The Motivation and Energy Inventory (MEI): Analysis of the clinically relevant response threshold in patients with major depressive disorder and emotional blunting using data from the COMPLETE study

Functional improvement as a treatment goal in major depressive disorder: a narrative review of the evidence for vortioxetine

This narrative review used manufacturer-sponsored vortioxetine clinical trial database (doses of 5-20 mg) to evaluate the effect of vortioxetine treatment on short- and long- term functional outcomes in major depressive disorder (MDD), in both the clinical trial setting and in routine practice. The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) was the most used functional scale and, based on this measure, short-term, placebo-controlled studies demonstrated significant improvements with vortioxetine 10 mg (reductions ranged from -0.92 to -2.10 points vs placebo after 6-8 weeks treatment) and 20 mg (reductions ranged from -0.88 to -3.92 vs placebo). Of note, the acute beneficial effects of vortioxetine on functionality were seen in patients with severe baseline depressive symptoms as well as those with significant anxiety. Long-term open-label extension studies further showed that maintenance treatment was associated with continued functional improvements over one year (reaching an average reduction of -6.2 SDS points from baseline) that were correlated with continued improvements in residual symptoms. Evidence from real-world studies, using multiple functional outcomes, further demonstrated generalizability to routine practice where patients are living with multiple comorbidities previously excluded from the randomized controlled trials. Taken overall, the findings from several head-to-head studies indicated a functional advantage of vortioxetine compared with other classes of antidepressants and demonstrated the effectiveness of vortioxetine as first-line treatment while also confirming its effectiveness in improving functional outcomes when given later in the treatment journey. In summary, vortioxetine is an effective treatment option for improving functional outcomes in people living with MDD.

The efficacy of vortioxetine in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Among the available pharmacological treatments for acute major depressive disorder (MDD), vortioxetine, a serotonin transporter inhibitor (SERT), has been widely used for its multimodal action on serotonin neurotransmission, which produces essential changes also on glutamate, gamma amino butyric acid (GABA), norepinephrine, acetylcholine, and dopamine.

AIM

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the acute efficacy of vortioxetine across multiple dosing and to evaluate whether there is a dose-response effect and as well there is a dose-response issue with respect to side effects in acute depression.

METHODS

According to PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched three major electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) for Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) studies published between January 2013 and April 2024. Twenty-four studies were included in the review and two meta-analyses were conducted to determine whether the mean Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scale values in the placebo groups differ significantly from the mean MADRS scale values in the group receiving vortioxetine 10 mg or vortioxetine 20 mg.

RESULTS

Vortioxetine significantly improved acute depression severity, anxiety symptoms, and cognitive function, with high response and remission rates in acute MDD. It was also well tolerated with a relatively low occurrence of severe or serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Observing the results of the meta-analysis, the effect was significant for both vortioxetine 10 and 20 mg, with a greater effect size for vortioxetine 20 mg.

CONCLUSION

Vortioxetine should be considered efficacious as a first- and second-line therapy.

Impact of depressive symptoms on motivation in persons with post-COVID-19 condition

OBJECTIVE

The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined Post-COVID-19 Condition (PCC) as the onset of symptoms within three months after resolution of an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, wherein symptoms persist for at least two months and cannot be explained by another medical/psychiatric condition. Persons living with PCC report debilitating symptoms including, but not limited to, depressive symptoms and motivational deficits. The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to evaluate the association between depressive symptoms and motivation in adults with PCC.

METHODS

We conducted a post-hoc analysis of an 8-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating adults (18 years or older) in Canada with WHO-defined PCC and cognitive symptoms. This post-hoc analysis is comprised of baseline data that evaluates the association between depressive symptom severity measured by the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR-16) and motivational systems measured by the Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System Questionnaire (BIS/BAS).

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant association between depressive symptoms and BIS (β = -0.041 95% CI [-0.066, -0.016], p<0.05), BAS reward responsiveness (β = 0.043 95% CI [0.012, 0.074], p<0.05), sex (β = -0.137 95% CI [-0.266, -0.008], p<0.05), and confirmed COVID-19 infection (β = 0.196 95% CI [0.061, 0.332], p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Depressive symptoms were associated with motivational deficits in persons living with PCC. Optimizing treatment for depressive symptoms may potentially improve aspects of motivational impairment amongst persons with PCC. All patients presenting with MDD and a history of COVID-19 infection should be assessed for the presence of PCC.

The Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST): Clinically meaningful response threshold in patients with major depressive disorder receiving antidepressant treatment

BACKGROUND

Functional impairment is common in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) provides a detailed clinician-rated assessment of functioning across multiple aspects of daily life. This study aimed to establish clinically relevant response thresholds for the FAST in patients with MDD receiving antidepressant treatment.

METHODS

Data were derived from three 8-week clinical trials of antidepressant therapy in patients with MDD that included assessment of functioning using the FAST as a pre-specified endpoint. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and threshold for response in terms of change in FAST total score were determined using anchor-based methods.

RESULTS

After 8 weeks of antidepressant treatment, the mean reduction in FAST total score in patients considered clinically minimally improved (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement [CGI-I] score of 3) was 7-9 points (~20 % reduction). The threshold for functional response (reduction in FAST total score from baseline in patients with a CGI-I score of ≤2 at week 8) was 16-19 points (~50 % reduction). The threshold for functional response was higher in patients with MDD and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder than in those with MDD alone (mean reduction in FAST total score at 8 weeks: 26 points [63 %]).

LIMITATIONS

Short-term studies.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide further validation of the FAST for assessing functioning in patients with MDD. In patients with MDD, the suggested MCID for FAST total score is 7-9 points and the proposed threshold for response is a reduction from baseline of approximately 50 %.

Effectiveness of Vortioxetine for the Treatment of Emotional Blunting in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Experiencing Inadequate Response to SSRI/SNRI Monotherapy in Spain: Results from the COMPLETE Study

Background

The multinational, open-label COMPLETE study (NCT03835715) investigated the effectiveness of vortioxetine in alleviating emotional blunting in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) experiencing inadequate response and emotional blunting while being treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI). This paper presents results for the subgroup of patients enrolled in Spain.

Methods

Patients with MDD (n = 67) experiencing partial response and emotional blunting during monotherapy with an SSRI or SNRI were switched to vortioxetine (10-20 mg/day) for 8 weeks. The primary study outcome was emotional blunting, assessed by the Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ).

Results

After 8 weeks of vortioxetine, the mean (SE) change in ODQ total score from baseline was -26.0 (2.9) (P < 0.001). Respective changes in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Motivation and Energy Inventory, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total scores were -14.9 (0.8), +34.2 (4.5), +6.3 (1.6), and ‒9.0 (1.3) (all P < 0.001 vs baseline). At week 8, 70.4% of patients no longer reported emotional blunting and 53.7% had achieved remission from their depressive symptoms (defined as a MADRS total score ≤10). Mediation analysis showed 77.1% of the change in SDS total score to be a direct effect of the improvement in ODQ total score after switching to vortioxetine. Adverse events were reported by 35 patients (52.2%), most commonly nausea (14 patients, 20.9%). At week 8, 33/54 patients (61.1%) were receiving vortioxetine 20 mg/day.

Conclusion

In this study investigating the effectiveness of vortioxetine in Spanish patients with MDD who experienced inadequate response and emotional blunting on SSRI/SNRI monotherapy, significant improvements in emotional blunting, core depressive symptoms (including anhedonia), sleep duration, motivation and energy, cognitive performance, and overall patient functioning were observed during the 8 weeks of treatment. Two-thirds of patients no longer reported emotional blunting and over half were in remission from their depressive symptoms at week 8.

Effect of venlafaxine on anhedonia and amotivation in patients with major depressive disorder

OBJECTIVE

Serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) have been postulated to afford benefits in alleviating anhedonia and amotivation. This post hoc pooled analysis evaluated the effect of venlafaxine XR, an SNRI, on these symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHODS

Data was pooled from five short-term randomized, placebo-controlled studies of venlafaxine XR for the treatment of MDD, comprising 1087 (venlafaxine XR, n = 585; placebo, n = 502) adult subjects. The change from baseline score in the MADRS anhedonia factor (based on items 1 [apparent sadness], 2 [reported sadness], 6 [concentration difficulties], 7 [lassitude], and 8 [inability to feel]) for anhedonia, and in motivational deficits (based on 3 items of HAM-D17: involvement in work and activities, psychomotor retardation, and energy level [ie, general somatic symptoms]) for amotivation, were measured through 8 weeks. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRMs) were used to analyze changes over time and ANCOVA to analyze the change from baseline at week 8 with LOCF employed to handle missing data.

RESULTS

At the end of 8 weeks, the change from baseline was significantly greater in patients on venlafaxine XR in both anhedonia (mean, 95% CI: -2.73 [-3.63, -1.82], p < 0.0001) and amotivation scores (mean, 95% CI: -0.78 [-1.04, -0.52], p < 0.0001) than those on placebo. For both measures, the between-group separation from baseline was statistically significant starting from week 2 onwards, and it increased over time.

CONCLUSION

This analysis demonstrates that venlafaxine XR is effective in improving symptoms of anhedonia and motivational deficits in patients with MDD.

The magnitude and sustainability of treatment benefit of zuranolone on function and well-being as assessed by the SF-36 in adult patients with MDD and PPD: An integrated analysis of 4 randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) and postpartum depression (PPD) are disabling conditions. This integrated analysis of MDD and PPD clinical trials investigated the impact of zuranolone-a positive allosteric modulator of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAA receptors and neuroactive steroid under investigation for adults with MDD and approved as an oral, once-daily, 14-day treatment course for adults with PPD in the US-on health-related quality of life, including functioning and well-being, as assessed using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey V2 (SF-36).

METHODS

Integrated data from 3 MDD (201B, MOUNTAIN, WATERFALL) and 1 PPD trial (ROBIN) for individual SF-36 domains were compared for zuranolone (30- and 50-mg) vs placebo at Day (D)15 and D42. Comparisons between zuranolone responders (≥50 % reduction from baseline in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total score) and nonresponders were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 1003 patients were included (zuranolone, n = 504; placebo, n = 499). Significant differences in change from baseline (CFB) to D15 for patients in zuranolone vs placebo groups were observed in 6/8 domains; changes were sustained or improved at D42, with significant CFB differences for all 8 domains. Zuranolone responders had significantly higher CFB scores vs nonresponders for all domains at D15 and D42 (p < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

Two zuranolone doses were integrated across populations of 2 disease states with potential differences in functioning, comorbidities, and patient demographics. All p-values presented are nominal.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrated data across 4 zuranolone clinical trials showed improvements in functioning and well-being across all SF-36 domains. Benefits persisted after completion of treatment course at D42.

The Role of Vortioxetine in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in General Hospital Psychiatry: A Case-Series and PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review of the Literature

Depressive symptoms are a customary finding in hospitalized patients, particularly those who are undergoing long hospitalizations, underwent major surgical procedures or suffer from high levels of multimorbidity and frailty. The patients included in this case series shared high degrees of frailty-complexity and were evaluated within the ordinary consultation and liaison psychiatry service of the University Hospital in Pisa, Italy, from September 2021 to June 2023. Patients were administered at least one follow-up evaluation after a week and before discharge. To relate this case series to the extant literature, a comprehensive systematic review of vortioxetine safety and efficacy was performed. None of the six patients included developed serious safety issues, but one patient complained of mild-to-moderate nausea for some days after the vortioxetine introduction. Five out of six patients exhibited at least a slight clinical benefit as measured by the clinical global impression scale. Of the 858 entries screened via Scopus and Medline/PubMed, a total of 134 papers were included in our review. The present case series provides preliminary evidence for vortioxetine's safety in this healthcare domain. The literature reviewed in this paper seems to endorse a promising safety profile and a very peculiar efficacy niche for vortioxetine in consultation and liaison psychiatry.

Goal Attainment Scaling for Depression: Validation of the Japanese GAS-D Tool in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder

Purpose

Goal attainment scaling (GAS) has been proposed as a person-centric, semi-quantitative measure that assimilates achievement of individually set goals into a single standardized "goal attainment score" that can be compared at the population level. We aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the GAS for depression (GAS-D) tool in assessing goal attainment in people living with major depressive disorder (MDD).

Patients and Methods

This was a prespecified analysis of a prospective, 24-week, multicenter, observational cohort study of employed Japanese outpatients with MDD initiating treatment with vortioxetine according to the Japanese label (JRCT1031210200). Participants were assessed using the Japanese version of the GAS-D and other clinical rating scales at baseline and Weeks 8, 12 and 24.

Results

Goal attainment was significantly associated with symptom severity as assessed by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scale, confirming convergent validity. In particular, GAS-D scores were significantly related to MADRS total score at Weeks 12 and 24, indicating that improvements in overall symptom severity with vortioxetine treatment were likely to be reflected in the achievement of individualized treatment goals. With an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.67 (95% CI 0.45-0.82), the GAS-D also showed moderate test-retest reliability between Weeks 8 and 12 while proving independent of demographic characteristics.

Conclusion

The results of this open-label study support the use of the GAS-D as a valid and sensitive outcome measure in the assessment of treatment response in MDD.