Antidepressant and anti-suicidal effects of ketamine in treatment-resistant depression associated with psychiatric and personality comorbidities: A double-blind randomized trial

Measuring suicidal behavior in the era of rapid-acting antidepressants: A systematic review of ketamine studies

Assessment measures for suicidal behavior range from depression scales to longer suicide-specific instruments. In this review, we systematically summarize and discuss the currently used instruments for assessing suicidal behavior in the context of ketamine and its enantiomers. We searched Medline/PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO databases for ketamine (and its enantiomers) human studies exploring this drug's antisuicidal effects on major depressive disorder patients, published from February 2000 to June 2023. Forty-six studies were included, identifying 16 assessment tools, mostly explicit and clinician-rated measures. Prominent tools included the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and both the clinician and patient-rated Beck Scales for Suicide Ideation (SSI and BSS). With the exception of the Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT), to the best of our knowledge, no other instrument that assesses suicidality seems to be specifically developed for measuring treatment response in rapid-acting antidepressants trials. Most scales have been validated in conventional antidepressant or psychotherapy contexts, though, for MADRS, as well as for SSI, BDI, and HAM-D, efforts have been made towards investigating their psychometric properties in the field of rapid-acting antidepressants. The heterogeneity of suicidal behavior assessment in ketamine studies may hinder adequate comparisons between them. Although there does not seem to be a universally preferable instrument for measuring suicidal behavior to date, the MADRS potentially emerges as an adequately recommended choice.

Clinical trials since 2020 of rapid anti-suicidal ideation effects of ketamine and its enantiomers: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Suicide is a global public health problem with few empirically supported treatments.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials (CT) since 2020 of racemic ketamine or one of its enantiomers' (R/S) potential to reduce suicidal ideation or behavior (SIB). An initial PubMed search on April 15th, 2024 yielded 2483 results. 104 relevant CTs were identified. An additional search using other search engines on March 19th, 2024 yielded 52 sources. After screening, 14 RCTs met the inclusion criteria which required clinically significant SIB among participants, ketamine or one of its enantiomers as an anti-SIB treatment, and SIB as an outcome. We excluded neuroimaging studies, meta-analyses, reviews, and case reports. Open-label studies were also excluded except in the case of R-ketamine where we included 2 open trials due to limited published data for this enantiomer, yielding a total of 16 CTs. We used the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for the RCTs. CTs reviewed had suicidal ideation (SI) but none had suicidal behavior as an outcome.

RESULTS

The studies include ketamine augmentation of other treatments such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), various routes of administration - intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), and intranasal (IN) - and single versus multiple dose designs. Multiple doses of IV ketamine/S-ketamine produced reductions in SI for periods of several days to weeks, while single doses showed shorter, more variable effects. Multiple and single doses of IN ketamine/S-ketamine and single doses of IV ketamine produced less consistent anti-SI results. IN and IV ketamine/S-ketamine administration appears to be well tolerated. R-ketamine appears to produce fewer side effects, but additional clinical research is needed to clarify its antidepressant and anti-SI effects in humans.

CONCLUSION

This review affirms the time-limited, anti-SI effects of ketamine and the need for personalized treatment. Limitations include study heterogeneity, small samples, and paucity of data for suicidal behavior or R-ketamine.

Association of intravenous ketamine with change in depressive symptoms in a large integrated health care system

OBJECTIVE

Racemic ketamine intravenous treatments (KIT) are widely used in community clinics for treatment resistant depression (TRD), but we lack studies on symptom improvement during standardized delivery to clinically complex patients with TRD. We aimed to assess depression symptom change for patients receiving standardized KIT for TRD in a large integrated health care delivery system relative to similar patients receiving standard medication management.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study (n = 570), depression symptom change measured by the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was examined in 143 adults with TRD receiving 0.5mg/kg 40-minute KIT infusion twice weekly for 3 weeks from 01/01/2018 to 12/31/2022 and 427 contemporaneous patients with medication management (MM) matched on variables including sex, race, age, and baseline depression symptom score. We excluded patients with major neurocognitive disorder, schizophrenia, or pregnancy.

RESULTS

The KIT group was more likely to achieve depression response (PHQ-9 reduction >50 %) compared to MM (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]= 1.72, 95 % CI = 1.17 - 2.53; P = 0.006). The KIT group (8 % vs 5 %) was more likely to achieve depression remission (i.e. PHQ-9 < 5); however, the adjusted risk with KIT vs MM was not statistically significant. Baseline depression symptoms were associated with higher depression symptoms at follow up, as were co-occurring anxiety and personality disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

KIT was significantly associated with depression response and symptom improvement compared to MM. Clinicians should consider comorbid personality disorder, anxiety disorders, and baseline depression severity as potential predictors of KIT and other treatment response in TRD.

Therapeutic Approaches to Tackle the Challenge of Depression That Is Resistant to Treatment-A Narrative Review

Background and Aims

The lack of therapeutic response characterizes treatment-resistant depression despite undergoing at least two adequate monotherapy trials with medications from distinct pharmacologic classes. The inability to attain remission in patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) is a significant issue of concern within public health. Therefore, the management of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) poses significant obstacles for both patients and healthcare professionals. Our goal was to investigate the published literature concerning different options for treatment for TRD, including those that do not involve the use of medications.

Methods

We thoroughly searched the literature in the Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases to find publications relevant to our narrative review and extracted data from appropriate data. For this review, literary works written solely in English were chosen.

Results

Ongoing research is being conducted to explore the treatment options for TRD, including pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Pharmacological interventions include a wide range of therapeutic approaches, including but not limited to investigating innovative medications and strategies such as augmentation, switching, and combination therapies involving established and emerging drugs. Nonpharmacological interventions, including brain stimulation such as theta burst stimulation, deep brain stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, intermittent transcranial magnetic stimulation, and magnetic seizure therapy, as well as psychotherapeutic approaches, are being explored for the management of TRD in both present and future contexts.

Conclusion

Researchers are dedicating significant resources to the aforementioned therapeutic interventions to advance the development of novel and efficacious treatment options for TRD and enhance our comprehension of the underlying disease. This review focused on looking at recent research concerning therapeutic interventions for TRD.

Biomarkers of cognitive and memory decline in psychotropic drug users

Psychotropic drugs are vital in psychiatry, aiding in the management of mental health disorders. Their use requires an understanding of their pharmacological properties, therapeutic applications, and potential side effects. Ongoing research aims to improve their efficacy and safety. Biomarkers play a crucial role in understanding and predicting memory decline in psychotropic drug users. A comprehensive understanding of biomarkers, including neuroimaging, biochemical, genetic, and cognitive assessments, is essential for developing targeted interventions and preventive strategies. In this narrative review, we performed a comprehensive search on PubMed and Google using review-specific terms. Clinicians should use a multifaceted approach, including neurotransmitter analysis, neurotrophic factors, miRNA profiling, and cognitive tasks for early intervention and personalized treatment. Anxiolytics' mechanisms involve various neurotransmitter systems and emerging targets. Research on biomarkers for memory decline in anxiolytic users can lead to early detection and intervention, enhancing clinical practices and aligning with precision medicine. Mood stabilizer users can benefit from early detection of memory decline through RNA, neurophysiological, and inflammatory biomarkers, promoting timely interventions. Performance-enhancing drugs may boost athletic performance in the short term, but their long-term health risks and ethical issues make their use problematic. Long-term use of psychotropic performance enhancers in athletes shows changes in biomarkers of cognitive decline, necessitating ongoing monitoring and intervention strategies. Understanding these genetic influences on memory decline helps pave the way for personalized approaches to prevent or mitigate cognitive deterioration, emphasizing the importance of genetic screening and early interventions based on an individual's genetic profile. Future research should focus on refining these biomarkers and protective measures against cognitive deterioration. Overall, a comprehensive understanding of biomarkers in psychotropic drug users is essential for developing targeted interventions and preventive strategies.

Therapeutic Potential of Psychedelic Compounds for Substance Use Disorders

Psychedelics have recently (re)emerged as therapeutics of high potential for multiple mental health conditions, including substance use disorders (SUDs). Despite early mid-20th century anecdotal reports and pilot studies demonstrating the possibility of these substances in efficaciously treating conditions such as alcohol and opioid use disorders, legal restrictions and social stigma have historically hindered further research into this area. Nevertheless, concurrent with the rise in SUDs and other mental health conditions, researchers have again turned their attention to these compounds, searching for differing pharmacological targets as well as more holistic treatments that might increase patient adherence and efficacy. The aim of this review is to examine the emerging evidence-based data with regards to the therapeutic treatment of SUDs with the psychedelic compounds psilocybin, ketamine, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), ayahuasca, ibogaine and peyote.

Efficacy of racemic ketamine or esketamine monotherapy for reducing suicidal ideation in uni- or bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The current systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effect of racemic ketamine or esketamine on suicidal ideation in individuals with uni- or bipolar depression. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Central, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials that examined the effect of racemic ketamine or esketamine monotherapy on suicidal ideation (SI) in individuals with uni- or bipolar depression. The two monotherapies were compared; the primary outcome was the rate of remission of SI, and the secondary outcome was the SI score. The risk ratio was used as an effect size measure for binary variables, while the standardized mean difference was used as an effect size measure for continuous variables. Our meta-analysis included 13 randomized controlled trials involving 1,1109 individuals with uni- or bipolar depression. Patients receiving racemic ketamine monotherapy had a significantly higher acute SI remission rate than those receiving placebo or midazolam (RR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.91, P < 0.0001). Racemic ketamine also led to significantly lower SI scores than placebo or midazolam (SMD = -0.36, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.01, P = 0.04). The evidence for the treatment of SI with esketamine was inconsistent. The pooled effect sizes for long-term anti-SI effects did not reveal significant differences between therapies. Our study indicated the efficacy of racemic ketamine monotherapy for rapidly and transiently reducing SI in individuals with uni- or bipolar depression, but the efficacy of racemic ketamine monotherapy against long-term suicidal ideation remains unclear. There is not -sufficient evidence to support the anti-suicidal effects of esketamine monotherapy.Protocol registration: Prospero registration number: CRD42023434380.

In silico exploration of venlafaxine, a potential non-tricyclic antidepressant in a liposomal formulation for nose-to-brain drug delivery

OBJECTIVE

Non-tricyclic antidepressants (non-TCAs) work by preventing the intake of norepinephrine and serotonin. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify a potent non-TCAs and to develop liposomal formulation, characterize and to determine the drug release study across model of dialysis membrane via in vitro and in silico techniques.

METHODS

The in silico docking analysis identified venlafaxine (VLF) as the best non-TCAs with the depressant targets (PDB ID: 3PBL and 4BVN). VLF-loaded liposomal formulation was prepared by the thin-film hydration technique and characterized by physicochemical properties, including entrapment efficacy, in vitro drug release, particle size analysis, and FTIR. Moreover, this article also compares VLF and VLF-loaded with liposome carriers (LPs) based on nose-to-brain drug delivery approaches to treating depression.

RESULTS

Drug release profiles of the optimal liposomal formulation of VLF-LPs were examined in the high entrapment efficiency 94.13 ± 1.20% was attained at 224 nm, composed of spherical particles having a mean particle size of 191 ± 2.0 nm, a polydispersity index of 0.281 ± 0.06 and zeta potential of -20.3 mV. The best formulation of VLF-LPs was more effective than oral VLF treatment, as shown by the in vitro drug release data.

CONCLUSION

The results show that the VLF-LPs formulation is a promising potential platform for application in nose-to-brain drug delivery. Thus, highlighting the robustness of the intranasal drug delivery system with enhanced pharmaceutical properties, efficacy, and bioavailability for the anti-depression effect.

Alterations of BDNF, mGluR5, Homer1a, p11 and excitatory/inhibitory balance in corticolimbic brain regions of suicide decedents

BACKGROUND

Developing biological based approaches for preventing suicide has become a priority. In recent years, there has been a surge in studies investigating the role of the glutamatergic system in suicide, although it remains unclear.

METHODS

We evaluated changes in the gene expression of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) and its scaffolding proteins Homer1a and p11 in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), amygdala (AMY), and hippocampus (HIP) of 28 suicide decedents (S) (with no clinical psychiatric history or treatment with anxiolytics or antidepressants) and 26 controls (C) by real-time PCR (qPCR). Indeed, we measured BDNF gene expression and VGluT1 and VGAT immunoreactivities in the HIP by qPCR and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Cases and controls matched for age (C: 48.6 ± 11.6 years; S: 46.9 ± 14.5 years) and postmortem interval (PMI; C: 20.1 ± 13h; S: 16.9 ± 5h).

RESULTS

In DLPFC, S had lower p11 gene expression levels, but no differences were found in mGluR5 or Homer1a. In the AMY and HIP, mGluR5 and Homer1a were increased, p11 and BDNF were reduced. In the HIP, there were less VGAT-ir and more VGluT1-ir.

LIMITATIONS

Future studies are necessary to evaluate protein levels, and determine the cell types and potential compensatory mechanisms in a larger sample including S diagnosed with psychiatric disorders, females and different ethnicities.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified significant alterations in mGluR5, Homer1a, p11, BDNF and excitatory/inhibitory balance in corticolimbic brain areas of S. These results further characterize the biological basis of suicide, contributing to the identification of potential biomarkers for suicide prevention.

Hallucinogenic potential: a review of psychoplastogens for the treatment of opioid use disorder

The United States is entering its fourth decade of the opioid epidemic with no clear end in sight. At the center of the epidemic is an increase in opioid use disorder (OUD), a complex condition encompassing physical addiction, psychological comorbidities, and socioeconomic and legal travails associated with the misuse and abuse of opioids. Existing behavioral and medication-assisted therapies show limited efficacy as they are hampered by lack of access, strict regimens, and failure to fully address the non-pharmacological aspects of the disease. A growing body of research has indicated the potential of hallucinogens to efficaciously and expeditiously treat addictions, including OUD, by a novel combination of pharmacology, neuroplasticity, and psychological mechanisms. Nonetheless, research into these compounds has been hindered due to legal, social, and safety concerns. This review will examine the preclinical and clinical evidence that psychoplastogens, such as ibogaine, ketamine, and classic psychedelics, may offer a unique, holistic alternative for the treatment of OUD while acknowledging that further research is needed to establish long-term efficacy along with proper safety and ethical guidelines.

Ketamine for the treatment of major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Intranasal esketamine has received regulatory approvals for the treatment of depression. Recently a large trial of repeated dose racemic ketamine also demonstrated efficacy in severe depression. However, uncertainties remain regarding comparative efficacy, dosage, and the time course of response.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Embase, Medline, Pubmed, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL up to April 13, 2023, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating ketamine for depression. Two investigators independently assessed study eligibility and risk of bias and extracted the data on depression severity scores, response and remission rates, and all-cause dropouts. Multivariable mixed-effects meta-regressions incorporated drug formulation (racemic (Rac) or esketamine (Esket)) and dose (Low or High) as covariates. Treatment effects were assessed: immediately following the first dose, during further repeated dosing, and follow-up after the final dose of a treatment course. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021221157).

Findings

The systematic review identified 687 articles, of which 49 RCTs were eligible for analysis, comprising 3299 participants. Standardised mean differences (95% confidence intervals) immediately following the first/single treatment were moderate-high for all conditions (Rac-High: -0.73, -0.91 to -0.56; Esket-High: -0.48, -0.75 to -0.20; Rac-Low: -0.33, -0.54 to -0.12; Esket-Low: -0.55, -0.87 to -0.24). Ongoing effects during repeated dosing were significantly greater than the control for Rac-High (-0.61; -1.02 to -0.20) and Rac-Low (-0.55, -1.09 to -0.00), but not Esket-Low (-0.15, -0.49 to 0.19) or Esket-High (-0.22, -0.54 to 0.10). At follow-up effects remained significant for racemic ketamine (-0.65; -1.23 to -0.07) but not esketamine (-0.33; -0.96 to 0.31). All-cause dropout was similar between experiment and control conditions for both formulations combined (Odds Ratio = 1.18, 0.85-1.64). Overall heterogeneity varied from 5.7% to 87.6.

Interpretation

Our findings suggested that effect sizes for depression severity, as well as response and remission rates, were numerically greater for racemic ketamine than esketamine. Higher doses were more effective than low doses. Differences were evident in initial effects, ongoing treatment, and lasting effects after the final dose.

Funding

None.