Safety and efficacy of the prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonist AMG 853 in asthmatic patients

Severe asthma beyond bronchodilators: Emerging therapeutic approaches

Asthma is characterized by reversible airway inflammation, obstruction, and structural remodeling, which lead to the eosinophils and lymphocytes accumulation at inflammation sites and the release of inflammatory cells, like mast cells and dendritic cells, from lungs' epithelial and smooth muscle cells that trigger the activation and release of cytokines and chemokines, attracting more cells and contributing to asthma development. Available pharmacological interventions, like bronchodilators and anti-inflammatory agents, are considered generally safe and effective to treat asthma, but many affected individuals with severe asthma still struggle with symptom control. This review highlights recent innovative therapies, such as chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cell (CRTH2) antagonists, S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) and phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors, and other novel biological agents, which offer potential new strategies for managing severe asthma and may alter the disease's course. Kew words. Inflammation; CRTH2; GSNOR; PDE; Interleukins; Biological agents.

The Prostaglandin D2 Receptor CRTH2 Contributes to Airway Hyperresponsiveness during Airway Inflammation Induced by Sensitization without an Adjuvant in Mice

INTRODUCTION

Prostaglandin D2 (PGD2), which is produced mainly by Th2 cells and mast cells, promotes a type-2 immune response by activating Th2 cells, mast cells, eosinophils, and group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) via its receptor, chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecules on Th2 cells (CRTH2). However, the role of CRTH2 in models of airway inflammation induced by sensitization without adjuvants, in which both IgE and mast cells may play major roles, remain unclear.

METHODS

Wild-type (WT) and CRTH2-knockout (KO) mice were sensitized with ovalbumin (OVA) without an adjuvant and then challenged intranasally with OVA. Airway inflammation was assessed based on airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), lung histology, number of leukocytes, and levels of type-2 cytokines in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF).

RESULTS

AHR was significantly reduced after OVA challenge in CRTH2 KO mice compared to WT mice. The number of eosinophils, levels of type-2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13) in BALF, and IgE concentration in serum were decreased in CRTH2 KO mice compared to WT mice. However, lung histological changes were comparable between WT and CRTH2 KO mice.

CONCLUSION

CRTH2 is responsible for the development of asthma responses in a mouse model of airway inflammation that features prominent involvement of both IgE and mast cells.

Effect of CRTH2 antagonism on the response to experimental rhinovirus infection in asthma: a pilot randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on T helper type 2 cells (CRTH2) antagonist timapiprant improved lung function and asthma control in a phase 2 study, with evidence suggesting reduced exacerbations. We aimed to assess whether timapiprant attenuated or prevented asthma exacerbations induced by experimental rhinovirus (RV) infection. We furthermore hypothesised that timapiprant would dampen RV-induced type 2 inflammation and consequently improve antiviral immune responses.

METHODS

Atopic patients with partially controlled asthma on maintenance inhaled corticosteroids were randomised to timapiprant (n=22) or placebo (n=22) and challenged with RV-A16 3 weeks later. The primary endpoint was the cumulative lower respiratory symptom score over the 14 days post infection. Upper respiratory symptoms, spirometry, airway hyperresponsiveness, exhaled nitric oxide, RV-A16 virus load and soluble mediators in upper and lower airways samples, and CRTH2 staining in bronchial biopsies were additionally assessed before and during RV-A16 infection.

RESULTS

Six subjects discontinued the study and eight were not infected; outcomes were assessed in 16 timapiprant-treated and 14 placebo-treated, successfully infected subjects. There were no differences between treatment groups in clinical exacerbation severity including cumulative lower respiratory symptom score day 0-14 (difference 3.0 (95% CI -29.0 to 17.0), p=0.78), virus load, antiviral immune responses, or RV-A16-induced airway inflammation other than in the bronchial biopsies, where CRTH2 staining was increased during RV-A16 infection in the placebo-treated but not the timapiprant-treated group. Timapiprant had a favourable safety profile, with no deaths, serious adverse events or drug-related withdrawals.

CONCLUSION

Timapiprant treatment had little impact on the clinicopathological changes induced by RV-A16 infection in partially controlled asthma.

AMG853, A Bispecific Prostaglandin D2 Receptor 1 and 2 Antagonist, Dampens Basophil Activation and Related Lupus-Like Nephritis Activity in Lyn-Deficient Mice

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a complex autoimmune disease during which patients develop autoantibodies raised against nuclear antigens. During the course of the disease, by accumulating in secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs), basophils support autoreactive plasma cells to amplify autoantibody production. We have recently shown that murine lupus-like disease could be controlled by 10 days of oral treatment with a combination of prostaglandin D₂ (PGD₂) receptor (PTGDR) antagonists through the inhibition of basophil activation and recruitment to SLOs. Importantly, inhibiting solely PTGDR-1 or PTGDR-2 was ineffective, and the development of lupus-like disease could only be dampened by using antagonists for both PTGDR-1 and PTGDR-2. Here, we aimed at establishing a proof of concept that a clinically relevant bispecific antagonist of PTGDR-1 and PTGDR-2 could be efficient to treat murine lupus-like nephritis. Diseased Lyn-deficient female mice received treatment with AMG853 (vidupiprant, a bispecific PTGDR-1/PTGDR-2 antagonist) for 10 days. This led to the dampening of basophil activation and recruitment in SLOs and was associated with a decrease in plasmablast expansion and immunoglobulin E (IgE) production. Ten days of treatment with AMG853 was consequently sufficient in reducing the dsDNA-specific IgG titers, circulating immune complex glomerular deposition, and renal inflammation, which are hallmarks of lupus-like disease. Thus, bispecific PTGDR-1 and PTGDR-2 antagonists, such as AMG853, are a promising class of drugs for the treatment or prevention of organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Role of prostaglandin D2 receptors in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm formation

Prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) released from immune cells or other cell types activates its receptors, D prostanoid receptor (DP)1 and 2 (DP1 and DP2), to promote inflammatory responses in allergic and lung diseases. Prostaglandin-mediated inflammation may also contribute to vascular diseases such as abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). However, the role of DP receptors in the pathogenesis of AAA has not been systematically investigated. In the present study, DP1-deficient mice and pharmacological inhibitors of either DP1 or DP2 were tested in two distinct mouse models of AAA formation: angiotensin II (AngII) infusion and calcium chloride (CaCl2) application. DP1-deficient mice [both heterozygous (DP1+/-) and homozygous (DP1-/-)] were protected against CaCl2-induced AAA formation, in conjunction with decreased matrix metallopeptidase (MMP) activity and adventitial inflammatory cell infiltration. In the AngII infusion model, DP1+/- mice, but not DP1-/- mice, exhibited reduced AAA formation. Interestingly, compensatory up-regulation of the DP2 receptor was detected in DP1-/- mice in response to AngII infusion, suggesting a potential role for DP2 receptors in AAA. Treatment with selective antagonists of DP1 (laropiprant) or DP2 (fevipiprant) protected against AAA formation, in conjunction with reduced elastin degradation and aortic inflammatory responses. In conclusion, PGD2 signaling contributes to AAA formation in mice, suggesting that antagonists of DP receptors, which have been extensively tested in allergic and lung diseases, may be promising candidates to ameliorate AAA.

Eicosanoid receptors as therapeutic targets for asthma

Eicosanoids comprise a group of oxidation products of arachidonic and 5,8,11,14,17-eicosapentaenoic acids formed by oxygenases and downstream enzymes. The two major pathways for eicosanoid formation are initiated by the actions of 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO), leading to leukotrienes (LTs) and 5-oxo-6,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid (5-oxo-ETE), and cyclooxygenase (COX), leading to prostaglandins (PGs) and thromboxane (TX). A third group (specialized pro-resolving mediators; SPMs), including lipoxin A4 (LXA4) and resolvins (Rvs), are formed by the combined actions of different oxygenases. The actions of the above eicosanoids are mediated by approximately 20 G protein-coupled receptors, resulting in a variety of both detrimental and beneficial effects on airway smooth muscle and inflammatory cells that are strongly implicated in asthma pathophysiology. Drugs targeting proinflammatory eicosanoid receptors, including CysLT1, the receptor for LTD4 (montelukast) and TP, the receptor for TXA2 (seratrodast) are currently in use, whereas antagonists of a number of other receptors, including DP2 (PGD2), BLT1 (LTB4), and OXE (5-oxo-ETE) are under investigation. Agonists targeting anti-inflammatory/pro-resolving eicosanoid receptors such as EP2/4 (PGE2), IP (PGI2), ALX/FPR2 (LXA4), and Chemerin1 (RvE1/2) are also being examined. This review summarizes the contributions of eicosanoid receptors to the pathophysiology of asthma and the potential therapeutic benefits of drugs that target these receptors. Because of the multifactorial nature of asthma and the diverse pathways affected by eicosanoid receptors, it will be important to identify subgroups of asthmatics that are likely to respond to any given therapy.

Prostaglandin regulation of type 2 inflammation: From basic biology to therapeutic interventions

Type 2 immunity is critical for the protective and repair responses that mediate resistance to parasitic helminth infection. This immune response also drives aberrant inflammation during atopic diseases. Prostaglandins are a class of critical lipid mediators that are released during type 2 inflammation and are integral in controlling the initiation, activation, maintenance, effector functions, and resolution of Type 2 inflammation. In this review, we explore the roles of the different prostaglandin family members and the receptors they bind to during allergen‐ and helminth‐induced Type 2 inflammation and the mechanism through which prostaglandins promote or suppress Type 2 inflammation. Furthermore, we discuss the potential role of prostaglandins produced by helminth parasites in the regulation of host–pathogen interactions, and how prostaglandins may regulate the inverse relationship between helminth infection and allergy. Finally, we discuss opportunities to capitalize on our understanding of prostaglandin pathways to develop new therapeutic options for humans experiencing Type 2 inflammatory disorders that have a significant prostaglandin‐driven component including allergic rhinitis and asthma.

Efficacy and Safety of Prostaglandin D2 Receptor 2 Antagonism with Fevipiprant for Patients with Asthma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Accumulating evidence has shown that prostaglandin D2 (PGD2)-chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTH2) pathway plays an important role in promoting eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthma. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CRTH2 antagonist fevipiprant in patients with persistent asthma compared with placebo.

RECENT FINDINGS

We identified eligible studies by searching PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov. The study was registered as CRD 42020221714 ( http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO ). Ten randomized controlled trials with 7902 patients met our inclusion criteria. A statistically significant benefit of fevipiprant compared with placebo was shown in improving forced expiratory volume in 1 s (MD 0.05 L, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.07; p < 0.0001), Asthma Control Questionnaire score (MD -0.10, 95% CI: -0.16 to -0.04; p = 0.001), and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score (MD 0.08, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.13; p = 0.003). Fevipiprant decreased number of patients with at least one asthma exacerbation requiring administration of systemic corticosteroids for 3 days or more (RR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.97; p = 0.01). Some benefits were a little more pronounced in the high eosinophil population (with an elevated blood eosinophil count or sputum eosinophil percentage) and in the 450 mg dose group. Fevipiprant was well tolerated with no safety issues compared with placebo. Fevipiprant could safely improve asthma outcomes compared to placebo. However, most of the differences didn't reach the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), thus the clinical benefits remained to be confirmed.

Role of Atypical Chemokines and Chemokine Receptors Pathways in the Pathogenesis of COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represents a heightened inflammatory response in the lung generally resulting from tobacco smoking-induced recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells and/or activation of lower airway structural cells. Several mediators can modulate activation and recruitment of these cells, particularly those belonging to the chemokines (conventional and atypical) family. There is emerging evidence for complex roles of atypical chemokines and their receptors (such as high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), antimicrobial peptides, receptor for advanced glycosylation end products (RAGE) or toll-like receptors (TLRs)) in the pathogenesis of COPD, both in the stable disease and during exacerbations. Modulators of these pathways represent potential novel therapies for COPD and many are now in preclinical development. Inhibition of only a single atypical chemokine or receptor may not block inflammatory processes because there is redundancy in this network. However, there are many animal studies that encourage studies for modulating the atypical chemokine network in COPD. Thus, few pharmaceutical companies maintain a significant interest in developing agents that target these molecules as potential antiinflammatory drugs. Antibody-based (biological) and small molecule drug (SMD)-based therapies targeting atypical chemokines and/or their receptors are mostly at the preclinical stage and their progression to clinical trials is eagerly awaited. These agents will most likely enhance our knowledge about the role of atypical chemokines in COPD pathophysiology and thereby improve COPD management.

Monoclonal Antibodies and Airway Diseases

Monoclonal antibodies, biologics, are a relatively new treatment option for severe chronic airway diseases, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). In this review, we focus on the physiological and pathomechanisms of monoclonal antibodies, and we present recent study results regarding their use as a therapeutic option against severe airway diseases. Airway mucosa acts as a relative barrier, modulating antigenic stimulation and responding to environmental pathogen exposure with a specific, self-limited response. In severe asthma and/or CRS, genome-environmental interactions lead to dysbiosis, aggravated inflammation, and disease. In healthy conditions, single or combined type 1, 2, and 3 immunological response pathways are invoked, generating cytokine, chemokine, innate cellular and T helper (Th) responses to eliminate viruses, helminths, and extracellular bacteria/fungi, correspondingly. Although the pathomechanisms are not fully known, the majority of severe airway diseases are related to type 2 high inflammation. Type 2 cytokines interleukins (IL) 4, 5, and 13, are orchestrated by innate lymphoid cell (ILC) and Th subsets leading to eosinophilia, immunoglobulin E (IgE) responses, and permanently impaired airway damage. Monoclonal antibodies can bind or block key parts of these inflammatory pathways, resulting in less inflammation and improved disease control.

New perspectives in bronchial asthma: pathological, immunological alterations, biological targets, and pharmacotherapy

Asthma is the most common, long-lasting inflammatory airway disease that affects more than 10% of the world population. It is characterized by bronchial narrowing, airway hyperresponsiveness, vasodilatation, airway edema, and stimulation of sensory nerve endings that lead to recurring events of breathlessness, wheezing, chest tightness, and coughing. It is the main reason for global morbidity and occurs as a result of the weakening of the immune system in response to exposure to allergens or environmental exposure. In asthma condition, it results in the activation of numerous inflammatory cells like the mast and dendritic cells along with the accumulation of activated eosinophils and lymphocytes at the inflammation site. The structural cells such as airway epithelial cells and smooth muscle cells release inflammatory mediators that promote the bronchial inflammation. Long-lasting bronchial inflammation can cause pathological alterations, viz. the improved thickness of the bronchial epithelium and friability of airway epithelial cells, epithelium fibrosis, hyperplasia, and hypertrophy of airway smooth muscle, angiogenesis, and mucus gland hyperplasia. The stimulation of bronchial epithelial cell would result in the release of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines that attract inflammatory cells into bronchial airways and plays an important role in asthma. Asthma patients who do not respond to marketed antiasthmatic drugs needed novel biological medications to regulate the asthmatic situation. The present review enumerates various types of asthma, etiological factors, and in vivo animal models for the induction of asthma. The underlying pathological, immunological mechanism of action, the role of inflammatory mediators, the effect of inflammation on the bronchial airways, newer treatment approaches, and novel biological targets of asthma have been discussed in this review.

Same Target, Different Therapeutic Outcomes: The Case of CAY10471 and Fevipiprant on CRTh2 Receptor in Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma

OBJECTIVE

Prostaglandin 2 (PGD2) mediated signalling of Chemoattractant Receptorhomologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTh2) receptor has been implicated in the recruitment of inflammatory cells. This explains the design of highly selective compounds with innate abilities to antagonize PGD2-CRTh2 interactions and prevent pro-inflammatory allergies such as rhinitis and uncontrolled asthma. The development of PGD2-competitive CRTh2 binders; CAY10471 and Fevipiprant represent remarkable therapeutic progress even though they elicit disparate pharmacological propensities despite utilizing the same binding pocket.

METHODS & RESULTS

In this study, we seek to pinpoint the underlying phenomenon associated with differential CRTh2 therapeutic inhibition by CAY10471 and Fevipiprant using membraneembedded molecular dynamics simulation. Findings revealed that the common carboxylate group of both compounds elicited strong attractive charges with active site Arg170 and Lys210. Interestingly, a distinctive feature was the steady occurrence of high-affinity salt-bridges and an Arg170-mediated pi-cation interaction with the tetrahydrocarbozole ring of CAY10471. Further investigations into the active site motions of both ligands revealed that CAY10471 was relatively more stable. Comparative binding analyses also revealed that CAY10471 exhibited higher ΔG, indicating the cruciality of the ring stabilization role mediated by Arg170. Moreover, conformational analyses revealed that the inhibitory activity of CAY10471 was more prominent on CRTh2 compared to Fevipiprant.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings could further advance the strategic design of novel CRTh2 binders in the treatment of diseases related to pro-inflammatory allergies.

The impact of the prostaglandin D2 receptor 2 and its downstream effects on the pathophysiology of asthma

Current research suggests that the prostaglandin D₂ (PGD₂ ) receptor 2 (DP₂ ) is a principal regulator in the pathophysiology of asthma, because it stimulates and amplifies the inflammatory response in this condition. The DP₂ receptor can be activated by both allergic and nonallergic stimuli, leading to several pro-inflammatory events, including eosinophil activation and migration, release of the type 2 cytokines interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-13 from T helper 2 (Th2) cells and innate lymphoid cells type 2 (ILCs), and increased airway smooth muscle mass via recruitment of mesenchymal progenitors to the airway smooth muscle bundle. Activation of the DP₂ receptor pathway has potential downstream effects on asthma pathophysiology, including on airway epithelial cells, mucus hypersecretion, and airway remodelling, and consequently might impact asthma symptoms and exacerbations. Given the broad distribution of DP₂ receptors on immune and structural cells involved in asthma, this receptor is being explored as a novel therapeutic target.

Lipid-Embedded Molecular Dynamics Simulation Model for Exploring the Reverse Prostaglandin D2 Agonism of CT-133 towards CRTH2 in the Treatment of Type-2 Inflammation Dependent Diseases

Chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTH2) has been involved in several inflammation dependent diseases by mediating the chemotaxis of pro-inflammatory cells in response to allergy and other responses through PGD2 ligation. This CRTH2-PGD2 signaling pathway has become a target for treating allergic and type 2 inflammation dependent diseases, with many inhibitors developed to target the PGD2 binding pocket. One of such inhibitors is the ramatroban analog, CT-133, which exhibited therapeutic potency cigarette smoke-induced acute lung injury in patients. Nonetheless, the molecular mechanism and structural dynamics that accounts for its therapeutic prowess remain unclear. Employing computational tools, this study revealed that although the carboxylate moiety in CT-133 and the native agonist PGD2 aided in their stability within the CRTH2 binding pocket, the tetrahydrocarbazole group of CT-133 engaged in strong interactions with binding pocket residues which could have formed as the basis of the antagonistic advantage of CT-133. Tetrahydrocarbazole group interactions also enhanced the relative stability CT-133 within the binding pocket which consequently favored CT-133 binding affinity. CT-133 binding also induced an inactive or 'desensitized' state in the helix 8 of CRTH2 which could conversely favor the recruitment of arrestin. These revelations would aid in the speedy development of small molecule inhibitors of CRTH2 in the treatment of type 2 inflammation dependent diseases.

G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Asthma Therapy: Pharmacology and Drug Action

Asthma is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease of the airways that is associated with airway hyperresponsiveness and airflow limitation. Although asthma was once simply categorized as atopic or nonatopic, emerging analyses over the last few decades have revealed a variety of asthma endotypes that are attributed to numerous pathophysiological mechanisms. The classification of asthma by endotype is primarily routed in different profiles of airway inflammation that contribute to bronchoconstriction. Many asthma therapeutics target G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which either enhance bronchodilation or prevent bronchoconstriction. Short-acting and long-acting β 2-agonists are widely used bronchodilators that signal through the activation of the β 2-adrenergic receptor. Short-acting and long-acting antagonists of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are used to reduce bronchoconstriction by blocking the action of acetylcholine. Leukotriene antagonists that block the signaling of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 are used as an add-on therapy to reduce bronchoconstriction and inflammation induced by cysteinyl leukotrienes. A number of GPCR-targeting asthma drug candidates are also in different stages of development. Among them, antagonists of prostaglandin D2 receptor 2 have advanced into phase III clinical trials. Others, including antagonists of the adenosine A2B receptor and the histamine H4 receptor, are in early stages of clinical investigation. In the past decade, significant research advancements in pharmacology, cell biology, structural biology, and molecular physiology have greatly deepened our understanding of the therapeutic roles of GPCRs in asthma and drug action on these GPCRs. This review summarizes our current understanding of GPCR signaling and pharmacology in the context of asthma treatment. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Although current treatment methods for asthma are effective for a majority of asthma patients, there are still a large number of patients with poorly controlled asthma who may experience asthma exacerbations. This review summarizes current asthma treatment methods and our understanding of signaling and pharmacology of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in asthma therapy, and discusses controversies regarding the use of GPCR drugs and new opportunities in developing GPCR-targeting therapeutics for the treatment of asthma.

A phase 2 study to evaluate the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of DP2 antagonist GB001 and to explore biomarkers of airway inflammation in mild-to-moderate asthma

Background

GB001 is an oral antagonist of the prostaglandin D2 receptor that may inhibit recruitment and activation of airway eosinophils, reducing airway inflammation.

Objective

To assess GB001 safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics from a Phase 2 study and explore the association between type 2 biomarkers (fractional exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophils) and asthma control markers following GB001 administration.

Methods

A randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind study evaluating 36 patients with mild‐to‐moderate atopic asthma. Patients receiving fluticasone propionate ≤500 mcg/day or equivalent were randomized (2:1) to GB001 (30 mg) or placebo once daily for 28 days. Safety, pharmacokinetics, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, asthma control questionnaire and rescue medication use were assessed. Clinical outcomes were analysed post hoc by baseline fractional exhaled nitric oxide (<35 and ≥35 ppb) and blood eosinophil (<250 and ≥250 cells/µL) subgroups.

Results

GB001 was well tolerated and rapidly absorbed with a 14.5‐hour terminal half‐life. Overall, GB001 demonstrated greater improvement relative to placebo in forced expiratory volume in 1 second at Day 28 (102 mL [95% CI: −110, 314]). Greater effects on forced expiratory volume in 1 second were observed in the high baseline fractional exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophil subgroups (207 mL [95% CI: −283, 698];133 mL [95% CI: −422, 687], respectively). These effects were observed as early as Day 2 (229 mL [95% CI: −170, 628]; 163 mL [95% CI: −223, 550] for the high baseline fractional exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophil subgroups, respectively) and were sustained through treatment completion.

Conclusion and clinical relevance

GB001 was well tolerated, with the estimated half‐life supporting once‐daily (QD) dosing. GB001 may have a rapid and sustained effect on lung function, particularly in patients with type 2 phenotype. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

PGD2/DP2 receptor activation promotes severe viral bronchiolitis by suppressing IFN- production

Prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) signals through PGD2 receptor 2 (DP2, also known as CRTH2) on type 2 effector cells to promote asthma pathogenesis; however, little is known about its role during respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis, a major risk factor for asthma development. We show that RSV infection up-regulated hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase expression and increased PGD2 release by cultured human primary airway epithelial cells (AECs). Moreover, PGD2 production was elevated in nasopharyngeal samples from young infants hospitalized with RSV bronchiolitis compared to healthy controls. In a neonatal mouse model of severe viral bronchiolitis, DP2 antagonism decreased viral load, immunopathology, and morbidity and ablated the predisposition for subsequent asthma onset in later life. This protective response was abolished upon dual DP1/DP2 antagonism and replicated with a specific DP1 agonist. Rather than mediating an effect via type 2 inflammation, the beneficial effects of DP2 blockade or DP1 agonism were associated with increased interferon-λ (IFN-λ) [interleukin-28A/B (IL-28A/B)] expression and were lost upon IL-28A neutralization. In RSV-infected AEC cultures, DP1 activation up-regulated IFN-λ production, which, in turn, increased IFN-stimulated gene expression, accelerating viral clearance. Our findings suggest that DP2 antagonists or DP1 agonists may be useful antivirals for the treatment of viral bronchiolitis and possibly as primary preventatives for asthma.

Inadequate assessment of adherence to maintenance medication leads to loss of power and increased costs in trials of severe asthma therapy: results from a systematic literature review and modelling study

Adherence to inhaled maintenance therapy in severe asthma is rarely adequately assessed, and its influence on trial outcomes is unknown. We systematically determined how adherence to maintenance therapy is assessed in clinical trials of "add-on" therapy for severe asthma. We model the improvement in trial power that could be achieved by accurately assessing adherence.A systematic search of six major databases identified randomised trials of add-on therapy for severe asthma. The relationship between measuring adherence and study outcomes was assessed. An estimate of potential improvements in statistical power and sample size was derived using digitally recorded adherence trial data.87 randomised controlled trials enrolling 22 173 participants were included. Adherence assessment was not reported in 67 trials (n=13 931, 63%). Studies that reported adherence used a range of self-report and subjective methods. None of the studies employed an objective assessment of adherence. Studies that reported adherence had a significantly reduced pooled variance in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) compared to those that did not assess adherence: s²=0.144 L² versus s²=0.168 L², p<0.0001. Power to detect clinically relevant changes in FEV₁ was significantly higher in trials that reported adherence assessment (mean power achieved 59% versus 49%). Modelling suggests that up to 50% of variance in FEV₁ outcomes is attributable to undetected variations in adherence. Controlling for such variations could potentially halve the required sample size.Few trials of add-on therapy monitor adherence to maintenance inhaled therapy, resulting in a greater variance in trial outcomes and inadequate power for determining efficacy.

Epithelial cell-derived prostaglandin D2 inhibits chronic allergic lung inflammation in mice

The precise role of prostaglandin D (PGD)₂ in allergic lung inflammation remains controversial. Here, we aimed to clarify the role of PGD₂ in chronic allergic lung inflammation using hematopoietic PGD synthase (H-PGDS)-deficient mice. Repeated intranasal administration of ovalbumin (OVA) resulted in eosinophilic infiltration and mucin production in the lungs of wild type (WT) mice, leading to respiratory dysfunction. H-PGDS deficiency exacerbated these effects, which were accompanied by increased mRNA expression of TNF-α and eosinophil chemoattractants. The bronchial epithelium expressed both H-PGDS and TNF-α in the inflamed WT lung, and H-PGDS deficiency increased TNF-α expression further. In cultured bronchial tissue of WT mice, treatment with LPS elevated mRNA expression of TNF-α and eosinophil chemoattractants. H-PGDS deficiency promoted the expression of these factors, which was inhibited by treatment with PGD₂ receptor, D prostanoid (DP) receptor agonist, or PGD₂ metabolite 15-deoxy-Δ^12,14-PGJ₂ (15d-PGJ₂). Treatment with TNF-α receptor antibody inhibited eosinophil chemoattractant expression. In vivo, administration of DP agonist or 15d-PGJ₂ inhibited OVA-induced allergic lung inflammation. Bronchial epithelial cell-derived PGD₂ attenuated lung eosinophilic infiltration with chronic allergic inflammation; these phenomena are at least partly attributed to the inhibition of TNF-α production via DP activation or 15-deoxy-Δ^12,14-PGJ₂ signaling.-Maehara, T., Nakamura, T., Maeda, S., Aritake, K., Nakamura, M., Murata, T. Epithelial cell-derived prostaglandin D₂ inhibits chronic allergic lung inflammation in mice.

Effects of an Oral CRTh2 Antagonist (AZD1981) on Eosinophil Activity and Symptoms in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

BACKGROUND

Approximately 50% of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) experience symptoms that are not fully controlled by antihistamines, indicating an unmet clinical need.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of the selective CRTh2 antagonist AZD1981 on symptoms and targeted leukocytes in adults with persistent CSU despite treatment with H1-antihistamines.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled study involving adult CSU subjects with symptoms despite daily antihistamines. The subjects underwent a 2-week placebo run-in and 4 weeks of double-blinded therapy with either AZD1981 40 mg TID or placebo, followed by a 2-week placebo washout. The primary objective was to assess the effect of AZD1981 on CSU signs and symptoms. Secondary objectives included the effects of AZD1981 on prostaglandin D2 (PGD2)-induced eosinophil shape change, circulating leukocyte subsets, CRTh2 expression on blood leukocytes, and total blood leukocyte histamine content.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight subjects were randomized to AZD1981 or placebo, with 26 subjects completing the study. The urticaria activity scores declined during the treatment phase in both groups, and they were significantly reduced in the AZD1981 group at the end of washout. AZD1981 treatment increased circulating eosinophils and significantly impaired PGD2-mediated eosinophil shape change. CRTh2 surface expression rose significantly on blood basophils during active treatment. No serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to examine the efficacy of a CRTh2 antagonist in antihistamine-refractory CSU. AZD1981 treatment was well tolerated, effectively inhibited PGD2-mediated eosinophil shape change, shifted numbers of circulating eosinophils, and reduced weekly itch scores more than hives during treatment and into washout. Further studies are needed to determine whether inhibition of the PGD2/CRTh2 pathway will be an -effective treatment for CSU.

Spotlight on fevipiprant and its potential in the treatment of asthma: evidence to date

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease, which may be classified into phenotypes and endotypes based on clinical characteristics and molecular mechanisms. The best described endotype of severe asthma is type 2 (T2)-high asthma, characterized by release of inflammatory cytokines by T helper 2 (T_H2) cells and type 2 innate lymphoid cells cells. Prostaglandin D2 contributes to T2 inflammation through binding of the G-protein-coupled receptor chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on T_H2 cells (CRTH2). Fevipiprant is an oral competitive antagonist of CRTH2. Early-phase trials have demonstrated safety and potential efficacy in patients with asthma, specifically, improvement in FEV₁ and eosinophilic airway inflammation. However, no clear biomarker identified patients who responded favorably to fevipiprant, although patients with moderate-to-severe asthma and evidence of T2 inflammation may be more likely to respond to treatment. Additional studies are needed to determine the efficacy and target population for use of this drug in patients with asthma.

Prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonists in allergic disorders: safety, efficacy, and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Prostaglandin D₂ (PGD₂) is a major cyclooxygenase mediator that is synthesized by activated human mast cells and other immune cells. The biological effects of PGD₂ are mediated by D-prostanoid (DP₁), DP₂ (CRTH2) and thromboxane prostanoid (TP) receptors that are expressed on several immune and non-immune cells involved in allergic inflammation. PGD₂ exerts various proinflammatory effects relevant to the pathophysiology of allergic disorders. Several selective, orally active, DP₂ receptor antagonists and a small number of DP₁ receptor antagonists are being developed for the treatment of allergic disorders.

AREAS COVERED

The role of DP₂ and DP₁ receptor antagonists in the treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis.

EXPERT OPINION

Head-to-head studies that compare DP₁ antagonists with the standard treatment for allergic rhinitis are necessary to verify the role of these novel drugs as mono- or combination therapies. Further clinical trials are necessary to verify whether DP₂ antagonists as monotherapies or, more likely, as add-on therapies, will be effective for the treatment of different phenotypes of adult and childhood asthma. Long-term studies are necessary to evaluate the safety of targeted anti-PGD₂ treatments.

Efficacy and safety of antagonists for chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells in adult patients with asthma: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTH2) antagonists are novel agents for asthma but with controversial efficacies in clinical trials. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the roles of CRTH2 antagonists in asthma.

Methods

We searched in major databases for RCTs comparing CRTH2 antagonists with placebo in asthma. Fixed- or random-effects model was performed to calculate mean differences (MD), risk ratio (RR) or risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

A total of 14 trails with 4671 participants were included in our final analysis. Instead of add-on treatment of CRTH2 antagonists to corticosteroids, CRTH2 antagonist monotherapy significantly improved pre-bronchodilator FEV₁ (MD = 0.09, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.15, P = 0.0005), FEV₁% predicted (MD = 3.65, 95% CI 1.15 to 6.14, P = 0.004), and AQLQ (MD = 0.25, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.41, P = 0.002), and reduced asthma exacerbations (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.85, P = 0.01). Rescue use of SABA was significantly decreased in both CRTH2 antagonist monotherapy (MD = − 0.04, 95% CI -0.05 to − 0.03, P < 0.00001) and as add-on to corticosteroids (MD = − 0.78, 95% CI -1.47 to − 0.09, P = 0.03). Adverse events were similar between the intervention and placebo groups.

Conclusions

CRTH2 antagonist monotherapy can safely improve lung function and quality of life, and reduce asthma exacerbations and SABA use in asthmatics.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0912-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Potential new targets for drug development in severe asthma

In recent years there has been increasing recognition of varying asthma phenotypes that impact treatment response. This has led to the development of biological therapies targeting specific immune cells and cytokines in the inflammatory cascade. Currently, there are two primary asthma phenotypes, Type 2 hi and Type 2 lo, which are defined by eosinophilic and neutrophilic/pauci- granulocytic pattern of inflammation respectively. Most biologics focus on Type 2 hi asthma, including all four biologics approved for treatment of uncontrolled asthma in the United States — omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab. Potential new targets for drug development are being investigated, such as IL-13, IL-4α receptor, CRTH2, TSLP, IL-25, IL-13, IL-17A receptor, and CXCR2/IL-8. This review will discuss the role of these molecules on the inflammatory response in uncontrolled asthma and the emerging biologics that address them. Through the delineation of distinct immunological mechanisms in severe asthma, targeted biologics are promising new therapies that have the potential to improve asthma control and quality of life.

Structures of the Human PGD2 Receptor CRTH2 Reveal Novel Mechanisms for Ligand Recognition

The signaling of prostaglandin D₂ (PGD₂) through G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) CRTH2 is a major pathway in type 2 inflammation. Compelling evidence suggests the therapeutic benefits of blocking CRTH2 signaling in many inflammatory disorders. Currently, a number of CRTH2 antagonists are under clinical investigation, and one compound, fevipiprant, has advanced to phase 3 clinical trials for asthma. Here, we present the crystal structures of human CRTH2 with two antagonists, fevipiprant and CAY10471. The structures, together with docking and ligand-binding data, reveal a semi-occluded pocket covered by a well-structured amino terminus and different binding modes of chemically diverse CRTH2 antagonists. Structural analysis suggests a ligand entry port and a binding process that is facilitated by opposite charge attraction for PGD₂, which differs significantly from the binding pose and binding environment of lysophospholipids and endocannabinoids, revealing a new mechanism for lipid recognition by GPCRs.

Targeting the PGD2/CRTH2/DP1 Signaling Pathway in Asthma and Allergic Disease: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Prostaglandin D₂ (PGD₂) released by degranulating mast cells is believed to play a key role in orchestrating mechanisms of inflammation in allergies and asthma. The biological effects of PGD₂ are mediated by D-prostanoid (DP1), CRTH2 (DP2), and thromboxane prostanoid (TP) receptors. The CRTH2 receptor is involved in induction of migration and activation of T helper type 2 (Th₂) lymphocytes, eosinophils, and basophils; up-regulation of adhesion molecules; and promotion of pro-inflammatory Th₂-type cytokines (interleukin [IL]-4, 5, 13), whereas the DP receptor is associated with relaxation of smooth muscles, vasodilation, inhibition of cell migration, and apoptosis of eosinophils. A number of CRTH2/PGD₂ receptor antagonists have been investigated in asthma and allergic diseases. The CRTH2 antagonist (OC000459) or dual CRTH2 and TP receptor antagonist (ramatroban) were effective in reducing eosinophilia, nasal mucosal swelling, and clinical symptoms of allergic rhinitis, with the latter drug registered for clinical use in this indication. OC000459 and setipiprant reduced the late but not early phase of response in an allergen challenge in atopic asthmatics. In persistent asthma, some molecules induced limited improvement in lung function, quality of life, and asthma symptoms (OC000459, BI671800), but in other trials with AMG 853 and AZ1981 these findings were not confirmed. The clear discrepancy between animal studies and clinical efficacy of CRTH2 antagonism in allergic rhinitis, and lack of efficacy in a general cohort of asthmatics, highlight the issue of patient phenotyping. There is no doubt that the PGD₂/CATH2/DP1 pathway plays a key role in allergic inflammation and further studies with selective or combined antagonisms in well defined cohorts of patients are needed.

Efficacy and safety of the CRTh2 antagonist AZD1981 as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists in patients with atopic asthma

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of AZD1981, a potent, specific antagonist of the CRTh2 receptor, as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β₂-agonists (LABA), in patients with persistent asthma with an allergic component.

Patients and methods

In this placebo-controlled, parallel-group Phase IIb study, patients with persistent atopic asthma on ICS and LABA were randomized to receive 12 weeks of treatment with placebo or AZD1981 (80 mg daily, 200 mg daily, and 10 mg, 40 mg, 100 mg, or 400 mg twice daily [BID]). The primary end point was the mean change from baseline in predose, prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) averaged over weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in the AZD1981-treatment group vs the placebo group. Secondary end points included other measures of lung function, symptoms, and asthma control, as well as standard measures of safety.

Results

In total, 1,140 patients (99.7%) received study treatment. There were improvements in the primary end point across all treatment groups over 12 weeks of treatment. However, the improvement for the highest AZD1981 dose (400 mg BID) vs placebo was not statistically significant (0.02 L, P=0.58), preventing interpretation of statistical testing for the lower doses. AZD1981 was well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse events was comparable across placebo and treatment groups.

Conclusion

In patients with allergic asthma receiving ICS and LABA therapy, the addition of AZD1981 at doses up to 400 mg BID failed to produce a clinically relevant improvement in lung function or any other measured end point, but appeared to have an acceptable safety profile. This clinical study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01197794).

Chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTH2) antagonists in asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION

More than 20 orally bioavailable chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTH2) antagonists have moved forward to clinical development in recent years for the treatment of asthma. However, evidence from individual randomised controlled trials (RCTs) has demonstrated inconsistent results in their efficacy and safety.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Global Index Medicus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus will be searched from inception to 30 December 2017 for eligible RCTs, with additional studies being identified by manual searches. The study eligibility, data extraction and quality appraisal will be performed by two independent reviewers. Studies deemed fit for inclusion will be assessed using Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. To generate more accurate analyses, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be used to grade the evidence. We will use the χ² test and the I² statistic to assess heterogeneity. The metaregression and subgroup analyses will be undertaken in the presence of heterogeneity. The potential for publication bias will be examined using funnel plots.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The current study is based on published data, thus ethical approval is not a requirement. The results of this study will be reported in an open-access peer-reviewed publication or will be disseminated as conference proceedings. This systematic review will increase the understanding of the application of CRTH2 antagonists in patients with asthma, which may help to establish and identify specific gaps in the evidence informing a future agenda for asthma research, policy and practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017079342.

JAK/STAT inhibitors and other small molecule cytokine antagonists for the treatment of allergic disease

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of janus kinase (JAK), chemoattractant receptor homologous molecule expressed on T_H2 cells (CRTH2), and phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors in allergic disorders.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed literature review.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Articles included in this review discuss the emerging mechanism of action of small molecule inhibitors and their use in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), asthma, and allergic rhinitis (AR).

RESULTS

Allergic diseases represent a spectrum of diseases, including AD, asthma, and AR. For decades, these diseases have been primarily characterized by increased T_H2 signaling and downstream inflammation. In recent years, additional research has identified disease phenotypes and subsets of patients with non-Th2 mediated inflammation. The increasing heterogeneity of disease has prompted investigators to move away from wide-ranging treatment approaches with immunosuppressive agents, such as corticosteroids, to consider more targeted immunomodulatory approaches focused on specific pathways. In the past decade, inhibitors that target JAK signaling, PDE4, and CRTH2 have been explored for their potential activity in models of allergic disease and therapeutic benefit in clinical trials. Interestingly, although JAK inhibitors provide an opportunity to interfere with cytokine signaling and could be beneficial in a broad range of allergic diseases, current clinical trials are focused on the treatment of AD. Conversely, both PDE4 and CRTH2 inhibitors have been evaluated in a spectrum of allergic diseases. This review summarizes the varying degrees of success that these small molecules have demonstrated across allergic diseases.

CONCLUSION

Emerging therapies currently in development may provide more consistent benefit to patients with allergic diseases by specifically targeting inflammatory pathways important for disease pathogenesis.

Elevated levels of circulating CD4(+) CRTh2(+) T cells characterize severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTh2) is a receptor for PGD2 and expressed by T cells, eosinophils, basophils, and ILC2 cells. CRTh2 expression by CD4(+) T cells identifies the Th2 subset, and these cells have been characterized as allergen-specific central memory Th2 cells. Recently, activation of the PGD2 -CRTh2 pathway in the lungs was associated with severe asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To assess circulating levels of Th2 cells and related mediators in severe asthma and those who experience asthma exacerbations.

METHODS

Peripheral blood cells expressing CRTh2 were characterized by flow cytometry and qRT-PCR. Serum IL-13 and PGD2 were measured by ELISA and compared with asthma severity and tendency to exacerbate.

RESULTS

Severe asthmatics had more circulating CD4(+) CRTh2(+) T cells, CRTh2 and GATA3 mRNA, and a higher level of serum IL-13 compared to mild/moderate asthmatics. The proportion of CD4(+) CRTh2(+) T cells was associated with lower lung function and was highest in severe asthmatics that exacerbated in the last year. Circulating CD4(+) CRTh2(+) T cells, unlike eosinophils, were positively correlated with inhaled steroid dose.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Elevated levels of circulating CD4(+) CRTh2(+) T cells are a feature of severe asthma, despite high-dose corticosteroids. Tracking the systemic level of these cells may help identify type 2 severe asthmatics at risk of exacerbation.

CRTH2 antagonists in asthma: current perspectives

Chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on T_H2 cells (CRTH2) binds to prostaglandin D₂. CRTH2 is expressed on various cell types including eosinophils, mast cells, and basophils. CRTH2 and prostaglandin D₂ are involved in allergic inflammation and eosinophil activation. Orally administered CRTH2 antagonists are in clinical development for the treatment of asthma. The biology and clinical trial data indicate that CRTH2 antagonists should be targeted toward eosinophilic asthma. This article reviews the clinical evidence for CRTH2 involvement in asthma pathophysiology and clinical trials of CRTH2 antagonists in asthma. CRTH2 antagonists could provide a practical alternative to biological treatments for patients with severe asthma. Future perspectives for this class of drug are considered, including the selection of the subgroup of patients most likely to show a meaningful treatment response.

Allergen-induced Increases in Sputum Levels of Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells in Subjects with Asthma

RATIONALE

Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2), a major source of type 2 cytokines, initiate eosinophilic inflammatory responses in murine models of asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of ILC2 in allergen-induced airway eosinophilic responses in subjects with atopy and asthma.

METHODS

Using a diluent-controlled allergen challenge crossover study, where all subjects (n = 10) developed allergen-induced early and late responses, airway eosinophilia, and increased methacholine airway responsiveness, bone marrow, blood, and sputum samples were collected before and after inhalation challenge.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

ILC2 (lin^-FcεRI^-CD45⁺CD127⁺ST2⁺) and CD4⁺T lymphocytes were enumerated by flow cytometry, as well as intracellular IL-5 and IL-13 expression. Steroid sensitivity of ILC2 and CD4⁺ T cells was investigated in vitro. A significant increase in total, IL-5⁺, IL-13⁺, and CRTH2⁺ ILC2 was found in sputum, 24 hours after allergen, coincident with a significant decrease in blood ILC2. Total, IL-5⁺, and IL-13⁺, but not CRTH2⁺, CD4⁺ T cells significantly increased at 24 and 48 hours after allergen in sputum. In blood and bone marrow, only CD4⁺ cells demonstrated increased activation after allergen. Airway eosinophilia correlated with IL-5⁺ ILC2 at all time points and allergen-induced changes in IL-5⁺ CD4⁺ cells at 48 hours after allergen. Dexamethasone significantly attenuated IL-2- and IL-33-stimulated IL-5 and IL-13 production by both cell types.

CONCLUSIONS

Innate and adaptive immune cells are increased in the airways associated with allergic asthmatic responses. Total and type 2 cytokine-positive ILC2 are increased only within the airways, whereas CD4⁺ T lymphocytes demonstrated local and systemic increases. Steroid sensitivity of both cells may explain effectiveness of this therapy in those with mild asthma.

Prostaglandins and Their Receptors in Eosinophil Function and As Therapeutic Targets

Of the known prostanoid receptors, human eosinophils express the prostaglandin D₂ (PGD₂) receptors DP1 [also D-type prostanoid (DP)] and DP2 (also chemoattractant receptor homologous molecule, expressed on Th2 cells), the prostaglandin E₂ receptors EP2 and EP4, and the prostacyclin (PGI₂) receptor IP. Prostanoids can bind to either one or multiple receptors, characteristically have a short half-life in vivo, and are quickly degraded into metabolites with altered affinity and specificity for a given receptor subtype. Prostanoid receptors signal mainly through G proteins and naturally activate signal transduction pathways according to the G protein subtype that they preferentially interact with. This can lead to the activation of sometimes opposing signaling pathways. In addition, prostanoid signaling is often cell-type specific and also the combination of expressed receptors can influence the outcome of the prostanoid impulse. Accordingly, it is assumed that eosinophils and their (patho-)physiological functions are governed by a sensitive prostanoid signaling network. In this review, we specifically focus on the functions of PGD₂, PGE₂, and PGI₂ and their receptors on eosinophils. We discuss their significance in allergic and non-allergic diseases and summarize potential targets for drug intervention.

Lipid Mediators of Allergic Disease: Pathways, Treatments, and Emerging Therapeutic Targets

Bioactive lipids are critical regulators of inflammation. Over the last 75 years, these diverse compounds have emerged as clinically-relevant mediators of allergic disease pathophysiology. Animal and human studies have demonstrated the importance of lipid mediators in the development of asthma, allergic rhinitis, urticaria, anaphylaxis, atopic dermatitis, and food allergy. Lipids are critical participants in cell signaling events which influence key physiologic (bronchoconstriction) and immune phenomena (degranulation, chemotaxis, sensitization). Lipid-mediated cellular mechanisms including: (1) formation of structural support platforms (lipid rafts) for receptor signaling complexes, (2) activation of a diverse family of G-protein coupled receptors, and (3) mediating intracellular signaling cascades by acting as second messengers. Here, we review four classes of bioactive lipids (platelet activating factor, the leukotrienes, the prostanoids, and the sphingolipids) with special emphasis on lipid synthesis pathways and signaling, atopic disease pathology, and the ongoing development of atopy treatments targeting lipid mediator pathways.

New and developing non-adrenoreceptor small molecule drugs for the treatment of asthma

INTRODUCTION

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) alone or in combination with an inhaled long-acting beta₂-agonist (LABA) are the preferred long-term treatment for adults and adolescents with symptomatic asthma. Additional drugs include leukotriene-receptor antagonists, slow-release theophylline and the long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) tiotropium (approved in 2015). There is a need for more effective therapies, as many patients continue to have poorly controlled asthma. Areas covered: New and developing long-acting non-adrenoreceptor synthetic drugs for the treatment of symptomatic chronic asthma despite treatment with an ICS alone or combined with a LABA. Data was reviewed from studies published up until November 2016. Expert opinion: Tiotropium improves lung function and has a modest effect in reducing exacerbations when added to ICS alone or ICS and LABA. The LAMAs umeclidinium and glycopyrronium are under development in fixed dose combination with ICS and LABA. Novel small molecule drugs, such as CRTH2 receptor antagonists, PDE₄ inhibitors, protein kinase inhibitors and nonsteroidal glucocorticoid receptor agonists and 'off-label' use of licensed drugs, such as macrolides and statins are under investigation for asthma, although their effectiveness in clinical practice is not established. To better achieve the goal of developing effective novel small molecule drugs for asthma will require greater understanding of mechanisms of disease and the different phenotypes and endotypes of asthma.

Biological Modulators in Eosinophilic Diseases

Eosinophils can regulate local and systemic inflammation, and their presence in higher numbers appears to play an important role in the pathology of various atopic and inflammatory diseases. Eosinophil maturation, recruitment, and survival depend on several cytokine regulators, including interleukin (IL)-5, IL-4, and IL-13 as well as growth factors such as GM-CSF. Over the last decade, the approach to treating eosinophilic diseases has changed greatly. A number of biologic modulators have been developed to target eosinophilic inflammatory pathways, and their usage has resulted in variable clinical improvement in the treatment of eosinophilic-associated conditions. Novel targeted therapies that are safe and effective for treating these disorders are being investigated. This review summarizes the clinical use of biologic agents that have been studied in clinical trials or approved for treating eosinophilic diseases.

Two Phase II randomized trials on the CRTh2 antagonist AZD1981 in adults with asthma

Background

Chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on T helper type 2 (Th2) cell (CRTh2) receptor antagonists is being investigated for asthma.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of the CRTh2 receptor antagonist, AZD1981 (with/without inhaled corticosteroids [ICSs]), on lung function and asthma control.

Patients and methods

Adults aged 18–60 years were enrolled in two randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials (protocol number: D9830C00003 [study 1, n=209] and protocol number: D9830C00004 [study 2, n=510]). In study 1, patients with stable asthma (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV₁]: 65%−110%) were withdrawn from ICS (<400 µg/d) and randomized to AZD1981 1,000 mg twice daily (bid) or placebo. In study 2, patients with uncontrolled asthma (FEV₁: 40%−85%) despite ICS therapy (≥500 µg/d) were randomized to 50 mg, 400 mg, or 1,000 mg bid AZD1981 or placebo. The primary efficacy variable for both trials was the change in morning peak expiratory flow after 4 weeks of treatment. Secondary variables included Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) scores, FEV₁ assessments, safety, and tolerability. In study 2, efficacy was also assessed according to atopic status.

Results

Following 4 weeks of treatment, there was a nonsignificant increase in morning peak expiratory flow on AZD1981 1,000 mg bid (9.5 L/min vs placebo, P=0.086 [study 1] and 12 L/min vs placebo, P=0.16 [study 2]). In study 2, all doses of AZD1981 provided significant improvements in ACQ-5 scores (0.26–0.3 units vs placebo, P=0.010–0.022); however, there was no dose–response relationship. Improved ACQ-5 scores and FEV₁ were observed in the majority of atopic patients treated with AZD1981. AZD1981 was well tolerated across treatment groups.

Conclusion

Further research may be warranted in atopic patients to fully evaluate the clinical efficacy of AZD1981.

Prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonists in early development as potential therapeutic options for asthma

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by bronchial hyper-reactivity. Although many currently available treatment regimens are effective, poor symptom control and refractory severe disease still represent major unmet needs. In the last years, numerous molecular therapeutic targets that interfere with the innate inflammatory response in asthma have been identified. Promising preliminary results concern the signaling cascade promoted by prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) and its receptor antagonists.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to provide the most recent clinical and preclinical data on the efficacy and safety of newly developed compounds for the treatment of allergic asthma. The authors will present an overview of the pathogenetic molecular mechanisms sustaining the chronic inflammatory response in asthma; the focus will be then directed on the mediators of the PGD2 pathway, the chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on TH2 cells, and their latest antagonists developed.

EXPERT OPINION

Bronchodilators and corticosteroids are not sufficient to achieve a satisfactory management of all asthmatic patients; the development of new specific treatments appears therefore essential. The good results in terms of cellular, functional and clinical outcomes, together with an acceptable safety of the CRTh2 antagonists represent a promising start for a tailored management of allergic asthma.

Patient stratification and the unmet need in asthma

Asthma is often described as an inflammatory disease of the lungs and in most patients symptomatic treatment with bronchodilators or inhaled corticosteroids is sufficient to control disease. Unfortunately there are a proportion of patients who fail to achieve control despite treatment with the best current treatment. These severe asthma patients have been considered a homogeneous group of patients that represent the unmet therapeutic need in asthma. Many novel therapies have been tested in unselected asthma patients and the effects have often been disappointing, particularly for the highly specific monoclonal antibody-based drugs such as anti-IL-13 and anti-IL-5. More recently, it has become clear that asthma is a syndrome with many different disease drivers. Clinical trials of anti-IL-13 and anti-IL-5 have focused on biomarker-defined patient groups and these trials have driven the clinical progression of these drugs. Work on asthma phenotyping indicates that there is a group of asthma patients where T helper cell type 2 (Th2) cytokines and inflammation predominate and these type 2 high (T2-high) patients can be defined by biomarkers and response to therapies targeting this type of immunity, including anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-13. However, there is still a subset of T2-low patients that do not respond to these new therapies. This T2-low group will represent the new unmet medical need now that the T2-high-targeting therapies have made it to the market. This review will examine the current thinking on patient stratification in asthma and the identification of the T2-high subset. It will also look at the T2-low patients and examine what may be the drivers of disease in these patients.

Pharmacological characterization of CRTh2 antagonist LAS191859: Long receptor residence time translates into long-lasting in vivo efficacy

The chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on T-helper type 2 cells (CRTh2) is a G protein-coupled receptor expressed on the leukocytes most closely associated with asthma and allergy like eosinophils, mast cells, Th2-lymphocytes and basophils. At present it is clear that CRTh2 mediates most prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) pro-inflammatory effects and as a result antagonists for this receptor have reached asthma clinical studies showing a trend of lung function improvement. The challenge remains to identify compounds with improved clinical efficacy when administered once a day. Herein we described the pharmacological profile of LAS191859, a novel, potent and selective CRTh2 antagonist. In vitro evidence in GTPγS binding studies indicate that LAS191859 is a CRTh2 antagonist with activity in the low nanomolar range. This potency is also maintained in cellular assays performed with human eosinophils and whole blood. The main differentiation of LAS191859 vs other CRTh2 antagonists is in its receptor binding kinetics. LAS191859 has a residence time half-life of 21h at CRTh2 that translates into a long-lasting in vivo efficacy that is independent of plasma levels. We believe that the strategy behind this compound will allow optimal efficacy and posology for chronic asthma treatment.

New Developments in Mast Cell Biology: Clinical Implications

Mast cells (MCs) are present in connective tissue and at mucosal surfaces in all classes of vertebrates. In health, they contribute to tissue homeostasis, host defense, and tissue repair via multiple receptors regulating the release of a vast stockpile of proinflammatory mediators, proteases, and cytokines. However, these potentially protective cells are a double-edged sword. When there is a repeated or long-term stimulus, MC activation leads to tissue damage and dysfunction. Accordingly, MCs are implicated in the pathophysiologic aspects of numerous diseases covering all organs. Understanding the biology of MCs, their heterogeneity, mechanisms of activation, and signaling cascades may lead to the development of novel therapies for many diseases for which current treatments are lacking or are of poor efficacy. This review will focus on updates and developments in MC biology and their clinical implications, with a particular focus on their role in respiratory diseases.

Investigational prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonists for airway inflammation

INTRODUCTION

By activating DP1 and DP2 receptors on immune and non-immune cells, prostaglandin D2 (PGD2), a major metabolic product of cyclo-oxygenase pathway released after IgE-mediated mast cell activation, has pro-inflammatory effects, which are relevant to the pathophysiology of allergic airway disease. At least 15 selective, orally active, DP2 receptor antagonists and one DP1 receptor antagonist (asapiprant) are under development for asthma and/or allergic rhinitis.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors cover the pharmacology of PGD2 and PGD2 receptor antagonists and look at the preclinical, phase I and phase II studies with selective DP1 and DP2 receptor antagonists.

EXPERT OPINION

Future research should aim to develop once daily compounds and increase the drug clinical potency which, apart from OC000459 and ADC-3680, seems to be relatively low. Further research and development of DP2 receptor antagonists is warranted, particularly in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, whose management is a top priority. Pediatric studies, which are not available, are required for assessing the efficacy and safety of this novel drug class in children with asthma and allergic rhinitis. Studies on the efficacy of DP2 receptor antagonists in various asthma phenotypes including: smokers, obese subjects, early vs late asthma onset, fixed vs reversible airflow limitation, are required for establishing their pharmacotherapeutic role.

Preclinical Safety Profile of a Depleting Antibody against CRTh2 for Asthma: Well Tolerated Despite Unexpected CRTh2 Expression on Vascular Pericytes in the Central Nervous System and Gastric Mucosa

CRTh2 is expressed on immune cells that drive asthma pathophysiology. Current treatment options for severe asthma are inadequate and therapeutic antibody-mediated depletion of CRTh2-expressing cells represents a promising new therapeutic strategy. Here we report for the first time that CRTh2 is not only expressed on immune cells, but also on microvasculature in the central nervous system (CNS) and gastric mucosa in humans. Microvascular expression of CRTh2 raises a safety concern because a therapeutic antiCRTh2 antibody with enhanced depletion capacity could lead to vascular damage. To evaluate this safety risk, we characterized microvascular expression in human and in transgenic mice expressing human CRTh2 protein (hCRTh2.BAC.Tg) and found that CRTh2 is not localized to microvascular endothelium that is directly exposed to circulating therapeutic antibody, but rather, to pericytes that in the CNS are shielded from direct circulatory exposure by the blood-brain barrier. Immunohistochemical visualization of an intravenously administered antiCRTh2 antibody in transgenic mice revealed localization to microvascular pericytes in the gastric mucosa but not in the CNS, suggesting the blood-brain barrier effectively limits pericyte exposure to circulating therapeutic antibody in the CNS. Repeated dosing with a depleting antiCRTh2 antibody in hCRTh2.BAC.Tg mice revealed linear pharmacokinetics and no drug-related adverse findings in any tissues, including the CNS and gastric mucosa, despite complete depletion of CRTh2 expressing circulating eosinophils and basophils. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that the likelihood of drug-related CNS or gastrointestinal toxicity in humans treated with a therapeutic depleting antiCRTh2 antibody is low despite pericyte expression of CRTh2 in these tissues.

Pharmacological Therapy of Bronchial Asthma: The Role of Biologicals

Bronchial asthma is a heterogeneous, complex, chronic inflammatory and obstructive pulmonary disease driven by various pathways to present with different phenotypes. A small proportion of asthmatics (5-10%) suffer from severe asthma with symptoms that cannot be controlled by guideline therapy with high doses of inhaled steroids plus a second controller, such as long-acting β2 agonists (LABA) or leukotriene receptor antagonists, or even systemic steroids. The discovery and characterization of the pathways that drive different asthma phenotypes have opened up new therapeutic avenues for asthma treatment. The approval of the humanized anti-IgE antibody omalizumab for the treatment of severe allergic asthma has paved the way for other cytokine-targeting therapies, particularly those targeting interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-13, IL-17, and IL-23 and the epithelium-derived cytokines IL-25, IL-33, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin. Knowledge of the molecular basis of asthma phenotypes has helped, and continues to help, the development of novel biologicals that target a diverse array of phenotype-specific molecular targets in patients suffering from severe asthma. This review summarizes potential therapeutic approaches that are likely to show clinical efficacy in the near future, focusing on biologicals as promising novel therapies for severe asthma.

Asthma phenotyping: a necessity for improved therapeutic precision and new targeted therapies

Asthma is a common heterogeneous disease with a complex pathophysiology that carries a significant mortality rate and high morbidity. Current therapies based on inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-agonists remain effective in a large proportion of patients with asthma, but ~10% (considered to have 'severe asthma') do not respond to these treatments even at high doses or with the use of oral corticosteroids. Analytical clustering methods have revealed phenotypes that include dependence on high-dose corticosteroid treatment, severe airflow obstruction and recurrent exacerbations associated with an allergic background and late onset of disease. One severe phenotype is eosinophilic inflammation-predominant asthma, with late-onset disease, rhinosinusitis, aspirin sensitivity and exacerbations. Blood and sputum eosinophilia have been used to distinguish patients with high Th2 inflammation and to predict therapeutic response to treatments targeted towards Th2-associated cytokines. New therapies in the form of humanized antibodies against Th2 targets, such as anti-IgE, anti-IL4Rα, anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-13 antibodies, have shown encouraging results in terms of reduction in exacerbations and improvement in airflow in patients with a 'Th2-high' expression profile and blood eosinophilia. Research efforts are now focusing on elucidating the phenotypes underlying the non-Th2-high (or Th2-low) group, which constitutes ~50% of severe asthma cases. There is an increasing need to use biomarkers to indicate the group of patients who will respond to a specifically targeted treatment. The use of improved tools to measure activity of disease, a better definition of severe asthma and the delineation of inflammatory pathways with omics analyses using computational tools, will lead to better-defined phenotypes for specific therapies.