the mainstay of ischemic stroke prevention. Current drugs (antiplatelets and oral anticoagulants) lead to increased bleeding risks, and the rates of stroke recurrence, despite antithrombotic therapy, are still elevated. There is a need for novel antithrombotic therapies with superior effectiveness but without increased bleeding risk. Factor XIa inhibitors might cover this gap.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript examines the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of asundexian and the current clinical evidence regarding its application in preventing ischemic stroke.

EXPERT OPINION

Asundexian shows a very favoring pharmacokinetic profile. Despite asundexian being inferior to apixaban for cardioembolic ischemic stroke, it could be useful in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke. Although antiplatelet therapy is the recommended treatment to prevent non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke, adding an anticoagulant might have beneficial effects through the dual-pathway inhibition strategy. Due to the potential risk of hemorrhagic transformation, there is hesitation to administer anticoagulants early to patients who have recently had an ischemic stroke, especially if they are also on antiplatelet therapy. However, clinical trials on asundexian confirmed its safety for bleeding, even when used with antiplatelets. A phase 3 trial is currently investigating the efficacy of asundexian in preventing non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke.

Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients Undergoing Acute Pulmonary Embolism Interventions

Catheter-based interventions and surgical embolectomy represent alternatives to systemic fibrinolysis for patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) or those with intermediate-high-risk PE who deteriorate hemodynamically. They are indicated when systemic fibrinolysis is contraindicated or ineffective, or if obstructive shock is imminent. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be added to reperfusion therapies or used alone for severe right ventricular dysfunction and cardiogenic shock. These advanced therapies complement but do not replace anticoagulation, which remains the cornerstone in PE management. This review summarizes the evidence and shares practical recommendations for the use of anticoagulant therapy before, during, and after acute PE interventions.

Rethinking the use of direct oral anticoagulants for secondary thromboprophylaxis in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome

Patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are at high risk for recurrent thrombosis, and indefinite anticoagulation is recommended. Patients with APS merit indefinite anticoagulation, and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have historically been the standard treatment. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) present an appealing alternative to VKAs. Due to their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, DOACs offer advantages over VKAs, namely the lack of need for laboratory monitoring, the usage of a fixed dosage, and the absence of significant interaction with dietary components and drugs. The efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with APS have been studied in four phase II/III clinical trials (three with rivaroxaban and one with apixaban). These studies showed DOACs' inferiority compared to VKAs in preventing recurrent thrombosis. Recurrence was significantly greater in patients with arterial thrombotic events and a triple positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies. No differences were observed in the incidence of venous thromboembolism between both groups. Major bleeding was similar in patients treated with DOACs or VKAs. Several observational studies have reported similar results. This review aims to analyse the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of DOACs for secondary prevention in patients with APS.

Perioperative Management of Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Review

Importance

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), comprising apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran, are commonly used medications to treat patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Decisions about how to manage DOACs in patients undergoing a surgical or nonsurgical procedure are important to decrease the risks of bleeding and thromboembolism.

Observations

For elective surgical or nonsurgical procedures, a standardized approach to perioperative DOAC management involves classifying the risk of procedure-related bleeding as minimal (eg, minor dental or skin procedures), low to moderate (eg, cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair), or high risk (eg, major cancer or joint replacement procedures). For patients undergoing minimal bleeding risk procedures, DOACs may be continued, or if there is concern about excessive bleeding, DOACs may be discontinued on the day of the procedure. Patients undergoing a low to moderate bleeding risk procedure should typically discontinue DOACs 1 day before the operation and restart DOACs 1 day after. Patients undergoing a high bleeding risk procedure should stop DOACs 2 days prior to the operation and restart DOACs 2 days after. With this perioperative DOAC management strategy, rates of thromboembolism (0.2%-0.4%) and major bleeding (1%-2%) are low and delays or cancellations of surgical and nonsurgical procedures are infrequent. Patients taking DOACs who need emergent (<6 hours after presentation) or urgent surgical procedures (6-24 hours after presentation) experience bleeding rates up to 23% and thromboembolism as high as 11%. Laboratory testing to measure preoperative DOAC levels may be useful to determine whether patients should receive a DOAC reversal agent (eg, prothrombin complex concentrates, idarucizumab, or andexanet-α) prior to an emergent or urgent procedure.

Conclusions and Relevance

When patients who are taking a DOAC require an elective surgical or nonsurgical procedure, standardized management protocols can be applied that do not require testing DOAC levels or heparin bridging. When patients taking a DOAC require an emergent, urgent, or semiurgent surgical procedure, anticoagulant reversal agents may be appropriate when DOAC levels are elevated or not available.

Clinical decisions for appropriate management of patients with atrial fibrillation

The management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) requires intricate clinical decision-making to optimize outcomes. In everyday clinical practice, physicians undergo difficult choices to better manage patients with AF. They need to balance thromboembolic and bleeding risk to focus on patients' symptoms and to manage a variety of multiple comorbidities. In this review, we aimed to explore the multifaceted dimensions of clinical decision-making in AF patients, encompassing the definition and diagnosis of clinical AF, stroke risk stratification, oral anticoagulant therapy selection, consideration of bleeding risk, and the ongoing debate between rhythm and rate control strategies. We will also focus on possible grey zones for the management of AF patients. In navigating this intricate landscape, clinicians must reconcile the dynamic interplay of patient-specific factors, evolving guidelines, and emerging therapies. The review underscores the need for personalized, evidence-based clinical decision-making to tailor interventions for optimal outcomes according to specific AF patient profiles.

Characteristics and prognosis of elderly-onset antiphospholipid syndrome: An observational cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease mainly affecting young individuals. Testing for antiphospholipid antibodies is recommended for young patients who are suspected to have APS. Yet, it is hard to differentiate APS from other acquired thrombophilia disorders in elderly-onset APS patients. This study aim to investigate the characteristics and prognosis of elderly-onset APS.

METHODS

This is an observational cohort study. Thrombotic APS patients who underwent follow-ups between 2009 and 2022 were included. Elderly-onset APS patients (onset age ≥60 years) were compared to non-elderly-onset APS patients (onset age <60 years) and matched cases of elderly non-APS patients (age ≥60 years with thrombosis).

RESULTS

A total of 161 APS patients were included in this study, 45 (28.0%) were elderly-onset APS. Stroke (35.6% vs. 18.1%, p = .018) was more common at disease onset in elderly-onset APS patients. Compared to non-elderly-onset patients, elderly-onset APS patients were associated with a higher number of cardiovascular risk factors. Elderly-onset APS patients showed significantly lower positive rate (51.1% vs. 71.6%, p = .014) and ratios [1.24 (1.01-1.38) vs. 1.37 (1.16-1.77), p = .004] of lupus anticoagulant. Elderly-onset APS patients had a significantly higher 10-years cumulative all-cause mortality (p < .001) and APS-related mortality than non-elderly-onset patients (p = .002) and elderly non-APS patients (p = .040).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly-onset APS patients have unique disease characteristics with higher 10-years cumulative all-cause mortality and APS-related mortality. Early recognition and control of comorbidities may reduce the recurrence of thrombosis and mortality in elderly-onset APS patients.

Therapeutic Potential of FXI Inhibitors: Hype or Hope?

Significant advancements have shaped the landscape of anticoagulant therapy in the past two decades, including the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), characterized by favorable safety and efficacy profiles and reduced drug-to-drug or food interaction resulting in excellent patient compliance. However, residual concerns still exist with standard-of-care anticoagulant therapy, including the inability to use DOACs in several clinical settings and the need to further reduce the risk of bleeding. Recent improvements in the understanding of the mechanisms behind thrombus formation have led to the awareness that the intrinsic pathway of the coagulation cascade may play an important role in pathological thrombosis, but not in hemostasis. This has represented the rationale for targeting this pathway with factor XI (FXI) inhibitors, with the aim of uncoupling hemostasis and thrombosis. Clinical evidence from patients with FXI deficiency further supports this concept. A number of compounds with different mechanisms of action have been developed to target FXI (i.e., asundexian, abelacimab, Ionis-FXIRx, milvexian, osocimab, and Xisomab 3G). To date, the majority of available trials have not gone beyond completion of phase 2 and results are conflictive making it difficult to appraise the clinical benefit of these compounds in the different clinical settings where they have been tested (i.e., atrial fibrillation, acute ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, end-stage renal disease, total knee arthroplasty). Moreover, the largest phase 3 randomized trial designed to test the efficacy of asundexian over apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation, the OCEANIC-AF, has been prematurely stopped as a result of the inferior efficacy of asundexian. In this review we discuss the pharmacological properties and available evidence generated thus far for factor XI inhibitors, providing a perspective on the current state of these drugs.

Oral anticoagulation in patients with left ventricular thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used off-label to treat patients with left ventricular thrombus (LVT). We analysed available meta-data comparing DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search and meta-analysis of observational and randomized data comparing DOACs vs. VKAs in patients with LVT. Endpoints of interest were stroke or systemic embolism, thrombus resolution, all-cause death, and a composite bleeding endpoint. Estimates were pooled using a random-effects model meta-analysis, and their robustness was investigated using sensitivity and influential analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 22 articles (18 observational studies, 4 small randomized clinical trials) reporting on a total of 3587 patients (2489 VKA vs. 1098 DOAC therapy). The pooled estimates for stroke or systemic embolism [odds ratio (OR): 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57, 1.15] and thrombus resolution (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.86, 1.46) were comparable, and there was low heterogeneity overall across the included studies. The use of DOACs was associated with lower odds of all-cause death (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.92) and a composite bleeding endpoint (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.97). A risk of bias was evident particularly for observational reports, with some publication bias suggested in funnel plots.

CONCLUSION

In this comprehensive analysis of mainly observational data, the use of DOACs was not associated with a significant difference in stroke or systemic embolism, or thrombus resolution, compared with VKA therapy. The use of DOACs was associated with a lower rate of all-cause death and fewer bleeding events. Adequately sized randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings, which could allow a wider adoption of DOACs in patients with LVT.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Insights into Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Manifestations

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a complex systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by a hypercoagulable state, leading to severe vascular thrombosis and obstetric complications. The 2023 ACR/EULAR guidelines have revolutionized the classification and understanding of APS, introducing broader diagnostic criteria that encompass previously overlooked cardiac, renal, and hematologic manifestations. Despite these advancements, diagnosing APS remains particularly challenging in seronegative patients, where traditional tests fail, yet clinical symptoms persist. Emerging non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies offer promising new diagnostic and management avenues for these patients. Managing APS involves a strategic balance of cardiovascular risk mitigation and long-term anticoagulation therapy, though the use of direct oral anticoagulants remains contentious due to varying efficacy and safety profiles. This article delves into the intricate pathogenesis of APS, explores the latest classification criteria, and evaluates cutting-edge diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies.