An assessment of patient preference and adherence to treatment with Wellbutrin SR: a web-based survey

Effectiveness and Tolerability of Korean Red Ginseng Augmentation in Major Depressive Disorder Patients with Difficult-to-treat in Routine Practice

Objective

: To test clinical effectiveness and tolerability of Korean Red Ginseng augmentation (RGA) in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients with difficult-to-treat.

Methods

Thirty six patients were enrolled in this 6 weeks, prospective, clinical trial. Rating scales were MontgomeryÅsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Patient Health Questionnaire-15, Clinical Global Impression-improvement (CGI-I), and Patient Satisfaction Score. The primary endpoint was a remission rate measured by MADRS score at the end of study (≤ 10). Clinical outcomes and tolerability were assessed at baseline, week 2, and week 6.

Results

Among 36 patients, 26 patients completed the study and 28 patients had post-baseline visit data. The remission rate by MADRS score was 39.3% (11/28) and 57.1% by CGI-I scores of 1 or 2 at the end of the study. The mean change of MADRS score was significantly decreased by 44.4% from baseline to the end of study. The most frequent adverse events were headache (7/28, 25.0%) during the study.

Conclusion

Our study indicates the putative effectiveness and tolerability of RGA for treating MDD with difficult-to-treat in clinical practice. However, adequately powered, randomized, controlled trials will be needed to confirm these results.

Adherence and dosing interval of subcutaneous antitumour necrosis factor biologics among patients with inflammatory arthritis: analysis from a Canadian administrative database

OBJECTIVES

Subcutaneous tumour necrosis factor alpha TNFαinhibitors (SC-TNFis) such as golimumab (GLM), adalimumab (ADA), etanercept (ETA) and certolizumab pegol (CZP) have been used for many years for the treatment of inflammatory arthritis. Non-adherence to therapy is an important modifiable factor that may compromise patient outcomes. The aim of this analysis was to compare adherence and dosing interval of SC-TNFis in the treatment of people with inflammatory arthritis.

DESIGN

We used the IMS Brogan database combining both Canadian private and public drug plan databases of Ontario and Quebec. Target drugs included SC-TNFis for inflammatory arthritis. The index period was from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2012 and patients were followed for 24 months through 30 June 2014. Inclusion criteria were adult patients newly prescribed a SC-TNFis with at least three prescriptions and retained on therapy at 24 months.Dosing regimens as per the product monographs were used to compare actual versus expected drug utilisation. The mean possession ratio was used as a marker for adherence. Patients who scored >80% were considered adherent. The average days between units was estimated by taking the total days on therapy and divided by the number of units the patient received.

RESULTS

4035 patients were included: 683 (16.9%), 1400 (34.7%), 1765 (43.7%) and 187 (4.6%) were treated with GLM, ADA, ETA and CZP, respectively. The proportion of adherent patients in the GLM cohort (n=595/683, 87%, p<0.0001) was greater compared with ADA (n=1044/1400, 75%), ETA (n=1285/1765, 73%) and CZP-treated patients (132/187, 71%). In addition, the number of patients receiving biological drug at a shorter dosing interval was similar between cohorts, and was 5%, 6%, 12% and 4% in GLM (≤26 days), ADA (≤12 days), ETA (≤6 days) and CZP-treated patients (≤12 days), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-life administrative database, GLM had better adherence compared with other SC-TNFis.

Age-related trends in injection site reaction incidence induced by the tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors etanercept and adalimumab: the Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system, 2004-2015

Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors are increasingly being used as treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the administration of these drugs carries the risk of inducing injection site reaction (ISR). ISR gives rise to patient stress, nervousness, and a decrease in quality of life (QoL). In order to alleviate pain and other symptoms, early countermeasures must be taken against this adverse event. In order to improve understanding of the risk factors contributing to the induction of ISR, we evaluated the association between TNF-α inhibitors and ISR by applying a logistic regression model to age-stratified data obtained from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The FAERS database contains 7,561,254 reports from January 2004 to December 2015. Adjusted reporting odds ratios (RORs) (95% Confidence Intervals) were obtained for interaction terms for age-stratified groups treated with etanercept (ETN) and adalimumab (ADA). The adjusted RORs for ETN* ≥ 70 and ADA* ≥ 70 groups were the lowest among the age-stratified groups undergoing the respective monotherapies. Furthermore, we found that crude RORs for ETN + methotrexate (MTX) combination therapy and ADA + MTX combination therapy were lower than those for the respective monotherapies. This study was the first to evaluate the relationship between aging and ISR using the FAERS database.

Adjunctive 5-Hydroxytryptophan Slow-Release for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Clinical and Preclinical Rationale

Serotonin transporter (SERT) inhibitors treat depression by elevating brain extracellular 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT_Ext). However, only one-third of patients respond adequately. Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a major unmet need. Interestingly, elevating 5-HT_Ext beyond what is achieved by a SERT inhibitor appears to treat TRD. Adjunctive administration of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) safely elevates 5-HT_Ext beyond the SERT inhibitor effect in humans; however, 5-HTP cannot be a clinically viable drug because of its poor pharmacokinetics. A slow-release (SR) delivery mode would be predicted to overcome the pharmacokinetic limitations of 5-HTP, substantially enhancing the pharmacological action and transforming 5-HTP into a clinically viable drug. Animal studies bear out this prediction. Thus, adjunct 5-HTP SR could be an important new treatment for TRD. Here, we review the clinical and preclinical evidence for this treatment.

Utilization and adherence patterns of subcutaneously administered anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment among rheumatoid arthritis patients

BACKGROUND

Adherence to therapy is a key requirement underlying achievement of clinical outcomes in randomized controlled drug registration trials. In postmarketing studies, comparison of adherence among therapies can become more complicated when drug dosing and administration schedules differ or when methods used to measure adherence are not consistently applied.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this exploratory study was to investigate a broad range of utilization and adherence outcomes associated with subcutaneous biologic treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) exhibiting ≥2 claims with an RA diagnosis (code 714.x), at least 24 months of continuous medical and pharmacy eligibility, and 30-day supplies of adalimumab, etanercept, or golimumab were selected from the Optum Insight Clinformatics database. Adherence and utilization measures were calculated and compared across treatment groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1532 adalimumab, 2099 etanercept, and 261 golimumab patients met inclusion criteria. Compared with both adalimumab and etanercept patients, golimumab patients were significantly more likely to have a medication possession ratio of ≥0.80 (82% vs 71% vs 62%; P < 0.001) and significantly less likely to have ≥4 late medication refills (6.9% vs 17.7% vs 26.1%; P < 0.001 for all). Etanercept patients had significantly greater refill intervals (37.7 vs 34.9 and 35.1 days) and had the lowest proportion of adherent fills (70% vs 77% and 75%) compared with both golimumab and adalimumab patients (P < 0.001 for all). Bivariate effects were reproduced in multivariate models that controlled for treatment duration.

CONCLUSIONS

A number of statistically significant medication adherence differences were observed among golimumab, adalimumab, and etanercept patients in treatment for RA. Overall, golimumab patients appeared to be the most adherent group. Findings may be partially attributable to golimumab patients' likely increased disease severity, their prior experience with biologic medication, or golimumab's once-monthly dosing schedule, which requires fewer administrations than both adalimumab and etanercept.

Intention-to-treat analyses and missing data approaches in pharmacotherapy trials for alcohol use disorders

OBJECTIVES

Intention to treat (ITT) is an analytic strategy for reducing potential bias in treatment effects arising from missing data in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Currently, no universally accepted definition of ITT exists, although many researchers consider it to require either no attrition or a strategy to handle missing data. Using the reports of a large pool of RCTs, we examined discrepancies between the types of analyses that alcohol pharmacotherapy researchers stated they used versus those they actually used. We also examined the linkage between analytic strategy (ie, ITT or not) and how missing data on outcomes were handled (if at all), and whether data analytic and missing data strategies have changed over time.

DESIGN

Descriptive statistics were generated for reported and actual data analytic strategy and for missing data strategy. In addition, generalised linear models determined changes over time in the use of ITT analyses and missing data strategies.

PARTICIPANTS

165 RCTs of pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorders.

RESULTS

Of the 165 studies, 74 reported using an ITT strategy. However, less than 40% of the studies actually conducted ITT according to the rigorous definition above. Whereas no change in the use of ITT analyses over time was found, censored (last follow-up completed) and imputed missing data strategies have increased over time, while analyses of data only for the sample actually followed have decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies in reporting versus actually conducting ITT analyses were found in this body of RCTs. Lack of clarity regarding the missing data strategy used was common. Consensus on a definition of ITT is important for an adequate understanding of research findings. Clearer reporting standards for analyses and the handling of missing data in pharmacotherapy trials and other intervention studies are needed.

Depression Treatment Non-adherence and its Psychosocial Predictors: Differences between Young and Older Adults?

Depression is a common disease among young and older adults. Although it can be treated, non-adherence is very common among individuals of different ages. The aim of the present paper is to review and summarize research findings regarding depression among young and older adults, with a special focus on the phenomenon of treatment non-adherence among young and older adults with depression. The first section of the review focuses on describing the characteristics of depression in young and older adults. The second section focuses on treatment non-adherence of young and older adults, the prevalence of this phenomenon, and its consequences. The third section focuses on several factors (illness beliefs, treatment beliefs, self-stigma, and self-esteem) that were identified as having a significant association with treatment non-adherence of individuals with depression, with special attention focused on age differences. Results of the review of the literature reveal that research in the area of depression treatment non-adherence and its predictors among young and older adults has received, to date, very minor and limited attention. Thus, there is a need to expand the current body of knowledge and promote future interventions geared towards the unique characteristics of depression among young and older adults, in order to increase their treatment adherence.

Impact of reducing dosing frequency on adherence to oral therapies: a literature review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of reduced frequency of oral therapies from multiple-dosing schedules to a once-daily (OD) dosing schedule on adherence, compliance, persistence, and associated economic impact.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed based on relevant articles identified from a comprehensive literature review using MEDLINE® and Embase®. The review included studies assessing adherence with OD, twice-daily (BID), thrice-daily (TID), and four-times daily (QID) dosing schedules and costs associated with optimal/suboptimal adherence among patients with acute and chronic diseases. Effect estimates across studies were pooled and analyzed using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect model.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies met inclusion criteria, and meta-analyzable data were available from 13 studies. The overall results indicated that OD schedules were associated with higher adherence rates (odds ratio [OR] 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80-5.23; P < 0.001 for OD versus > OD dosing) and compliance rates (OR 3.50, 95% CI 1.73-7.08; P < 0.001 for OD versus > OD dosing); persistence rates showed the same direction but were not statistically significant (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.62-3.29; P = 0.405 for OD versus BID dosing). Results for each of the conditions were consistent with those observed overall with respect to showing the benefits of less frequent dosing. From a health economic perspective, higher adherence rates with OD relative to multiple dosing in a number of conditions were consistently associated with corresponding lower costs of health care resources utilization.

CONCLUSION

Current meta-analyses suggested that across acute and chronic disease states, reducing dosage frequency from multiple dosing to OD dosing may improve adherence to therapies among patients. Improving adherence may result in subsequent decreases in health care costs.

Why is greater medication adherence associated with better outcomes

Background

Previous studies found an association of greater adherence to placebo medication with better outcomes. The present study tested whether this association was explained by any of the following factors: 1) adherence to other medications, 2) healthcare behaviors, 3) disease risk, or 4) predicted degree of adherence. Data included information on more than 800 risk factors from 27,347 subjects in two randomized controlled trials of hormone therapy in the Women's Health Initiative.

Results

Greater adherence to placebo was not associated with colon cancer but was substantially and significantly associated with several diverse outcomes: death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and breast cancer. Adherence to hormone therapy was only weakly associated with outcomes. The WHI risk factors only poorly predicted degree of adherence, R² < 4%. No underlying factors accounted for the association between placebo adherence and outcome.

Conclusion

The results suggest that adherence to placebo is a marker for important risk factors that were not measured by WHI. Once identified these risk factors may be used to increase the validity of observational studies of medical treatment by reducing unmeasured confounding.

Sociodemographic and clinical predictors of compliance with antidepressants for depressive disorders: systematic review of observational studies

BACKGROUND

The literature shows that compliance with antidepressant treatment is unsatisfactory. Several personal and disease-related variables have been shown to be related to compliance behavior. The objective of this study was to review the literature about sociodemographic and clinical predictors of compliance in patients with depressive disorders.

METHODS

The Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, PsycInfo, and Cinahl databases were searched until May 2012. Studies that analyzed sociodemographic and clinical predictors or correlates of compliance in patients with depressive disorder were included. A quantitative synthesis was not performed because of the heterogeneity and availability of the data reported. For similar reasons, the results were not classified according to the different phases of treatment. The search was limited to studies published in English and Spanish.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The most consistent associations with compliance were found for age (older patients showed more compliance) and race (white patients were more likely to adhere to treatment than minority ethnic groups). Few studies assessed clinical factors, and the most plausible predictors of compliance were certain comorbidities and substance abuse. Severity of depression did not play an important role in predicting compliance.

CONCLUSION

The impact of the variables studied on compliance behavior appeared to be inconsistent. Identifying potential predictors of compliance with antidepressant treatment is important, both for the routine practice of the mental health professional and for refining interventions to enhance adherence and target them to specific populations at risk of noncompliance.

Patient adherence to prescribed medication instructions for dyspepsia: the DIAMOND-study

BACKGROUND

Insight into patient adherence is needed to enable an effect evaluation of medication for dyspepsia.

OBJECTIVES

Adherence was explored by investigating two adherence outcome measures (completeness and intake fidelity) using data from the DIAMOND-study.

METHODS

The DIAMOND-study is a pragmatic RCT comparing a 'step-up' with a 'step-down' treatment strategy. In step 1 participants (n =653) were instructed to use five pills/day for maximally 30 days: an antacid 4dd plus a placebo 1dd ('step-up') or a proton pump inhibitor 1dd plus a placebo 4dd ('step-down'). If the complaints persisted, step 2 was started (H(2)-receptor antagonist 2dd), and subsequently step 3 (five pills/day, placebo and verum vice versa from step 1). Completeness was assessed by pill counts, intake fidelity by patient questionnaires measuring the degree to which patients adhered to specific instructions concerning timing, frequency, dose and way of intake.

RESULTS

In step 1, patients used on average 3.9 pills/day (78% of the prescribed doses), in step 2, 1.7 pills/day (85%) and in step 3, 3.6 pills/day (72%). For the four times daily pills, half of the patients used less than 80% of the prescribed pills per day. This was one third of the patients for the twice daily pills and one quarter for the once daily pills. There were no completeness differences between active or placebo medication and no differences between the study arms. As regards intake fidelity, 70% of the patients made one or more errors in the medication intake.

CONCLUSION

There is room for improvement in adherence rates for dyspepsia medication.

Patient preferences and healthcare outcomes: an ecological perspective

This article examines the nature of patients' preferences for healthcare and whether clinician accommodation of patient preferences influences health outcomes. First, we provide a conceptualization of patient preferences along with their key attributes. Second, we review research on the relationship between health outcomes and patient preferences for treatments and for the process of care (e.g., preferred involvement in decision-making). Third, following a critique of this literature, we present an ecological model of patient preferences that, while acknowledging that patient preferences may emerge from various contexts (e.g., family or media exposure), we focus on the important role that clinical encounters and patients' health-related experiences play in the elicitation and construction of patient preferences. Fourth, we propose two pathways, one behavioral (adherence) and the other psychological (sense of autonomy or satisfaction with decision), through which meeting patient preferences could lead to better health outcomes. Fifth, we discuss how preferences can be elicited and clarified through patient-centered conversations. We conclude with implications for future research and clinical practice.

Treatment satisfaction and persistence among postmenopausal women on osteoporosis medications: 12-month results from POSSIBLE US™

SUMMARY

Women in POSSIBLE US™ who expressed greater treatment satisfaction at study entry were more likely to persist with osteoporosis therapy over a 1-year period. Lower satisfaction among women with moderate/severe side effects increased the risk of discontinuation/switching by 67%. Treatment satisfaction and side effect experience influence osteoporosis medication adherence.

INTRODUCTION

Non-adherence is common among women using postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) medications. We describe the association between treatment satisfaction, measured with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), and the risk of discontinuation/switching PMO medications using patient-reported data from a large, longitudinal cohort study.

METHODS

Data from 2,405 participants in the Prospective Observational Scientific Study Investigating Bone Loss Experience (POSSIBLE US™) Study were evaluated. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for the association between treatment satisfaction at study entry and self-reported discontinuation/switching of pharmacologic PMO medications over a 1-year follow-up period. Logistic regression was used to evaluate relationships between treatment satisfaction, lifestyle behaviors, and compliance with bisphosphonate dosing instructions.

RESULTS

Median TSQM scores were highest (indicating greatest satisfaction) for the side effects domain [n = 1,182; median = 87.5 (Q1 = 75.0, Q3 = 100.0)] and lowest for global satisfaction [n = 2,340; median = 64.0 (Q1 = 55.7, Q3 = 77.7)]. Median scores decreased for the side effects and global satisfaction domains as patient-reported side effect severity increased. Women with higher satisfaction were less likely to discontinue/switch medications than women with lower scores (adjusted HRs for convenience 0.73, 95% CI = 0.63-0.85; effectiveness 0.82, 95% CI = 0.70-0.97; and global satisfaction 0.73, 95% CI = 0.63-0.85). Lower treatment satisfaction was particularly influential among women who reported moderate/severe side effects (HR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.37-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower treatment satisfaction was associated with a 22% (1/0.82) to 67% (1/0.60) increased risk of discontinuation/switching osteoporosis medication during 1 year of follow-up.

Do we prescribe what patients prefer? Pilot study to assess patient preferences for medication regimen characteristics

BACKGROUND

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate patients' self-reported attitudes towards medication-related factors known to impair adherence and to assess their prevalence in ambulatory care as an essential prerequisite to improve patient adherence.

METHODS

We conducted a face-to-face interview with 110 primary care patients maintained on at least one drug. For each drug, the patient was asked to specify medication-related factors of interest, ie, dosage form, dosage interval, required relationship with food intake, and the planned time of day for intake, and to rate the individual relevance of each prevalent parameter on a three-point Likert scale (discriminating between prefer, neutral, and dislike).

RESULTS

Tablets with a once-daily dosage frequency were the most preferred dosage form, with a high prevalence in the ambulatory setting. Drug intake in the morning and evening were most preferred, and drug intake at noon was least preferred, but also had a low prevalence in contrast with drug intake independent of meals that was most preferred. Interestingly, only one quarter (26.4%) of all the patients were able to indicate clear preferences or dislikes.

CONCLUSION

When patients are asked to specify their preferences for relevant medication regimen characteristics, they clearly indicated regimens that have been associated with better adherence in earlier studies. Therefore, our results suggest that adaptation of drug regimens to individual preferences might be a promising strategy to improve adherence. Because the German health care system may differ from other systems in relevant aspects, our findings should be confirmed by evaluation of patient preferences in other health care systems. Once generalizability of the study results is shown, these findings could be a promising basis upon which to promote patient adherence right from the beginning of drug therapy.

Final results of the DAPS (Denosumab Adherence Preference Satisfaction) study: a 24-month, randomized, crossover comparison with alendronate in postmenopausal women

The final analysis of this 2-year, randomized, crossover study showed that postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were more adherent, compliant, and persistent with subcutaneous denosumab injections every 6 months than with once-weekly alendronate tablets. After receiving both treatments, women reported greater satisfaction with injectable denosumab and preferred it over oral alendronate.

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis patients who are non-compliant or non-persistent with therapy may have suboptimal clinical outcomes. This 2-year, randomized, open-label, crossover study compared treatment adherence between subcutaneous denosumab, 60 mg every 6 months, and oral alendronate, 70 mg once weekly.

METHODS

Postmenopausal women at 25 centers in the USA and Canada with bone mineral density T-scores -4.0 to -2.0 and no prior bisphosphonate use received alendronate then denosumab, or denosumab then alendronate, over successive 12-month periods. Adherence required both compliance (denosumab injections 6 months apart or ≥ 80% of alendronate tablets) and persistence (both denosumab injections or ≥ 2 alendronate doses in the last month and completion of the treatment period).

RESULTS

Of the 250 women enrolled (124 alendronate, 126 denosumab), 221 entered the second year (106 denosumab, 115 alendronate). Denosumab was associated with less non-adherence than alendronate (first year, 11.9% vs 23.4%; second year, 7.5% vs 36.5%). Risk ratios for non-adherence, non-compliance, and non-persistence favored denosumab in both years (p < 0.05). Of 198 subjects expressing treatment preference, 183 (92.4%) preferred the injections over the oral therapy. BMD improved further when subjects received denosumab after alendronate and remained stable when they received alendronate after denosumab.

CONCLUSION

Based on the final results of this crossover study after women had received each treatment for up to 1 year, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were more adherent, compliant, and persistent with subcutaneous denosumab injections every 6 months than with once-weekly alendronate tablets and reported increased treatment preference and satisfaction with injectable denosumab over oral alendronate.

Development, reliability, and validity of a new Preference and Satisfaction Questionnaire

OBJECTIVES

Existing questionnaires that assess preference and/or satisfaction with postmenopausal bone loss treatments were reviewed and determined to be inadequate for the assessment of an oral pill versus a subcutaneous injection. The Preference and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) was developed to assess preference, satisfaction, and bother with a weekly oral tablet versus a once every 6 months subcutaneous injection for treatment of postmenopausal bone loss.

METHODS

Questions were developed based on literature review and expert input. Content validity of the PSQ in this patient population was assessed among current or previous bisphosphonate users in group interviews, and item comprehension and readability were also evaluated. Reliability, validity, and structure of the questionnaire were assessed in two phase 3 randomized clinical trials.

RESULTS

Twenty-four women participated in cognitive interviews and found the PSQ understandable and acceptable. Subsequently, 1583 trial participants took the PSQ. Interitem correlations, ranging from 0.50 to 0.97 for preference items, 0.85 to 0.94 for pill-satisfaction items, and 0.84 to 0.92 for injection-satisfaction items, and a well-fitting confirmatory factor analysis (root mean square error of approximation 0.04, nonnormed fit index 0.99, and root mean square residual 0.08) supported the structure of the instrument. Cronbach's alpha reliability values for pill satisfaction, injection satisfaction, pill bother, and injection bother were 0.93, 0.89, 0.82, and 0.61, respectively. Discriminative validity was indicated with better satisfaction and bother scores being related to adherence and the absence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The PSQ is a valid and reliable measure and may be a valuable tool to assess patient preference and satisfaction with a weekly oral tablet and 6-month subcutaneous injection for postmenopausal bone loss.

A systematic review of the impact of adherence on the effectiveness of e-therapies

Background

As the popularity of e-therapies grows, so too has the body of literature supporting their effectiveness. However, these interventions are often plagued by high attrition rates and varying levels of user adherence. Understanding the role of adherence may be crucial to understanding how program usage influences the effectiveness of e-therapy interventions.

Objective

The aim of this study was to systematically review the e-therapy literature to (1) describe the methods used to assess adherence and (2) evaluate the association of adherence with outcome of these interventions.

Methods

A systematic review of e-therapy interventions was conducted across disease states and behavioral targets. Data were collected on adherence measures, outcomes, and analyses exploring the relationship between adherence measures and outcomes.

Results

Of 69 studies that reported an adherence measure, only 33 (48%) examined the relationship between adherence and outcomes. The number of logins was the most commonly reported measure of adherence, followed by the number of modules completed. The heterogeneity of adherence and outcome measures limited analysis. However, logins appeared to be the measure of adherence most consistently related to outcomes in physical health interventions, while module completion was found to be most related to outcomes in psychological health interventions.

Conclusions

There is large variation in the reporting of adherence and the association of adherence with outcomes. A lack of agreement about how best to measure adherence is likely to contribute to the variation in findings. Physical and psychological outcomes seem influenced by different types of adherence. A composite measure encompassing time online, activity completion, and active engagements with the intervention may be the best measure of adherence. Further research is required to establish a consensus for measuring adherence and to understand the role of adherence in influencing outcomes.

Patient preferences for treatment of major depressive disorder and the impact on health outcomes: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the peer-reviewed literature on patient preferences for depression treatments and the impact of these preferences on the outcomes of treatment.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified via a systematic search conducted simultaneously in PsycINFO and MEDLINE using EBSCOhost and EMBASE. Publications were retrieved in March 2010.

STUDY SELECTION

Search terms included depression OR MDD OR major depressive disorder, patient preference, treatment preference, intervention preference, and pharmacotherapy preference. There were no restrictions on years of publication. The search was restricted to research articles written in English.

DATA EXTRACTION

Fifteen articles contained unique information on patient preferences for depression treatments and their impact on depression-related outcomes.

RESULTS

The patient preference literature includes a limited number of studies examining the impact of patient preferences on outcomes such as depression severity, treatment initiation, persistence and adherence, treatment engagement, the development of the therapeutic alliance, and health-related quality of life. The majority of the preference research has focused on comparisons of psychotherapy versus pharmacotherapy, with some limited information regarding comparisons of psychotherapies. Results from the research to date suggest that the impact of patient treatment preferences is mixed. The results also indicate that patient preferences have minimal impact on depression severity outcomes within the context of controlled clinical trials but may be more strongly associated with other outcomes such as entry into treatment and development of the therapeutic alliance. However, it is important to note that the literature is limited in that the impact of patient preference has been examined only through secondary analyses, and there have been few studies designed explicitly to examine the impact of patient preferences, particularly outside the context of controlled clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Consideration of patient preferences for depression treatments may lead to increased treatment initiation and improved therapeutic alliance. However, despite treatment guidelines and suggestions in the literature, the value of and appropriate procedures for considering patient preferences in real-world treatment decisions deserves more careful study. Further research is needed, and future studies should be conducted in more naturalistic treatment settings that examine patient preferences for other specific approaches to depression treatments including preferences related to comparisons of individual pharmacotherapies and second-step treatments.

Predictors of antidepressant adherence: results of a Japanese Internet-based survey

AIM

The purpose of the present study was to identify the psychosocial/pharmacological predictors of antidepressant (AD) adherence.

METHODS

An Internet-based survey was conducted among 1151 Japanese individuals with major depressive disorder. Subjects were asked to report their degree of non-adherence for each AD taken using a 5-point Likert scale: 0, never forget; 1, rarely forget; 2, occasionally forget; 3, sometimes forget; and 4, often forget. The highest number reported among each subject was assigned as their low adherence index (LAI). Individuals with an LAI > or = 3 were defined as members of the low adherence (LA) group. Predictors of LA was analyzed using bivariate and multivariate models, both among the total number of subjects and single AD subgroup (n = 657).

RESULTS

Nearly one-third of subjects (n = 381, 33.1%) reported LA. On bivariate analysis, LA was associated with lower age, worker or student status (vs unemployed or housewife), higher daily dosing frequency (DDF), low drug satisfaction, and a neutral/negative doctor-patient relationship (DPR; P < 0.001). In a multivariate model, LA was predicted by age (< or =34 years: odds ratio [OR], 1.64), worker or student status (OR, 1.87), higher DDF (> or =twice daily: OR, 1.61), and neutral/negative DPR (OR, 1.54; P < 0.01). Among the single-AD subgroup, adherence was similar between those on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors and tricyclics. Use of neither medication was associated with adherence in a multivariate model.

CONCLUSION

LA was predicted by lower age, worker or student status, higher DDF, and neutral/negative DPR. Adherence was not significantly different between subjects on newer agents and tricyclics.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of extended-release bupropion in elderly patients with major depressive disorder

Major depressive disorder in the elderly is associated with increased morbidity and reduced quality of life. This 10 week, placebo-controlled study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release bupropion (150-300 mg once daily) in depressed patients aged 65 years or older. The statistical assumptions necessary for the validity of the protocol-specified analysis of covariance were not met for the analysis of the primary outcome variable (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score at Week 10, last observation carried forward). Alternative statistical methods used for the analysis of this variable demonstrated statistical significance. Statistically significant improvements were observed on the majority of secondary end points when compared with placebo, including the health outcome measures for motivation and energy, and life satisfaction and contentment. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate and similar between treatment groups. This study demonstrated that the extended-release bupropion is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for major depression in the elderly.

How do physician assessments of patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests differ from actual preferences? A comparison in Canada and the United States using a stated-choice survey

BACKGROUND

Patient preferences can affect colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test use. We compared utility-based preferences for alternative CRC screening tests from a stated-preference discrete-choice survey of the general population and physicians in Canada and the United States.

METHODS

General population respondents (Canada, n = 501; US, n = 1087) participated in a survey with 12 choice scenarios and 9 CRC screening test attributes. Physicians (n = 100, both Canada and US) reported expected patient preferences. We estimated relative importance of attributes using bivariate probit regression analysis and calculated willingness-to-pay for various CRC screening tests.

RESULTS

In 28 and 31% of scenarios, Canadian and US respondents, respectively, chose no screening over a hypothetical test. Canadian (45%) and US (46%) physicians expected patients to choose no screening more often. For all groups the most important attribute was sensitivity, but physicians' perception of patients' preferences are significantly different from actual preferences. Other key attributes are those related to test performance or the testing process. Fecal DNA, colonoscopy, and virtual colonoscopy were the most preferred tests by all groups, but respondents were willing-to-pay more than physicians predicted.

CONCLUSION

Physicians' perception of patients' preferences are quite different from those of the general population. However, among general population and physicians, Canadian and US preferences were similar.

Bioequivalence of zonisamide orally dispersible tablet and immediate-release capsule formulations: results from two open-label, randomized-sequence, single-dose, two-period, two-treatment crossover studies in healthy male volunteers

BACKGROUND

To make it easier for patients who are prescribed zonisamide to administer their medicine, a rapidly disintegrating oral tablet formulation has been developed.

OBJECTIVE

These 2 trials assessed the bioequiva-lence of a new orally dispersible tablet formulation of zonisamide (test) versus an immediate-release reference capsule.

METHODS

Study 1 assessed the bioequivalence of a 100-mg orally dispersible tablet versus a 100-mg reference capsule. Study 2 assessed the bioequivalence of a 300-mg test tablet versus three 100-mg reference capsules. Both trials were open-label, randomized-sequence, single-dose, 2-period, 2-treatment crossover studies in consenting healthy male volunteers aged 18 to 55 years. A 4-week washout separated treatment periods. The zonisamide test tablet was placed on the tongue and, after it had dispersed in saliva, swallowed without water. Zonisamide serum concentrations were analyzed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay with tandem mass spectrome-try detection (lower limit of quantification, 10 ng/nL). Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% CI of the ratio of AUC(0-72) and C(max) were within the regulatory criteria of 0.80 to 1.25. The safety profile was assessed through adverse events (AEs) and analysis of laboratory and echocardiogram parameters.

RESULTS

In study one, 36 male subjects were enrolled and randomized (mean [SD] age, 26.1 [6.9] years; weight, 77.6 [11.0] kg; race: white, 35 [97.2%], and Asian, 1 [2.8%]). Of those, 7 were withdrawn prior to completion (5 were lost to follow-up, 1 failed the drug screening, 1 withdrew due to AEs, and 1 was excluded due to undisclosed medical history). In study two, 40 male subjects were enrolled and randomized (mean [SD] age, 31.2 [10.3] years; weight, 76.1 [9.0] kg; race: white, 38 [95.0%], black, 1 [2.5%], and other, 1 [2.5%]). Of those, 2 were withdrawn prior to completion (1 failed the urine drug screening and 1 withdrew consent). The ratios (90% CIs) of AUC(0-72) for the 100-mg and 300-mg test formulations were 1.00 (0.98-1.02) and 1.00 (0.98-1.01), respectively. The ratios (90% CIs) of C(max) were 0.97 (0.94-1.00) and 0.98 (0.95-1.00). A total of 25 subjects experienced treatment-emergent AEs in study 1; of these, 8 events in 3 patients were considered to be possibly or probably related to study drug administration. A total of 21 subjects experienced treatment-emergent AEs in study 2; of these, 11 events in 6 subjects were considered to be possibly or probably related to study drug administration. All AEs and laboratory and ECG findings were similar between formulations.

CONCLUSIONS

The test formulation of zonisamide met regulatory criteria for bioequivalence to the reference formulation in these healthy male volunteers. Both formulations were generally well tolerated at both dose levels.

Treating depression with different galenical drug formulations: Does it make a difference? The comparison of mirtazapine fast dissolving formulation (FDT) with conventional mirtazapine tablets (CT)

Objective. To assess clinical advantages of fast dissolving tablet (FDT) formulation of mirtazapine by comparison to conventional (CT) mirtazapine tablets in the treatment of depressed patients. Methods. A posteriori analyses of pooled data of a total of 30 studies (of at least 6 weeks duration, total N=3510) with CT and FDT in depressed patients was performed. Weight changes were recorded at baseline and regular intervals until the end of the study. Patient preferences for the one or the other formulation, as well as the appraisal of the FDT qualities, were assessed by means of a global internet-based survey including 5,428 patients. Results. Compared with mirtazapine CT, the FDT was associated with an average 0.3 kg less weight increase (P=0.0015) during the 6 weeks of treatment. The qualities and preference for FDT (global survey) were positively evaluated by the majority of patients. Particular advantages of FDT over CT were: better compliance (47.3% of raters), taste, ease and overall convenience of use (>75% of raters). Conclusions. The FDT mirtazapine differed from conventional tablets (CT) not only regarding somewhat less weight increase and overall use preference, but more importantly, regarding better compliance with treatment.

Patient satisfaction with antidepressants: an Internet-based study

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction with antidepressants (ADs) depends on various factors whose individual contributions are incompletely understood.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted of 1199 Japanese individuals being treated for major depressive disorder. Satisfaction for each AD was quantified using a 5-point scale. The average of all agents was calculated for each subject and defined as the Satisfaction Score (SS). Those on a single AD medication (n=667) were divided into four subgroups based on their medication: fluvoxamine (n=165), milnacipran (n=91), paroxetine (n=196), and tricyclic antidepressant (TCA; n=103). Among those with higher SS (>or==4.0), their satisfaction reasons were elicited by three multiple-choice responses: efficacy, fewer side effects, and lower dosing frequency. To compare the responses to these three questions among the four subgroups, one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc comparison tests were performed. Logistic regression was done to determine whether these three responses predict higher satisfaction.

RESULTS

The number of ADs taken by an individual was negatively correlated with the SS (r=-.074, p=.011). SS did not correlate with demographic features. SS was similar among the four subgroups but their satisfaction reasons differed. Predictors of higher SS (SS=5.0 versus 4.0) were reporting "efficacy" and "fewer side effects" as satisfaction reasons.

LIMITATIONS

Web-based surveys have a selection bias, and diagnoses were based on self-reports.

CONCLUSIONS

SS waned as the number of ADs increased. Among users of four ADs, SS was similar but their satisfaction reasons differed. Perceived efficacy and fewer side effects predicted higher drug satisfaction.

Efficacy of once-daily olopatadine 0.2% ophthalmic solution compared to twice-daily olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution for the treatment of ocular itching induced by conjunctival allergen challenge

Olopatadine 0.1% (Patanol) and olopatadine 0.2% (Pataday) ophthalmic solutions are topical ocular anti-allergic agents with antihistaminic and mast cell stabilizing properties. The efficacy of two doses of olopatadine 0.1% was compared to one dose of olopatadine 0.2% in the prevention of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis over 24 hours. This double-masked conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) study found no significant difference in the mean itching scores between two drops of olopatadine 0.1% and one drop of olopatadine 0.2%. Both showed significant activity at the 24-hour time point and were statistically superior to placebo. No adverse events occurred while on drug therapy.