Clinically Manifesting Air Embolisms in Cryoballoon Ablation: Can Novel Water Buckets Reduce the Risk?

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: anticipating and avoiding complications

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is being performed more frequently and more widely at more centers. This stems from several factors including 1) demographic forces leading to an increased prevalence of the arrhythmia; 2) greater availability of ambulatory monitoring making diagnosis more frequent; 3) relative inefficacy of medications; and 4) improved safety and efficacy of the procedure. Ablation has become much more streamlined and reproducible than a decade ago, but life-threatening complications may still arise.

AREAS COVERED

This review will focus on awareness, avoidance, and early recognition and management of complications of AF ablation. This literature review is challenged by differing approaches to ablation of AF both within a center and between centers, the rapid improvement of technology making the outcomes associated with a therapeutic strategy begun a few years prior relatively obsolete, as well as the heterogeneity of the population being studied.

EXPERT OPINION

Newer technologies are on the horizon which will allow us to ablate AF with increasing efficacy, efficiency, and hopefully safety. Such new technology and changing usage mandate vigilance to avoid complications.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Inspiration-Induced Negative Left Atrial Pressure during Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is performed under deep sedation, which may cause inspiration-induced negative left atrial pressure (INLAP) associated with deep inspiration. INLAP could be the cause of periprocedural complications. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 381 patients with AF (mean age, 63.9 ± 10.8 years; 76 women; 216 cases of paroxysmal AF) who underwent CA under deep sedation using an adaptive servo ventilator (ASV). Patients whose LAP was not obtained were excluded. INLAP was defined as <0 mmHg of mean LAP during inspiration immediately after the transseptal puncture. The primary and secondary endpoints were the presence of INLAP and the incidence of periprocedural complications. Results: Among 381 patients, INLAP was observed in 133 (34.9%). Patients with INLAP had higher CHA2DS2-Vasc scores (2.3 ± 1.5 vs. 2.1 ± 1.6) and 3% oxygen desaturation indexes (median 18.6 (interquartile range 11.2–31.1) vs. 15.7 (8.1–25.3)), and higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (23.3 vs. 13.3%) than patients without INLAP. Air embolism occurred in four patients with INLAP (3.0 vs. 0.0%). Conclusion: INLAP is not rare in patients undergoing CA for AF under deep sedation with ASV. Much attention should be paid to the possibility of air embolism in patients with INLAP.

5S Study: Safe and Simple Single Shot Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Pulsed Field Ablation Using Sedation

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation represents an energy source specific for ablation of cardiac arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation. The aim of the study was to describe the adoption and the process of streamlining procedures with a new ablation technology.

METHODS

All-comer atrial fibrillation patients (n=191; mean age 69±12 years) underwent catheter ablation with a pulsed field ablation ablation device exclusively using analog-sedation. In the validation phase (n=25), device electrogram quality was compared with a circular mapping catheter to assess pulmonary vein isolation and esophageal temperature monitoring was used. In the streamline phase (n=166), a single-catheter approach was implemented. Postprocedural cerebral magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 53 patients. In 52 patients, esophageal endoscopy was performed at day 1 after the procedure. Follow-up was performed using 72 hours Holter ECGs.

RESULTS

On a pulmonary vein basis, pulmonary vein isolation rate was 100% including a single shot isolation rate of 99.5%. The electrogram information of the pulsed field ablation catheter and the circular mapping catheter were 100% congruent. Neither esophageal temperature rises nor esophageal thermal injury were observed. Two minor strokes occurred, presumable due to air embolism during catheter exchanges through the large bore sheath (13.8 F ID). In the streamline phase, reduced procedure times (46±14 versus 38±13 minutes, P=0.004), no further strokes and a low incidence of silent cerebral injury (10/53 patients; 19%) were noted. During short-term follow-up, 17/191 patients (9%) had a atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The pulsed field ablation device allows for simple and safe simple single shot pulmonary vein isolation using standard sedation protocols. Procedural speed and efficacy are remarkable and streamlining measures have added safety.

Cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation experience in Japan

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In Japan, cryoballoon ablation has been widely accepted and more than 70 000 patients have undergone pulmonary vein isolation using this novel technology since the introduction. This review focused on the current status of cryoballoon ablation in Japan and clarified the characteristics as compared to Europe and the United States.

RECENT FINDINGS

The number of atrial fibrillation patients undergoing cryoballon ablation has rapidly increased over the last 6 years. Most of the Japanese physicians consider the indication of cryoballoon ablation based on the anatomy of the pulmonary veins and left atrium evaluated on preprocedural computed tomography, and often perform adjunctive radiofrequency ablation after the pulmonary vein isolation. The reported overall efficacy and safety were similar to that in Europe and the United States; however, there are some distinctive complications of the cryoballoon procedure in Japan, such as air embolisms, gastric hypomotility and coronary artery spasms.

SUMMARY

Currently, the cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation is widely accepted in Japan owing to the low incidence of lethal complications, shorter procedure time and acceptable single procedure atrial fibrillation freedom.

Clinical Effect of Adaptive Servo-Ventilation on Left Atrial Pressure During Catheter Ablation in Sedated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Sedation during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation often provokes a decline in left atrial (LA) pressure (LAP) under atmospheric pressure and increases the risk of systemic air embolisms. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) on the LAP in sedated patients.Methods and Results:Fifty-one consecutive patients undergoing cryoballoon PVI were enrolled. All patients underwent sedation using propofol throughout the procedure. After the transseptal puncture and the insertion of a long sheath into the LA, the LAP was measured. Then, the ASV treatment was started, and the LAP was re-measured. The LAP before and after the ASV support was investigated. Before ASV, the LAP during the inspiratory phase was significantly smaller than that during the expiratory phase (4.9±5.4 mmHg vs. 14.0±5.2 mmHg, P<0.01). The lowest LAP was -2.2±5.1 mmHg and was under 0 mmHg in 37 (73%) patients. After the ASV, the LAP during the inspiratory phase significantly increased to 8.9±4.1 mmHg (P<0.01), and lowest LAP increased to 4.7±5.9 mmHg (P<0.01). The negative lowest LAP value became positive in 30/37 (81%) patients. There were no statistical differences regarding obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), obesity, gender, or other comorbidities between patients with and without a negative lowest LAP after ASV support.

CONCLUSIONS

ASV is effective for increasing the LAP above 0 mmHg and might prevent air embolisms during PVI.