Can Vascular Patterns on Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Help Predict Skin Necrosis after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy?

Evaluation of safety and operative time in tumescent-free robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy: a retrospective single-center cohort study

Purpose

Tumescent in nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has been reported to increase the risk of necrosis by impairing blood flow to the skin flap and nipple-areolar complex. At our institution, we introduced a tumescent-free robotic NSM using the da Vinci single-port system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent tumescent-free robotic NSM between October 2020 and March 2023 at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea). Clinicopathological characteristics, adverse events, and operative time were evaluated.

Results

During the study period, 118 patients underwent tumescent-free robotic NSM. Thirty-one patients (26.3%) experienced an adverse event. Five patients (4.2%) were classified as grade III based on the Clavien-Dindo classification and required surgery. The mean total operative time was 467 minutes for autologous tissue reconstruction (n = 49) and 252 minutes for implants (n = 69). No correlation was found between the cumulative number of surgical cases and the breast operative time (P = 0.30, 0.52, 0.59 for surgeons A, B, C) for the 3 surgeons. However, a significant linear relationship (P < 0.001) was observed, with the operative time increasing by 13 minutes for every 100-g increase in specimen weight.

Conclusion

Tumescent-free robotic NSM is a safe procedure with a feasible operative time and few adverse events.

Safety of Augmenting Breast Volume in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction With Contralateral Breast Augmentation: Comparison With 2-Stage Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction is a standard method of implant-based reconstruction; however, the risk of skin necrosis and implant failure exists. During simultaneous contralateral augmentation, an implant larger than the resected tissue must be inserted to balance both sides, which may increase the risk of complications. This study examined the differences in the incidence of complications between the single-stage direct-to-implant reconstruction and 2-stage reconstruction when contralateral augmentation was performed simultaneously.

METHODS

This study included 99 patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction with contralateral augmentation between 2012 and 2020. A retrospective chart review was conducted and the patients were divided into 2 groups: the single-stage reconstruction (n = 61) and 2-stage reconstruction (TSR, n = 38) groups. Demographic data and surgical and oncological information were collected. Complications including skin necrosis and reconstruction failure were investigated as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Implant volume and contralateral implant volume were significantly greater in TSR group than in the single-stage reconstruction group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications and reconstruction failure rates between both groups. The nipple-sparing mastectomy was the risk factor for complications. Furthermore, the risk factors for mastectomy skin necrosis were implant volume and differences in the volume of both implants.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-stage reconstruction did not increase the risk of complications compared with TSR when implants that were larger than the resected tissue were inserted after mastectomy. Proper patient selection and selection of implants that are not excessively large could satisfy patients' cosmetic needs in a single operation.

Nipple-areolar complex (NAC) or skin flap ischemia necrosis post nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM)-analysis of clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to identify clinicopathologic factors and/or preoperative MRI vascular patterns in the prediction of ischemia necrosis of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) or skin flap post nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 441 NSM procedures from January 2011 to September 2021 from the breast cancer database at our institution. The ischemia necrosis of NAC or skin flap was evaluated in correlation with clinicopathologic factors and types of skin incision. Patients who received NSM with preoperative MRI evaluation were further evaluated for the relationship between vascular pattern and the impact on ischemia necrosis of NAC or skin flap.

RESULTS

A total of 441 cases with NSM were enrolled in the current study, and the mean age of the cases was 49.1 ± 9.8 years old. A total of 41 (9.3%) NSM procedures were found to have NAC ischemia/necrosis. Risk factors were evaluated of which old age, large mastectomy specimen weight (> 450 g), and peri-areola incision were identified as predictors of NAC necrosis. Two-hundred seventy NSM procedures also received preoperative MRI, and the blood supply pattern was 18% single-vessel type and 82% double-vessel pattern. There were no correlations between MRI blood supply patterns or types of skin flap incisions with ischemia necrosis of NAC. There were also no correlations between blood loss and the pattern or size of the blood vessel.

CONCLUSION

Factors such as the type of skin incision, age, and size of mastectomy weight played an important role in determining ischemia necrosis of NAC; however, MRI vascular (single or dual vessel supply) pattern was not a significant predictive factor.

Nipple Sparing Mastectomy Technique to Reduce Ischemic Complications: Preserving Important Blood Flow Based on Breast MRI

BACKGROUND

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate breast reconstruction is commonly performed. However, nipple areolar complex (NAC) and mastectomy skin necrosis represent significant complications requiring reoperation and revision. Breast MRI, often obtained for oncologic assessment, can visualize the dominant breast and NAC vascular supply. This study describes the surgical technique utilizing breast MRI blood flow information to preserve important NAC blood supply, thereby, reducing ischemic complications.

METHODS

After IRB approval, a prospectively maintained database of all NSM by a single breast surgeon from 2018 to 2020 formed the study group. Preoperative contrast enhanced Breast MRI analysis determined the dominant NAC blood supply. Intraoperatively, the dominant Internal Mammary Artery Perforator (IMP) to the NAC was preserved (IMP-NSM). The IMP-NSM surgical technique preserving the IMP blood flow, evaluation of breast MRI blood flow patterns, surgical findings, and ischemic complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

114 NSM were performed in 74 patients (mean age: 49 years [range, 22-73 years], BMI 25.8 kg/m² [range, 19-41 kg/m²]). Breast MRI identified the dominant IMP to the NAC in 92%. IMP preservation was successful in 89% (101/114). Necrosis requiring NAC removal occurred in 0.9% (1/114), and skin necrosis reoperation in 1.8% (2/114). Including all post-operative necrosis occurred in 10.5% (12/114), statistically significantly lower compared to the literature for NSM assessing MRI blood flow data without surgical IMP preservation (necrosis 24.4%, p < 0.001) (Bahl et al. in J Am Coll Surg 223(2):279-285, 2016) utilizing Doppler for IMP preservation (necrosis 37%, p < 0.001) (Swistel et al. in Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2(8):e198, 2014) and dividing the IMP in all (necrosis 31.4%, p < 0.001) (Ahn et al. in Eur J Surg Oncol 44(8):1170-1176, 2018).

CONCLUSIONS

The IMP-NSM surgical technique preserves the dominant blood supply to the NAC, thereby, decreasing ischemic complications.

Useful Reduction Mammoplasty Technique in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery and Reconstruction

Background

A combination of the reduction mammoplasty technique and breast reconstruction allows surgeons to lift ptotic breasts through local flaps and skin reduction during surgery for breast cancer. This study presents a reliable course for the combination of partial and skin or nipple-sparing mastectomy with reduction-reconstruction surgery.

Methods

Fifty-seven patients underwent a partial mastectomy before reduction mammoplasty of both breasts during the same time period between 2014 and 2021 at our institution and thirteen patients underwent skin or nipple-sparing mastectomy, breast reconstruction with an extended latissimus dorsi flap or silicone implant, and aesthetic reduction mammoplasty of the contralateral breast during the same time period. Additional photos were obtained preoperatively, immediately after the operation, and at one, three, six, and twelve months postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively and postoperative complications were noted.

Results

Among the patients who underwent a partial mastectomy, the mean age was 45.18 ± 11.05 years, the mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.74 ± 3.53 kg/m², and the mean preoperative right and left breast volumes were 663.85 (±28.12) cc and 664.34 (±37.13) cc, respectively, and the mean excised mass weight was 177.74 (±213.93) g. Among the patients who underwent a skin-sparing mastectomy, the mean age was 51.62 ± 8.96 years, the mean BMI was 26.91 ± 4.34 kg/m², and the mean preoperative right and left breast volumes were 624.17 (±98.52) cc and 562.31 (±80.81) cc, respectively, and the mean excised mass weight was 618.05 (±338.17) g. Four patients (5.3%) in the partial mastectomy group had fat necrosis. The mean patient satisfaction score was higher postoperatively in both groups.

Conclusion

Patients with breast cancer and large and/or ptotic breasts can successfully undergo reduction mammoplasty for both breasts immediately following partial mastectomy and nipple or skin-sparing mastectomy.

The Impact of Preoperative Breast Volume on Development of Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis in Immediate Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN) can significantly impact outcome after immediate breast reconstruction. Several techniques exist to predict MSFN, but these may require additional testing and information, and they are often not available before surgery. We aim to identify whether breast volume, as calculated from preoperative mammography, can be used as a preoperative predictor of MSFN.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review from 2010 to 2020 resulted in 378 patients who underwent immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Complete imaging data were available for 278 patients and 441 reconstructed breasts. Demographic, perioperative, and outcomes data were collected. Measurements from preoperative diagnostic mammograms were used to calculate breast volume. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the association of variables available preoperatively, including breast volume from mammogram and MSFN. Secondary analyses were performed for need for reoperation and loss of reconstruction.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis of MSFN development, demographic variables found to be significantly associated with MSFN included body mass index (P = 0.04), diabetes (P = 0.03), and breast volume calculated from routine mammography (P ≤ 0.0001). Average preoperative breast volume via mammography without and with MSFN was 970.6 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 908.9-1032.3) and 1298.3 mL (95% CI, 1140.0-1456.5) (P < 0.0001), respectively. Statistically significant intraoperative variables for MSFN development included prolonged operative time (P = 0.005), greater initial tissue expander fill volumes (P ≤ 0.001), and prepectoral implant location (P = 0.02). Higher initial tissue expander fill volumes in implant-based reconstructions were associated with increased rates of MSFN, 264.1 mL (95% CI, 247.2-281.0) without MSFN and 349.9 mL (95% CI, 302.0-397.8) in the group with MSFN, respectively (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, preoperative imaging volume (P = 0.02) was found to be significant, whereas body mass index and diabetes lost significance (P = 0.40) in association with MSFN.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study establish an association between larger breast volume on preoperative imaging and development of MSFN. This may be useful as a tool for more appropriate patient selection and guidance in the setting of immediate breast reconstruction.

Blood supply of the male breast nipple-areola complex evaluated by CTA

PURPOSE

In addition to women, men also undergo breast surgeries, and early studies on the blood supply of breasts are nearly all conducted in female subjects. The vasculature of the male breast is seldom studied. Understanding the male-specific blood supply of the breast is important for pre-operative planning and reducing complications. The purpose of this retrospective study is to fill the gap in the literature by describing the main blood supply and its orientation in the male breast.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated thoracic computed tomographic angiography (CTA) data from January 1, 2017 to July 30, 2019. Single or multiple dominant arteries and their origins were traced, and the artery route and orientation related to the nipple-areola complex (NAC) were revealed through data analysis of the images.

RESULTS

Totally, 284 breasts were included. Most breasts were supplied by a single dominant artery (196, 69%), among which the lateral thoracic artery (LTA; 119, 41.9%; type I) and internal thoracic artery (ITA; 63, 22.2%; type II) were the most common arteries. A minority of breasts were supplied by vascular anastomoses formed by dual arteries (17, 6.0%; type III), and in 25.0% of breasts, no specific dominant artery was found (type IV). The predominant artery distribution was evaluated.

CONCLUSION

This study cohort of male thoracic CTA provided and analysed the elaborate vascular anatomy of the NAC region. Our results favour inferior periareolar incision in regard to diminished vascular-related complications in male surgeries without pre-operative vascular evaluation. This study also suggests that super-lateral or lower-lateral-based pedicles can reserve more vasculature.

Mastectomy Flap Thickness and Complications in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Objective Evaluation using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background:

Ischemic complications after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) have been associated with numerous variables. However, the impact of NSM flap thickness has been incompletely evaluated.

Methods:

NSM flap thickness was determined for all NSMs from 2006 to 2016 with available pre- or postoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs). Demographics and outcomes were stratified by those with and without ischemic complications.

Results:

Of 1,037 NSM reconstructions, 420 NSMs had MRI data available, which included 379 preoperative MRIs and 60 postoperative MRIs. Average total preoperative skin/subcutaneous tissue NSM flap thickness was 11.4 mm. Average total postoperative NSM flap thickness was 8.7 mm. NSMs with ischemic complications were found to have significantly thinner overall postoperative NSM flap thickness compared with those without ischemic complications (P = 0.0280). Average overall postoperative NSM flap thickness less than 8.0 mm was found to be an independent predictor of ischemic complications (odds ratio, 6.5263; P = 0.026). In NSMs with both pre- and postoperative MRIs, the overall average postoperative NSM flap thickness was 68.2% of preoperative measurements. Average overall postoperative NSM flap thickness was significantly less than average overall preoperative NSM flap thickness (P < 0.0001). NSMs with ischemic complications were found to have a significantly lower ratio of overall postoperative to preoperative flap thickness (52.0% versus 74.0%; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions:

Ischemic complications after NSM are significantly associated with thinner postoperative NSM flap thickness. Particularly, NSM flap thickness less than 8.0 mm is a positive independent predictor of ischemic complications. The ratio of postoperative to preoperative NSM flap thickness was significantly lower in reconstructions with ischemic complications.