Hemodynamic Optimization in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Machine learning-powered, device-embedded heart sound measurement can optimize AV delay in patients with CRT

BACKGROUND

Continuous optimization of atrioventricular (AV) delay for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is mainly performed by electrical means.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to develop an estimation model of cardiac function that uses a piezoelectric microphone embedded in a pulse generator to guide CRT optimization.

METHODS

Electrocardiogram, left ventricular pressure (LVP), and heart sounds were simultaneously collected during CRT device implantation procedures. A piezoelectric alarm transducer embedded in a modified CRT device facilitated recording of heart sounds in patients undergoing a pacing protocol with different AV delays. Machine learning (ML) was used to produce a decision-tree ensemble model capable of estimating absolute maximal LVP (LVPmax) and maximal rise of LVP (LVdP/dtmax) using 3 heart sound-based features. To gauge the applicability of ML in AV delay optimization, polynomial curves were fitted to measured and estimated values.

RESULTS

In the data set of ∼30,000 heartbeats, ML indicated S1 amplitude, S2 amplitude, and S1 integral (S1 energy for LVdP/dtmax) as most prominent features for AV delay optimization. ML resulted in single-beat estimation precision for absolute values of LVPmax and LVdP/dtmax of 67% and 64%, respectively. For 20-30 beat averages, cross-correlation between measured and estimated LVPmax and LVdP/dtmax was 0.999 for both. The estimated optimal AV delays were not significantly different from those measured using invasive LVP (difference -5.6 ± 17.1 ms for LVPmax and +5.1 ± 6.7 ms for LVdP/dtmax). The difference in function at estimated and measured optimal AV delays was not statiscally significant (1 ± 3 mm Hg for LVPmax and 9 ± 57 mm Hg/s for LVdP/dtmax).

CONCLUSION

Heart sound sensors embedded in a CRT device, powered by a ML algorithm, provide a reliable assessment of optimal AV delays and absolute LVPmax and LVdP/dtmax.

Variation in optimal hemodynamic atrio-ventricular delay of biventricular pacing with different endocardial left ventricular lead locations using precision hemodynamics

INTRODUCTION

It is not known whether the optimal atrioventricular (AVopt ) delay varies between left ventricular (LV) pacing site during endocardial biventricular pacing (BiVP) and may therefore needs consideration.

METHODS

We assessed the hemodynamic AVopt in patients with chronic heart failure undergoing endocardial LV lead implantation. AVopt was assessed during atrio-BiVP with a "roving LV lead." Up to four locations were studied: mid-lateral wall, mid-septum (or a close alternative), site of greatest hemodynamic improvement, and LV lead implant site. The AVopt was compared to a fixed AV delay of 180 ms.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were included (12 male, aged 66.5 ± 12.8 years, ejection fraction 26 ± 7%, 16 left bundle branch block or high percentage of right ventricular pacing [RVP], QRS duration 167 ± 27 ms). In most locations (62/63), AVopt increased systolic blood pressure during BiVP compared with RVP (relative improvement 6 mmHg, interquartile range [IQR] 4-9 mmHg). Compared to a fixed AV delay, the hemodynamic improvement at AVopt was higher (1 mmHg, IQR 0.2-2.6 mmHg, p < .001). Within most patients (16/17), we observed a difference in AVopt between pacing sites (median paced AVopt 209 ms, IQR 117-250). Within this range, the hemodynamic impact of these differences was small (median loss 0.6 mmHg, IQR 0.1-2.6 mmHg).

CONCLUSION

Within a patient, different endocardial LV lead locations have slightly different hemodynamic AVopt which are superior to a fixed AV delay. The hemodynamic consequence of applying an optimum from a different lead location is small.

His-Optimized and Left Bundle Branch-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: In Control of Fusion Pacing

Fusion pacing, which exploits conduction via the intrinsic His-Purkinje system, forms the basis of recent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) optimization algorithms. However, settings need to be constantly adjusted to accommodate for changes in AV conduction, and the algorithms are not always available (eg, depending on the device, in case of AV block or with atrial fibrillation). His-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (HOT-CRT), and left-bundle branch optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT) which combines conduction system pacing with ventricular fusion pacing, provide constant fusion with ventricular activation (irrespective of intrinsic AV conduction). These modalities provide promising treatment strategies for patients with heart failure, especially in those with chronic atrial fibrillation who require CRT (in whom the atrial port is usually plugged and can be used to connect the conduction system pacing lead).

Usefulness of Optimization of Interventricular Delay Using an Electrical Cardiometry Method in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Implantation

There are no studies examining interventricular (VV) delay optimization by an electrical cardiometry method in relation to subsequent cardiac function in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) -implanted patients. This study aimed to compare the VV delay in CRT-implanted patients by the dp/dt and electrical cardiometry and to examine the optimization of VV delay and improvement of cardiac function. We examined 19 consecutive CRT-implanted patients. The protocol included biventricular stimulation with either simultaneous or sequential pacing, and we evaluated systolic volume (SV) using an electrical cardiometry and the dp/dt of the left ventricle. The optimal VV delay was determined by the maximum SV using the electrical cardiometry. Two groups were defined, those whose increase in SV was at or above the median and those whose SV increase was below the median; changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The correlation between the VV delay optimized by the electrical cardiometry and dp/dt methods was high (R = 0.61, P = 0.006). Compared to the baseline SV (43.4 mL), the SV increased to 47.8 mL with simultaneous biventricular pacing (versus baseline P = 0.008) and further increased to 49.8 mL with optimized VV delay (versus simultaneous biventricular pacing P = 0.020). LVEF after 6 months significantly improved in the above-median SV increase group (37.6 versus 28.2%, P = 0.041), but not in the below-median SV increase group (26.5 versus 26.5%, P = 0.985). In conclusion, the optimal VV delay by electrical cardiometry method was almost concordant with that by the dp/dt method. Cardiac function significantly improved in the group with the above-median SV increase.

Optimizing lead placement for pacing in dyssynchronous heart failure: The patient in the lead

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) greatly reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure. However, despite tremendous efforts, response has been variable and can be further improved. Although optimizing left ventricular lead placement (LVLP) is arguably the cornerstone of CRT, the procedure of LVLP using the transvenous approach has remained largely unchanged for more than 2 decades. Improvements have been developed using scar location and electrical and/or mechanical mapping, and interest in conduction system pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing has emerged recently. Conduction system pacing is promising but may not be suitable for all patients with dyssynchronous heart failure. This review underscores the importance of a patient-tailored approach and discusses the potential applications of both conduction system pacing and targeted biventricular CRT.

Acute recoordination rather than functional hemodynamic improvement determines reverse remodelling by cardiac resynchronisation therapy

PURPOSE

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) improves left ventricular (LV) function acutely, with further improvements and reverse remodelling during chronic CRT. The current study investigated the relation between acute improvement of LV systolic function, acute mechanical recoordination, and long-term reverse remodelling after CRT.

METHODS

In 35 patients, LV speckle tracking longitudinal strain, LV volumes & ejection fraction (LVEF) were assessed by echocardiography before, acutely within three days, and 6 months after CRT. A subgroup of 25 patients underwent invasive assessment of the maximal rate of LV pressure rise (dP/dt_max,) during CRT-implantation. The acute change in dP/dt_max, LVEF, systolic discoordination (internal stretch fraction [ISF] and LV systolic rebound stretch [SRSlv]) and systolic dyssynchrony (standard deviation of peak strain times [2DS-SD18]) was studied, and their association with long-term reverse remodelling were determined.

RESULTS

CRT induced acute and ongoing recoordination (ISF from 45 ± 18 to 27 ± 11 and 23 ± 12%, p < 0.001; SRS from 2.27 ± 1.33 to 0.74 ± 0.50 and 0.71 ± 0.43%, p < 0.001) and improved LV function (dP/dt_max 668 ± 185 vs. 817 ± 198 mmHg/s, p < 0.001; stroke volume 46 ± 15 vs. 54 ± 20 and 52 ± 16 ml; LVEF 19 ± 7 vs. 23 ± 8 and 27 ± 10%, p < 0.001). Acute recoordination related to reverse remodelling (r = 0.601 and r = 0.765 for ISF & SRSlv, respectively, p < 0.001). Acute functional improvements of LV systolic function however, neither related to reverse remodelling nor to the extent of acute recoordination.

CONCLUSION

Long-term reverse remodelling after CRT is likely determined by (acute) recoordination rather than by acute hemodynamic improvements. Discoordination may therefore be a more important CRT-substrate that can be assessed and, acutely restored.