Structural MRI-Based Measures of Accelerated Brain Aging do not Moderate the Acute Antidepressant Response in Late-Life Depression

Geroscience-Centric Perspective for Geriatric Psychiatry: Integrating Aging Biology With Geriatric Mental Health Research

The geroscience hypothesis asserts that physiological aging is caused by a small number of biological pathways. Despite the explosion of geroscience research over the past couple of decades, the research on how serious mental illnesses (SMI) affects the biological aging processes is still in its infancy. In this review, we aim to provide a critical appraisal of the emerging literature focusing on how we measure biological aging systematically, and in the brain and how SMIs affect biological aging measures in older adults. We will also review recent developments in the field of cellular senescence and potential targets for interventions for SMIs in older adults, based on the geroscience hypothesis.

Cognitive, Disability, and Treatment Outcome Implications of Symptom-Based Phenotyping in Late-Life Depression

OBJECTIVE

Late-life depression is associated with substantial heterogeneity in clinical presentation, disability, and response to antidepressant treatment. We examined whether self-report of severity of common symptoms, including anhedonia, apathy, rumination, worry, insomnia, and fatigue were associated with differences in presentation and response to treatment. We also examined whether these symptoms improved during treatment with escitalopram.

DESIGN

Eighty-nine older adults completed baseline assessments, neuropsychological testing and providing self-reported symptom and disability scales. They then entered an 8-week, placebo-controlled randomized trial of escitalopram, and self-report scales were repeated at the trial's end. Raw symptom scale scores were combined into three standardized symptom phenotypes and models examined how symptom phenotype severity was associated with baseline measures and depression improvement over the trial.

RESULTS

While rumination/worry appeared independent, severity of apathy/anhedonia and fatigue/insomnia were associated with one another and with greater self-reported disability. Greater fatigue/insomnia was also associated with slower processing speed, while rumination/worry was associated with poorer episodic memory. No symptom phenotype severity score predicted a poorer overall response to escitalopram. In secondary analyses, escitalopram did not improve most phenotypic symptoms more than placebo, aside for greater reductions in worry and total rumination severity.

CONCLUSION

Deeper symptom phenotype characterization may highlight differences in the clinical presentation of late-life depression. However, when compared to placebo, escitalopram did not improve many of the symptoms assessed. Further work is needed to determine whether symptom phenotypes inform longer-term course of illness, and which treatments may best benefit specific symptoms.

The heterogeneity of late-life depression and its pathobiology: a brain network dysfunction disorder

Depression is frequent in older individuals and is often associated with cognitive impairment and increasing risk of subsequent dementia. Late-life depression (LLD) has a negative impact on quality of life, yet the underlying pathobiology is still poorly understood. It is characterized by considerable heterogeneity in clinical manifestation, genetics, brain morphology, and function. Although its diagnosis is based on standard criteria, due to overlap with other age-related pathologies, the relationship between depression and dementia and the relevant structural and functional cerebral lesions are still controversial. LLD has been related to a variety of pathogenic mechanisms associated with the underlying age-related neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular processes. In addition to biochemical abnormalities, involving serotonergic and GABAergic systems, widespread disturbances of cortico-limbic, cortico-subcortical, and other essential brain networks, with disruption in the topological organization of mood- and cognition-related or other global connections are involved. Most recent lesion mapping has identified an altered network architecture with "depressive circuits" and "resilience tracts", thus confirming that depression is a brain network dysfunction disorder. Further pathogenic mechanisms including neuroinflammation, neuroimmune dysregulation, oxidative stress, neurotrophic and other pathogenic factors, such as β-amyloid (and tau) deposition are in discussion. Antidepressant therapies induce various changes in brain structure and function. Better insights into the complex pathobiology of LLD and new biomarkers will allow earlier and better diagnosis of this frequent and disabling psychopathological disorder, and further elucidation of its complex pathobiological basis is warranted in order to provide better prevention and treatment of depression in older individuals.

BrainAge of patients with severe late-life depression referred for electroconvulsive therapy

BACKGROUND

Severe depression is associated with accelerated brain aging. BrainAge gap, the difference between predicted and observed BrainAge, was investigated in patients with late-life depression (LLD). We aimed to examine BrainAge gap in LLD and its associations with clinical characteristics indexing LLD chronicity, current severity, prior to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and ECT outcome.

METHODS

Data was analyzed from the Mood Disorders in Elderly treated with Electroconvulsive Therapy (MODECT) study. A previously established BrainAge algorithm (BrainAge R by James Cole, (https://github.com/james-cole/brainageR)) was applied to pre-ECT T1-weighted structural MRI-scans of 42 patients who underwent ECT.

RESULTS

A BrainAge gap of 1.8 years (SD = 5.5) was observed, Cohen's d = 0.3. No significant associations between BrainAge gap, number of previous episodes, current episode duration, age of onset, depression severity, psychotic symptoms or ECT outcome were observed.

LIMITATIONS

Limited sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial findings suggest an older BrainAge than chronological age in patients with severe LLD referred for ECT, however with high degree of variability and direction of the gap. No associations were found with clinical measures. Larger samples are needed to better understand brain aging and to evaluate the usability of BrainAge gap as potential biomarker of prognosis an treatment-response in LLD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02667353.

Neuroimaging-Based Brain Age Estimation: A Promising Personalized Biomarker in Neuropsychiatry

It is now possible to estimate an individual's brain age via brain scans and machine-learning models. This validated technique has opened up new avenues for addressing clinical questions in neurology, and, in this review, we summarize the many clinical applications of brain-age estimation in neuropsychiatry and general populations. We first provide an introduction to typical neuroimaging modalities, feature extraction methods, and machine-learning models that have been used to develop a brain-age estimation framework. We then focus on the significant findings of the brain-age estimation technique in the field of neuropsychiatry as well as the usefulness of the technique for addressing clinical questions in neuropsychiatry. These applications may contribute to more timely and targeted neuropsychiatric therapies. Last, we discuss the practical problems and challenges described in the literature and suggest some future research directions.

MRI predictors of pharmacotherapy response in major depressive disorder

Major depressive disorder is among the most prevalent psychiatric disorders, exacting a substantial personal, social, and economic toll. Antidepressant treatment typically involves an individualized trial and error approach with an inconsistent success rate. Despite a pressing need, no reliable biomarkers for predicting treatment outcome have yet been discovered. Brain MRI measures hold promise in this regard, though clinical translation remains elusive. In this review, we summarize structural MRI and functional MRI (fMRI) measures that have been investigated as predictors of treatment outcome. We broadly divide these into five categories including three structural measures: volumetric, white matter burden, and white matter integrity; and two functional measures: resting state fMRI and task fMRI. Currently, larger hippocampal volume is the most widely replicated predictor of successful treatment. Lower white matter hyperintensity burden has shown robustness in late life depression. However, both have modest discriminative power. Higher fractional anisotropy of the cingulum bundle and frontal white matter, amygdala hypoactivation and anterior cingulate cortex hyperactivation in response to negative emotional stimuli, and hyperconnectivity within the default mode network (DMN) and between the DMN and executive control network also show promise as predictors of successful treatment. Such network-focused measures may ultimately provide a higher-dimensional measure of treatment response with closer ties to the underlying neurobiology.