Multisite Pacing for Heart Failure Associated With Left Ventricular Apical Pacing in Congenital Heart Disease

Left ventricular apical pacing-induced heart failure in a child after congenital heart surgery: a case report

Background

Left ventricular apical pacing (LVAP) is considered to preserve left ventricular (LV) systolic function in both patients with and without congenital heart disease. However, sporadic LVAP-associated cardiac dysfunction in children with complex structural heart disease was recently reported. We present the case of a 2.5-year-old child with complex congenital heart disease and LVAP-induced cardiomyopathy.

Case summary

Corrective surgery for double outlet right ventricle, subpulmonary ventricular septal defect, and transposition of the great arteries was done at the age of 1.5 months. Late complete atrioventricular block occurred, necessitating VVI pacemaker insertion with LV apical epicardial leads. He presented with heart failure and dilated cardiomyopathy 1.5 years after pacemaker insertion and required persistent circulatory support with intravenous inotropes. Speckle tracking echocardiography identified an important LV apical to basal dyssynchrony. After excluding any coronary artery involvement, cardiac resynchronization therapy was performed. Speckle tracking echocardiography guided lead placement resulted in improved LV contraction synchrony. Cardiac function recovered progressively in combination with oral heart failure medication and is almost normal at 10-month follow-up.

Discussion

Right ventricular pacing is a well-known cause of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. The LV apex and LV free wall are thought to be most optimal locations for ventricular pacing in children. However, LVAP can also be the cause of a pacing-induced cardiomyopathy and decreased systolic LV function in children with complex congenital heart disease due to lack of LV contraction synchrony. Cardiac resynchronization therapy can reverse this LV dysfunction and remodelling.

New Guidelines of Pediatric Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: What Is Changing in Clinical Practice?

Guidelines are important tools to guide the diagnosis and treatment of patients to improve the decision-making process of health professionals. They are periodically updated according to new evidence. Four new Guidelines in 2021, 2022 and 2023 referred to pediatric pacing and defibrillation. There are some relevant changes in permanent pacing. In patients with atrioventricular block, the heart rate limit in which pacemaker implantation is recommended was decreased to reduce too-early device implantation. However, it was underlined that the heart rate criterion is not absolute, as signs or symptoms of hemodynamically not tolerated bradycardia may even occur at higher rates. In sinus node dysfunction, symptomatic bradycardia is the most relevant recommendation for pacing. Physiological pacing is increasingly used and recommended when the amount of ventricular pacing is presumed to be high. New recommendations suggest that loop recorders may guide the management of inherited arrhythmia syndromes and may be useful for severe but not frequent palpitations. Regarding defibrillator implantation, the main changes are in primary prevention recommendations. In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, pediatric risk calculators have been included in the Guidelines. In dilated cardiomyopathy, due to the rarity of sudden cardiac death in pediatric age, low ejection fraction criteria were demoted to class II. In long QT syndrome, new criteria included severely prolonged QTc with different limits according to genotype, and some specific mutations. In arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, hemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmic syncope were downgraded to class II recommendation. In conclusion, these new Guidelines aim to assess all aspects of cardiac implantable electronic devices and improve treatment strategies.

Lead Management in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease

Pediatric patients with congenital heart disease present unique challenges when it comes to cardiac implantable electronic devices. Pacing strategy is often determined by patient size/weight and operator experience. Anatomic considerations, including residual shunts, anatomic obstructions and barriers, and abnormalities in the native conduction system, will affect the type of CIED implanted. Given the young age of patients, it is important to have an "eye on the future" when making pacemaker/defibrillator decisions, as one can expect several generator changes, lead revisions, and potential lead extractions during their lifetime.