Acute Cor Pulmonale in COVID-19-Related ARDS: Improvement With Almitrine Infusion

Unraveling the impact of nitric oxide, almitrine, and their combination in COVID-19 (at the edge of sepsis) patients: a systematic review

Introduction: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a large number of critically ill and severe COVID-19 patients meet the diagnostic criteria for sepsis and even septic shock. The treatments for COVID-19 patients with sepsis are still very limited. For sepsis, improving ventilation is one of the main treatments. Nitric oxide (NO) and almitrine have been reported to improve oxygenation in patients with "classical" sepsis. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NO, almitrine, and the combination of both for COVID-19 (at the edge of sepsis) patients. Method: A systematic search was performed on Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, Wanfang Data, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, case series, and case reports in COVID-19 patients with suspected or confirmed sepsis were performed. Study characteristics, patient demographics, interventions, and outcomes were extracted from eligible articles. Results: A total of 35 studies representing 1,701 patients met eligibility criteria. Inhaled NO did not affect the mortality (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.33-2.8, I2 = 81%, very low certainty), hospital length of stay (SMD 0.62, 95% CI 0.04-1.17, I2 = 83%, very low certainty), and intubation needs (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.34-1.93, I2 = 56%, very low certainty) of patients with COVID-19 (at the edge of sepsis). Meanwhile, almitrine did not affect the mortality (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.17-1.13, low certainty), hospital length of stay (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.29-0.29, low certainty), intubation needs (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.5-1.79, low certainty), and SAEs (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.63-2.15, low certainty). Compared with pre-administration, the PaO2/FiO2 of patients with NO (SMD-0.87, 95% CI -1.08-0.66, I2 = 0%, very low certainty), almitrine (SMD-0.73, 95% CI-1.06-0.4, I2 = 1%, very low certainty), and the combination of both (SMD-0.94, 95% CI-1.71-0.16, I2 = 47%, very low certainty) increased significantly. Conclusion: Inhaled NO, almitrine, and the combination of the two drugs improved oxygenation significantly, but did not affect the patients' mortality, hospitalization duration, and intubation needs. Almitrine did not significantly increase the patients' SAEs. Well-designed high-quality studies are needed for establishing a stronger quality of evidence. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=367667, identifier CRD42022367667.

American Society of Echocardiography COVID-19 Statement Update: Lessons Learned and Preparation for Future Pandemics

The COVID-19 pandemic has evolved since the publication of the initial American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) statements providing guidance to echocardiography laboratories. In light of new developments, the ASE convened a diverse, expert writing group to address the current state of the COVID-19 pandemic and to apply lessons learned to echocardiography laboratory operations in future pandemics. This statement addresses important areas specifically impacted by the current and future pandemics: (1) indications for echocardiography, (2) application of echocardiographic services in a pandemic, (3) infection/transmission mitigation strategies, (4) role of cardiac point-of-care ultrasound/critical care echocardiography, and (5) training in echocardiography.

Right ventricle-specific therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To summarize knowledge and identify gaps in evidence regarding treatment of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they reported effects of treatments on right ventricular function, whether or not the intent was to modify right ventricular function.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction was performed independently and in duplicate by two authors. Data items included the study design, patient population, type of intervention, comparison group, and RV-specific outcomes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 1,430 studies screened, 51 studies reporting on 1,526 patients were included. By frequency, the included studies examined the following interventions: ventilator settings (29.4%), inhaled medications (33.3%), extracorporeal life support (13.7%), intravenous or oral medications (13.7%), and prone positioning (9.8%). The majority of the studies were non-randomized experimental studies (53%), with the next most common being case reports (16%). Only 5.9% of studies were RCTs. In total, 27% of studies were conducted with the goal of modifying RV function.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the prevalence of RVD in ARDS and its association with mortality, the dearth of research on this topic is concerning. This review highlights the need for prospective trials aimed at treating RV dysfunction in ARDS.

Prognostic value of acute cor pulmonale in COVID-19-related pneumonia: A prospective study

Background

It is known that acute cor pulmonale (ACP) worsens the prognosis of non-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (NC-ARDS). The ACP risk score evaluates the risk of ACP occurrence in mechanically ventilated patients with NC-ARDS. There is less data on the risk factors and prognosis of ACP induced by COVID-19-related pneumonia.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of ACP, assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and clinical factors associated with ACP in a cohort of patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia.

Materials and methods

Between February 2020 and June 2021, patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) at Amiens University Hospital for COVID-19-related pneumonia were assessed by TTE within 48 h of admission. ACP was defined as a right ventricle/left ventricle area ratio of >0.6 associated with septal dyskinesia. The primary outcome was mortality at 30 days.

Results

Among 146 patients included, 36% (n = 52/156) developed ACP of which 38% (n = 20/52) were non-intubated patients. The classical risk factors of ACP (found in NC-ARDS) such as PaCO₂ >48 mmHg, driving pressure >18 mmHg, and PaO₂/FiO₂ < 150 mmHg were not associated with ACP (all P-values > 0.1). The primary outcome occurred in 32 (22%) patients. More patients died in the ACP group (n = 20/52 (38%) vs. n = 12/94 (13%), P = 0.001). ACP [hazards ratio (HR) = 3.35, 95%CI [1.56–7.18], P = 0.002] and age >65 years (HR = 2.92, 95%CI [1.50–5.66], P = 0.002) were independent risk factors of 30-day mortality.

Conclusion

ACP was a frequent complication in ICU patients admitted for COVID-19-related pneumonia. The 30-day-mortality was 38% in these patients. In COVID-19-related pneumonia, the classical risk factors of ACP did not seem relevant. These results need confirmation in further studies.

The Combination Clinical Value of Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Serum HbAlc in the Diagnosis of Chronic Pulmonary Heart Disease

Objective. To analyze the combination clinical value of plasma brain natriuretic peptide and serum glycated hemoglobin (HbAlc) in chronic pulmonary heart disease. Methods. A total of 200 patients with chronic pulmonary heart disease admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to January 2022 were selected as the observation group, and 200 healthy subjects were selected as the control group during the same period. All subjects were examined by an ECG vector map and plasma BNP, and HbAlc levels were detected to analyze the value and clinical significance of each index in single diagnosis and combined diagnosis. Results. Plasma BNP and HbAlc levels in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group ( $P<0.05$ ). There were 154 BNP positive, 146 HbAlc positive, 164 parallel combined diagnosis positive, and 132 serial combined diagnosis positive. Sensitivity of series combination diagnosis was significantly higher than other indexes ( $P<0.05$ ); especially, parallel combination diagnosis was significantly higher than other indexes ( $P<0.05$ ). Besides, area under the ROC curve of parallel combination diagnosis and series combination diagnosis was significantly higher than that of each index alone diagnosis ( $P<0.05$ ). Conclusion. In the diagnosis of chronic pulmonary heart disease, the combination of plasma BNP and HbAlc can effectively improve the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity, as well as improve the area under the ROC curve.

ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the COVID-19 Era: Appraisal of the Evidence

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to present a public health challenge and has had a significant impact on the presentation, time-dependent management, and clinical outcomes of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Patients with COVID-19 and pre-disposing cardiovascular risk factors like hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus are at a higher risk of developing STEMI, and global trends have highlighted delayed management of STEMI, which may contribute to worse clinical outcomes. Prolonged time to intervention has also resulted in an increased rate of no reflow, which is an independent risk factor for worse outcomes in these patients. Timely primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains standard of care for STEMI and can be attained within the recommended 90 minutes timeline from hospital presentation. A coordinated, safe, standardized, algorithmic approach among emergency medical services, emergency departments, and cardiac catheterization laboratory is needed to ensure optimal patient outcome during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The focus of this case report is to highlight the challenges of PCI for ST elevation myocardial infarction in the COVID-19 era.

Usefulness of Right Ventricular Longitudinal Shortening Fraction to Detect Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Acute Cor Pulmonale Related to COVID-19

Objective

To compare two-dimensional–speckle tracking echocardiographic parameters (2D-STE) and classic echocardiographic parameters of right ventricular (RV) systolic function in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–related acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) complicated or not by acute cor pulmonale (ACP).

Design

Prospective, between March 1, 2020 and April 15, 2020.

Setting

Intensive care unit of Amiens University Hospital (France).

Participants

Adult patients with moderate-to-severe CARDS under mechanical ventilation for fewer than 24 hours.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and Main Results

Tricuspid annular displacement (TAD) parameters (TAD-septal, TAD-lateral, and RV longitudinal shortening fraction [RV-LSF]), RV global longitudinal strain (RV-GLS), and RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS) were measured using transesophageal echocardiography with a dedicated software and compared with classic RV systolic parameters (RV-FAC, S′ wave, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion [TAPSE]). RV systolic dysfunction was defined as RV-FAC <35%. Twenty-nine consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe CARDS were included. ACP was diagnosed in 12 patients (41%). 2D-STE parameters were markedly altered in the ACP group, and no significant difference was found between patients with and without ACP for classic RV parameters (RV-FAC, S′ wave, and TAPSE). In the ACP group, RV-LSF (17% [14%-22%]) had the best correlation with RV-FAC (r = 0.79, p < 0.001 v r = 0.27, p = 0.39 for RVGLS and r = 0.28, p = 0.39 for RVFWLS). A RV-LSF cut-off value of 17% had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 86% to identify RV systolic dysfunction.

Conclusions

Classic RV function parameters were not altered by ACP in patients with CARDS, contrary to 2D-STE parameters. RV-LSF seems to be a valuable parameter to detect early RV systolic dysfunction in CARDS patients with ACP.