Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Submassive Pulmonary Embolism in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy

Large-bore suction thrombectomy for sub-massive pulmonary embolism during second trimester of pregnancy: a case report

Background

Pregnancy-associated pulmonary embolism (PAPE) remains a significant cause of maternal mortality. Anticoagulation remains the mainstay of therapy for most pulmonary embolism (PE)-related pregnancies. However, in patients with haemodynamic compromise or those refractory to anticoagulation, management is challenging. Systemic thrombolysis is associated with a substantial risk of maternal bleeding and fetal loss. In non-pregnant PE patients, large bore catheter-directed suction thrombectomy is a proven and important technique to manage intermediate or high-risk PE, allowing for normalization of pulmonary pressures, avoidance of haemodynamic deterioration, without the need for thrombolytics, major surgery, significant blood loss, or prolonged hospitalization.

Case summary

A primigravid patient in her second trimester of pregnancy, initially diagnosed with a deep vein thrombosis refractory to heparin, presents with near-syncope due to sub-massive pulmonary embolism. The various management options including thrombolysis and surgical embolectomy etc. were discussed in detail by a multi-disciplinary PE team. She underwent large bore suction thrombectomy with complete thrombi removal, normalization of right heart strain, without the need for thrombolytics or surgery, minimal blood loss and was discharged after a short length of stay. She gave birth at term to a healthy infant.

Conclusion

Suction thrombectomy is an important consideration for physicians managing high-risk PAPE and is likely to be associated with much a lower risk of maternal and fetal mortality compared to thrombolysis or surgery.

Venous Thromboembolism Management in Pregnant Patients

Pulmonary embolism (PE) in pregnancy accounts for 10% of maternal deaths in the United States. As maternal morbidity and mortality continue to increase, it is imperative for all specialties interfacing with pregnant patients to understand the current research and guidelines surrounding risk stratification, diagnosis, and treatments of PE in pregnancy. Given the complexity of high-risk pregnancy-associated PE (PA-PE), that is, which is associated with hemodynamic instability or collapse, and the rising popularity of new technologies to treat high-risk PA-PE in the nonpregnant population, this review aims to emphasize the differences in diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of the pregnant and nonpregnant PE patients. Furthermore, this review will cover treatment paradigms that include anticoagulation versus advanced therapies such as systemic thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and inferior vena cava disruption as well as the more novel therapies which fall under the umbrella term of catheter-based treatments. Finally, this review will include a case-based review of 2 patients with PA-PE requiring catheter-based therapies and their ultimate clinical outcomes.

Pulmonary Embolism and Pregnancy-Challenges in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Decisions in High-Risk Patients

Diagnosis of acute PE in pregnant women with haemodynamic instability is following the general integrated risk-adapted diagnostic algorithm and starts with bedside echocardiography to assess RV function. If RV dysfunction is identified, a prompt and immediate reperfusion without further imaging should be initiated. Although pregnancy is listed as a relative contraindication of systemic thrombolysis, in pregnant women with acute PE and haemodynamic instability thrombolysis must be considered. In those cases, other treatment strategies as surgical embolectomy or catheter-directed low-dose thromboylysis or percutaneous thrombectomy should be taken into consideration as well. A multidisciplinary team with experience of PE management in pregnancy should be consulted to reach consensus on the best treatment approach.