MRI of the Knee and Shoulder Performed Before Radiography

Lower extremity MRI: are their requests always appropriate in France?

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim is to assess current lower extremity MRI requests' relevance with a secondary focus on the knee.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using data from the National Health Data System (SNDS), we conducted an observational study of adults (18+) who underwent lower extremity MRI between July 1 and December 31, 2021. This study included analyzing medical consultations and imaging procedures (particularly X-rays) in the 6 months before and after the index MRI, as well as medical procedures and hospitalizations related to knee procedures within 6 months post-MRI.

RESULTS

During the study period, 779,721 adults underwent lower extremity MRI, marking a 76% increase compared to a previous study conducted in 2012. General practitioners requested MRI in 70.5% of cases, often as the primary imaging modality. Notably, 52.1% of patients had not undergone lower extremity X-rays in the 6 months preceding MRI, and 13% underwent at least two MRI examinations within a year. Focusing on the knee, most patients (80%) did not undergo any outpatient medical procedure or hospitalization involving the knee within the 6 months post MRI.

CONCLUSION

In France, lower extremity MRI, particularly knee MRI, is frequently used as a first-line imaging procedure, unlike what is recommended.

KEY POINTS

Question How often are requests for lower extremity MRI examinations appropriate? Findings Lower extremity MRI is often performed as a first-line imaging procedure, even though it is not recommended. Clinical relevance The study findings underscore the importance of disseminating guidelines regarding lower extremity MRI appropriateness to increase its availability for appropriate purposes, thereby improving patient care.

Automatic Protocolling of Non-contrast Musculoskeletal MRIs Does Not Result in Increase in Patient Recall Rates for Contrast-Enhanced Studies

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Physicians spend large amounts of time on protocolling imaging studies, limiting their time spent on other essential clinical tasks. Most musculoskeletal (MSK) MRI studies are performed for the evaluation of joint pain and internal derangements and usually require no intravenous contrast. Contrast-enhanced MRI studies are performed for the evaluation of infection, suspected or established tumor, and rheumatological conditions. Protocolling all MSK MRI studies takes time away from other important tasks during the workday. Routine joint MRI scans have established set of sequences, and thus, could be scheduled and performed without special protocols by the radiologists. In a large tertiary care center like ours with multiple MRI magnets, we set up a process of automated protocoling and scheduling of non-contrast joint MRI scans ordered by referring doctors. This project's purpose was to assess the effect of this newly established process of 'automatic protocoling and scheduling' of MSK MRI scans on the rate of overlooked MRI exams that may have required contrast examinations, and on the patient recall-rate to obtain follow-up post-contrast sequences for further diagnostic characterization.

METHODS

All MSK reports of MRIs during the last two months of the years before and after the implementation of automatic protocolling (intervention) were searched for the presence of indications related to neoplasms, infections, and rheumatological conditions. For each of the three disease categories, we determined the number of MRIs obtained with and without contrast before and after the intervention. For each matching study obtained without contrast, the patient chart was reviewed for contraindications to contrast, positive final diagnosis, whether interpreting radiologist mentioned the exam being limited by lack of contrast, and recommendations for a follow-up contrast enhanced study.

RESULTS

A total of 846 MSK MRIs were performed prior to intervention and 822 MRIs were performed afterwards. Overall, 25% of the studies were performed without contrast prior to the intervention, and 31% of studies were performed without contrast afterwards (Chi square 0.07, p-value 0.79). No report contained a recommendation for contrast enhanced follow-up study before or after the intervention.

CONCLUSION

Automatic protocolling of routine MSK non-contrast MRI studies resulted in statistically insignificant, minimal increase in the overall number of non-contrast enhanced studies obtained for work up of neoplasms, infections, and rheumatological conditions. There was no increase in patient recall rate for additional post contrast sequences and the new process resulted in time savings to fellows and other physicians, being not distracted from other important tasks.

Ankle MRI and preceding radiographs: an evaluation of physician ordering practices

OBJECTIVE

Multiple guidelines have been published for appropriate imaging in patients with ankle-related symptoms which suggest radiographs as the initial imaging examination for both acute and chronic ankle abnormalities. Few studies have evaluated adherence to these imaging guidelines. This study retrospectively evaluated the utilization of ankle MRI and preceding radiographs based on ordering provider group and MRI indication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 4186 ankle MRIs performed over a 9-year period at a single institution were evaluated for the presence of preceding ankle and/or foot radiographs at two time points, within 3 months and within 6 months of the MRI examination. Ankle MRIs were then categorized based on 6 ordering provider groups and 13 MRI indications.

RESULTS

Of the 4186 MRIs evaluated, 68% had preceding radiographs within 3 months and 77% had radiographs within 6 months. Primary care, sports medicine, and podiatry had the lowest rates of preceding radiographs (73%, 68%, and 64%, respectively, within 6 months). Eighty-six percent of ankle MRIs ordered by orthopedic surgery had preceding radiographs within 6 months and 89% of ankle MRIs ordered by emergency medicine and inpatient providers had preceding radiographs. MRIs intended for evaluation of Achilles tendon or plantar fascia abnormalities were among the least likely indications to have preceding radiographs.

CONCLUSION

Based on established clinical guidelines, there was a lower-than-expected rate of obtaining preceding radiographs for ankle MRIs among most provider groups, particularly non-orthopedic outpatient providers. Additional research is needed to address the lack of adherence to clinical imaging guidelines and ensure appropriate imaging.

Impact of a Musculoskeletal "Mini-Residency" Professional Development Program on Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging Orders by Primary Care Providers

BACKGROUND

The US Department of Veterans Affairs has created a portfolio of educational programs to train primary care providers (PCPs) in the evaluation and management of common musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. Appropriate resource utilization for evaluation of knee pain, including limiting unnecessary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, is an important theme of these initiatives. The objective of this study was to report the utilization of knee MRI by PCP providers before and after the MSK education program and to determine the appropriateness of these MRI orders.

METHODS

Twenty-six PCPs participated in the MSK Mini-Residency educational program held in Salt Lake City between April 2012 and October 2014. Knee MRI orders submitted by these providers 12 months before and 12 months after their participation were reviewed. Magnetic resonance imaging orders were categorized as "inappropriate," "probably inappropriate," or "possibly appropriate," based on accepted guidelines for knee MRI utilization. Differences in the numbers of precourse and postcourse MRI orders for each of these categories were compared using Student t test.

RESULTS

Following our program, MRI orders decreased from 130 (precourse) to 93 (postcourse), a reduction of 28% ( p = 0.04). This reduction was observed entirely within the "inappropriate" and "probably inappropriate" categories; the number of orders categorized as "possibly appropriate" increased, but not significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

The MSK Mini-Residency training program was a successful educational intervention and was associated with a reduction in inappropriate knee MRI utilization for some participants, while keeping appropriate MRI utilization stable.

Does MRI Knee in Those over 50 Years with Knee Pain in Osteoarthritis Alter Management? A Retrospective Review

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a significant cause of pain and disability worldwide. Imaging provides diagnosis, prognostication, and follow-up. Radiographs are first line, useful, and inexpensive. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect additional features not seen on radiograph, but it is of questionable usefulness in the management of knee OA. Our aim was to investigate the usefulness of MRI in the workup of knee OA and whether MRI alters management in knee OA. A retrospective review was performed of consecutive MRI knees performed for knee pain in those over 50 years. Clinical information and documentation of management plan pre- and post-MRI were collected. Assessment was made whether the MRI results influenced the final management plan. Of the 222 MRI knees included for study, the majority (62.2%) had not had a recent radiograph. OA was reported in 86.9% of radiographs and 89.6% of MRI. On MRI, the most prevalent finding was tearing/abnormality of the medial meniscus, seen in 47% of MRIs overall, increasing to all in severe OA. MRI assisted with management in 9.5% of all (21/222) patients, and changed management plans in 23% of those that had documented management plans prior to the MRI (6/26 patients). MRIs can guide tailored management in knee OA and are useful for surgical planning; however, they should only be ordered in certain cases, and a radiograph should always be performed first. MRI should be considered if symptoms are not explained by OA alone or the appropriate treatment option requires MRI.

Secondary review reduced inpatient MRI orders and avoidable hospital days

INTRODUCTION

Medical centers have dramatically increased the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). At 2 large academic tertiary care centers in New York City, nearly half of inpatient MRI orders took more than 12 h to complete, delaying patient discharge and increasing avoidable hospital days. We posited that transitioning inpatient MRIs to outpatient facilities, when safe and appropriate, could reduce inpatient MRI orders and avoidable hospital days.

METHODS

We manually reviewed 59 inpatient MRI orders delayed on the estimated date of discharge (EDD). These orders were often delayed due to no standard process to escalate orders for medical reasons or no system to coordinate outpatient orders. We developed a revised workflow involving an automation platform that flagged inpatient MRI orders requested within 24 h of the EDD and emailed the care team to request a second review of the order. The care team reconsidered whether the order was (1) required for discharge, (2) non-urgent and could be converted to an outpatient order, or (3) unnecessary and could be canceled.

RESULTS

Over 9 months, the automation platform flagged 618 inpatient MRI orders, of which 53.9% (333/618) were reviewed by the care team. Among the orders, 24.0% (80/333) of reviewed orders and 12.9% (80/618) of all orders were transitioned to either outpatient or canceled orders. These transitioned orders were associated with 267 fewer avoidable hospital days and a cost savings of $199,194.

CONCLUSION

A standardized process and second review of inpatient MRI orders on the EDD can reduce inappropriate orders and more effectively use inpatient imaging resources.

PRECIS

A standardized workflow and automation platform encouraged a second review of inpatient MRI orders to reduce inappropriate orders, avoidable hospital days, and hospital costs.

Hospital Employment Of Physicians In Massachusetts Is Associated With Inappropriate Diagnostic Imaging

The transition among many US physicians from independent practice to hospital employment has raised concerns about whether employed physicians will be more inclined to refer patients for hospital-based services that are unnecessary or inappropriate. Using claims data for 2009-16, we conducted a difference-in-differences analysis to investigate whether this form of hospital-physician integration is associated with inappropriate referrals for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a widely used mode of diagnostic imaging, for three common medical conditions: lower back pain, knee pain, and shoulder pain. Study findings indicate that the odds of a patient receiving an inappropriate MRI referral increased by more than 20 percent after a physician transitioned to hospital employment. Most patients who received an MRI referral by an employed physician obtained the procedure at the hospital where the referring physician was employed. These results point to hospital-physician integration as a potential driver of low-value care.

Effects of Physician Experience, Specialty Training, and Self-referral on Inappropriate Diagnostic Imaging

BACKGROUND

Although previous research has demonstrated high rates of inappropriate diagnostic imaging, the potential influence of several physician-level characteristics is not well established.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the influence of three types of physician characteristics on inappropriate imaging: experience, specialty training, and self-referral.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of over 70,000 MRI claims submitted for commercially insured individuals. Physician characteristics were identified through a combination of administrative records and primary data collection. Multi-level modeling was used to assess relationships between physician characteristics and inappropriate MRIs.

SETTING

Massachusetts PARTICIPANTS: Commercially insured individuals who received an MRI between 2010 and 2013 for one of three conditions: low back pain, knee pain, and shoulder pain.

MEASUREMENTS

Guidelines from the American College of Radiology were used to classify MRI referrals as appropriate/inappropriate. Experience was measured from the date of medical school graduation. Specialty training comprised three principal groups: general internal medicine, family medicine, and orthopedics. Two forms of self-referral were examined: (a) the same physician who ordered the procedure also performed it, and (b) the physicians who ordered and performed the procedure were members of the same group practice and the procedure was performed outside the hospital setting.

RESULTS

Approximately 23% of claims were classified as inappropriate. Physicians with 10 or less years of experience had significantly higher odds of ordering inappropriate MRIs. Primary care physicians were almost twice as likely to order an inappropriate MRI as orthopedists. Self-referral was not associated with higher rates of inappropriate MRIs.

LIMITATIONS

Classification of MRIs was conducted with claims data. Not all self-referred MRIs could be detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Inappropriate imaging continues to be a driver of wasteful health care spending. Both physician experience and specialty training were highly associated with inappropriate imaging.

Effects of Physician Experience, Specialty Training, and Self-referral on Inappropriate Diagnostic Imaging

BACKGROUND

Although previous research has demonstrated high rates of inappropriate diagnostic imaging, the potential influence of several physician-level characteristics is not well established.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the influence of three types of physician characteristics on inappropriate imaging: experience, specialty training, and self-referral.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of over 70,000 MRI claims submitted for commercially insured individuals. Physician characteristics were identified through a combination of administrative records and primary data collection. Multi-level modeling was used to assess relationships between physician characteristics and inappropriate MRIs.

SETTING

Massachusetts PARTICIPANTS: Commercially insured individuals who received an MRI between 2010 and 2013 for one of three conditions: low back pain, knee pain, and shoulder pain.

MEASUREMENTS

Guidelines from the American College of Radiology were used to classify MRI referrals as appropriate/inappropriate. Experience was measured from the date of medical school graduation. Specialty training comprised three principal groups: general internal medicine, family medicine, and orthopedics. Two forms of self-referral were examined: (a) the same physician who ordered the procedure also performed it, and (b) the physicians who ordered and performed the procedure were members of the same group practice and the procedure was performed outside the hospital setting.

RESULTS

Approximately 23% of claims were classified as inappropriate. Physicians with 10 or less years of experience had significantly higher odds of ordering inappropriate MRIs. Primary care physicians were almost twice as likely to order an inappropriate MRI as orthopedists. Self-referral was not associated with higher rates of inappropriate MRIs.

LIMITATIONS

Classification of MRIs was conducted with claims data. Not all self-referred MRIs could be detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Inappropriate imaging continues to be a driver of wasteful health care spending. Both physician experience and specialty training were highly associated with inappropriate imaging.

Reducing the Volume of Low-Value Outpatient MRI Joint Examinations in Patients ≥55 Years of Age

Purpose:

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not beneficial in patients with joint pain and concomitant osteoarthritis (OA). We attempt to determine whether evaluation of OA via X-rays can reduce inappropriate MRI and computed tomography (CT) arthrogram use. In our jurisdiction, CT arthrograms are used as surrogate tests because of MRI wait times.

Materials and Methods:

Our intervention required patients ≥55 years of age scheduled for outpatient MRI of the knee/hip/shoulder at an urban hospital to have X-rays (weight bearing when appropriate) from within 1 year. Red flags (ie, neoplasm, infection) were identified for which MRI would be indicated regardless. Through review of radiographs on picture archiving and communication system/digital media and use of the validated Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) OA scale, radiologists assessed the presence and degree of OA. A finding of significant OA (KL > 2) without red flags would preclude MRI. Monthly averages of MRI and CT arthrogram examinations were measured 33 months before and 23 months following introduction of the intervention.

Results:

The proportion of protocoled MRI requisitions that were avoided was 21%. If extrapolated to the province of British Columbia, 2419 of 11 700 examinations could have been prevented in the past year. The average monthly number of knee/hip/shoulder MRI examinations as a percentage of total MRI examinations decreased from 4.9% to 4.3% ( P < .02) following the intervention. The average monthly number of knee/hip/shoulder CT arthrogram examinations decreased from 20.6 to 12.1 ( P < .0001).

Conclusion:

We were able to decrease the number of MRI and CT arthrogram examinations in patients ≥55 years of age with joint pain by implementing an evaluation for OA via recent X-ray imaging.

Reduction in inappropriate MRI knee studies after implementation of an appropriateness checklist: Experience at a tertiary care centre

PURPOSE

To evaluate reduction in inappropriate knee MRI requests following implementation of a mandatory knee MRI appropriateness checklist.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed at a single tertiary care centre. A knee MRI appropriateness checklist was developed based on the ACR Appropriateness Criteria and adherence from referring physicians was mandatory. Reports from 200 consecutive knee MRI studies one year prior to implementation were compared to 200 consecutive knee MRI studies following implementation. The presence of moderate or greater osteoarthritis on MRI reports was used as a marker for inappropriate knee MRIs. Patient demographics, wait times, number of knee MRIs, and number of all MRIs at our centre over a six month period post-intervention and pre-intervention were recorded. Differences between pre-intervention and post-intervention presence of moderate or greater osteoarthritis, patient demographics, wait times, and number of MRIs analyzed.

RESULTS

A significant decrease was found in moderate or greater grade osteoarthritis following intervention, decreasing from 36.5% to 20.5% (73 studies versus 41 studies, p = 0.023). Of these, the most profound decrease occurred in studies with severe osteoarthritis, with an 80 % decrease (35 studies versus 7 studies, p < 0.001). Post intervention, 48 % fewer knee MRIs were performed in the same time interval (652 studies pre-intervention versus 336 studies post intervention, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the patient demographics.

CONCLUSION

Mandatory knee MRI appropriateness checklists are associated with a significant reduction in the number of inappropriate studies performed. Follow up studies will be required to assess long-term impact in a larger population.

A Day in the Life of MRI: The Variety and Appropriateness of Exams Being Performed in Canada

Purpose

This study aimed to determine the volumes and types of magnetic resonance imaging exams being performed across Canada, common indications for the exams, and exam appropriateness using multiple evaluation tools.

Methods

Thirteen academic medical institutions across Canada participated. Data were obtained relating to a single common day, October 1, 2014. Patient demographics, type by anatomic region and indication for imaging were analysed. Each exam was assessed for appropriateness via the Canadian Association of Radiologists Referral Guidelines and the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria. The Alberta and Saskatchewan spine screening forms and the Alberta knee screening form were also used where applicable. The proportion of exams that were unscorable, appropriate, and inappropriate was determined. Exam-level results were compared between the 2 main evaluation tools.

Results

Data were obtained for 1087 relevant exams. There were 591 women and 460 men. 36 requisitions did not indicate the patient's sex. Brain exams were the most common, comprising 32.5% of the sample. Cancer was the most common indication. Overall, 87.0%–87.4% of the MR exams performed were appropriate; 6.6%–12.6% were inappropriate, based on the 2 main evaluation tools. Results differed by anatomic region; spine exams had the highest proportion, with nearly one-third of exams deemed inappropriate.

Conclusion

Variations by anatomic region indicate that focused exam request evaluation or screening methods could substantially reduce inappropriate imaging.

MRI Before Radiography for Patients With New Shoulder Conditions

PURPOSE

To assess the patterns of Appropriate Criteria application among orthopedic specialists and other fields of medicine for use of MRI and radiography and the subsequent necessity for surgical intervention.

METHODS

The hospital electronic medical record was used to identify all shoulder MRI studies at a single large urban teaching hospital between January 2, 2011, and June 30, 2011. For each study, variables collected included ordering department, patient age, patient gender, patient's self-reported race/ethnicity, whether the patient obtained surgery for an issue related to the MRI diagnosis, the type of MRI ordered, the date of pain onset, the date of x-ray (if any), and the date of the MRI.

RESULTS

A total of 475 patients who underwent shoulder MRI were included in our study. We found significant associations between a patient having had a prior x-ray and ordering department (P < .0001), male gender (P = .0005), and subjects who had subsequent surgery (P = .0006). Neither age nor race and ethnicity had an influence on x-ray before MRI. Orthopedic specialists ordering MRIs had the highest percentage of patients undergo subsequent surgery (33.3%) compared with the second-most, primary care (18.4%), and all other ordering departments (P = .0009).

CONCLUSIONS

Detailed analysis suggests that providers who do not have specific training in shoulder pathology should consider consultation with an orthopedic surgeon before ordering shoulder MRI for patients who may need additional imaging after radiography.

The incident tibiofemoral osteoarthritis with rapid progression phenotype: development and validation of a prognostic prediction rule

OBJECTIVES

No clinical prediction rules were found for estimating the likelihood of developing incident radiographic tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) with rapid progression. Such a tool would enhance prognostic capability for clinicians and researchers.

DESIGN

We used two longitudinal datasets to independently derive (Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study) and validate (Osteoarthritis Initiative) a prognostic clinical prediction rule for estimating the probability of incident rapidly progressing radiographic knee OA in the following 4-5 years. Eligible subjects had at least one knee with a Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) graded tibiofemoral joint of 0 or 1. Several potential risk factors were examined including obesity, age, knee alignment, frequent knee symptoms, contralateral knee OA and knee injury history. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess discrimination.

RESULTS

A total of 1690 subjects participated in the derivation and 2422 subjects participated in the validation of the clinical prediction rule. The multivariable model displayed good discrimination with AUC of 0.79 in the derivation dataset and 0.81 in the validation dataset.

CONCLUSIONS

Persons with contralateral knee OA, a baseline index knee OA grade of 1, higher body mass index (BMI) and higher baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities arthritis index total scores were more likely to develop K&L grade of 3 or 4 within 5 years. Frequent knee symptoms at baseline were not a significant predictor. The prediction rule and nomogram can assist clinicians in estimating the probability of rapidly progressing radiographic knee OA and the nomogram can assist researchers conducting epidemiologic studies and clinical trials.