1
|
Kelahan L, Cheng SN, Kagoma YK, Horowitz JM, Miller FH, Guo HH, Chow L. Using Online Survey Software to Enhance Radiology Learning. Acad Radiol 2021; 28:1799-1809. [PMID: 32972839 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.08.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Online educational modules can augment radiology learning by creating opportunities to interact with images in more dynamic ways than with static presentation of images in lectures or journal articles. Building these modules on an online survey platform allows for quantitative assessment and learner feedback, without requiring programming knowledge or need for new website creation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Interactive online tutorials were built on a web-based survey platform (Qualtrics, Provo, Utah) accessible by computer or mobile device to teach radiology imaging findings of selected high-morbidity diagnoses. Topics included congenital-type internal hernias (module 1), acute appendicitis in the pregnant patient (module 2), and unintentionally retained surgical instruments (RSI; module 3). Modules consisted of pretest, educational module, and post-test components. For modules 1 and 2, graphics interchange formats were utilized to show CT and MRI image stacks for the diagnosis of congenital-type internal hernias and acute appendicitis in pregnant patients, respectively. For module 3, the "Heat Map" format was chosen to showcase intraoperative radiograph cases, which allowed participants to click on the potential RSI in the image. Pre- and post-test scores were evaluated. To determine statistical significance, an alpha level of 0.05 was utilized. RESULTS Module 1 (Internal Hernia): Twenty-one radiology trainees completed the module. The mean pretest score was 3.66 (±1.13) points out of a total 6 possible points (61%), compared to 4.52 (±1.03) points on the post-test (75%). This was a statistically significant increase on the post-test of 0.87 points (95% CI [confidence interval] 0.36, 1.38), t(20) = 3.53, p= 0.002. Module 2 (MR Appendicitis): Seventeen radiology trainees completed the module. The mean pretest score was 3.18 (±1.42) points out of a total 6 possible points (53%), compared to 5.12 (±0.86) points on the post-test (85%). This was a statistically significant increase on the post-test of 1.94 points (95% CI 1.12, 2.76), t(16) = 5.00, p< 0.001. Module 3 (RSI): One hundred seven participants completed the module. The mean pretest score was 3.60 (±1.53) points out of a total 6 possible points (60%), compared to 4.54 (±1.36) points on the post-test (76%). This was a statistically significant increase on the post-test of 0.94 points (95% CI 0.67, 1.21), t(106) = 6.84, p< 0.001. CONCLUSION An online survey platform can be used to build interactive education modules. Post-test scores significantly improved from pretest scores with these educational modules.
Collapse
|
2
|
Weprin S, Crocerossa F, Meyer D, Maddra K, Valancy D, Osardu R, Kang HS, Moore RH, Carbonara U, J Kim F, Autorino R. Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review. Patient Saf Surg 2021; 15:24. [PMID: 34253246 PMCID: PMC8276389 DOI: 10.1186/s13037-021-00297-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A retained surgical item (RSI) is defined as a never-event and can have drastic consequences on patient, provider, and hospital. However, despite increased efforts, RSI events remain the number one sentinel event each year. Hard foreign bodies (e.g. surgical sharps) have experienced a relative increase in total RSI events over the past decade. Despite this, there is a lack of literature directed towards this category of RSI event. Here we provide a systematic review that focuses on hard RSIs and their unique challenges, impact, and strategies for prevention and management. METHODS Multiple systematic reviews on hard RSI events were performed and reported using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. Database searches were limited to the last 10 years and included surgical "sharps," a term encompassing needles, blades, instruments, wires, and fragments. Separate systematic review was performed for each subset of "sharps". Reviewers applied reciprocal synthesis and refutational synthesis to summarize the evidence and create a qualitative overview. RESULTS Increased vigilance and improved counting are not enough to eliminate hard RSI events. The accurate reporting of all RSI events and near miss events is a critical step in determining ways to prevent RSI events. The implementation of new technologies, such as barcode or RFID labelling, has been shown to improve patient safety, patient outcomes, and to reduce costs associated with retained soft items, while magnetic retrieval devices, sharp detectors and computer-assisted detection systems appear to be promising tools for increasing the success of metallic RSI recovery. CONCLUSION The entire healthcare system is negatively impacted by a RSI event. A proactive multimodal approach that focuses on improving team communication and institutional support system, standardizing reports and implementing new technologies is the most effective way to improve the management and prevention of RSI events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Weprin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
| | - Fabio Crocerossa
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
- Division of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Dielle Meyer
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Maddra
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
| | - David Valancy
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
| | - Reginald Osardu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
| | - Hae Sung Kang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
| | - Robert H Moore
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
| | - Umberto Carbonara
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA
- Dept of Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Fernando J Kim
- Division of Urology Denver Health Medical Center and University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Colorado, Denver, USA
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, 23298-0118, USA.
| |
Collapse
|