1
|
Bluth EI, Frush DP, Oates ME, LaBerge J, Pan HY, Newhauser WD, Rosenthal SA. Medical workforce in the United States. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23 Suppl 1:e13799. [PMID: 36382354 PMCID: PMC9880972 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This section focuses on the professional workforce comprised of the primary medical specialties that utilize ionizing radiation in their practices. Those discussed include the specialties of radiology and radiation oncology, as well as the subspecialties of radiology, namely diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, nuclear radiology, and nuclear medicine. These professionals provide essential health care services, for example, the interpretation of imaging studies, the provision of interventional procedures, radionuclide therapeutic treatments, and radiation therapy. In addition, they may be called on to function as part of a radiologic emergency response team to care for potentially exposed persons following radiation events, for example, detonation of a nuclear weapon, nuclear power plant accidents, and transportation incidents. For these reasons, maintenance of an adequate workforce in each of these professions is essential to meeting the nation's future needs. Currently, there is a shortage for all physicians in the medical radiology workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward I. Bluth
- Department of RadiologyOchsner Clinic FoundationNew OrleansLouisianaUSA
| | - Donald P. Frush
- Department of RadiologyDuke UniversityDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - M. Elizabeth Oates
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of Kentucky College of MedicineLexingtonKentuckyUSA
| | - Jeanne LaBerge
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Hubert Y. Pan
- Sutter Radiation Oncology CenterSacramentoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Wayne D. Newhauser
- Department of Physics and AstronomyLouisiana State University and Mary Bird Perkins Cancer CenterBaton RougeLouisianaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to review key social justice and competitive advantage arguments for diversity in interventional radiology (IR) to substantiate the need for a more inclusive workforce. CONCLUSION. As a specialty based on innovation and flexibility of thought, IR is well positioned to be a driver of diversity and inclusion in medicine. The status quo is far from ideal. Social justice and business advantage arguments provide us with the imperative for change.
Collapse
|
3
|
Vilanilam GK, Wadhwa V, Tomblinson CM, McCarty JL, Samant RS. Trends in Neuroradiology Fellowship Match in the United States: Analysis of the 13-Year National Resident Matching Program Data. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2020; 50:831-834. [PMID: 33041160 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The neuroradiology fellowship match is conducted by the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) every year. The purpose of this study is to report the trends in neuroradiology match results from 2008 to 2020 in the United States (US) using data available from the NRMP. The fellowship match data was obtained from the NRMP archives. Data specific to programs (number of programs and filled positions) were obtained. Using the NRMP's "Charting Outcomes in the Match: Specialty Matching Service'' report, a detailed analysis of applicant characteristics broken down for each specialty, was also obtained for neuroradiology for the year 2018. Neuroradiology programs in the NRMP Match increased from 71 to 77 and the number of positions increased from 158 to 270 between 2008 and 2020. The fill rate of fellowship spots has remained steady at 75.9% in 2008 and 74.4% in 2020. The proportion of US allopathic medical graduates (US MD) amongst the filled spots decreased from 79.2% (2008) to 64.2% (2020), while the proportion of international medical graduates (IMGs) increased from 11.7% to 25.4%. US MD and IMG fill trends did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.78 and P = 0.92, respectively). US MDs had a higher number of research experiences and publications (23.2 and 26, respectively) when compared to US IMGs (5 and 7) and non-US IMGs (6.8 and 14.2). To conclude, over the last 13 years, the neuroradiology fellowship programs in the US have increased in number and expanded in size, with an almost stable fill rate of around 75%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George K Vilanilam
- Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
| | - Vibhor Wadhwa
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Courtney M Tomblinson
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Jennifer L McCarty
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rohan S Samant
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yun JH, Maldow DJ, Ahuja RS, Khan F, Gunn AJ, Hoffmann JC. Training by the Numbers: A Survey-Based Analysis of the Number of Positions Available in New Interventional Radiology Training Pathways. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2019; 50:137-140. [PMID: 31806410 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As of June 30, 2020, interventional radiology (IR) fellowships will cease to exist and will be replaced by the integrated IR, independent IR, and early specialization in IR (ESIR) pathways. The objective of this study is to determine the alignment in the number of available positions between the ESIR and independent IR pathways. METHODS An analysis was performed of 150 residency programs offering at least 1 of the 3 IR training pathways. Information regarding the most up-to-date list for integrated IR, independent IR, ESIR, and IR fellowship programs were obtained from the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR), the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS), and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) websites. A 4-question survey was distributed to residency program directors and residency program coordinators to confirm the number of positions offered in each of the training pathways at their institution. RESULTS Ninety-nine of 113 ESIR programs (87.6% response rate) reported a total of 176 approved ESIR positions. One hundred and eleven fellowship programs in the United States currently offer a total of 331 positions. Seventy-seven integrated IR programs and 48 independent IR programs offer 150 and 133 positions, respectively, for a total of 283 advanced IR training positions. DISCUSSION A substantial discrepancy currently exists with IR training pathways, as the number of available ESIR positions far outnumbers the available independent IR pathway positions. There is a continuing need for communication with residency programs and frequent reevaluation of the various IR training pathways to maintain the most accurate database.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung H Yun
- Department of Radiology, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY; Stony Brook School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY
| | - David J Maldow
- Department of Radiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY
| | - Rakesh S Ahuja
- Department of Radiology, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Faraz Khan
- Department of Radiology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY
| | - Andrew J Gunn
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Demertzis JL, Baker JC, Friedman MV, Resnik CS, Miller TT, Rubin DA. Musculoskeletal Radiology Fellowship Application and Selection Process: Perceptions of Residents, Fellows, and Fellowship Directors. Acad Radiol 2018; 25:1219-1226. [PMID: 29631928 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Revised: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
RATIONAL AND OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess resident, fellow, and fellowship director perceptions of the musculoskeletal (MSK) radiology fellowship application process. MATERIALS AND METHODS A task group constructed three surveys with questions about current and "ideal" fellowship application and selection processes. Surveys were distributed to MSK fellowship directors, who were also asked to give separate surveys to current fellows. US and Canadian radiology residency directors were asked to distribute surveys to current R3 and R4 residents. Responses were tabulated and analyzed. RESULTS Responses were received from 47 MSK fellowship directors, 73 MSK fellows, and 147 residents. Fellowship directors and fellows reported that most fellowship offers occur between July and September of the R3 year, although 19% of directors made offers as early as the R2 year. Of the 43 director respondents, 31 (72%) noted "pressure from other programs" as the main driving force behind their policies, but 28 (65%) felt that their timelines were "too early." A formal match was supported by 55% of responding fellowship directors, 57% of fellows, and 61.9% of residents, citing "fairness" as a major justification. CONCLUSIONS MSK radiology fellowship selection occurs as early as the R2 year, before many residents have had substantial exposure to different subspecialties. An "arms race" has developed with programs moving their timelines earlier in response to the actions of other programs, presumably to avoid missing the best candidates. Although a majority of respondents would support a formalized match to increase fairness, there is not universal agreement that it would be the best approach.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bundy JJ, Hage AN, Chick JFB, Gemmete JJ, Srinivasa RN, Lee E, Johnson E, Hussain J, Cline M, Patel N, Srinivasa RN. Trends in Interventional Radiology Through the Eye of the Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology: A 27-Year History. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2018; 48:353-358. [PMID: 30054029 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the quantity, manuscript types, geographic distribution of publications, and published content trends in a major interventional radiology journal over 27 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS Available publication data from the Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology was collected via Scopus from November 1990 to November 2017. Quantity, manuscript type, geographic distribution, number of citations, and publication content were analyzed. RESULTS 6925 papers were published in JVIR during the study period. The number of publications increased by 234% from an average of 103 publications/year in the first 5 years to 344 publications/year in the last 5 years. Manuscript types included 4891 original articles (70.6%), 987 letters (14.3%), 360 review articles (5.2%), 324 notes (4.7%), 167 conference papers (2.4%), 102 editorials (1.5%), 61 errata (0.9%), 23 articles in press (0.3%), and 10 short surveys (0.1%). The majority of publications originated in the United States with 3945 articles (57.0%), followed by Canada with 366 articles (5.3%), and Japan and South Korea with 360 (5.2%) and 340 articles (4.9%), respectively. As for article content, arterial disease and interventions were discussed in 2256 publications (32.6%), followed by venous (1237; 17.9%), miscellaneous (1072; 15.5%), oncology (1006; 14.5%), genitourinary (758; 10.9%), portal (337; 4.9%), neurovascular (253; 3.7%), gastrointestinal (232; 3.4%), biliary (210; 3.0%), pediatric (130; 1.9%), clinical trials (119; 1.7%), and guideline development (119; 1.7%). CONCLUSION There has been a marked increase in the number of publications in JVIR over 27 years. JVIR has shown continued growth since its inception and has strengthened its international reputation with more global research than ever before.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob J Bundy
- College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - Anthony N Hage
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | - Joseph J Gemmete
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Rajiv N Srinivasa
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Eunjee Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Evan Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jawad Hussain
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Michael Cline
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Nishant Patel
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Ravi N Srinivasa
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Evaluating current and recent fellows’ perceptions on the interventional radiology residency: Results of a United States survey. Diagn Interv Imaging 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2017.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
8
|
Hoffmann JC, Singh A, Peterkin Y, Mittal S, Coronel E, Flug J. Current Perceptions Regarding Training During the On-Call Period, the Fellowship Process, and Boards Structure: Results of a 2015 Radiology Resident National Survey. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2016; 45:361-369. [DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2016.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2016] [Accepted: 04/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|