Effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on major depressive disorder with peripartum onset: A multicenter, open-label, controlled proof-of-concept clinical trial (DELOS-1)

Efficacy of bright light therapy for perinatal depression: A meta-analysis of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological treatments are commonly used in individuals experiencing perinatal depression (PPD); however, a debate regarding the reproductive safety of antidepressants is ongoing. Many pregnant women opt to discontinue antidepressant out of concern about potential negative effects on the developing fetus, while slow and ineffective antidepressant medications hinder improved outcomes in women with PPD. In recent years, bright light therapy (BLT) has gained traction as a treatment option for PPD; however, clinical trials findings examining the efficacy of BLT in this population have been inconclusive.

AIM

To validate the feasibility and safety of BLT for the treatment of PPD.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of patients with PPD treated with BLT vs placebo following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled studies published up to December 2023. The results were evaluated using the standardized mean difference of improvement for depression scores and odds ratios (ORs) for remission rate, response rate, incidence of adverse events, and dropout rate.

RESULTS

The BLT group had higher PPD response rate [50.68% vs 33.08%; OR = 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-3.35; P = 0.004; I^² = 35%] and remission rate (54.10% vs 18.52%; OR = 5.00; 95%CI: 2.09-11.99; P = 0.0003; I^² = 0%) than the placebo group. Improvements in depression scores were higher in the BLT group than the placebo group for the overall efficacy (standardized mean difference = -0.47; 95%CI: -0.80 to -0.13; P = 0.007). No significant differences between the two groups in drop-outs (21.84% vs 29.63%; OR = 0.63; 95%CI: 0.31-1.29; P = 0.21; I^² = 0%) or adverse events (17.89% vs 9.68%; OR = 2.01; 95%CI: 0.95-4.25; P = 0.07; I^² = 0%) were observed.

CONCLUSION

BLT can potentially treat PPD, showing better results than the control group in this study. BLT is effective and safe and could increase the available therapeutic options for PPD.

Clinical application of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is an emerging non-invasive neuromodulation therapy. This study aimed to explore the therapeutic use of taVNS, optimal stimulation parameters, effective sham protocols, and safety.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted. Five databases and grey literature were searched. The data extracted included stimulation parameters, adverse events (AEs), and therapeutic effects on clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

109 studies were included. taVNS was used across 21 different clinical populations, most commonly in psychiatric, cardiac, and neurological disorders. Overall, 2,214 adults received active taVNS and 1,017 received sham taVNS. Reporting of stimulation parameters was limited and inconsistent. taVNS appeared to have a favourable therapeutic effect across a wide range of clinical populations with varied parameters. Three sham protocols were reported but their effectiveness was documented in only two of the 54 sham-controlled studies. Most reported adverse events were localised to stimulation site.

CONCLUSION

There is growing evidence for taVNS therapeutic effect. taVNS appears safe and tolerable. Sham protocols need evaluation. Standardised and comprehensive reporting of both stimulation parameters and adverse events is required. Two different questionnaires have been proposed to evaluate adverse events and the effectiveness of sham methods in blinding participants.

Analysis of taVNS effects on autonomic and central nervous systems in healthy young adults based on HRV, EEG parameters

Objective.Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), a non-invasive method of stimulating the vagus nerve, simultaneously affects the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and central nervous system (CNS) through efferent and afferent pathways. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of taVNS on the ANS and CNS through heart rate variability (HRV) and electroencephalography (EEG) parameters of identified responders.Approach.Two sets of data were collected from each of 10 healthy adult male subjects in their 20 s, and five HRV parameters from the time domain (RMSSD, pNN50, pNN30, pNN20, ppNNx) and two EEG parameters (power of alpha band, power of delta band) were extracted.Main results.Based on pNN50, responders to taVNS were identified; among them, pNN50 (p= 0.0041) and ppNNx (p= 0.0037) showed significant differences before and after taVNS. At the same time, for alpha power and delta power of EEG, significant difference (p< 0.05) was observed in most channels after taVNS compared to before stimulation.Significance.This study demonstrated the validity of identifying responders using pNN50 and the influence of taVNS on both the ANS and CNS. We conclude that taVNS can be used to treat a variety of diseases and as a tool to help control the ANS and CNS.

Neural, Anti-Inflammatory, and Clinical Effects of Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The discovery of effective treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) may help target different brain pathways. Invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an effective neuromodulation technique for the treatment of MDD; however, the effectiveness of the noninvasive technique, transauricular VNS (taVNS), remains unknown. Moreover, a mechanistic understanding of the neural effects behind its biological and therapeutic effects is lacking. This review aimed to evaluate the clinical evidence and the neural and anti-inflammatory effects of taVNS in MDD.

METHODS

Two searches were conducted using a systematic search strategy reviewed the clinical efficacy and neural connectivity of taVNS in MDD in humans and evaluated the changes in inflammatory markers after taVNS in humans or animal models of depression. A risk of bias assessment was performed in all human studies.

RESULTS

Only 5 studies evaluated the effects of taVNS in patients with depression. Although the studies demonstrated the efficacy of taVNS in treating depression, they used heterogeneous methodologies and limited data, thus preventing the conduct of pooled quantitative analyses. Pooled analysis could not be performed for studies that investigated the modulation of connectivity between brain areas; of the 6 publications, 5 were based on the same experiment. The animal studies that analyzed the presence of inflammatory markers showed a reduction in the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines or receptor expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Data on the clinical efficacy of taVNS in the treatment of MDD are limited. Although these studies showed positive results, no conclusions can be drawn regarding this topic considering the heterogeneity of these studies, as in the case of functional connectivity studies. Based on animal studies, the application of taVNS causes a decrease in the level of inflammatory factors in different parts of the brain, which also regulate the immune system. Therefore, further studies are needed to understand the effects of taVNS in patients with MDD.

The efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is used for treating depression but the efficacy and safety have not been well assessed. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of taVNS in depression.

METHODS

The retrieval databases included English databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library and PsycINFO, and Chinese databases of CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and Sino Med, and the retrieval period was from their inception to November 10, 2022. The clinical trial registers (ClinicalTrials.gov and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry) were also searched. Standardized mean difference and the risk ratio were used as the effect indicator and the effect size was represented by the 95 % confidence interval. Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system were used to assess the risk of bias and quality of evidence respectively.

RESULTS

Totally, 12 studies of 838 participants were included. taVNS could significantly improve depression and reduce Hamilton Depression Scale scores. Low to very low evidence showed that taVNS had higher response rates than sham-taVMS and comparable response rates compared to antidepressants (ATD) and that taVNS combined with ATD had comparable efficacy to ATD with fewer side effects.

LIMITATIONS

The number of studies in subgroups was small and the evidence quality was low to very low.

CONCLUSIONS

taVNS is an effective and safe method for alleviating depression scores and had a comparable response rate to ATD.