Efficacy and safety of peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy in patients with atopic comorbidities

The riddle of response to cutaneous allergen exposure in patients with atopic dermatitis

The skin is the largest immunologic organ in the body and contains immune cells that play a role in both food allergen sensitization and desensitization. The dual allergen exposure hypothesis posits that sensitization to food allergens may occur with cutaneous exposure on inflamed skin, eg, atopic dermatitis, but early oral consumption generally leads to tolerance. However, only one-third of children with atopic dermatitis develop a food allergy, suggesting that there is a more complex mechanism for allergen sensitization. Emerging evidence suggests that the outcome of cutaneous allergen exposure is context-dependent and largely influenced by the state of the skin barrier with healthy skin promoting natural tolerance. Current research supports the ability to induce desensitization through repeated application of allergens to the skin, known as epicutaneous immunotherapy. Preclinical research with an occlusive patch has demonstrated a significantly reduced T-helper cell type 2-driven immunologic response when applied to intact, uninflamed skin and induction of a unique population of regulatory T cells that express a broader range of homing receptors, which may be able to maintain sustained protection. In clinical studies of children aged 1 through 11 years with a peanut allergy, epicutaneous immunotherapy with an occlusive patch led to significant desensitization with no major differences in efficacy or safety between children with and without atopic dermatitis. These data begin to answer the conundrum of how allergens that are applied to the skin can lead to both sensitization and desensitization, and future studies should enable us to optimize the power of the skin as a complex immunologic organ to treat allergic, autoimmune, and autoinflammatory disorders.

Feast for thought: A comprehensive review of food allergy 2021-2023

A review of the latest publications in food allergy over the past couple of years confirmed that food allergy is a major public health concern, affecting about 8% of children and 10% of adults in developed countries. The prevalence of food allergy varies around the world, with the increase being driven mainly by environmental factors, possibly together with genetic susceptibility to environmental changes. A precise diagnosis of food allergy is extremely important. Both new tests (eg, the basophil activation test) and improved optimization of information provided by existing tests (eg, the skin prick test and measurement of specific IgE level) can contribute to improving the accuracy and patients' comfort of food allergy diagnosis. Understanding the underlying immune mechanisms is fundamental to designing allergen-specific treatments that can be safe and effective in the long term. New discoveries of the immune response to food allergens, including T-cell and B-cell responses, have emerged. Novel therapeutic approaches are being trialed at various stages of development as attempts to allow for more active intervention to treat food allergy. Prevention is key to reducing the increase in prevalence. Early introduction of allergenic foods seems to be the most effective intervention, but others are being studied, and will, it is hoped, lead to modification of the epidemiologic trajectory of food allergy over time.

Food Allergen Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Patients with IgE-Mediated Food Allergy

The prevalence of allergic diseases, including food allergy, is increasing, especially in developed countries. Implementation of an elimination diet is not a sufficient therapeutic strategy in patients with food allergy, whose quality of life is significantly impaired. In recent years, new effective therapeutic strategies have been developed, such as the application of oral, sublingual, and epicutaneous immunotherapy. Oral immunotherapy is the most often applied strategy because of its effectiveness and ease of application, with an acceptable safety profile. The effectiveness of oral immunotherapy in patients with egg, cow's milk, and peanut allergy has been proven both in terms of raising of the threshold and the development of tolerance, and in some patients, the development of sustainable unresponsiveness. Although oral immunotherapy is an effective treatment for food allergy, several limitations, including a long duration and a significant rate of reported adverse events, reduces its success. Therefore, new therapeutic options, such as treatment with biologicals, either as combinations with food allergen immunotherapy or as monotherapy with the aim of improving the efficacy and safety of treatment, are being investigated.