Clinical decision support for imaging in the era of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Imaging 3.0: A scoping review

We aim to provide a comprehensive summary of the current body of literature concerning the Imaging 3.0 initiative and its implications for patient care within the field of radiology. We offer a thorough analysis of the literature pertaining to the Imaging 3.0 initiative, emphasizing the practical application of the five pillars of the program, their cost-effectiveness, and their benefits in patient management. By doing so, we hope to illustrate the impact the Imaging 3.0 Initiative can have on the future of radiology and patient care.

Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Indication Selection on Appropriateness Order Scoring for Imaging Clinical Decision Support

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess appropriateness scoring and structured order entry after the implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI) tool for analysis of free-text indications.

METHODS

Advanced outpatient imaging orders in a multicenter health care system were recorded 7 months before (March 1, 2020, to September 21, 2020) and after (October 20, 2020, to May 13, 2021) the implementation of an AI tool targeting free-text indications. Clinical decision support score (not appropriate, may be appropriate, appropriate, or unscored) and indication type (structured, free-text, both, or none) were assessed. The χ2 and multivariate logistic regression adjusting for covariables with bootstrapping were used.

RESULTS

In total, 115,079 orders before and 150,950 orders after AI tool deployment were analyzed. The mean patient age was 59.3 ± 15.5 years, and 146,035 (54.9%) were women; 49.9% of orders were for CT, 38.8% for MR, 5.9% for nuclear medicine, and 5.4% for PET. After deployment, scored orders increased to 52% from 30% (P < .001). Orders with structured indications increased to 67.3% from 34.6% (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, orders were more likely to be scored after tool deployment (odds ratio [OR], 2.7, 95% CI, 2.63-2.78; P < .001). Compared with physicians, orders placed by nonphysician providers were less likely to be scored (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.78-0.83; P < .001). MR (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.87) and PET (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.10-0.13) were less likely to be scored than CT (; P < .001). After AI tool deployment, 72,083 orders (47.8%) remained unscored, 45,186 (62.7%) with free-text-only indications.

CONCLUSIONS

Embedding AI assistance within imaging clinical decision support was associated with increased structured indication orders and independently predicted a higher likelihood of scored orders. However, 48% of orders remained unscored, driven by both provider behavior and infrastructure-related barriers.

Decreasing Duplicative Imaging: Inpatient and Emergency Medicine Abdominal Ultrasound Within 72 Hours of Abdominal CT

PURPOSE

The aim of this project was to reduce abdominal ultrasound examinations in patients who had undergone abdominal CT within 72 hours previously.

METHODS

A best practice advisory (BPA) was created in the electronic medical record to advise against the use of abdominal ultrasound in adult inpatients and emergency department patients who had undergone abdominal CT within the preceding 72 hours. Acceptable acknowledgment reasons to proceed with the order were made available if providers chose to override. Frequency of BPA firing and subsequent ordering behavior were evaluated 6 months after integration of the BPA into the electronic medical record. Chart review was conducted for 100 patients whose orders were placed through an override of the alert to determine if the ultrasound study added value and for all patients whose ultrasound studies were canceled to confirm that patient care was not compromised by omitting the ultrasound study.

RESULTS

In the first 6 months, a total of 614 inpatient and emergency department abdominal ultrasound orders triggered the BPA. A total of 16% of orders (n = 96) were canceled by the provider after the BPA, reflecting 518 overrides. The majority of retained orders were to evaluate the gallbladder (44% [227 of 518]). Chart review confirmed utility for gallbladder imaging and that the canceled ultrasound examinations would not have contributed value to patients' care.

CONCLUSIONS

A recently performed abdominal CT scan may obviate the need for inpatient and emergency department abdominal ultrasound, particularly in the setting of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury. A BPA resulted in only 16% of orders' being canceled, whereas chart review revealed a much larger opportunity to avoid duplicative imaging.

Maximizing Value While Volumes are Increasing

Radiologists are facing ever increasing volumes while trying to provide value-based care. There are several drivers of increasing volumes: increasing population size, aging population, increased utilization, gaps in evidence-based care, changes in the provider workforce, defensive medicine, and increasing case complexity. Higher volumes result in increased cognitive and systemic errors and contribute to radiologist fatigue and burnout. We discuss several strategies for mitigating high volumes including abbreviated MRI protocols, 24/7 radiologist coverage, reading room assistants, and other strategies to tackle radiologist burnout.

Radiology Research in Quality and Safety: Current Trends and Future Needs

Promoting quality and safety research is now essential for radiology as reimbursement is increasingly tied to measures of quality, patient safety, efficiency, and appropriateness of imaging. This article provides an overview of key features necessary to promote successful quality improvement efforts in radiology. Emphasis is given to current trends and future opportunities for directing research. Establishing and maintaining a culture of safety is paramount to organizations wishing to improve patient care. The correct culture must be in place to support quality initiatives and create accountability for patient care. Focused educational curricula are necessary to teach quality and safety-related skills and behaviors to trainees, staff members, and physicians. The increasingly complex healthcare landscape requires that organizations build effective data infrastructures to support quality and safety research. Incident reporting systems designed specifically for medical imaging will benefit quality improvement initiatives by identifying and learning from system errors, enhancing knowledge about safety, and creating safer systems through the implementation of standardized practices and standards. Finally, validated performance measures must be developed to accurately reflect the value of the care we provide for our patients and referring providers. Common metrics used in radiology are reviewed with focus on current and future opportunities for investigation.

Patient Recall Imaging in the Ambulatory Setting

OBJECTIVE

Recalling a patient to repeat a radiology examination is an adverse and, in certain cases, preventable event. Our objectives were to assess the rate of patient recalls for all imaging performed in the outpatient setting at our institution and to characterize the underlying reasons for the recalls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all repeat imaging requests for an inadequate initial imaging study between January 2012 and March 2015.

RESULTS

We identified 100 recall requests (mean, 2.6 requests per month), for an overall recall rate of approximately 1 in 8046 ambulatory studies and 1 in 1684 MRI studies. Nearly all recalls (98%) involved adults. A total of 95% of the recalls were for MRI studies. The most common reason for a patient recall request was an incomplete examination, making up 24% of all requests. The other causes were inadequate coverage of the area of interest (22%), protocoling errors (20%), poor imaging quality (15%), additional imaging to clarify a finding (11%), insufficient contrast visualization (7%), and incorrect patient information (1%).

CONCLUSION

We found that patient recalls for imaging in the outpatient setting at our institution are not common. When recalls did occur, they were most often related to the acquisition of MR images. Improved technologist education on MRI protocoling and enhanced communication between ordering clinicians and radiologists to clarify the purpose of imaging might reduce the need for repeat ambulatory imaging.

Same-Day Sinus and Brain CT Imaging in the Medicare Population: Are Practice Patterns Changing in Association with Medicare Policy Initiatives?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Monitoring the frequency of same-day sinus and brain CT (Outpatient Measure 14, "OP-14") is part of a recent large Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services hospital outpatient quality initiative to improve imaging efficiency. This study investigates patient-level claims data in the Medicare population focusing on where same-day sinus and brain CT imaging is performed and how the frequency of same-day studies changed with time before and during OP-14 measure program implementation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Research Identifiable Files were used to identify all sinus and brain CT examinations from 2004 through 2012 for a 5% random patient sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Overall and site of service use rates were calculated for same- and non-same-day examinations. Changes were mapped to policy initiative timetables.

RESULTS

The number of same-day sinus and brain CT studies from 2004 to 2012 increased 67% from 1.85 (95% CI, 1.78-1.91) per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries in 2004 to 3.08 (95% CI, 3.00-3.15) in 2012. The biggest driver of increased same-day studies was the emergency department setting, from 0.56 (95% CI, 0.53-0.60) per 1000 to 1.78 (95% CI, 1.72-1.84; +215.7%). Overall use of brain CT from 146.0 (95% CI, 145.1-146.9) per 1000 to 176.3 (95% CI, 175.4-177.2; +21%) and sinus CT from 12.6 (95% CI, 12.4-12.8) per 1000 to 15.4 (95% CI, 15.2-15.6; +22%) increased until 2009 and remained stable through 2012.

CONCLUSIONS

Previously increasing same-day sinus and brain CT in Medicare beneficiaries plateaued in 2009, coinciding with the implementation of targeted measures by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Same-day imaging continues to increase in the emergency department setting.

Radiology order decision support: examination-indication appropriateness assessed using 2 electronic systems

PURPOSE

The goal of the study was to determine the effects of guideline implementation strategy using 2 commercial radiology clinical decision support (CDS) systems.

METHODS

The appropriateness and insurance dispositions of MRI and CT orders were evaluated using the Medicalis SmartReq and Nuance RadPort CDS systems during 2 different 3-month periods. Logistic regression was used to compare these outcomes between the 2 systems, after adjusting for patient-mix differences.

RESULTS

Approximately 2,000 consecutive outpatient MRI and CT orders were evaluated over 2 periods of 3 months each. Medicalis scored 60% of exams as "indeterminate" (insufficient information) or "not validated" (no guidelines). Excluding these cases, Nuance scored significantly more exams as appropriate than did Medicalis (80% versus 51%, P < .001) and predicted insurance outcome significantly more often (76% versus 58%, P < .001). Only when the Medicalis "indeterminate" and "not validated" categories were combined with the high- or moderate-utility categories did the 2 CDS systems have similar performance. Overall, 19% of examinations with low-utility ratings were reimbursed. Conversely, 0.8% of examinations with high- or moderate-utility ratings were denied reimbursement.

CONCLUSIONS

The chief difference between the 2 CDS systems, and the strongest influence on outcomes, was how exams without relevant guidelines or with insufficient information were handled. Nuance augmented published guidelines with clinical best practice; Medicalis requested additional information utilizing pop-up windows. Thus, guideline implementation choices contributed to decision making and outcomes. User interface, specifically, the number of screens and completeness of indication choices, controlled CDS interactions and, coupled with guidance implementation, influenced willingness to use the CDS system.

Early Experience With Implementation of a Commercial Decision-Support Product for Imaging Order Entry

Clinical decision support platforms for imaging order entry have recently been mandated by the federal government. Little data exists outside of the convener sites on how to go about the implementation process. As an early adopter of a commercially available clinical decision support program for imaging order entry, we present our initial experience.

Optimizing Patient-centered Communication and Multidisciplinary Care Coordination in Emergency Diagnostic Imaging: A Research Agenda

Patient-centered emergency diagnostic imaging relies on efficient communication and multispecialty care coordination to ensure optimal imaging utilization. The construct of the emergency diagnostic imaging care coordination cycle with three main phases (pretest, test, and posttest) provides a useful framework to evaluate care coordination in patient-centered emergency diagnostic imaging. This article summarizes findings reached during the patient-centered outcomes session of the 2015 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference "Diagnostic Imaging in the Emergency Department: A Research Agenda to Optimize Utilization." The primary objective was to develop a research agenda focused on 1) defining component parts of the emergency diagnostic imaging care coordination process, 2) identifying gaps in communication that affect emergency diagnostic imaging, and 3) defining optimal methods of communication and multidisciplinary care coordination that ensure patient-centered emergency diagnostic imaging. Prioritized research questions provided the framework to define a research agenda for multidisciplinary care coordination in emergency diagnostic imaging.

A Large State Medicaid Outpatient Advanced Imaging Utilization Management Program

A decade of rapidly rising outpatient advanced imaging utilization ended toward the end of the past decade, with slow growth since. This has been attributed to repetitive reimbursement cuts, medical radiation exposure concerns, increasing deductibles and patient copayments, and the influence of radiology benefit management companies. State Medicaid programs have been reluctant to institute radiology benefit management preauthorization programs since the time burden for obtaining test approval could cause providers to drop out. Also, these patients may lack the knowledge to appeal denials, and medically necessary tests could be denied with adverse outcomes. Little data exist demonstrating the efficacy of such programs in decreasing utilization and cost. We report a 2-year experience with an outpatient advanced imaging prior notification program for a large state Medicaid fee-for-service population. The program did not allow any denials, but nevertheless the data reveal a large, durable decrease in advanced imaging utilization and cost.

Of mice and men: escaping the relative value unit trap

Although radiologists have kept pace with the dramatic growth of medical imaging during the past two decades through the use of PACS, digital dictation, and 3-dimensional reconstruction, radiology is approaching the point of diminishing returns. As reimbursements further decline, attempts to increase radiologists' productivity risk commoditization of the specialty. The continued evolution of US health care policy, however, presents an opportunity for radiologists, using their core competencies, to shape the future direction of medicine.

Computerized decision support in adult and pediatric critical care

Computerized decision support (CDS) is the most advanced form of clinical decision support available and has evolved with innovative technologies to provide meaningful assistance to medical professionals. Critical care clinicians are in unique environments where vast amounts of data are collected on individual patients, and where expedient and accurate decisions are paramount to the delivery of quality healthcare. Many CDS tools are in use today among adult and pediatric intensive care units as diagnostic aides, safety alerts, computerized protocols, and automated recommendations for management. Some CDS use have significantly decreased adverse events and improved costs when carefully implemented and properly operated. CDS tools integrated into electronic health records are also valuable to researchers providing rapid identification of eligible patients, streamlining data-gathering and analysis, and providing cohorts for study of rare and chronic diseases through data-warehousing. Although the need for human judgment in the daily care of critically ill patients has limited the study and realization of meaningful improvements in overall patient outcomes, CDS tools continue to evolve and integrate into the daily workflow of clinicians, and will likely provide advancements over time. Through novel technologies, CDS tools have vast potential for progression and will significantly impact the field of critical care and clinical research in the future.

Applications of justification and optimization in medical imaging: examples of clinical guidance for computed tomography use in emergency medicine

Availability, reliability, and technical improvements have led to continued expansion of computed tomography (CT) imaging. During a CT scan, there is substantially more exposure to ionizing radiation than with conventional radiography. This has led to questions and critical conclusions about whether the continuous growth of CT scans should be subjected to review and potentially restraints or, at a minimum, closer investigation. This is particularly pertinent to populations in emergency departments, such as children and patients who receive repeated CT scans for benign diagnoses. During the last several decades, among national medical specialty organizations, the American College of Emergency Physicians and the American College of Radiology have each formed membership working groups to consider value, access, and expedience and to promote broad acceptance of CT protocols and procedures within their disciplines. Those efforts have had positive effects on the use criteria for CT by other physician groups, health insurance carriers, regulators, and legislators.

Applications of justification and optimization in medical imaging: examples of clinical guidance for computed tomography use in emergency medicine

Availability, reliability, and technical improvements have led to continued expansion of computed tomography (CT) imaging. During a CT scan, there is substantially more exposure to ionizing radiation than with conventional radiography. This has led to questions and critical conclusions about whether the continuous growth of CT scans should be subjected to review and potentially restraints or, at a minimum, closer investigation. This is particularly pertinent to populations in emergency departments, such as children and patients who receive repeated CT scans for benign diagnoses. During the last several decades, among national medical specialty organizations, the American College of Emergency Physicians and the American College of Radiology have each formed membership working groups to consider value, access, and expedience and to promote broad acceptance of CT protocols and procedures within their disciplines. Those efforts have had positive effects on the use criteria for CT by other physician groups, health insurance carriers, regulators, and legislators.