1
|
Costea AI, Khanna R, Iglesias M, Rong Y. Hospital readmissions following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with THERMOCOOL™ STSF/ THERMOCOOL™ ST catheter with CARTO™ 3 system versus TactiCath™ catheter with EnSite™ system. J Comp Eff Res 2025; 14:e240075. [PMID: 39629822 DOI: 10.57264/cer-2024-0075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation (CA) is a mainstay treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). RF catheters with contact force (CF) sensing technology and electroanatomical mapping systems enable real-time assessment of catheter tip-tissue interface CF, facilitating individualized and precise CA. This study examined inpatient hospital readmissions in patients with AF treated with THERMOCOOL™ ST/ THERMOCOOL™ STSF catheter with the CARTO™ 3 System versus TactiCath™ catheter with the EnSite™ System. Materials & methods: Patients undergoing CA for AF between 1 July 2019 to 30 November 2021 were identified from the Premier Healthcare Database and grouped based on use of THERMOCOOL ST/STSF or TactiCath™. Study outcomes were all-cause, cardiovascular (CV)-, and AF-related inpatient readmission at 91-365-day post-CA. Inverse probability of treatment weighting of propensity scores balanced baseline patient, comorbidity and hospital characteristics. A weighted generalized estimating equation (GEE) model examined differences in readmission outcomes. Results: A total of 15,518 patients met inclusion criteria (THERMOCOOL ST/STSF, n = 13,001; TactiCath™, n = 2517). Patient characteristics were generally well-balanced after weighting. Patients treated with THERMOCOOL ST/STSF + CARTO 3 had a 20% lower likelihood of all-cause inpatient readmissions (7.8 vs 9.3%, chi-square p = 0.041; odds ratio [OR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.96, GEE p = 0.019) and a 21% lower likelihood of CV-related inpatient readmission (5.2 vs 6.2%, chi-square p = 0.133, OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62-0.99, GEE p = 0.043) in 91-365-days post-CA versus those treated with TactiCath™ + Ensite. No significant differences were observed for AF-related readmissions. Conclusion: Patients undergoing CA for AF treated with THERMOCOOL ST/STSF + CARTO 3 had a significantly lower risk of all-cause and CV-related inpatient hospital readmission versus those treated with TactiCath™ + Ensite.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rahul Khanna
- MedTech Epidemiology & Real-World Data Science, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Maximiliano Iglesias
- Johnson & Johnson MedTech, Franchise Health Economics & Market Access, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Yiran Rong
- MedTech Epidemiology & Real-World Data Science, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kaminski C, Beardslee LA, Rajani R. Sensorized Endovascular Technologies: Additional Data to Enhance Decision-Making. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 99:105-116. [PMID: 37922964 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current endovascular procedures rely mostly on anatomic information, guided by fluoroscopy, to perform interventions (i.e. angioplasty, stent placement, coils). However, the structural parameters provided by these imaging technologies do not provide any physiological data on either the disease state or efficacy of intervention. Additional endovascular tools are needed to collect physiologic and other both anatomic and nonanatomic data to further individualize endovascular interventions with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes. This review details the current state of the art for these sensorized endovascular technologies and details systems under development with the aim of identifying gaps and new directions. The objective of this review was to survey the Vascular Surgery literature, engineering literature, and commercially available products to determine what exists in terms of sensor-enabled endovascular devices and where gaps and opportunities exist for further sensor integration. METHODS Search terms were entered into search engines such as Google and Google Scholar to identify endovascular devices containing sensors. A variety of terms were used including directly search for items such as "sensor-enabled endovascular devices" and then also completing more refined searches bases on areas of interest (i.e. fractional flow reserve, navigation, retrograde endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, etc.). For the most part, systems were included where the sensor was mounted directly onto the catheter and implantable sensors such as those that have been investigated for use with stents have been excluded. RESULTS The authors were able to identify a body of literature in the area of endovascular devices that contain sensors to measure physiologic information. However, areas where additional sensing capabilities may be useful were identified. CONCLUSIONS Several different types of sensors and sensing systems were identified that have been integrated with endovascular catheters. Although a great deal of work has been done in this field, there are additional useful data that could be obtained from additional novel sensing technologies. Furthermore, significant effort needs to be allocated to carefully studying how these new technologies can be employed to actually improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candice Kaminski
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Luke A Beardslee
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ravi Rajani
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lo M, Nair D, Mansour M, Calkins H, Reddy VY, Colley BJ, Tanaka-Esposito C, Sundaram S, DeLurgio DB, Sanders P, Khatib S, Bernard M, Olson N, Gibson D, Miller A, Li J, Natale A. Contact force catheter ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: Results from the PERSIST-END study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2023; 34:279-290. [PMID: 36352771 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Use of a novel magnetic sensor enabled optical contact force ablation catheter has been established to be safe and effective for treatment of symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) but has yet to be demonstrated in the persistent AF (PersAF) population. METHODS PERSIST-END was a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized, investigational study designed to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of TactiCath™ Ablation Catheter, Sensor Enabled™(SE) (TactiCath SE) for use in the treatment of subjects with documented PersAF refractory or intolerant to at least one Class I/III AAD. The ablation strategy included pulmonary vein isolation and additional targets at physician discretion. Follow-up through 15-months, including a 3-month blanking period and 3-month therapy consolidation period, was performed with cardiac event and Holter monitoring. Primary safety, primary effectiveness, clinical success, and quality of life (QOL) endpoints were analyzed. RESULTS Of 224 subjects enrolled at 21 investigational sites in the United States and Australia, 223 underwent ablation with the investigational catheter. The primary safety event rate was 3.1% (seven events in seven subjects). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia recurrence at 15-months was 61.6% and clinical success at 15 months was 89.8%. Subject QOL significantly improved following ablation as assessed via AFEQT (31.6 point increase, p < .0001) and EQ-5D-5L (10.7 point increase, p < .0001) and was met with a 53% reduction in all cause cardiovascular healthcare utilization. CONCLUSION The sensor-enabled force-sensing catheter is safe and effective for the treatment of drug refractory recurrent symptomatic PersAF, reducing arrhythmia recurrence while improving QOL and healthcare utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Lo
- Arkansas Heart Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Devi Nair
- St. Bernards Medical Center, Jonesboro, Arkansas, USA
| | - Moussa Mansour
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Vivek Y Reddy
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Sri Sundaram
- South Denver Cardiology Associates, Littleton, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Department of Cardiology, Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sammy Khatib
- Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ding L, Huang X, Dai C, Zhang H, Weng S, Yu F, Qi Y, Zhang S, Shi R, Tang M. Safety and effectiveness of a novel dielectric mapping system: one-year, two chinese centers experiences. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2022; 22:352. [PMID: 35922759 PMCID: PMC9351078 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02790-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The KODEX-EPD system is a novel, dielectric three-dimensional mapping system. We aim to illustrate the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of ablation using the KODEX-EPD system. METHODS A total of 272 patients with supraventricular arrhythmias were enrolled and underwent catheter ablation using the KODEX-EPD system from October 2020 to July 2021. The feasibility, safety, and ablation outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Of the enrolled patients, 15 (5.4%) had atrial tachycardia (AT), 88 (31.4%) had atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), 141 (50.4%) had atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), 34 (12.1%) had atrial fibrillation (AF), and 9 (3.2%) had atrial flutter (AFL). All AF patients included were first-do-pulmonary vein isolation (PVI); there were 26 paroxysmal AF and 8 persistent AF. All patients achieved immediate success of ablation. The mean follow-up duration was 11.8 ± 2.4 months. One patient (1.1%) in the AVRT subgroup and two patients (1.4%) in the AVNRT subgroup experienced recurrence. When considering a three-month blanking time, the estimated freedom of AF at one-year post-ablation with and without AADs was 75.7% and 70.4%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in the overall AF recurrence (log-rank; P = 0.931) or AAD-free AF recurrence (log-rank; P = 0.841) between RFCA and cryoablation. One patient had mild pulmonary embolism. None of the patients died or had a cerebrovascular event in the periprocedural period. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective, two-center study demonstrated that catheter ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias using the KODEX-EPD system is feasible, safe, and effective. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Ding
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No.167 North Lishi Rd, Xicheng, Beijing, 100037, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao Huang
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Cong Dai
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongda Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No.167 North Lishi Rd, Xicheng, Beijing, 100037, People's Republic of China
| | - Sixian Weng
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No.167 North Lishi Rd, Xicheng, Beijing, 100037, People's Republic of China
| | - Fengyuan Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No.167 North Lishi Rd, Xicheng, Beijing, 100037, People's Republic of China
| | - Yingjie Qi
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No.167 North Lishi Rd, Xicheng, Beijing, 100037, People's Republic of China
| | - Shu Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No.167 North Lishi Rd, Xicheng, Beijing, 100037, People's Republic of China
| | - Ruizheng Shi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
| | - Min Tang
- State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No.167 North Lishi Rd, Xicheng, Beijing, 100037, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|