1
|
Hamel C, Avard B, Gorelik N, Heroux M, Mai D, Sheikh A, Vo A, Watson ML, Rakhra K. Canadian Association of Radiologists Musculoskeletal System Diagnostic Imaging Referral Guideline. Can Assoc Radiol J 2024; 75:269-278. [PMID: 37635274 DOI: 10.1177/08465371231190807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Musculoskeletal System Expert Panel consists of musculoskeletal radiologists, a family physician, a sports and exercise medicine physician, emergency medicine physicians, a patient advisor, and an epidemiologist/guideline methodologist. After developing a list of 25 musculoskeletal clinical/diagnostic scenarios, a systematic rapid scoping review was undertaken to identify systematically produced referral guidelines that provide recommendations for 1 or more of these clinical/diagnostic scenarios. Recommendations from 41 guidelines (50 publications) and contextualization criteria in the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) for guidelines framework were used to develop 124 recommendation statements across the 25 scenarios related to the evaluation of the musculoskeletal system. This guideline presents the methods of development and the recommendations for imaging in the context of musculoskeletal pain, infection, tumors, arthropathies, metabolic bone disease, stress injuries, orthopedic hardware, avascular necrosis/bone infarction, and complex regional pain syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candyce Hamel
- Canadian Association of Radiologists, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Barb Avard
- North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Natalia Gorelik
- Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Adnan Sheikh
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Kawan Rakhra
- The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mercer RW, Peter CA, Habib U, Xie J, Graeber A, Simeone FJ, Chang CY. Anterior and posterior hip osteoarthritis: prevalence and potential value of CT compared to radiographs. Skeletal Radiol 2024; 53:473-479. [PMID: 37632549 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04434-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the added value of computed tomography (CT) to identify severe hip osteoarthritis (OA). MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective query of all cases of hip or knee arthroplasty planning CTs between January 2018 and March 2022 was performed. Age, sex, and symptoms were collected from the medical record. CTs were evaluated for the degree of osteoarthritis and classified using an adapted Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system in the anterior, posterior, superior, and superomedial hip. Frontal hip or pelvis radiographs within 1 year of the CT were also graded. RESULTS There were 265 eligible hips in 178 subjects, age 66 ± 11 (range 31-93) years, with 85/178 (48%) males and 93/178 (52%) females, and 127/265 (48%) right and 138/265 (52%) left hips. The posterior hip joint was the most common location for grade 2/3 OA (20%), followed by superior hip joint (14%). Anterior or posterior grade 2/3 OA occurred concurrently with superior or superomedial grade 2/3 OA in 32/68 (47%) of hips. Grade 2/3 OA was detected on CT more commonly than on XR both in the superior (14 vs 8.6%, P = 0.0016) and superomedial (8.7 vs 4.8%, P = 0.016) hip joint. Of the 71 symptomatic hips, 22 (31%) hips demonstrated either anterior and/or posterior grade 2/3 OA on CT, and 9 (9/22, 41%) of these hips had superior or superomedial grade 0/1 OA. CONCLUSION CT may be warranted when the patient has pain suggestive of osteoarthritis not detected on radiographs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald W Mercer
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey 6E, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Cynthia Assimta Peter
- Department of Radiology, Sengkang General Hospital, East Way, Sengkang, 110, Singapore
| | - Ukasha Habib
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey 6E, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Juliana Xie
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey 6E, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Adam Graeber
- Department of Radiology, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Drive, Fort Sam Houston, TX, 78234, USA
| | - F Joseph Simeone
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey 6E, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Connie Y Chang
- Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey 6E, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mourad C, Vande Berg B. Osteoarthritis of the hip: is radiography still needed? Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52:2259-2270. [PMID: 36538067 PMCID: PMC10509135 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04270-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Revised: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis (OA) is based on clinical arguments, and medical imaging is obtained to confirm the diagnosis and rule out other possible sources of pain. Conventional radiographs are recommended as the first line imaging modality to investigate chronic hip pain. They should be obtained in a rigorous technique that includes an antero-posterior (AP) radiograph of the pelvis. The choice of the appropriate lateral view depends on the clinical indication, Lequesne's false profile being valuable in the assessment of OA. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more sensitive to detect joint effusion/synovitis, cartilage, labral, and bone marrow lesions. However, structural joint changes are frequent in asymptomatic population and neither radiographs nor MRI have shown a good correlation with pain and functional impairment. MRI seems to be more suitable than radiographs as a biomarker for clinical trials addressing early OA. The absence of a validated MR biomarker of early OA, together with issues related to machine availability and MRI protocol repeatability, prevent the widespread use of MRI in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charbel Mourad
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hôpital Libanais Geitaoui CHU, Beyrouth, 1100, Achrafieh, Lebanon.
| | - Bruno Vande Berg
- Department of Radiology, Cliniques CHC Montlégia, Boulevard Patience Et Beaujonc 2, 4000, Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Henry-Blake C, Marshall M, Treadwell K, Parmar S, Higgs J, Edwards JJ, Peat G. The use of plain radiography in diagnosing osteoarthritis: A systematic review and time trend analysis. Musculoskeletal Care 2023; 21:462-477. [PMID: 36426659 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) suggest there is no role for routine radiography in the diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA). It is not known how consistent this recommendation is across international guidelines, or the impact of UK guidance on domestic OA X-ray request rates. METHODS A systematic search identified guideline recommendations on the role of radiography in OA diagnosis. Full texts underwent dual screening and appraisal using the AGREE II tool. A narrative synthesis was performed. Consultation data were extracted from a UK primary care database: the Consultations in Primary Care Archives (CiPCA). The annual proportion of X-ray requests per 100 OA consulters from 2000 to 2012 were calculated. Joinpoint regression analysis examined if there were changes in the trend of X-ray request rates and compared these with the publication dates of UK guidelines. RESULTS Eighteen evidence-based OA guidelines were included in the review. Eleven recommended a clinical diagnosis of OA without radiographic confirmation. Seven recommended routine radiography; these guidelines were predominantly for radiologists. A mean of 17.3 X-rays per 100 patients were requested in patients consulting for OA per year between 2000 and 2012. A statistically significant reduction in X-ray request rates was seen in 2003. CONCLUSION Recommendations on the role of radiography in OA vary between medical specialty and countries. UK guidelines appear to have had a limited impact on X-ray request rates in OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kane Treadwell
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Simran Parmar
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Jordan Higgs
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - John J Edwards
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - George Peat
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Friedman JM, Diaz LE, Roemer FW, Guermazi A. Imaging of common hip pathologies in runners. Jpn J Radiol 2023; 41:488-499. [PMID: 36607548 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-022-01381-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Running is an increasingly popular sport and form of exercise. Because of the importance of the hip in the biomechanics involved with running, forming the primary connection between the axial and appendicular skeleton of the lower extremities, accurate diagnosis and reporting of hip pathology are vital for appropriate management. This review provides an overview of the most common hip pathologies and injuries encountered in runners. Radiologic studies, primarily conventional radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide useful diagnostic information and should be used in combination with clinical findings to help guide therapeutic management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Friedman
- Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, 820 Harrison Avenue, FGH Building, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
| | - Luis E Diaz
- Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, 820 Harrison Avenue, FGH Building, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Frank W Roemer
- Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, 820 Harrison Avenue, FGH Building, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.,Department of Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ali Guermazi
- Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, 820 Harrison Avenue, FGH Building, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mank VM, Barranco-Trabi J, Mank JK, Roberts J, Newman DP. A Case Study of Chronic Iliopsoas Tendinopathy and Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction Masquerading As Pelvic Girdle Pain. Cureus 2021; 13:e15719. [PMID: 34290919 PMCID: PMC8288589 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Pain related to pregnancy can occur anytime between conception to the postpartum period. Pregnancy and the following months after birth are a time of physical change to the woman’s body, with significant hormonal effects. We present a case of a young female with chronic pain several years after her second pregnancy that presented a diagnostic challenge. She was initially diagnosed with persistent pelvic girdle pain (PGP) type 2, responded somewhat to appropriately targeted pelvic floor therapy, with a plateau in her progress. The diagnosis was revised to PGP type 4, with some improvement in pain with customized therapy. Her treatment again changed with a focus on sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction and iliopsoas tendinopathy with excellent and complete resolution of her pain. The overlapping nature of these diagnoses caused a significant challenge in creating a tailored physical therapy approach to her pain that eventually led to her final diagnosis being one of exclusion. Treatment was focused on optimization of joint mobility and tissue lengthening, with the resolution of her pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria M Mank
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey K Mank
- Department of Biology, University of New England, Biddeford, USA
| | - Jefferson Roberts
- Department of Rheumatology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, USA
| | - David P Newman
- Pain Management-Physiotherapy, Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hawk C, Whalen W, Farabaugh RJ, Daniels CJ, Minkalis AL, Taylor DN, Anderson D, Anderson K, Crivelli LS, Cark M, Barlow E, Paris D, Sarnat R, Weeks J. Best Practices for Chiropractic Management of Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline. J Altern Complement Med 2020; 26:884-901. [PMID: 32749874 PMCID: PMC7578188 DOI: 10.1089/acm.2020.0181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) through a broad-based consensus process on best practices for chiropractic management of patients with chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. Design: CPG based on evidence-based recommendations of a panel of experts in chronic MSK pain management. Methods: Using systematic reviews identified in an initial literature search, a steering committee of experts in research and management of patients with chronic MSK pain drafted a set of recommendations. Additional supportive literature was identified to supplement gaps in the evidence base. A multidisciplinary panel of experienced practitioners and educators rated the recommendations through a formal Delphi consensus process using the RAND Corporation/University of California, Los Angeles, methodology. Results: The Delphi process was conducted January-February 2020. The 62-member Delphi panel reached consensus on chiropractic management of five common chronic MSK pain conditions: low-back pain (LBP), neck pain, tension headache, osteoarthritis (knee and hip), and fibromyalgia. Recommendations were made for nonpharmacological treatments, including acupuncture, spinal manipulation/mobilization, and other manual therapy; modalities such as low-level laser and interferential current; exercise, including yoga; mind-body interventions, including mindfulness meditation and cognitive behavior therapy; and lifestyle modifications such as diet and tobacco cessation. Recommendations covered many aspects of the clinical encounter, from informed consent through diagnosis, assessment, treatment planning and implementation, and concurrent management and referral. Appropriate referral and comanagement were emphasized. Conclusions: These evidence-based recommendations for a variety of conservative treatment approaches to the management of common chronic MSK pain conditions may advance consistency of care, foster collaboration between provider groups, and thereby improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Hawk
- Texas Chiropractic College, Pasadena, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David Paris
- VA Northern CA Health Care System, Redding, CA, USA
| | - Richard Sarnat
- Advanced Medicine Integration Group, L.P., Columbus, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shah A, Nassri M, Kay J, Simunovic N, Mascarenhas VV, Andrade AJ, Marin-Peña ÓR, Ayeni OR. Intraoperative radiation exposure in hip arthroscopy: a systematic review. Hip Int 2020; 30:267-275. [PMID: 31766894 DOI: 10.1177/1120700019887362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Fluoroscopy is used in hip arthroscopy (HA) for portal placement, instrument localisation, and guidance in bony resection. The recent increase in arthroscopic hip procedures may place patients and surgeons at risk for increased radiation exposure and radiation-induced complications. The purpose of the current systematic review was to assess intraoperative radiation exposure in HA. The systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines; inclusion criteria were studies assessing radiation exposure in HA. 9 studies including 994 patients were included. Mean age was 38.6 years and 48% (436 of 906) were female. Mean time of fluoroscopy exposure was 0.58 minutes. Dose area product was 129.5 cGycm2. Mean intraoperative absorbed radiation dose studies was 12.6 mGy. Mean intraoperative effective dose was 0.48 mSv. The mean occupational exposure to the surgeon per case was 0.0031 mSv. Higher patient body mass index (BMI) correlated to greater patient effective and cumulative dose (p < 0.05, r = 0.404), and greater occupational exposure (p < 0.001, r = 0.460). Increasing surgeon experience decreased fluoroscopy time (p = 0.039) and radiation dose (p = 0.002). Radiation dose and effective dose were well under the thresholds for deterministic effects (2 Gy) and annual radiation exposure for occupational workers (20 mSv). Intraoperative radiation exposure to patients and surgeons is within acceptable annual radiation limits. Ensuring careful selection of perioperative imaging modalities, proper protective shielding, specifically the use of leaded eyeglasses, and optimal C-arm positioning are key strategies to reduce radiation exposure to patients and surgeons alike.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Shah
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mohammed Nassri
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Kay
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole Simunovic
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Vasco V Mascarenhas
- Musculoskeletal Imaging Unit, Department of Radiology, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Óliver R Marin-Peña
- Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Department, University Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
| | - Olufemi R Ayeni
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Performance of a Deep Learning Algorithm in Detecting Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head on Digital Radiography: A Comparison With Assessments by Radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213:155-162. [PMID: 30917021 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.20817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to compare the sensitivity of a deep learning (DL) algorithm with the assessments by radiologists in diagnosing osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) using digital radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We performed a two-center, retrospective, noninferiority study of consecutive patients (≥ 16 years old) with a diagnosis of ONFH based on MR images. We investigated the following four datasets of unilaterally cropped hip anteroposterior radiographs: training (n = 1346), internal validation (n = 148), temporal external test (n = 148), and geographic external test (n = 250). Diagnostic performance was measured for a DL algorithm, a less experienced radiologist, and an experienced radiologist. Noninferiority analyses for sensitivity were performed for the DL algorithm and both radiologists. Subgroup analysis for precollapse and postcollapse ONFH was done. RESULTS. Overall, 1892 hips (1037 diseased and 855 normal) were included. Sensitivity and specificity for the temporal external test set were 84.8% and 91.3% for the DL algorithm, 77.6% and 100.0% for the less experienced radiologist, and 82.4% and 100.0% for the experienced radiologist. Sensitivity and specificity for the geographic external test set were 75.2% and 97.2% for the DL algorithm, 77.6% and 75.0% for the less experienced radiologist, and 78.0% and 86.1% for the experienced radiologist. The sensitivity of the DL algorithm was noninferior to that of the assessments by both radiologists. The DL algorithm was more sensitive for precollapse ONFH than the assessment by the less experienced radiologist in the temporal external test set (75.9% vs 57.4%; 95% CI of the difference, 4.5-32.8%). CONCLUSION. The sensitivity of the DL algorithm for diagnosing ONFH using digital radiography was noninferior to that of both less experienced and experienced radiologist assessments.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lesions of Ligamentum Teres: Diagnostic Performance of MRI and MR Arthrography—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 211:W52-W63. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.19198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
11
|
Mohan HK, Strobel K, van der Bruggen W, Gnanasegaran G, Kampen WU, Kuwert T, Van den Wyngaert T, Paycha F. The role of hybrid bone SPECT/CT imaging in the work-up of the limping patient: a symptom-based and joint-oriented review. Eur J Hybrid Imaging 2018; 2:8. [PMID: 29782592 PMCID: PMC5954706 DOI: 10.1186/s41824-018-0026-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
A vast spectrum of lower limb bone and joint disorders (hip, knee, ankle, foot) present with a common clinical presentation: limping. Too often this symptom generates an inefficient cascade of imaging studies. This review attempts to optimise the diagnostic effectiveness of bone scintigraphy using the hybrid SPECT/CT technique in relation to the diagnostic clues provided by other imaging modalities, discusses the appropriate clinical indications, optimal scintigraphic procedures and illustrates updated image pattern-oriented reporting. Frequent lower limb bone and joint pathologies that can now be reliably diagnosed using hybrid bone SPECT/CT imaging will be reviewed. Bone SPECT/CT can be an effective problem-solving tool in patients with persistent limping when careful history taking, clinical examination, and first-line imaging modalities fail to identify the underlying cause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H K Mohan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Bengaluru, India
| | - K Strobel
- 2Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - W van der Bruggen
- 3Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Slingeland Hospital, Doetinchem, The Netherlands
| | - G Gnanasegaran
- 4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - W U Kampen
- Nuclear Medicine Spitalerhof, Hamburg, Germany
| | - T Kuwert
- 6Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - T Van den Wyngaert
- 7Department of Nuclear Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.,8Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - F Paycha
- 9Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|