Use of the ON-Q pain management system is associated with decreased postoperative analgesic requirement: double blind randomized placebo pilot study

Bilateral erector spinae plane block on opioid-sparing effect in upper abdominal surgery: study protocol for a bi-center prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a promising technique for effective analgesia. It is still uncertain if ESPB offers the same opioid-sparing effect as thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) in midline incision for upper abdominal surgery.

METHODS

The study is a prospective, bi-center, randomized, controlled, non-inferior trial. One hundred fifty-eight patients scheduled for upper abdominal surgery will be randomly assigned to receive bilateral ESPB or PVB before surgery. The primary outcome will be the equivalent cumulative analgesia dosage of sufentanil during the surgery, which is defined as the total dosage of sufentanil from anesthesia induction to tracheal extubation. The main secondary outcomes include postoperative complications and the quality of recovery-15 score at 24 h, 48 h, and 30 days after surgery.

DISCUSSION

This study will assess the opioid-sparing efficacy of ESPB and PVB, complications, and the quality of recovery of two blocks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2300073030 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/ ). Registered on 30 June 2023.

Continuous Wound Irrigation and Intraoperative Methadone Decreases Opioid Use and Shortens Length of Stay After CRS/HIPEC

BACKGROUND

Epidural analgesia is resource and labor intense and may limit postoperative management options and delay discharge. This study compared postoperative outcomes after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) with epidural analgesia versus continuous wound infusion system (CWIS) with/without intraoperative methadone.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective chart review was performed including all patients undergoing open CRS/HIPEC from 2018 to 2021. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, length of stay, and in-hospital analgesic use were reviewed. In-hospital opioid exposure in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) was calculated. Multivariate analysis (MVA) for mean total and daily opioid exposure was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 157 patients were included. Fifty-three (34%) had epidural analgesia, 96 (61%) had CWIS, and 79 (50%) received methadone. Length of stay was significantly shorter with CWIS + methadone versus epidural (7 vs. 8 days, p < 0.01). MVA showed significantly lower mean total and daily opioid exposure with CWIS+methadone versus epidural (total: 252.8 ± 17.7 MME vs. 486.8 ± 86.6 MME; odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.98, p = 0.04; Daily: 32.8 ± 2.0 MME vs. 51.9 ± 5.7 MME, OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-0.99, p ≤ 0.05). The CWIS-only group (n = 17) had a significantly lower median oral opioid exposure versus epidural (135 MME vs. 7.5 MME, p < 0.001) and longer length of stay versus CWIS + methadone (9 vs. 7 days, p = 0.04), There were no CWIS or methadone-associated complications and one epidural abscess.

CONCLUSIONS

CWIS + methadone safely offers better pain control with less in-hospital opioid use, shorter length of stay, and decreased resource utilization compared with epidural analgesia in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.

Same-Day Outpatient Lower-Extremity Joint Replacement: A Critical Analysis Review

➢ The economics of transitioning total joint arthroplasty (TJA) to standalone ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) should not be capitalized on at the expense of patient safety in the absence of established superior patient outcomes. ➢ Proper patient selection is essential to maximizing safety and avoiding complications resulting in readmission. ➢ Ambulatory TJA programs should focus on reducing complications frequently associated with delays in discharge. ➢ The transition from hospital-based TJA to ASC-based TJA has substantial financial implications for the hospital, payer, patient, and surgeon.

Comparison of continuous preperitoneal infiltration versus patient controlled analgesia for pain control in elective colorectal surgery

Background:

Post-operative analgesia is crucial in enhanced recovery after surgery and to minimize post-operative complications. There remains data paucity on the efficacy of preperitoneal analgesia (PPA) compared to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). This study aims to examine the efficacy of preperitoneal infusion as analgesia following elective colorectal surgery.

Methods:

This is a prospective cross-sectional study of all patients which underwent elective colorectal surgeries, performed in a tertiary surgical referral center with dedicated colorectal unit. Patients from May 2017 to April 2021 who underwent elective colorectal surgery were included in this study. Pain scores were reviewed and analyzed at regular intervals post-operatively for comparison.

Results:

Amongst the 200 patients included, there were 174 patients in the PPA arm and 26 patients using PCA. Patients in the PPA group were older age (63.29 vs 56.00, P = 0.003). A total of 118 patients in PPA cohort (67.8%) and 21 from PCA cohort (80.8%) underwent open surgery and the remaining 82 patients underwent laparoscopic surgeries. Although postoperative pain scores were consistently below 5 and reduced in trend from 2 hours to 96 hours postoperatively in both groups, the pain scores on coughing markedly reduced in the PPA group when compared PCA alone. The total dosage of opioid required in PPA cohort was also significantly lower when compared to PCA group at the first 24 hours postoperatively 12.21 (±13.0) vs 20.0 (±14.43), P = 0.048.

Conclusions:

PPA is a comparable modality for analgesia after elective colorectal surgery that reduces the opioid requirement postoperatively giving adequate pain relief. PPA should be considered as an alternative modality for multi-modal analgesia.

Sustaining a Multidisciplinary, Single-Institution, Postoperative Mobilization Clinical Practice Improvement Program Following Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol has been recently extended to hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery, with excellent outcomes reported. Early mobilization is an essential facet of the ERAS protocol, but compliance has been reported to be poor. We recently reported our success in a 6-month clinical practice improvement program (CPIP) for early postoperative mobilization. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced reduced staffing and resource availability, which can make CPIP sustainability difficult.

OBJECTIVE

We report outcomes at 1 year following the implementation of our CPIP to improve postoperative mobilization in patients undergoing major HPB surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We divided our study into 4 phases-phase 1: before CPIP implementation (January to April 2019); phase 2: CPIP implementation (May to September 2019); phase 3: post-CPIP implementation but prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (October 2019 to March 2020); and phase 4: post-CPIP implementation and during the pandemic (April 2020 to September 2020). Major HPB surgery was defined as any surgery on the liver, pancreas, and biliary system with a duration of >2 hours and with an anticipated blood loss of ≥500 ml. Study variables included length of hospital stay, distance ambulated on postoperative day (POD) 2, morbidity, balance measures (incidence of fall and accidental dislodgement of drains), and reasons for failure to achieve targets. Successful mobilization was defined as the ability to sit out of bed for >6 hours on POD 1 and ambulate ≥30 m on POD 2. The target mobilization rate was ≥75%.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients underwent major HPB surgery from phases 2 to 4 of our study, with 33 (29.0%), 45 (39.5%), and 36 (31.6%) patients in phases 2, 3, and 4, respectively. No baseline patient demographic data were collected for phase 1 (pre-CPIP implementation). The majority of the patients were male (n=79, 69.3%) and underwent hepatic surgery (n=92, 80.7%). A total of 76 (66.7%) patients underwent ON-Q PainBuster insertion intraoperatively. The median mobilization rate was 22% for phase 1, 78% for phases 2 and 3 combined, and 79% for phase 4. The mean pain score was 2.7 (SD 1.0) on POD 1 and 1.8 (SD 1.5) on POD 2. The median length of hospitalization was 6 days (IQR 5-11.8). There were no falls or accidental dislodgement of drains. Six patients (5.3%) had pneumonia, and 21 (18.4%) patients failed to ambulate ≥30 m on POD 2 from phases 2 to 4. The most common reason for failure to achieve the ambulation target was pain (6/21, 28.6%) and lethargy or giddiness (5/21, 23.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

This follow-up study demonstrates the sustainability of our CPIP in improving early postoperative mobilization rates following major HPB surgery 1 year after implementation, even during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further large-scale, multi-institutional prospective studies should be conducted to assess compliance and determine its sustainability.

Improving postoperative mobilisation rates in patients undergoing elective major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery

BACKGROUND

Early mobilisation reduces postoperative complications such as pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis and hospital length of stay. Many authors have reported poor compliance with early mobilisation within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery initiatives.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to increase postoperative day (POD) 2 mobilisation rate from 23% to 75% in patients undergoing elective major hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery within 6 months.

METHODS

We report a multidisciplinary team clinical practice improvement project (CPIP) to improve postoperative mobilisation of patients undergoing elective major HPB surgery. We identified the common barriers to mobilisation and analysed using the fishbone or cause-and-effect diagram and Pareto chart. A series of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles followed this. We tracked the rate of early mobilisation and mean distance walked. In the post hoc analysis, we examined the potential cost savings based on reduced hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Mobilisation rate on POD 2 following elective major HPB surgery improved from 23% to 78.9%, and this sustained at 6 months after the CPIP. Wound pain was the most common reason for failure to ambulate on POD 2. Hospital length of stay reduced from a median of 8 days to 6 days with an estimated cost saving of S$2228 per hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary quality improvement intervention effort resulted in an improved POD 2 mobilisation rate for patients who underwent elective major HPB surgery. This observed outcome was sustained at 6 months after completion of the CPIP with potential cost savings.

Continuous wound infusion with ropivacaine alone provides adequate analgesia following laparotomy

BACKGROUND

Although continuous wound infusion (CWI) with local anaesthetic has been used as an adjunct for pain relief following laparotomy, its use as the main modality has not been studied. This approach negates side effects related to intravenous opioid administration, therefore promoting enhanced recovery from surgery. We conducted this study to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of CWI following laparotomy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent laparotomy from June 2016 to December 2019 were analysed. All patients were given CWI with only oral supplementation. Pain was assessed based on the numeric rating scale (NRS).

RESULTS

One hundred and three patients were analysed. Mean age was 61.1 (standard deviation 16.7). 47.6% of patients were operated for intestinal obstruction. Large bowel resection was the most common operation performed (49.5%). 69.9% of patients underwent emergency surgery, whilst 51.5% of patients had surgery for cancer. On postoperative day 0, NRS was 3.2 (standard deviation (sd) 2.6) which decreased to 1.5 (sd 1.9) on day 3, and 1.1 (sd 1.8) on day 5. Mean time to flatus was 2.3 (sd 1.4) days, whilst mean time to first bowel movement was 3.1 (sd 1.7) days. Patients were able to commence ambulation by 2.5 (sd 1.8) days. Patients could tolerate a normal diet on day 3.9 (sd 3.3), and IV drip was removed on day 3.5 (sd 3.0). Mean length of stay was 9.1 (sd 6.9) days. Only two patients suffered from respiratory depression (1.9%) whilst five patients suffered from hypotension (4.9%). No patients had pruritus. 23.3% of patients had nausea or vomiting. Only one patient had a catheter-related complication which was easily addressed.

CONCLUSION

CWI provides adequate pain relief as the principle modality of analgesia after surgery, without opioid side effects.

Subcutaneous analgesic system versus epidural for post-operative pain control in surgical pediatric oncology patients

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Pediatric oncology patients often undergo open operations for tumor resection, and epidural catheters are commonly utilized for pain control. Our purpose was to evaluate whether a subcutaneous analgesic system (SAS) provides equivalent post-operative pain control.

METHODS

An IRB approved, retrospective chart review of children age <18 undergoing open abdominal, pelvic or thoracic surgery for tumor resection between 2017 and 2019 who received either epidural or SAS for post-operative pain control was performed. Comparisons of morphine milligram equivalents (MME), pain scores, and post-operative course were made using parametric and non-parametric analyses.

RESULTS

Of 101 patients, median age was 7 years (2 months-17.9 years). There were 65 epidural and 36 SAS patients. Transverse laparotomy was the most common incision (41%), followed by thoracotomy (29%). Pain scores, MME, urinary catheter days, and post-operative length of stay (LOS) were similar between the two groups. Urinary catheter use was more common in epidural patients (70% vs 30%, p = <0.001). SAS patients had faster time to ambulation and time to regular diet by 1 day (p = 0.02). Epidural patients more commonly had a complication with the pain device (20% vs 3%, p = 0.02) and were more likely to be discharged with narcotics (60% vs. 40%, p = 0.04). Charges associated with the hospital stay were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In pediatric oncology patients undergoing open abdominal, pelvic, and thoracic surgery, SAS may provide similar pain control to epidural, but with faster post-operative recovery, fewer complications, and less discharge narcotic use. A prospective study is needed to validate these results.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective Comparative LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Characterization of Device-Related Malfunction, Injury, and Death Associated with Using Elastomeric Pumps for Delivery of Local Anesthetics in the US Food and Drug Administration MAUDE Database

Purpose

To characterize medical device reports about elastomeric pumps delivering local anesthesia made to the US Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.

Patients and Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of medical device reports submitted to MAUDE from January 2010 to July 2018. A systematic, computerized algorithm was used to identify records pertaining to elastomeric pumps using local anesthesia. Included records indicated the use of local anesthesia or were determined to involve the use of local anesthetics (if they did not contain specific information on drug use). Reports were analyzed within the MAUDE event type categories of malfunction, injury, death, other, and missing. Possible cases of liver injury or surgical site infection were also identified. Manual review of narratives provided in MAUDE was performed by 2 reviewers to identify possible or probable cases of local anesthetic system toxicity (LAST).

Results

From a pool of 384,285 reports about elastomeric pumps from the MAUDE database, 4093 met inclusion criteria for involving elastomeric pumps to deliver local anesthetics, with the peak number of reports occurring in 2014. Of these identified reports, 3624 (88.5%) were categorized as malfunctions, 292 (7.1%) as injuries, and 8 (0.2%) as involving death. We identified 13 cases (0.3%) of possible liver injury and 51 cases (1.2%) of possible surgical site infection; 139 reports (3.4%) were determined to be probably (n=53) or possibly (n=86) associated with LAST.

Conclusion

Malfunction of elastomeric pumps delivering local anesthetics leaves patients vulnerable to injury or death. Our study indicates that reports of malfunction, injury, and death have been reported to the MAUDE database. These reports likely reflect an underrepresentation of cases in the real-world population, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive medical device reporting.

Entrapping bupivacaine-loaded emulsions in a crosslinked-hydrogel increases anesthetic effect and duration in a rat sciatic nerve block model

The purpose of this research was to evaluate a novel long-acting bupivacaine delivery system for control of postoperative pain. Bupivacaine-loaded lipid emulsion (BLE) droplets were created by high-speed homogenization. The BLE droplets were then entrapped into a crosslinked-hyaluronic acid hydrogel system to create an injectable composite gel formulation (HA-BLE). Dynamic light scattering, rheological, and drug release techniques were used to characterize the formulations. A rat sciatic nerve block with a thermal nociceptive assay was used to evaluate the anesthetic effect in comparison to controls, bupivacaine HCl and liposomal bupivacaine. The BLE droplets had a zeta potential, droplet size, and polydispersity index of -40.8 ± 0.66 mV, 299 ± 1.77 nm, and 0.409 ± 0.037, respectively. The HA-BLE formulation could be injected through 25 g needles and had an elastic modulus of 372 ± 23.7 Pa. Approximately 80% and 100% of bupivacaine was released from the BLE and HA-BLE formulations by 20 and 68 h, respectively. The HA-BLE formulation had a 5-times greater anesthetic area under the curve and an anesthetic duration that was twice as long as controls. Results indicate that incorporating the BLEs into the hydrogel significantly increased anesthetic effect by protecting the BLE droplets from the in vivo environment.

Continuous preperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing major abdominal or pelvic surgeries. A prospective controlled randomized study

Background and Aims

This study was conducted to compare continuous preperitoneal infusion (CPI) with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) of ropivacaine for pain relief and effect on pulmonary functions after major abdominal and pelvic surgeries.

Material and Methods

One hundred patients were randomized into two equal groups. Patients in CPI group (n = 50) received analgesia by continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine, whereas those in the CEI group (n = 50) received continuous epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was the first request of analgesia. The secondary outcome was the influence on the pulmonary functions.

Results

The time for the first request of analgesia was longer in the CPI group compared with that in the CEI group (7.3 ± 1.6 vs. 4.1 ± 1.1 h with P value = 0.001). The daily dose of morphine was lesser in CPI versus CEI group (11.3 ± 1 against 17.4 ± 0.9 mg). The pulmonary function tests were comparable except peak expiratory flow rate, which was better in CPI (170 ± 5.4) than CEI group (148.1 ± 5.8; with P value = 0.001).

Conclusion

Continuous preperitoneal infusion provides a superior analgesic effect than the continuous epidural infusion as regards delayed first request of analgesia, better pain scores, lesser usage of additional analgesics with better respiratory function.

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks compared to thoracic epidurals or multimodal analgesia for midline laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNBs) have been investigated to control pain for abdominal surgery via midline laparotomy while avoiding the adverse events of opioid or epidural analgesia. The review compiles the evidence comparing CPNBs to multimodal and epidural analgesia.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review using broad search terms in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane. Primary outcomes were pain scores and cumulative opioid consumption at 48 hours. Secondary outcomes were length of stay and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We rated the quality of the evidence using Cochrane and GRADE recommendations. The results were synthesized by meta-analysis using Revman.

RESULTS

Our final selection included 26 studies (1,646 patients). There was no statistically significant difference in pain control comparing CPNBs to either multimodal or epidural analgesia (low quality evidence). Less opioids were consumed when receiving epidural analgesia than CPNBs (mean difference [MD]: -16.13, 95% CI [-32.36, 0.10]), low quality evidence) and less when receiving CPNBs than multimodal analgesia (MD: -31.52, 95% CI [-42.81, -20.22], low quality evidence). The length of hospital stay was shorter when receiving epidural analgesia than CPNBs (MD: -0.78 days, 95% CI [-1.29, -0.27], low quality evidence) and shorter when receiving CPNBs than multimodal analgesia (MD: -1.41 days, 95% CI [-2.45, -0.36], low quality evidence). There was no statistically significant difference in PONV comparing CPNBs to multimodal (high quality evidence) or epidural analgesia (moderate quality evidence).

CONCLUSIONS

CPNBs should be considered a viable alternative to epidural analgesia when contraindications to epidural placement exist for patients undergoing midline laparotomies.

Local anaesthesia in dentistry: a review

Over the past century, there is perhaps no greater contribution to the practice of clinical dentistry than the development and application of local anaesthesia. What were once considered painful procedures have now been made routine by the deposition and action of local anaesthetics. This article will serve as a review of basic pharmacological principles of local anaesthesia, subsequent sequelae that can arise from their use, considerations when using local anaesthetics, and recent advances in the delivery of local anaesthetics.

Surgeon-Placed Continuous Wound Infusion Pain Catheters Markedly Decrease Narcotic Use and Improve Outcomes After Pancreatic Tumor Resection

BACKGROUND

Pancreatectomy results in significant postoperative pain and typically requires opioid analgesia for adequate pain control. Local anesthetics may decrease postoperative pain and opioid requirements but can be limited by onset of action, duration of effect, and inability to titrate dosing after administration. This can be overcome by surgeon placement of tunneled peri-incisional catheters with continuous wound infusion (CWI).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients undergoing open pancreatic tumor resection. All the patients received patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), enabling an objective comparison of opioid requirements, and underwent the same recovery pathway. The patients received CWI (n = 45), PCA alone (n = 11), or epidural analgesia (EA) (n = 9). The primary outcome was total opioid use in terms of intravenous morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and patient-reported pain scores on a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10.

RESULTS

No differences in baseline patient or tumor characteristics were observed. In both the uni- and multivariate analyses, CWI was associated with lower opioid use than PCA (MME, 83 vs 207 mg; p = 0.004) or EA (MME, 83 vs 156 mg; p < 0.001) without having a negative impact on pain scores. Furthermore, CWI was associated with a greater percentage of time that patients experienced optimal pain control (NRS, ≤ 4: 63% vs 50%; p = 0.033) and a shorter time to PCA independence (4.0 vs 4.9 days; p = 0.004) than PCA alone. In addition, CWI was associated with earlier ambulation [EA vs CWI: odds ratio (OR), 0.05; p = 0.021], improved spirometry performance (CWI vs PCA: regression coefficient (coef), 267; p = 0.013), and earlier urinary catheter removal (EA vs CWI: coef, 1.30; p = 0.013). The findings showed no differences in time to return of bowel function, antiemetic use, or hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

After open pancreatic tumor resection, CWI is safe and associated with decreased opioid requirements and improved functional outcomes without a negative impact on pain scores, supporting its potential for preferred use over PCA or EA alone.

Postoperative analgesic efficacy of continuous wound infusion with local anesthetics after laparoscopy (PAIN): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

To investigate the efficacy of continuous wound infusion (CWI) with local anesthetics for reducing postoperative pain compared with placebo in patients undergoing benign gynecologic laparoscopy.

METHODS

In this double-blind trial, 66 patients were randomly assigned to receive either ropivacaine or normal saline though a multi-orifice catheter placed into the umbilical surgical wound for 50 h postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was the severity of postoperative pain 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery. The secondary outcome measure was the number of rescue analgesics requested.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics did not statistically differ between the ropivacaine and placebo groups. The intensity of postoperative pain was significantly lower in the ropivacaine group than in the placebo group 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery (all P < 0.05). The number of rescue analgesics requested was also significantly lower in the ropivacaine group than in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding other surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

CWI with local anesthetics after laparoscopic surgery provides good analgesia and reduces rescue analgesics consumption.

Continuous local anaesthetic wound infusion for postoperative pain after midline laparotomy for colorectal resection in adults

BACKGROUND

Colorectal resection through a midline laparotomy is a commonly performed surgical procedure to treat various bowel conditions. The typical postoperative hospital stay after this operation is 6 to 10 days. The main factors hindering early recovery and discharge are thought to include postoperative pain and delayed return of bowel function.Continuous infusion of a local anaesthetic into tissues surrounding the surgical incision via a multi-lumen indwelling wound catheter placed by the surgeon prior to wound closure may reduce postoperative pain, opioid consumption, the time to return of bowel function, and the length of hospital stay.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of continuous local anaesthetic wound infusion for postoperative pain after midline laparotomy for colorectal resection in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase databases to January 2019 to identify trials relevant to this review. We also searched reference lists of relevant trials and reviews for eligible trials. Additionally, we searched two clinical trials registers for ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomised controlled trials (including non-standard designs) or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing continuous wound infusion of a local anaesthetic versus a placebo or a sham after midline laparotomy for colorectal resection in adults. We did not compare continuous local anaesthetic wound infusion to other techniques, such as transverse abdominis plane block or thoracic epidural analgesia. We allowed non-randomised analgesic co-interventions carried out equally in the intervention and control groups.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently identified trials for inclusion and assessed their quality using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. We extracted data using standardised forms, including pain at rest and on movement (10-point scale), opioid consumption via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system (mg morphine equivalent), postoperative opioid-related adverse events, the time to rescue analgesia, the time to first flatus and to first bowel movement, the time to ambulation, the length of hospital stay, serious postoperative adverse events, and patient satisfaction. We quantitatively synthesised the data by meta-analysis. We summarised and graded the certainty of the evidence for critical outcomes using the GRADEpro tool and created a 'Summary of findings' table.

MAIN RESULTS

This review included six randomised controlled trials that enrolled a total of 564 adults undergoing elective midline laparotomy for colorectal resection comparing continuous wound infusion of a local anaesthetic to a normal saline placebo. Due to 23 post-randomisation exclusions, a total of 541 participants contributed data to the analysis of at least one outcome (local anaesthetic 268; control 273). Most participants were aged 55 to 65 years, with normal body mass index and low to moderate anaesthetic risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists class I-III). Random sequence generation, allocation concealment, and blinding were appropriately carried out in most trials. However, we had to downgrade the certainty of the evidence for most outcomes due to serious study limitations (risk of bias), inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision and reporting bias.Primary outcomesOn postoperative day 1, pain at rest (mean difference (MD) -0.59 (from 3.1), 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.12 to -0.07; 5 studies, 511 participants; high-certainty evidence), pain on movement (MD -1.1 (from 6.1), 95% CI -2.3 to -0.01; 3 studies, 407 participants; low-certainty evidence) and opioid consumption via PCA (MD -12 mg (from 41 mg), 95% CI -20 to -4; 6 studies, 528 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) were reduced in the local anaesthetic group compared to the control group.Secondary outcomesThere was a reduction in the time to first bowel movement (MD -0.67 from 4.4 days, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.17; 4 studies, 197 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and the length of hospital stay (MD -1.2 from 7.4 days, 95% CI -2.0 to -0.3; 4 studies, 456 participants; high-certainty evidence) in the local anaesthetic group compared to the control group.There was no evidence of a difference in any serious postoperative adverse events until hospital discharge (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.58; 6 studies, 541 participants; low-certainty evidence) between the two study groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

After elective midline laparotomy for colorectal resection, continuous wound infusion of a local anaesthetic compared to a normal saline placebo reduces postoperative pain at rest and the length of hospital stay, on the basis of high-certainty evidence. This means we are very confident that the effect estimates for these outcomes lie close to the true effects. There is moderate-certainty evidence to indicate that the intervention probably reduces opioid consumption via PCA and the time to first bowel movement. This means we are moderately confident that effect estimates for these outcomes are likely to be close to the true effects, but there is a possibility that they are substantially different. The intervention may reduce postoperative pain on movement, however, this conclusion is based on low-certainty evidence. This means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited. The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. There is low-certainty evidence to indicate that the intervention may have little or no effect on the rates of any serious postoperative adverse events until hospital discharge. High-quality randomised controlled trials to evaluate the intervention with a focus on important clinical and patient-centred outcomes are needed.

Optimizing health before elective thoracic surgery: systematic review of modifiable risk factors and opportunities for health services research

Despite progress in many different domains of surgical care, we are still striving toward practices which will consistently lead to the best care for an increasingly complex surgical population. Thoracic surgical patients, as a group, have multiple medical co-morbidities and are at increased risk for developing complications after surgical intervention. Our healthcare systems have been focused on treating complications as they occur in the hopes of minimizing their impact, as well as aiding in recovery. In recent years there has emerged a body of evidence outlining opportunities to optimize patients and likely prevent or decrease the impact of many complications. The purpose of this review article is to summarize four major domains-optimal pain control, nutritional status, functional fitness, and smoking cessation-all of which can have a substantial impact on the thoracic surgical patient's course in the hospital-as well as to describe opportunities for improvement, and areas for future research efforts.

Efficacy of Intravenous Acetaminophen in Length of Stay and Postoperative Pain Control in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery Patients

Background: Opiate-based pain medications may incur adverse effects following bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous Acetaminophen (IVAPAP) on length of stay (LOS) after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgery.

Methods: This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted from October 2011 to March 2014 at a 416-bed teaching hospital. Eighty-nine total patients were included (control group, n = 45; treatment group, n = 44). Patients were administered either 1000 mg of IVAPAP or placebo every 6 h beginning preoperatively and continuing for four doses. LOS, total narcotic consumption, pain and nausea scores, time to return of flatus (ROF), and postoperative rescue pain medication used were measured during the first 24 h after surgery.

Results: LOS was significantly decreased in the treatment group compared with control (2.72 days vs. 3.18 days; p = 0.03). There was significant reduction in time to ROF (1.87 days vs. 2.24 days; p = 0.04). Pain was significantly decreased in the first 2 postoperative hours in the treatment group (p = 0.02). Total opioid consumption, postoperative nausea scores, and use of rescue pain medications were not affected.

Conclusions: The use of IVAPAP significantly decreases LOS following LRYGB, improves acute postoperative pain control, and mediates quicker return of bowel function.

A Multimodal Preemptive Analgesic Protocol for Alveolar Bone Graft Surgery: Decreased Pain, Hospital Stay, and Health Care Costs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate postoperative pain, hospital length of stay (LOS), and associated costs of multiple perioperative analgesic strategies following alveolar bone grafting (ABG).

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care pediatric hospital.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) harvest techniques: "Open Harvest" (n = 22), "Trephine Only" (n = 14), or "Trephine + Pain Pump" (n = 25).

INTERVENTION

The "Open Harvest" group underwent open ICBG harvest with 3-walled osteotomies. For the other 2 treatment groups, a trephine drill was used to harvest iliac crest bone with a ropivacaine infusion pump into the hip donor site ("Trephine + Pain Pump") or without ("Trephine Only"). Patients who underwent ABG with only cadaveric allograft were analyzed as a comparison group ("No Harvest").

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Outcomes were planned prior to data collection: maximum pain score, hospital LOS, and associated health care costs.

RESULTS

Maximum pain scores were significantly higher in the "Open Harvest" group (7.3/10) compared to "Trephine + Pain Pump" (1.8/10; P < .0001) and "No Harvest" groups (2.8/10; P < .01). Hospital LOS decreased from 2.4 days ("Open Harvest") to 0.5 days (Trephine + Pain Pump"; P < .0001). Twelve (48%) patients from "Trephine + Pain Pump" were discharged on the day of surgery. The "Trephine + Pain Pump" saved an estimated $5336 for a unilateral ABG and $7265 for a bilateral ABG compared to "Open Harvest."

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of the trephine ICBG technique and ropivacaine infusion catheter effectively decreased pain, shortened hospital stay, and improved cost saving compared to patients who have undergone other methods of ICBG.

Use of the On-Q Pain Pump in Alveolar Bone Grafting: Effect on Hospit Length of Stay

Objective

Alveolar bone grafting (ABG) with iliac crest bone graft can be associated with significant pain at the donor site. The On-Q pain pump has been shown to be efficacious in treating postsurgical pain. The aim of this study was to compare the length of postoperative hospital stay in patients undergoing ABG who received the On-Q pain pump at the iliac crest donor site (On-Q+) with that of patients who did not receive the On-Q pain pump (On-Q-).

Design

A retrospective, cohort study, approved by institutional review board, was performed. Thirty-one consecutive patients in the On-Q- group were compared with 38 consecutive patients in the On-Q– group. The two cohorts were assessed for length of stay. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact probability test.

Setting

Tertiary care academic medical center.

Patients

Sixty-nine patients with cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P) undergoing secondary ABG with iliac crest bone graft were operated on between May 1993 and January 2014.

Main Outcome Measure

Length of postoperative hospital stay.

Result

Mean length of stay in the On-Q– patients was 0.52 days versus 0.37 days for the On-Q– patients. This difference between the two cohorts was not statistically significant (P = .234).

Conclusion

Although there is a trend toward a shorter length of stay in our patients who received the On-Q pump, this finding was not statistically significant. Given the expense and additional burden of care associated with the device, we have become more selective in its utilization.

Comparison of intrathecal morphine and surgical-site infusion of ropivacaine as adjuncts to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in living-donor kidney transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

This prospective observational study compared the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of intrathecal morphine (ITM) and surgical-site infusion (SSI) of ropivacaine as adjuncts to intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) (fentanyl) in living-donor kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Patients undergoing living-donor kidney transplantation who received ITM or SSI in addition to IV PCA were included. Rescue analgesia was achieved with IV meperidine as required. The primary outcome, measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS), was pain at rest and when coughing. Patients were assessed for 48 hours after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients (32 ITM, 21 SSI) were included in the study. The ITM group showed significantly lower NRS scores, at rest and when coughing, for up to 12 and eight hours. NRS scores were comparable between the groups at other times. The ITM group had significantly less postoperative systemic opioid requirement in the first 24 hours, but there was no significant difference between the systemic opioid consumption of the groups on postoperative Day 2. In the ITM group, 3 (9.4%) patients presented with bradypnoea and 1 (3.1%) with excessive sedation in the first 12 postoperative hours. More patients in the ITM group developed pruritus requiring treatment during the first 24 hours. There were no differences between the groups in other outcomes (e.g. nausea/vomiting, change in pulmonary or kidney functions).

CONCLUSION

Compared with SSI, ITM reduced immediate postoperative pain and IV opioid consumption on postoperative Day 1 after living-donor kidney transplantation, but at the cost of increased pruritus and respiratory depression.

Randomised Comparison of Three Types of Continuous Anterior Abdominal Wall Block after Midline Laparotomy for Gynaecological Oncology Surgery

Effective analgesia after midline laparotomy surgery is essential for enhanced recovery programs. We compared three types of continuous abdominal wall block for analgesia after midline laparotomy for gynaecological oncology surgery. We conducted a single-centre, double-blind randomised controlled trial. Ninety-four patients were randomised into three groups to receive two days of programmed intermittent boluses of ropivacaine (18 ml 0.5% ropivacaine every four hours) via either a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) catheter, posterior rectus sheath (PRS) catheter, or a subcutaneous (SC) catheter. All groups received patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, and regular paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication. Measured outcomes included analgesic and antiemetic usage and visual analog scores for pain, nausea, vomiting, and satisfaction. Eighty-eight patients were analysed (29 SC, 29 PRS and 30 TAP). No differences in the primary outcome were found (median milligrams morphine usage on day two SC 28, PRS 25, TAP 21, P=0.371). There were differences in secondary outcomes. Compared with the SC group, the TAP group required less morphine in recovery (0 mg versus 6 mg, P=0.01) and reported less severe pain on day one (visual analog scores 36.3 mm versus 55 mm, P=0.04). The TAP group used fewer doses of tropisetron on day one compared with the PRS group (8 versus 21, P=0.016). Programmed intermittent boluses of ropivacaine delivered via PRS, TAP and SC catheters can be provided safely to patients undergoing midline laparotomy surgery. Initially TAP catheters appear superior, reducing early opioid and antiemetic requirements and severe pain, but these advantages are lost by day two.

Influence of different positioning of a local pain catheter on postoperative pain after paramedian laparotomy-a blinded, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Continuous application of local anaesthetics reduces postoperative pain after different approaches for laparotomy. In this randomized, blinded trial, we investigated the effect of continuous application of local anaesthetics after paramedian laparotomy either with subfascial or subcutaneous catheter in addition to a standardized systemic analgesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage III/IV melanoma and indication for radical iliac lymph node dissection (RILND) were randomized to a continuous application of a local anaesthetic through either a subfascial or subcutaneous catheter. Participants and those assessing the outcomes were blinded. The main outcome criterion was the pain level on the first postoperative morning while exercising measured with a visual analogue scale. Minor criteria were the pain measured by the area-under-curve until the third postoperative day, the patient's satisfaction with analgesic treatment, the analgesic requirement, the overall complications and the day of discharge.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were evaluated. Pain therapy was sufficient in both groups during the postoperative course while resting and during mobilization. There were no significant differences regarding the main and minor outcome criteria. Doses of additional analgesics did not differ between groups. No adverse events or side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

For patients who undergo paramedian laparotomy, none of the investigated techniques is superior to the other at a median pain level under visual analogue scale (VAS) 30 mm on the first postoperative morning.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00003632 (German Register of Clinical Trials).

Effectiveness and safety of continuous wound infiltration for postoperative pain management after open gastrectomy

AIM: To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of continuous wound infiltration (CWI) for pain management after open gastrectomy.

METHODS: Seventy-five adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System (ASA) grade 1-3 undergoing open gastrectomy were randomized to three groups. Group 1 patients received CWI with 0.3% ropivacaine (group CWI). Group 2 patients received 0.5 mg/mL morphine intravenously by a patient-controlled analgesia pump (PCIA) (group PCIA). Group 3 patients received epidural analgesia (EA) with 0.12% ropivacaine and 20 µg/mL morphine with an infusion at 6-8 mL/h for 48 h (group EA). A standard general anesthetic technique was used for all three groups. Rescue analgesia (2 mg bolus of morphine, intravenous) was given when the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was ≥ 4. The outcomes measured over 48 h after the operation were VAS scores both at rest and during mobilization, total morphine consumption, relative side effects, and basic vital signs. Further results including time to extubation, recovery of bowel function, surgical wound healing, mean length of hospitalization after surgery, and the patient’s satisfaction were also recorded.

RESULTS: All three groups had similar VAS scores during the first 48 h after surgery. Group CWI and group EA, compared with group PCIA, had lower morphine consumption (P < 0.001), less postoperative nausea and vomiting (1.20 ± 0.41 vs 1.96 ± 0.67, 1.32 ± 0.56 vs 1.96 ± 0.67, respectively, P < 0.001), earlier extubation (16.56 ± 5.24 min vs 19.76 ± 5.75 min, P < 0.05, 15.48 ± 4.59 min vs 19.76 ± 5.75 min, P < 0.01), and earlier recovery of bowel function (2.96 ± 1.17 d vs 3.60 ± 1.04 d, 2.80 ± 1.38 d vs 3.60 ± 1.04 d, respectively, P < 0.05). The mean length of hospitalization after surgery was reduced in groups CWI (8.20 ± 2.58 d vs 10.08 ± 3.15 d, P < 0.05) and EA (7.96 ± 2.30 d vs 10.08 ± 3.15 d, P < 0.01) compared with group PCIA. All three groups had similar patient satisfaction and wound healing, but group PCIA was prone to higher sedation scores when compared with groups CWI and EA, especially during the first 12 h after surgery. Group EA had a lower mean arterial pressure within the first postoperative 12 h compared with the other two groups.

CONCLUSION: CWI with ropivacaine yields a satisfactory analgesic effect within the first 48 h after open gastrectomy, with lower morphine consumption and accelerated recovery.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of levobupivacaine 0.5 %, a local anesthetic, infusion in the surgical wound after modified radical mastectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Effective treatment of postoperative pain contributes to decreasing the rate of complications as well as the total cost of the operated patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the costs and the efficiency of use of continuous infusion of levobupivacaine 0.5 % with the help of an infusion pump in modified radical mastectomy.

METHODS

A cost calculation of the analgesic procedures (continuous infusion of levobupivacaine 0.5 % [levobupivacaine group (LG)] or saline [saline group (SG)] (2 ml/h 48 h) has been carried out based on the data of a previous clinical trial (double-blind randomized study) of patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy surgery. The measure of the effectiveness was the point reduction of pain derived from the verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS). The usual incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was performed.

RESULTS

Considering only the intravenous analgesia, overall costs were lower in LG, as less analgesia was used (EUR14.06 ± 7.89 vs. 27.47 ± 14.79; p < 0.001). In this study the costs of the infusion pump were not calculated as it was used by both groups and they offset each other. However, if the infusion pump costs were included, costs would be higher in the LG, (EUR91.89 ± 7.89 vs. 27.47 ± 14.79; p < 0.001) and then the ICER was -8.51, meaning that for every extra point of decrease in the pain verbal numerical rating score over the 2-day period, the cost increased by EUR8.51.

CONCLUSION

Infiltration of local anesthetics is an effective technique for controlling postoperative pain and the associated added costs are relatively low in relation to the total cost of mastectomy, therefore providing patients with a higher quality of care in the prevention of pain.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov: reference number NCT01389934. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01389934

Impact of analgesic modality on stress response following laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a post-hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Epidural analgesia is perceived to modulate the stress response after open surgery. This study aimed to explore the feasibility and impact of measuring the stress response attenuation by post-operative analgesic modalities following laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol.

METHODS

Data were collected as part of a double-blinded randomised controlled pilot trial at two UK sites. Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection were randomised to receive either thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) or continuous local anaesthetic infusion to the extraction site via wound infusion catheter (WIC) post-operatively. The aim of this study was to measure the stress response to the analgesic modality by measuring peripheral venous blood samples analysed for serum concentrations of insulin, cortisol, epinephrine and interleukin-6 at induction of anaesthesia, at 3, 6, 12 and 24 h after the start of operation. Secondary endpoints included mean pain score in the first 48 h, length of hospital stay, post-operative complications and 30-day re-admission rates.

RESULTS

There was a difference between the TEA and WIC groups that varies across time. In the TEA group, there was significant but transient reduced level of serum epinephrine and a higher level of insulin at 3 and 6 h. In the WIC, there was a significant reduction of interleukin-6 values, especially at 12 h. There was no significant difference observed in the other endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant transient attenuating effect of TEA on stress response following laparoscopic colorectal surgery and within ERAS as expressed by serum epinephrine and insulin levels. Continuous wound infusion with local anaesthetic, however, attenuates cytokine response as expressed by interleukin-6.

A randomized double-blind clinical trial of a continuous 96-hour levobupivacaine infiltration after open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery for postoperative pain management--including clinically important changes in protein binding

BACKGROUND

Continuous local anesthetic infiltration has been used for pain management after open colorectal surgery. However, its application to patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery has not been examined. The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was to study the use of a commercial infiltration device in patients undergoing open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery, along with plasma concentrations of levobupivacaine, its acute-phase binding protein (alpha-1 acid glycoprotein, AAG), and the stress marker, cortisol.

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomized (2:1) to receive a continuous infiltration of either levobupivacaine or placebo using a commercial device (ON-Q PainBuster) inserted in the preperitoneal layer at the end of surgery. Blood was sampled for determination of levobupivacaine and AAG and cortisol concentrations. Other outcomes measured were pain scores, morbidity and mortality, time to bowel movement, mobilization, and length of hospitalization.

RESULTS

In patients having open surgery, the levobupivacaine treatment showed a trend toward reduced total opioid consumption. No patients reported adverse effects attributable to levobupivacaine, despite 11 patients having concentrations at some time(s) during the 96-hour infiltration of up to 5.5 mg/L exceeding a putative toxicity threshold of 2.7 mg/L. AAG concentrations measured postsurgery increased by a mean of 55% (P < 0.001) at 48 hours. Cortisol concentrations also increased significantly by a mean of 191% at 1 hour.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous local anesthetic infiltration may be more beneficial in open surgery. The threshold for adverse effects from highly bound local anesthetic drugs established in healthy volunteers is of limited usefulness in clinical scenarios in which AAG concentration increases in response to surgical stress. Hence, there is scope to adopt higher doses to enhance therapeutic benefit.

Preperitoneal catheter analgesia is an effective method for pain management after colorectal surgery: the results of 100 consecutive patients

Background

In a previous prospective randomized trial, we showed that local anesthetic infusion using a preperitoneal catheter is an effective postoperative analgesic method following colorectal resections. Over time, we have improved the technique of preperitoneal catheter analgesia. In this prospective cohort study, we report the results of 100 consecutive patients who underwent colorectal resections.

Materials and methods

Preperitoneal catheter analgesia was performed via a multihole catheter placed in the preperitoneal space using 10 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine every 4 hours following the operation for the first 3 days. Additional analgesics were used whenever necessary. Postoperative pain was assessed with the visual analog scale score. Short-term clinical outcomes, such as need for systemic analgesics, time to first gas and stool discharge, length of hospital stay, and morbidity, particularly surgical site infections, were reported.

Results

From May 2009 to May 2010, 100 consecutive patients were recruited in the study. A total of 83 patients were operated on for malignancy, and the tumor was located in the rectum in 52 patients and in the colon in 31 patients. The median pain score was 4 (0–6), 3 (0–9), 2 (0–8), 1 (0–8), 1 (0–6), 0 (0–6), and 0 (0–3) at postoperative hours 0, 1, 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72, respectively. Additional analgesics were required in 34 patients: 21 of them required only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and 13 patients needed opioids additionally. The median amounts of opioid analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were 1.76±0.78 mg and 6.70±1.18 mg, respectively. However, almost all of the additional analgesics were given in the first 24 hours. Surgical site infections were detected in eight patients.

Conclusion

Preperitoneal catheter analgesia is an effective analgesic method. When applied and used properly, it may even be used as the sole analgesic method in some patients.

Use of continuous local anesthetic infusion in the management of postoperative split-thickness skin graft donor site pain

Donor sites from split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) impose significant pain on patients in the early postoperative period. We report the use of continuous local anesthetic infusion as a method for the management of postoperative STSG donor site pain. Patients undergoing single or dual, adjacent STSG harvest from the thigh (eight patients) or back (one patient) were included in this study. Immediately after STSG harvest, subcutaneous catheters were placed for continuous infusion of local anesthetic. Daily donor site-specific pain severity scores were prospectively recorded in nine patients receiving local anesthetic infusion. Patient characteristics, technical aspects, and postoperative complications were identified in the study. The thigh was the anatomic location chosen for most donor sites. A single catheter was placed for donor sites limited to 4 inches in width or less. A dual catheter system was used for those wider than 4 inches. An elastomeric pump delivered continuously a total of 4 ml/hr of a solution of 0.5% bupivacaine. The average anesthetic infusion duration was 3.1 days. A substantial decrease in worst, least, and average donor site pain scores was found from the first 24 hours to the second postoperative day in our patients, a treatment trend that continued through postoperative day 3. One patient developed minor anesthetic leakage from the catheter insertion site; and in three cases, accidental dislodgement of the catheters occurred. There were no cases of donor site secondary infection. All donor sites were completely epithelialized at 1-month follow-up. Continuous local anesthetic infusion is technically feasible and may represent an option for postoperative donor site pain control after STSG harvesting. Relative cost-benefit of the technique remains to be determined.

Evaluation of novel local anesthetic wound infiltration techniques for postoperative pain following colorectal resection surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Novel local anesthetic blocks have become increasingly popular in the multimodal pain management following abdominal surgery, but have not been evaluated in a procedure-specific manner in colorectal surgery.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of novel local anesthetic techniques in colorectal surgery.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (date range, January 1990 to February 2013) STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials comparing a novel local anesthetic technique with placebo/routine analgesia in adults undergoing open or laparoscopic colonic or rectal resection were selected.

INTERVENTIONS

This is a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating novel local anesthetic wound infiltration techniques such as wound catheter, transversus abdominis plane block, and intraperitoneal instillation in colorectal surgical procedures. The comparator group was defined as placebo/routine analgesia.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was opiate requirement at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included opiate requirements at 48 hours, pain numerical rating score at 24 and 48 hours at rest and on movement, recovery (length of stay, nausea and vomiting, time until bowel movement and diet resumption), and complications. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate specific local anesthetic techniques and open and laparoscopic surgery.

RESULTS

Twelve randomized controlled trials compared local anesthetic techniques with placebo/routine analgesia. Local anesthetic techniques demonstrated a significant reduction in opiate requirement at 48 hours. Local anesthetic techniques were also associated with lower pain scores on movement at 24 and 48 hours, shorter length of stay, and earlier resumption of diet.

LIMITATIONS

The diverse study design led to statistical heterogeneity in several analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel local anesthetic wound infiltration techniques in colorectal surgery appear to reduce opiate requirements, to reduce pain scores, and to improve recovery in comparison with placebo/routine analgesia.

The value of continuous wound infusion systems for postoperative pain control following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an analysis of outcomes and cost

BACKGROUND

Current health-care reform is focusing on improving patient outcomes while cutting health-care costs, and as such, surgeons should consider that postoperative pain management techniques can contribute to the overall value of care delivered to patients. The current study aims to evaluate the value of continuous wound infusion systems (CWIS) in patients following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB).

METHODS

Records of all consecutive patients who underwent elective LRYGB by a single surgeon from January 2008 until June 2010 were reviewed. The presence of CWIS, patient pain scores, postanesthesia care unit (PACU) times, postoperative narcotic and antiemetic requirements, postoperative complications, and hospital length of stay (LOS) were recorded. Clinical data were subsequently linked and correlated with hospital financial data to determine overall hospital costs.

RESULTS

Forty-four LRYGB patients were reviewed; 24 (54.5 %) received CWIS for postoperative pain control. There was no significant difference in PACU times, postoperative LOS, or postoperative complications. Patients with CWIS required significantly less narcotics (36.7 vs. 55.5 mg IV morphine equivalents for total LOS; p = 0.03) and antiemetics (5.0 vs. 12.4 mg ondansetron for total LOS; p = 0.02); however, patients with CWIS did not report better pain control and had slightly higher hospital costs ($13,627.00 vs. $13,395.05, p = 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the current study suggest that the value of CWIS for postoperative pain control following LRYGB is limited. As the environment for hospital reimbursement is changing to be one which is value driven, surgeons should consider analyses such as this when making decisions on which treatments to offer their patients.

Postoperative Opioid Requirements Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients Receiving Continuous Bupivacaine Through a Pump System: A Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

Patients who undergo Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery have self-reported considerable postoperative pain, often requiring opioid administration.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether continuous delivery of local anesthetic via an infusion pump system decreased postoperative opioid usage in post-RYGB patients.

METHODS

The electronic health record was used to identify and review 289 patients who underwent RYGB at our institution from January 2009 to October 2011. The treatment group received a continuous infusion of 0.375% bupivacaine administered by intraperitoneal soaker catheter for 48 hours via an infusion pump; the control group did not receive a pump or local anesthetic. Both groups received general anesthesia, nausea prophylaxis, and pain medication. Pain management consisted of opioid-containing patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for the first 24 hours. Patients transitioned to supplemental intravenous opioid boluses, plus an oral opioid, for the remainder of their stay. Opioid use was measured in terms of morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and length of hospitalization.

RESULTS

Morphine equivalents over the postoperative time period studied were significantly lower in the bupivacaine group than the control group (133 vs 106 mg, respectively; P = .001). There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the 2 groups (P = .80). Finally, the length of hospitalization between the 2 groups did not differ (P = .77).

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that continuous infusion of bupivacaine, administered via a pain pump system, may have decreased postoperative opioid utilization. There were no differences in VAS scores or length of hospitalization between groups.

On-Q ® pain pump versus epidural for postoperative analgesia in children

PURPOSE

The On-Q(®) pain pump provides a continuous infusion of local anesthesia for management of postoperative pain. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and outcomes of the On-Q(®) pump compared to continuous epidural in children postoperatively.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients in our hospital who received a postoperative epidural or On-Q(®) pump from 2005 to 2008. Patients were sub-categorized by incision type.

RESULTS

Seventy patients received epidural and 66 On-Q(®). On-Q(®) therapy was longer by 1 day (p < 0.0001), but did not affect postoperative length of stay. Patients with On-Q(®) pumps had a decreased rate of Foley catheter placement (p = 0.002) and shorter duration of catheter use by more than a day (p < 0.001). Moderate to severe pain was similar in the two groups on postoperative days 0-5. Supplemental narcotic use was higher in the On-Q(®) group only on postoperative day 1 (p = 0.005) and in patients with midline and transverse abdominal incisions. No differences were seen in time to ambulation or recovery of postoperative ileus.

CONCLUSION

The On-Q(®) pain pump is an effective method for postoperative pain control, without the inherent risks of epidural catheters.

Wound infusion of bupivacaine following radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomised placebo-controlled clinical study

CONTEXT

The effectiveness of postoperative analgesia through a wound catheter is subject to considerable debate.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that local wound infusion with bupivacaine followed by continuous infusion could reduce postoperative need for opioids in patients undergoing retropubic prostatectomy.

DESIGN

Single-centre prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

A major university hospital in Denmark.

PATIENTS

Following written informed consent, 60 patients scheduled for prostatectomy were recruited to the study and 50 completed the protocol to reach data analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

Thirty millilitre bolus of bupivacaine (2.5 mg ml) or isotonic saline was injected through a subfascially placed wound catheter followed by continuous infusion at 5 ml h during the following 48 h. All patients were prescribed paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, morphine and oxycodone if needed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was the opioid requirement. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at rest and with activity, and nausea and vomiting scores.

RESULTS

The total amount of morphine required during the postoperative period was not significantly higher (P=0.49) in the placebo group (12 mg, 25 to 75% percentile 5 to 18) than the bupivacaine group (10 mg, 25 to 75% percentile 0 to 16). Similarly, the total amount of oxycodone required was not significantly different (P=0.99) and was equal among the groups (5 mg, 25 to 75% percentile 5 to 10). At 2 h postoperatively, a significantly (P=0.0488) higher number of patients required additional morphine in the placebo group. No differences between the groups were detected at any time point regarding pain scores or the presence of nausea and vomiting.

CONCLUSION

Additional use of a wound catheter in patients undergoing prostatectomy in the present perioperative setting appears superfluous.

Epidural versus ON-Q local anesthetic-infiltrating catheter for post-thoracotomy pain control

OBJECTIVE

The authors compared thoracic epidural with ON-Q infiltrating catheters in patients having open thoracotomy to determine whether one method better relieves postoperative pain and would allow earlier discharge from the hospital and, hence, cost savings.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty adult patients (24 to 81 years old) undergoing open thoracotomy by one surgeon.

INTERVENTIONS

One group had thoracic epidural catheters placed by an anesthesiologist and then managed by the acute pain service. The other group had intraoperative ON-Q (ON-Q; I-Flow; Lake Forest, California) infiltrating catheters placed by the surgeon, wound infiltration with a local anesthetic, plus patient-controlled analgesia with an intravenous opioid.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The authors measured and compared average daily pain rating, maximum pain rating, time to discharge from the hospital, and total bill for hospital stay. Patients who received epidural analgesia had lower average pain scores on day 2 than did patients in the ON-Q group. Patients in the ON-Q group reported higher maximum pain scores on days 1 and 2 and at the time of discharge. Patients in the ON-Q group were discharged an average of 1 day earlier; hence, their average total bill was lower.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though the maximum pain score was higher in the ON-Q group, patients were comfortable enough to be discharged earlier, resulting in cost savings. ON-Q infiltrating catheters present a good option for providing postoperative analgesia to patients having an open thoracotomy.

Safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Fast-track surgery has been shown to enhance postoperative recovery in several surgical fields. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

METHODS

The present study was designed as a single-center, randomized, unblinded, parallel-group trial. Patients were eligible if they had gastric cancer for which laparoscopic distal gastrectomy was indicated. The fast-track surgery protocol included intensive preoperative education, a short duration of fasting, a preoperative carbohydrate load, early postoperative ambulation, early feeding, and sufficient pain control using local anesthetics perfused via a local anesthesia pump device, with limited use of opioids. The primary endpoint was the duration of possible and actual postoperative hospital stay.

RESULTS

We randomized 47 patients into a fast-track group (n=22) and a conventional pathway group (n=22), with three patients withdrawn. The possible and actual postoperative hospital stays were shorter in the fast-track group than in the conventional group (4.68±0.65 vs. 7.05±0.65; P<0.001 and 5.36±1.46 vs. 7.95±1.98; P<0.001). The time to first flatus and pain intensity were not different between groups; however, a greater frequency of additional pain control was needed in the conventional group (3.64±3.66 vs. 1.64±1.33; P=0.023). The fast-track group was superior to the conventional group in several factors of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, including: fatigue, appetite loss, financial problems, and anxiety. The complication and readmission rates were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Fast-track surgery could enhance postoperative recovery, improve immediate postoperative quality of life, and be safely applied in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Postoperative pain management after spinal fusion surgery: an analysis of the efficacy of continuous infusion of local anesthetics

Spinal fusion surgery is a major surgery that results in severe postoperative pain, therefore pain reduction is a primary concern. New strategies for pain management are currently under investigation and include multimodal treatment. A 3-year retrospective analysis of patients with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing spinal fusion surgery was performed at our hospital, assessing patient pain scores, opioid use, and recovery. We evaluated the effect of adding continuous infusion of local anesthetics (CILA) to a postoperative pain management protocol that includes intraoperative intrathecal morphine, as well as postoperative patient-controlled analgesia and oral opioid/acetaminophen combination. The study compared 25 patients treated according to the standard protocol, with 62 patients treated with CILA in addition to the pain management protocol. Patients in the CILA group used nearly 0.5 mg/kg less opioid analgesics during the first 24 hours after surgery.

Feasibility study of analgesia via epidural versus continuous wound infusion after laparoscopic colorectal resection

Background

With the adoption of enhanced recovery and emerging new modalities of analgesia after laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR), the role of epidural analgesia has been questioned. This pilot trial assessed the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing epidural analgesia and use of a local anaesthetic wound infusion catheter (WIC) following LCR.

Methods

Between April 2010 and May 2011, patients undergoing elective LCR in two centres were randomized to analgesia via epidural or WIC. Sham procedures were used to blind surgeons, patients and outcome assessors. The primary outcome was the feasibility of a large RCT, and all outcomes for a definitive trial were tested. The success of blinding was assessed using a mixed-methods approach.

Results

Forty-five patients were eligible, of whom 34 were randomized (mean(s.d.) age 70(11·8) years). Patients were followed up per-protocol; there were no deaths, and five patients had a total of six complications. Challenges with capturing pain data were identified and resolved. Mean(s.d.) pain scores on the day of discharge were 1·9(3·1) in the epidural group and 0·7(0·7) in the WIC group. Median length of stay was 4 (range 2–35, interquartile range 3–5) days. Mean use of additional analgesia (intravenous morphine equivalents) was 12 mg in the WIC arm and 9 mg in the epidural arm. Patient blinding was successful in both arms. Qualitative interviews suggested that patients found participation in the trial acceptable and that they would consider participating in a future trial.

Conclusion

A blinded RCT investigating the role of epidural and WIC administration for postoperative analgesia following LCR is feasible. Rigorous standard operating procedures for data collection are required.

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of continuous infusion of local anesthetic to the diaphragm closure following laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia can result in significant postoperative pain requiring use of narcotics and patient dissatisfaction. A catheter-based delivery method that has demonstrated effectiveness and safety in other laparoscopic and open procedures (ON-Q, I Flow Corporation) was used to deliver pain medicine. This randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy of continuous infusion of local anesthetic to the diaphragm closure post laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.

METHODS

After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, qualifying patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia voluntarily consented to the study protocol. Standard techniques for routine closure of hiatal hernia repair were used. The ON-Q pain pump catheter was placed adjacent to the sutures used to repair the hiatal hernia, so that it rested between the diaphragm and the collagen patch used to reinforce the hernia repair. The pump infused either bupivacaine 0.5% or NaCl 0.9% at 2 cc/h for 5 days postoperatively. Patients kept a daily diary for pain scores, number of narcotic pain pills taken, and number of nausea pills taken.

RESULTS

Of the 46 patients enrolled in the study, seven were dropped for adverse events or noncompliance; 20 were given placebo (0.9% NaCl) and 19 were given 0.5% bupivacaine.

CONCLUSION

This randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial showed no advantage in using the ON-Q pain pump in terms of providing measurable reduction of pain or concomitant narcotic or nausea medication use. Further studies are indicated to determine alternatives for reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair.

A comparison of postoperative outcomes utilizing a continuous preperitoneal infusion versus epidural for midline laparotomy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain management with a continuous preperitoneal infusion (CPI) for locoregional anesthesia has been shown to have improved postoperative outcomes. This is the first direct comparison of CPI versus epidural infusion (EPI), both in conjunction with systemic analgesia.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of midline laparotomy cases, comparing the use of CPI with systemic patient-controlled analgesia to EPI with systemic patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 240 cases from 2007 to 2009 were reviewed. There were 41.3% using CPI and 58.7% with EPI. There were no differences with respect to age, body mass index, or American Society of Anesthesiologists score between CPI and EPI cases. In a multivariate model, total hospital stay was 2 days shorter for the CPI group (P < .001), and the total admission cost was less for CPI (by $6,164; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of CPI results in decreased length of hospital stay, decreased number of days with a Foley catheter, and lower hospital costs, compared with EPI use. These findings show that the routine use of CPI for pain management after laparotomy is a safe alternative to EPI.