1
|
Senti G, Freiburghaus AU, Larenas-Linnemann D, Hoffmann HJ, Patterson AM, Klimek L, Di Bona D, Pfaar O, Ahlbeck L, Akdis M, Weinfeld D, Contreras-Verduzco FA, Pedroza-Melendez A, Skaarup SH, Lee SM, Cardell LO, Schmid JM, Westin U, Dollner R, Kündig TM. Intralymphatic Immunotherapy: Update and Unmet Needs. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2018; 178:141-149. [PMID: 30391954 DOI: 10.1159/000493647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only allergy treatment that confers long-term symptom amelioration for patients suffering from allergy. The most frequently used allergen application route is subcutaneous injection (SCIT), commonly taken as the gold standard, followed by sublingual (SLIT) or oral (OIT) application of allergen preparations. This is an up-to-date review of the clinical evidence for a novel route of allergen application, i.e., directly into lymph nodes - intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT). The major advantages of ILIT over the current AIT approaches are its short duration and the low allergen doses administered. The whole treatment consists of merely 3 ultrasound-guided injections into inguinal lymph nodes 1 month apart. While the number of patients included in randomised controlled trials is still limited, the clinical results for ILIT are encouraging, but more clinical trials are needed, as well as more preclinical work for optimising formulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Senti
- Clinical Trials Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,
| | | | | | - Hans Jürgen Hoffmann
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Danilo Di Bona
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Chair and School of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, University of Bari - Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Lars Ahlbeck
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Neuro and Inflammation Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Mübeccel Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research SIAF, Davos Platz, Switzerland
| | - Dan Weinfeld
- Asthma and Allergy Clinic (Adults), Department of Internal Medicine, South Alvsborgs (Central) Hospital, Boras, Sweden
| | | | | | - Søren H Skaarup
- Department of Clinical Medicine - Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Sang Min Lee
- Division of Allergy and Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Lars-Olaf Cardell
- Division of ENT Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johannes M Schmid
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ulla Westin
- Division of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Region Skane, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ralph Dollner
- Department Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Clinic for Head-Neck and Reconstructive Surgery, Oslo University Hospital (OUS) HF - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas M Kündig
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergic diseases are among the most common diseases of humans. The immune response towards allergens is regulated by T-lymphozytes and characterized by an interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-13 dominated Th2 cytokine profile. RESULTS Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causative treatment option and able to change the course of disease, e. g. to prevent the development of asthma and new sensitizations. The intralymphatic delivery of allergenes named intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) has been evaluated in clinical trials and was demonstrated to be a highly potent application route with low effort and side effects while having equal efficacy if compared with current standard AIT forms. However, studies that verify important questions like optimal dose, new allergen forms, use of adjuvants etc. are still missing. Moreover, it has to be evaluated, whether different indications like rhinitis, or atopic dermatitis are suitable for ILIT and whether it is useful in children. Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) is a possible alternative application form. It is minimally invasive and basically consists of the affixation of allergen containing patches to the epidermis over 6 weeks. From the studies performed so far, the authors concluded, that epicutaneous immunotherapy is safe and efficacious in a dose-dependent manner after 6 patches only. CONCLUSIONS AIT is accepted to be the only causative treatment option for allergies. New application routes in ILIT and EPIT may become more important and allow for different delivery methods in the future, however further clinical studies are required and in preparation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Gold Standard allergen-specific immunotherapy is associated with low efficacy because it requires either many subcutaneous injections of allergen or even more numerous sublingual allergen administrations to achieve amelioration of symptoms. Intralymphatic vaccination can maximize immunogenicity and hence efficacy. We and others have demonstrated that as few as three low dose intralymphatic allergen administrations are sufficient to effectively alleviate symptoms. Results of recent prospective and controlled trials suggest that this strategy may be an effective form of allergen immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Senti
- Clinical Trials Center, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100/MOU2, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas M Kündig
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Allergen-specific immunotherapy is the only treatment of allergic diseases that aims at modifying the underlying immune mechanism. Current protocols are long and at risk of anaphylactic reactions. The main aim of current research is decreasing the risk of side effects and increasing efficacy, in particular targeting reduction of treatment duration. Since the advent of molecular biology, extracts can be replaced by recombinant hypo-allergens, peptides, or fusion proteins. In addition, different routes of administration are being pursued as well as the addition of new adjuvants that are targeted at skewing the immune system away from a Th2 to a more Th1 or regulatory T cell phenotype. In this review, we summarize the recent advances in this field focusing on the allergen modifications and new adjuvants.
Collapse
|