No cashew allergy in infants introduced to cashew by age 1 year

Development of peanut, sesame and tree nut allergy in Polish children at high risk of food allergy: a protocol for a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Peanut allergies cause serious health problems worldwide. A strong finding has shown that the early introduction of peanuts into the diet of infants at high risk of food allergy reduces the prevalence of peanut allergy. Allergies to peanuts, sesame and tree nuts have been shown to coexist in 60% of cases and vary according to geographical location and dietary habits. Insights into the prevalence of nut and seed allergies in societies with varying consumption levels are essential for developing population-specific weaning guidelines. Understanding the age at which peanut allergy develops is paramount for successful early introduction strategies.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will perform a cross-sectional study at two tertiary allergy centres in Warsaw and Bydgoszcz. Two hundred forty children aged 4-36 months with eczema or egg allergy will undergo an extensive assessment of their peanut, sesame and tree nut allergy status through skin testing, specific IgE measurements and oral food challenges. The primary outcome is the prevalence of peanut, sesame and tree nut allergies in Polish children at high risk of food allergy. Additionally, the timing of the development of peanut, sesame and tree nut allergies in the first 3 years of life in a high-risk population will be assessed.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Warsaw, Poland approved this protocol (KB/86/2021). The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal no later than 1 year after data collection. The abstract will be presented at relevant national and international conferences.Although the authors may be able to commit to journal submission no later than 1 year after data collection, publication dates remain beyond their control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05662800.

Cashew Allergy Prevalence and Sensitization in 1-Year-Old Infants

BACKGROUND

Cashew allergy is the most common tree nut allergy in Australia, but there are limited data on the population-level prevalence and risk factors.

OBJECTIVE

Describe the prevalence of cashew sensitization and allergy in 12-month-old infants and identify risk factors.

METHODS

Data were from the EarlyNuts cohort, a population-based sample of infants recruited in Melbourne, Australia. Families completed a questionnaire and infants underwent a skin prick test (SPT) to cashew. Infants with positive SPTs were offered food challenges. Questionnaires collected demographic data and allergy risk factors. Allergy outcomes were determined by challenge outcomes or a convincing history of an allergic reaction. We used weights to adjust estimated prevalence to reflect the distribution of risk factors among the combined sample of participants and nonparticipants.

RESULTS

We recruited 1,933 participants and identified 1,414 cashew allergy outcomes. Of these, 1.96% (95% CI, 1.28-2.99) had an SPT result of 3 mm or greater and 1.49% (95% CI, 0.91-2.44) were allergic to cashew. Infants with eczema or peanut allergy in the first year of life were more likely to be allergic to cashew (adjusted odds ratio = 5.75; 95% CI, 2.08-15.88; P = .001; and adjusted odds ratio = 19.30; 95% CI, 5.44-68.43; P < .001, respectively). Twenty-five percent of participants had cashew introduced before 12 months (95% CI, 22.7-27.8). There was no association between the timing of cashew introduction and cashew allergy.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study describing the prevalence of and risk factors for cashew allergy in a population-based infant cohort. Eczema and peanut allergy were associated with an increased risk of cashew allergy. Few infants were introduced to cashew before age 12 months, which suggests that infant feeding guidelines have not yet translated to the earlier introduction of all allergens.

Early-life risk factors for food allergy: Dietary and environmental factors revisited

There appears a steep increase in the prevalence of food allergy worldwide in the past few decades. It is believed that, rather than genetic factors, the recently altered dietary and environmental factors are the driving forces behind the rapid increase of this disease. Accumulating evidence has implied that external exposures that occurred in prenatal and postnatal periods could affect the development of oral tolerance in later life. Understanding the potential risk factors for food allergy would greatly benefit the progress of intervention and therapy. In this review, we present updated knowledge on the dietary and environmental risk factors in early life that have been shown to impact the development of food allergy. These predominantly include dietary habits, microbial exposures, allergen exposure routes, environmental pollutants, and so on. The key evidence, conflicts, and potential research topics of each theory are discussed, and associated interventional strategies to prevent the disease development and ameliorate treatment burden are included. Accumulating evidence has supported the causative role of certain dietary and environmental factors in the establishment of oral tolerance in early life, especially the time of introducing allergenic foods, skin barrier function, and microbial exposures. In addition to certain immunomodulatory factors, increasing interest is raised toward modern dietary patterns, where adequately powered studies are required to identify contributions of those modifiable risk factors. This review broadens our understanding of the connections between diet, environment, and early-life immunity, thus benefiting the progress of intervention and therapy of food allergy.

Feasibility and safety of introducing cashew nut spread in infant diets-A randomized trial

BACKGROUND

To reduce peanut allergy prevalence, infant feeding guidelines now recommend introducing peanuts in an age-appropriate form (such as peanut butter) as part of complementary feeding. However, due to a lack of randomized trial evidence, most infant feeding and food allergy prevention guidelines do not include tree nuts. The aims of this trial were to determine safety and feasibility of dosage consumption recommendations for infant cashew nut spread introduction.

METHODS

This is a parallel, three-arm (1:1:1 allocation), single-blinded (outcome assessors), randomized controlled trial. General population term infants were randomized at 6-8 months of age to either a one teaspoon (Intervention 1 n = 59) or increasing dosage regime of one teaspoon at 6-7 months, two teaspoons at 8-9 months, and three teaspoons from 10 months of age onwards (Intervention 2 n = 67) cashew nut spread, both three times per week, or no specific advice on cashew introduction (Control n = 70). At 1 year of age, food challenge proven IgE-mediated cashew nut allergy was assessed.

RESULTS

Compliance in Intervention 1 (92%) was higher than Intervention 2 (79%), p = .04. Only one infant had delayed (at 5 h) facial swelling and eczema flare to cashew introduction at 6.5 months, but no cashew allergy at 1 year. Only one infant (Control) had cashew allergy at 1 year, and this infant had not been introduced to cashew prior to 12 months of age.

CONCLUSION

Regular infant consumption of one teaspoon of cashew nut spread three times per week from 6 to 8 months of age was found to be feasible and safe.

TreEAT trial: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of early introduction of tree nuts for the prevention of tree nut allergy in infants with peanut allergy

INTRODUCTION

Children with peanut allergy are at increased risk of developing tree nut allergies, which can be severe and for most lifelong. Introduction of peanut in the first year of life can reduce the risk of peanut allergy; however, prevention strategies for tree nut allergies have not been established. We aimed to test the efficacy and safety of a novel strategy, a supervised multi-nut oral food challenge (OFC) compared with standard care for tree nut allergy prevention in infants at high risk of developing tree nut allergy, TreEAT.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

TreEAT is a 2-armed, open-label, randomized, controlled trial (RCT). Infants (n = 212) aged 4-11 months with peanut allergy will be randomized 1:1 at peanut allergy diagnosis to either a hospital-based multi-tree nut (almond, cashew, hazelnut, and walnut) OFC using multi-nut butter or standard care (home introduction of individual tree nuts). All infants will be assessed at age 18 months, with questionnaires and SPT to peanut and tree nuts. Peanut and tree nut OFCs will be performed as required to determine the allergy status for each nut. The primary outcome is tree nut allergy at age 18 months. Secondary outcomes include peanut allergy resolution, proportion, and severity of adverse events related to tree nut ingestion, number and frequency of tree nuts ingested, quality of life and parental anxiety, and allergy-related healthcare visits from randomization to 18 months of age. Analyses will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

TreEAT was approved by the Royal Children's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (#70489). Outcomes will be presented at scientific conferences and disseminated through publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04801823.

Tree nut allergy: a systematic review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Systematic scoping review, focusing on randomized clinical trials of recent research addressing tree nut allergy.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review addresses published, unpublished, and re-analyzed studies on tree nut allergy definition, epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.

SUMMARY

The importance of tree nut allergy spans nations, economies, and cultures. While broad themes in epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy are emerging, the next major advance in tree nut allergy will require large, robust studies to deliver results important to patients and families.

Cashew oral immunotherapy for desensitizing cashew-pistachio allergy (NUT CRACKER study)

BACKGROUND

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a treatment option for patients with milk, egg, and peanut allergy, but data on the efficacy and safety of cashew OIT are limited.

METHODS

A cohort of 50 cashew-allergic patients aged ≥4 years, who were consecutively enrolled into cashew OIT (target dose 4000 mg protein) between 4/2016 and 12/2019. Fifteen cashew-allergic patients who continued cashew elimination served as observational controls. Co-allergy to pistachio and walnut was determined. Full desensitization rate and associated immunological changes in both groups were compared. Patients fully desensitized to cashew were instructed to consume a dose of 1200 mg cashew protein for 6 months and were then challenged to a full dose. Patients with co-allergy to pistachio or walnut were challenged to the respective nut.

RESULTS

Forty-four of 50 OIT-treated patients (88%) compared to 0% in controls tolerated a dose of 4000 mg cashew protein at the end of the study (odds ratio 8.3, 95% CI 3.9-17.7, p < 0.001). An additional three patients were desensitized to 1200 mg cashew protein, and three patients stopped treatment. Three patients (6%) were treated with injectable epinephrine for home reactions. Desensitized patients had decreased SPT, sIgE, basophil reactivity, and increased sIgG4, following treatment. Following cashew desensitization, all pistachio (n = 35) and four of eight walnut co-allergic patients were cross-desensitized to the respective nut. All (n = 44) patients consuming a low cashew dose for ≥6 months following desensitization passed a full-dose cashew OFC.

CONCLUSIONS

Cashew OIT desensitizes most cashew-allergic patients and cross-desensitizes to pistachio. Safety is similar to OIT for other foods.

Tolerance induction through non-avoidance to prevent persistent food allergy (TINA) in children and adults with peanut or tree nut allergy: rationale, study design and methods of a randomized controlled trial and observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Peanuts (PN) and tree nuts (TN) are among the most frequent elicitors of food allergy and can lead to life-threatening reactions. The current advice for allergic patients is to strictly avoid the offending food independently of their individual threshold level, whereas sensitized patients without allergic symptoms should frequently consume the food to avoid (re-)development of food allergy. The aim of this trial is to investigate (I) whether the consumption of low allergen amounts below the individual threshold may support natural tolerance development and (II) to what extent regular allergen consumption in sensitized but tolerant subjects prevents the (re-)development of PN or TN allergy.

METHODS

The TINA trial consisting of (part I) a randomized, controlled, open, parallel group, single-center, superiority trial (RCT), and (part II) a prospective observational exploratory cohort study. Children and adults (age 1-67 years) with suspected or known primary PN and/or TN allergy will undergo an oral food challenge (OFC) to determine their clinical reactivity and individual threshold. In the RCT, 120 PN or TN allergic patients who tolerate ≥100 mg of food protein will be randomized (1:1 ratio) to consumption of products with low amounts of PN or TN on a regular basis or strict avoidance for 1 year. The consumption group will start with 1/100 of their individual threshold, increasing the protein amount to 1/50 and 1/10 after 4 and 8 months, respectively. The primary endpoint is the clinical tolerance to PN or TN after 1 year assessed by OFC. In the cohort study, 120 subjects sensitized to PN and/or TN but tolerant are advised to regularly consume the food and observed for 1 year. The primary endpoint is the maintenance of clinical tolerance to PN and/or TN after 1 year assessed by challenging with the former tolerated cumulative dose.

DISCUSSION

This clinical trial will help to determine the impact of allergen consumption versus avoidance on natural tolerance development and whether the current dietary advice for PN or TN allergic patients with higher threshold levels is still valid.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register; ID: DRKS00016764 (RCT), DRKS00020467 (cohort study). Registered on 15 January 2020, http://www.drks.de .

Practical Challenges and Considerations for Early Introduction of Potential Food Allergens for Prevention of Food Allergy

Recent randomized controlled trials aimed at the prevention of food allergy have led to sweeping changes in food allergy prevention guidelines. Emphasis is now on the introduction of potential food allergens, particularly peanut and egg, rather than avoidance. Although guidelines recommend against delaying the introduction of other potential allergens, there remains little or no evidence of the benefit of their early introduction. Parents and physicians alike report a need for greater guidance and resources on early potential allergen introduction in the complementary feeding period. A thorough understanding of early introduction literature, current prevention guidelines, and infant nutrition will empower physicians to address patient needs and concerns both when advice is established as effective and where uncertainty remains. We discuss the state of the science, compare recommendations between guidelines, and provide practical options to introduce allergenic foods, alongside other complementary foods, within the first year of life. We include a review of the available literature, including review and suggestions of potential doses of food allergens, and the first published comparison of commercially available products and homemade early introduction foods to help clinicians support their patients. We address the nutritional, dietary, and practical considerations of introducing food allergens in the first year of life while adhering to infant feeding guidelines. Finally, given the limitations of existing guidelines, we review the need for shared decision-making between physicians and parents regarding early allergen introduction.