Renal Artery Stenosis Treated Successfully With Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy

Use of Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy in Recanalization of Calcified Visceral and Renal Arteries: A Case Report and Update of the Literature

PURPOSE

Calcifications of the visceral and renal arteries lead to chronic mesenteric ischemia and renal artery stenosis, and both open and endovascular treatments can be proposed. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a novel technique used in peripheral and coronary interventions.

CASE REPORT

A 73-year-old man presented with chronic postprandial abdominal pain and weight loss. Computed-tomography-angiography (CTA) showed 93% calcified stenosis of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). The plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) was affected by immediate recoiling. The patient underwent ShockwaveTM IVL of the SMA via brachial access and stent-graft implantation. At 3-months follow-up, the patient showed symptoms resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of Shockwave IVL can be an effective treatment for severely calcified SMA stenosis. A similar approach can be employed in both celiac and renal arteries as reported in 11 cases in literature and herein summarized. Intravascular lithotripsy resulted in high technical success and uneventful follow-up. However, given the small number of patients reported, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This article reports a case of recanalization of superior mesenteric artery with heavily calcified lesion treated with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) with Shockwave™ Intravascular Lithotripsy Balloon (Shockwave Medical Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). Beside, for the first time, we summarize the Literature on the use of IVL in the renal and visceral arteries district, providing indications, applications and useful hints for the endovascular treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia and renal artery stenosis. This preliminary data show straightforward applicability, high technical success, and uneventful follow-up and IVL can be proposed as an useful tool for challenging revascularization of heavily calcified reno-visceral arteries.

Renal intravascular shockwave lithotripsy in complex mono Ch-EVAR

BACKGROUND

Our objective is to present the Peripheral Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) System in the treatment of calcific renal artery stenosis (RAS) during Chimney Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (Ch-EVAR). The Ch-EVAR technique is a bail out procedure in treating aortic aneurysms with challenging anatomy regarding the proximal sealing zone. RAS typically involves varying degrees of calcification, and final treatment can be fraught with risk of vessel's damages and suboptimal results, particularly when renal angioplasty represents the only feasible course of action in Ch-EVAR.

METHOD

We present a case of a patient with a complex juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm and a pre-obstructive chalky stenosis of the right renal artery who underwent mono ChEVAR associated to visceral Intravascular Lithotripsy shockwave angioplasty.

CONCLUSION

IVL is an attractive modality for the treatment of challenging, heavily calcified renal arteries that combines the calcium-disrupting capability of lithotripsy with the familiarity of balloon catheters to facilitate proper stent deployment.

RESULT

We propose the IVL system as an additional tool in the vascular surgeon's armamentarium not only to obtain large-bore access to enable Transaortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) and EVAR but also to perform angioplasty of severely calcified visceral arteries during Ch-EVAR.

Use of intravascular lithotripsy in non-coronary artery lesions

BACKGROUND

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel technique increasingly used for plaque modification and endovascular revascularization in patients with severe calcification and peripheral artery disease. However, much of the available literature on IVL is focused on its use in coronary arteries, with relatively limited data on non-coronary artery use.

AIM

To analyze the safety and efficacy of current IVL use in non-coronary artery lesions, as reported in case reports and case series.

METHODS

We searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Reference Citation Analysis databases for case reports and case series on IVL use in peripheral artery disease. We then extracted variables of interest and calculated the mean and proportions of these variables.

RESULTS

We included 60 patients from 33 case reports/case series. Ninety-eight percent of the cases had IVL usage in only one blood vessel, while four had the IVL used in two vessels (2.0%), resulting in 64 Lesions treated with IVL. The mean age of the patients was 73.7 (SD 10.9). IVL was successfully used in severe iliofemoral artery stenosis (51.6%), severe innominate, subclavian, and carotid artery stenosis (26.7% combined), and severe mesenteric vessel stenosis (9.4%). Additionally, IVL was successfully used in severe renal (7.8%) and aortic artery (4.7%) stenosis. There were complications in 12% of the cases, with dissection being the commonest.

CONCLUSION

IVL has successfully used in plaque modification and endovascular revascularization in severely calcified and challenging lesions in the iliofemoral, carotid, subclavian, aorta, renal, and mesenteric vessels. The most severe but transient complications were with IVL use in the aortic arch and neck arteries.

Use of Intravascular Lithotripsy in Heavily Calcified Renal Artery Stenosis: A Case Report

Heavily calcified arterial lesions are difficult to treat in an endovascular manner with conventional techniques due to limited arterial compliance. Intravascular lithotripsy offers a novel minimally invasive therapeutic option through endovascular emission of acoustic waves, fracturing calcium deposits and facilitating lesion dilation. We present the case of a successful application of the Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy system (IVL®, Shockwave Medical Inc) in a heavily calcified stenosis of the right renal artery in a patient with a coral reef aorta.

Shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of calcific renal artery stenosis after an inadequately expanded renal artery stent

Renal artery calcifications can be associated with insufficient stent expansion and in-stent restenosis. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) uses shockwaves to disrupt calcium and treat calcific renal in-stent restenosis. Herein, the authors present a case to treat resistant reno-vascular hypertension and in-stent restenosis of an inadequately expanded renal stent in a patient with severe calcific renal artery stenosis. The patient was treated with IVL and stent dilation. The patient was followed subsequently, and her home blood pressure was well controlled on anti-hypertensive medications. In conclusion, IVL promises pronounced success in the modification of severely calcified renal artery lesions and can be used to treat renal artery stenosis even in the context of inadequately expanding renal artery stents.