Correlation Between Lymphedema Disease Severity and Lymphoscintigraphic Findings: A Clinical-Radiologic Study

Lipomatosis of Nerve Misdiagnosed as Primary Lymphedema: Report of Two Cases

Primary lymphedema (i.e., a chronic condition characterized by the accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitial spaces due to impaired lymphatic drainage) and lipomatosis of nerve (LN) (i.e., a congenital lesion characterized by the presence of fat interspersed within nerve) can involve a significant overgrowth of the affected limb, but their pathophysiology and treatment are totally different. This report addresses the misdiagnosis of both entities. The purpose is to highlight how both entities can be differentiated through two case reports. The first patient, a 69-year-old man, presented in our lymphedema clinic with multiple debulking operations; he was diagnosed with right upper extremity lymphedema during childhood. The thumb, index, and middle fingers had previously been amputated due to sequelae from the bony overgrowth. MRI of the right upper extremity showed pathognomonic features of LN affecting the median nerve associated with soft tissue fatty overgrowth. He had a 3 months follow-up for this condition in our institution during which his symptoms remained stable. The second patient, an 81-year-old man, presented in our lymphedema clinic. He carried a long time diagnosis of primary left lower extremity lymphedema and had been followed at our institution for more than 25 years. Physical examination revealed overgrowth (increased volume) affecting the entire leg and foot. MRI showed pathognomonic features of LN of the left sciatic nerve. No surgical interventions were performed. At the last follow-up, his extremity showed slightly worsened diameter measurements. Based on our 2 cases presented and 2 additional cases identified in the literature, we believe that primary lymphedema and LN are two different entities that could be confused. Plastic surgeons treating patients with lymphedema should be aware of LN and rule out this condition clinically and with imaging (US or MRI).

A comprehensive review of computational diagnostic techniques for lymphedema

Lymphedema is localized swelling due to lymphatic system dysfunction, often affecting arms and legs due to fluid accumulation. It occurs in 20% to 94% of patients within 2-5 years after breast cancer treatment, with around 20% of women developing breast cancer-related lymphedema. This condition involves the accumulation of protein-rich fluid in interstitial spaces, leading to symptoms like swelling, pain, and reduced mobility that significantly impact quality of life. The early diagnosis of lymphedema helps mitigate the risk of deterioration and prevent its progression to more severe stages. Healthcare providers can reduce risks through exercise prescriptions and self-manual lymphatic drainage techniques. Lymphedema diagnosis currently relies on physical examinations and limb volume measurements, but challenges arise from a lack of standardized criteria and difficulties in detecting early stages. Recent advancements in computational imaging and decision support systems have improved diagnostic accuracy through enhanced image reconstruction and real-time data analysis. The aim of this comprehensive review is to provide an in-depth overview of the research landscape in computational diagnostic techniques for lymphedema. The computational techniques primarily include imaging-based, electrical, and machine learning (ML) approaches, which utilize advanced algorithms and data analysis. These modalities were compared based on various parameters to choose the most suitable techniques for their applications. Lymphedema detection faces challenges like subtle symptoms and inconsistent diagnostics. The research identifies bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), Kinect sensor and ML integration as the promising modalities for early lymphedema detection. BIS can effectively identify lymphedema as early as four months post-surgery with sensitivity of 44.1% and specificity of 95.4% in diagnosing lymphedema whereas ML and artificial neural network achieved an impressive average cross-validation accuracy of 93.75%, with sensitivity at 95.65% and specificity at 91.03%. ML and imaging can be integrated into clinical practice to enhance diagnostic accuracy and accessibility.

The value of the dermal rim sign on nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging for predicting dermal backflow in patients with primary lower extremity lymphedema

PURPOSE

The dermal rim sign (DRS) on nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging has been shown to predict dermal backflow (DBF) in patients with secondary upper limb lymphedema. However, whether the DRS has the same effects on primary lower extremity lymphedema (PLEL) has not been clearly reported. Therefore, this study aimed to explore whether the DRS can be used to diagnose DBF on lymphoscintigraphy in patients with PLEL.

METHODS

A total of 94 patients who were diagnosed with PLEL were recruited for this retrospective study from January 2022 to December 2023. All the patients were divided into two groups according to the lymphoscintigraphy findings: no DBF and DBF. The magnetic resonance imaging data of the two groups were recorded and statistically compared for the following indicators: range of lymphedema involvement (left, right, whole lower limbs, only thigh, only calf and ankle), signs of lymphedema (notable thickening of skin, parallel line sign, grid sign, honeycomb sign, band sign, lymph lake sign, crescent sign, DRS), and lymphedema measurement (skin thickness, band width). The DRS is characterized by notable thickening of the skin plus the grid sign and/or honeycomb sign, plus the band sign.

RESULTS

The following statistically significant differences in the following indicators were found between the two groups (P < .05): notable skin thickening, parallel line sign, grid sign, honeycomb sign, band sign, DRS, skin thickness, and band width. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for predicting for DBF with the DRS was 82%, 64%, and 77%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed good consistency between the DRS and DBF from the perspective of imaging. This tool is suitable for children, adolescents, and patients with contraindications to lymphoscintigraphy. The DRS has important value in assessing the severity of PLEL. The DRS is suggested for the clinical use of combined surgical treatment of PLEL.

Current Diagnostic Measures for Lymphedema: A Comprehensive Review

ABSTRACT

Lymphedema presents diagnostic challenges due to complex symptomatology and multifaceted onset. This literature review synthesizes diagnostic measures ranging from clinical assessments to advanced imaging techniques and emerging technologies. It explores the challenges in early detection and delves into the disparities in access to advanced diagnostic tools, which exacerbate health outcome differences across populations. This review not only provides insights into the effectiveness of current diagnostic modalities but also underscores the necessity for ongoing research and innovation. The goal is to enhance the accuracy, affordability, and accessibility of lymphedema diagnostics. This is crucial for guiding future research directions and for the development of standardized diagnostic protocols that could help mitigate the progression of lymphedema and enhance the quality of life for affected individuals.

Surgical management of lymphedema: prophylactic and therapeutic operations

Purpose of Review

Lymphedema is chronic limb swelling from lymphatic dysfunction and is currently incurable. Breast-cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) affects up to 5 million Americans and occurs in one-third of breast cancer survivors following axillary lymph node dissection. Compression remains the mainstay of therapy. Surgical management of BCRL includes excisional procedures to remove excess tissue and physiologic procedures to attempt improve fluid retention in the limb. The purpose of this review is to highlight surgical management strategies for preventing and treating breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Recent findings

Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) is a microsurgical technique that anastomoses disrupted axillary lymphatic vessels to nearby veins at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and has been reported to reduce lymphedema rates from 30% to 4-12%.

Summary

Postsurgical lymphedema remains incurable. Surgical management of lymphedema includes excisional procedures and physiologic procedures using microsurgical technique. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction has emerged as a prophylactic strategy to prevent lymphedema in breast cancer patients.

Advances in lymphedema: An under-recognized disease with a hopeful future for patients

Lymphedema has traditionally been underappreciated by the healthcare community. Understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and treatments beyond compression have been limited until recently. Increased investigation has demonstrated the key role of inflammation and resultant fibrosis and adipose deposition leading to the clinical sequelae and associated reduction in quality of life with lymphedema. New imaging techniques including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), indocyanine green lymphography, and high-frequency ultrasound offer improved resolution and understanding of lymphatic anatomy and flow. Nonsurgical therapy with compression, exercise, and weight loss remains the mainstay of therapy, but growing surgical options show promise. Physiologic procedures (lymphovenous anastomosis and vascularized lymph node transfers) improve lymphatic flow in the diseased limb and may reduce edema and the burden of compression. Debulking, primarily with liposuction to remove the adipose deposition that has accumulated, results in a dramatic decrease in limb girth in appropriately selected patients. Though early, there are also exciting developments of potential therapeutic targets tackling the underlying drivers of the disease. Multidisciplinary teams have developed to offer the full breadth of evaluation and current management, but the development of a greater understanding and availability of therapies is needed to ensure patients with lymphedema have greater opportunity for optimal care.

Early Detection of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Accuracy of Indocyanine Green Lymphography Compared with Bioimpedance Spectroscopy and Subclinical Lymphedema Symptoms

Introduction: The reported incidences of breast cancer-related lymphedema (LE) affecting the arms vary greatly. Reason for this variability includes different diagnostic techniques used across studies. In the current study, we compared the accuracy of indocyanine green lymphography (ICG_L) and bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) in detecting LE before presentation of clinical signs. Methods and Results: Patients with no initial detectable signs of clinical LE of their arms after axillary lymph node dissection or removal of >5 lymph nodes on sentinel lymph node biopsy were included. Subclinical LE was defined as BIS values outside the normal range [(≥7 units (or >10 units)] or a 7-unit (or 10 unit) change between two measurements. We tracked ICG_L and BIS measurements for 133 potentially affected arms (n = 123). ICG_L detected signs of lymphatic flow disruption in 63 arms (47%). Based on the BIS value of 7 units, 60 arms (45%) had values outside the normal range. When using ICG_L-identified LE cases as true positives, BIS had a 54% accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.54) in detecting LE. Accuracy was 61% for subclinical LE symptoms when compared with ICG_L (AUC = 0.62). Both BIS and subclinical LE symptoms had <0.70 AUC-receiver characteristic operator curve, suggesting that BIS and development of subclinical LE symptoms are not adequate for identifying patients with subclinical LE. Conclusion: ICG_L is a reliable diagnostic tool for detecting early signs of lymphatic flow disruption in subclinical LE. Utilizing ICG_L to diagnose subclinical LE followed by a personalized treatment plan may provide patients the best chance of preventing disease progression.

The Use of Ultrasound Imaging for Upper Extremity Lymphedema after Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

 The aim of this study was to analyze the different applications of ultrasound (US) in upper extremity lymphedema (UEL) after breast cancer.

METHODS

 A systematic review of the literature was performed in line with the PRISMA statement using MEDLINE/PubMed databases from January 1970 to December 2021. Articles describing the application of US in patients with UEL after breast cancer were included. The quality of the study, the level of reproducibility, and the different applications and type of US technique were analyzed.

RESULTS

 In total, 30 articles with 1,193 patients were included in the final review. Five different applications were found: (1) diagnosis of UEL (14 studies found a direct correlation between lymphedema and morphological and/or functional parameters); (2) staging/severity of UEL (9 studies found a direct correlation between the clinical stage and the soft-tissue stiffness/texture/thickness); (3) therapeutic assessment (3 studies found an improvement in the circulatory status or in the muscle/subcutaneous thickness after conservative treatments); (4) prognosis assessment of UEL (1 study found a correlation between the venous flow and the risk of UEL); and (5) surgical planning (3 studies determined the location of the lymphatic vessel for lymphovenous anastomosis [LVA] surgery).

CONCLUSION

 Morphological and functional parameters have been correlated with the diagnosis, stage, therapeutic effect, prognosis of UEL, and surgical planning of LVA.

Imaging of the Lymphatic Vessels for Surgical Planning: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Secondary lymphedema is a common complication after surgical or radiotherapeutic cancer treatment. (Micro) surgical intervention such as lymphovenous bypass and vascularized lymph node transfer is a possible solution in patients who are refractory to conventional treatment. Adequate imaging is needed to identify functional lymphatic vessels and nearby veins for surgical planning.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the Embase, MEDLINE ALL via Ovid, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Trials databases was conducted in February 2022. Studies reporting on lymphatic vessel detection in healthy subjects or secondary lymphedema of the limbs or head and neck were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 129 lymphatic vessel imaging studies were included, and six imaging modalities were identified. The aim of the studies was diagnosis, severity staging, and/or surgical planning.

CONCLUSION

Due to its utility in surgical planning, near-infrared fluorescence lymphangiography (NIRF-L) has gained prominence in recent years relative to lymphoscintigraphy, the current gold standard for diagnosis and severity staging. Magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL) gives three-dimensional detailed information on the location of both lymphatic vessels and veins and the extent of fat hypertrophy; however, MRL is less practical for routine presurgical implementation due to its limited availability and high cost. High frequency ultrasound imaging can provide high resolution imaging of lymphatic vessels but is highly operator-dependent and accurate identification of lymphatic vessels is difficult. Finally, photoacoustic imaging (PAI) is a novel technique for visualization of functional lymphatic vessels and veins. More evidence is needed to evaluate the utility of PAI in surgical planning.

Investigation of the Association Between Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema and the Side Effects of Taxane-Based Chemotherapy Using Indocyanine Green Lymphography

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common complication. Docetaxel (DOC) and paclitaxel (PTX) have been used in taxane-based chemotherapy for breast cancer and to induce fluid retention. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between lymphatic functionality and the side effects of taxane-based chemotherapy using indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography. Methods and Results: One hundred and eighty breast cancer cases who underwent full-dose taxane-based chemotherapy (DOC or PTX) and complained of upper extremity edema were enrolled in this study. BCRL was diagnosed exclusively on the basis of ICG lymphography results. The characteristics (age, body mass index, laterality, surgery type, regional lymph node irradiation, hormone therapy, and chemotherapy type) of patients diagnosed with BCRL (+) and BCRL (-; fluid retention only) were compared. The side effects were compared in eight categories (neutropenia, skin toxicity, nail changes, myalgia/arthralgia, peripheral neuropathy, stomatitis, dysgeusia, and digestive disease). BCRL (+) consisted of 116 patients and BCRL (-) consisted of 64 patients. BCRL (+) had significantly higher rates of axillary lymph node dissection (98.3%), lymph node irradiation (68.1%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (14.7%), and DOC (62.9%) than BCRL (-) patients (56.3%, 20.3%, 3.1%, and 34.4%, respectively; p = 0.002 for neoadjuvant rate, p < 0.001 for the other rates). BCRL (+) patients had significantly higher rates of peripheral neuropathy (60.3%) than BCRL (-) patients (40.6%; p = 0.01). Conclusions: The occurrence rate of BCRL increased for the patients with peripheral neuropathy induced by taxane-based chemotherapy. This implies that peripheral neuropathy can induce BCRL.

Correlation between Lymphatic Surgery Outcome and Lymphatic Image-Staging or Clinical Severity in Patients with Lymphedema

Lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography reveal the severity of extremity lymphedema. Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) index and NECST classification are related to the clinical severity of lymphedema. We aimed to investigate the correlation between lymphatic surgery, lymphatic imaging, and clinical severity in patients with lymphedema. Thirty-five patients with lower-extremity lymphedema who underwent lymphatic venous anastomosis (LVA) were evaluated. Ten of the thirty-five patients underwent multi-surgery (additional vascularized lymphatic transfer and/or liposuction). We investigated the correlation between the LEL index, NECST classification, lymphoscintigraphy staging, ICG lymphography staging, and rate of improvement (RI: [preoperative LEL index − postoperative LEL index]/[preoperative LEL index] × 100). The LEL index in 35 patients after LVA and all procedures decreased significantly compared to that of preoperative (272.4 vs. 256.2 vs. 243.5, p < 0.05). RI after LVA and all procedures showed positive correlations with the preoperative LEL index; however, there was no correlation with any other lymphatic image or clinical severity. LVA can reduce lymphedema circumference at any stage. Additional surgery improved the circumference. Hence, LVA as the first line of treatment, and vascularized lymphatic transfer and liposuction as additional procedures, should be considered as the standard treatment for lymphedema.

Primary Lymphedema: Update on Genetic Basis and Management

Significance: Primary lymphedema is a chronic condition without a cure. The lower extremities are more commonly affected than the arms or genitalia. The disease can be syndromic. Morbidity includes decreased self-esteem, infections, and reduced function of the area. Recent Advances: Several mutations can cause lymphedema, and new variants continue to be elucidated. A critical determinant that predicts the natural history and morbidity of lymphedema is the patient's body mass index (BMI). Individuals who maintain an active lifestyle with a normal BMI generally have less severe disease compared to subjects who are obese. Because other causes of lower extremity enlargement can be confused with lymphedema, definitive diagnosis requires lymphoscintigraphy. Critical Issues: Most patients with primary lymphedema are satisfactorily managed with compression regimens, exercise, and maintenance of a normal body weight. Suction-assisted lipectomy is our preferred operative intervention for symptomatic patients who have failed conservative therapy. Suction-assisted lipectomy effectively removes excess subcutaneous fibro-adipose tissue and can improve underlying lymphatic function. Future Directions: Many patients with primary lymphedema do not have an identifiable mutation and thus novel variants will be identified. The mechanisms by which mutations cause lymphedema continue to be studied. In the future, drug therapy for the disease may be developed.

Imaging biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment response in patients with lymphedema

Lymphedema is defined as a dysfunction of the lymphatic system producing an accumulation of lymphatic fluid in the surrounding tissue, as well as edema and fibrosis. A total of 250 million people worldwide are affected by this condition. Greater than 99% of these cases are related to a secondary cause. As there is a lack of curative therapy, the goal involves early diagnosis, in order to prevent the progression of the disease. Additionally, early diagnosis can aid in decreasing the demand for more complex surgical procedures. Currently, there is an impressive breadth of diagnostic tests available for these patients. We aimed to review the available literature in relation to the utilization of imaging biomarkers for the early diagnosis and treatment response in lymphedema.

Mechanical Lymphatic Drainage (RAGodoy®): Literature Review

Lymphatic drainage is the main form of therapy for lymphedema, as it affects the pathophysiology of this clinical condition. The two main objectives of lymphatic drainage are the formation and drainage of lymph. In recent years, Godoy & Godoy developed a novel concept of mechanical lymphatic drainage involving a device denominated RAGodoy®, which performs passive exercises of the lower and upper limbs as a form of lymphatic drainage. The aim of the present study was to address the concept of this therapy as well as perform a literature review on its forms of use and the results obtained. All studies analyzed show that this technique used as monotherapy enables the treatment of lymphedema, but superior results are achieved when combined with compression mechanisms.

Relationship Between the Circumference Difference and Findings of Indocyanine Green Lymphography in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common complication. Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography has been performed to assess lymphatic functionality. We found that some BCRL patients had a difference in circumference in partial regions only. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patients with BCRL about the correlation between the difference in circumference and the findings of ICG lymphography.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-five patients with unilateral BCRL were enrolled in this study. We evaluated the differences in circumference taken at 4 parts on the upper limb (at around the wrist, forearm, elbow, and brachium). The difference in circumference was evaluated between the affected part (Caf) and the unaffected part (Cun). We calculated the circumference difference rate (CDR) as follows: CDR = 100 (Caf - Cun)/Caf. First, we classified each part of all BCRL patients (620 parts) based on the findings of ICG lymphography (linear, collateral, dermal back flow [DBF], and no enhancement) and evaluated the correlation. Second, in the patients with partial volume change, we compared the mean CDR in each part.

RESULTS

One hundred six parts were of a linear pattern, 31 parts were collateral, 350 parts were DBF, and 133 parts had no enhancement. The mean CDR of each finding was 3.3% in linear, 4.0% in collateral, 9.6% in DBF, and 9.4% in no enhancement. There was no significant difference between linear and collateral (P = 0.62), DBF, and no enhancement (P = 0.89) patterns. However, there was a significant difference between linear or collateral and DBF or no enhancement (all P < 0.001). In the 22 patients with distal DBF and proximal linear, the CDR was significantly higher in the forearm compared with the brachium (6.4% and 3.0%; P = 0.003). In the 26 patients with distal linear and proximal DBF, the CDR was significantly higher in the brachium compared with the forearm (4.3% and 7.7%; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant correlation between the difference in circumference and the severity of ICG findings.

The relationship between the drainage function of inguinal lymph nodes and unilateral pelvic cancer-related lymphedema: A retrospective analysis

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between iliolumbar lymph nodes (LNs), inguinal LNs, and unilateral pelvic cancer-related lymphedema by retrospective analysis of lymphoscintigraphy data.Ninety-six patients (3 men and 93 women; mean age, 53.3 ± 11.3 years) with pelvic cancer-related lymphedema were enrolled in this retrospective study. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed at 1 hour and 4 to 6 hours after injection. The visualization of inguinal LNs and iliolumbar LNs were recorded.According to statistical analysis, the display of inguinal LNs in lymphoscintigraphy has a significant negative correlation with ipsilateral lower limb lymphedema (P < .01, r = -0.561). However, there is no correlation between the show of iliolumbar LNs and ipsilateral lower extremity lymphedema (P = .056, r = -0.138). When lymphoscintigraphy was performed at 1 hour after injection, there were 13 out of 96 patients without inguinal LNs revealed on imaging, but at 4 to 6 hours after injection, inguinal LNs were seen in lymphoscintigraphy.The drainage function of inguinal LNs has a significant negative correlation with ipsilateral pelvic cancer-related lymphedema. Treatment dedicated to restoring the drainage function of LNs in the inguinal region may effectively relieve lymphedema. The image acquisition at 4 to 6 hours after injection is necessary for significant additional information.

Use of non-contrast MR in diagnosing secondary lymphedema of the upper extremities

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to determine if a combination of dermal thickening and subcutaneous fluid honeycombing on non-contrast MRI, termed the dermal rim sign (DRS), can be diagnostically analogous to dermal backflow seen on lymphoscintigraphy in patients with secondary upper extremity lymphedema.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Upper extremity MRI and lymphoscintigraphy were performed on patients referred to a multidisciplinary lymphedema clinic for suspicion of secondary lymphedema. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of DRS on MRI in detecting dermal backflow on lymphoscintigraphy and the correlation between DRS, Indocyanine Green (ICG) lymphography, bioimpedence L-Dex® ratio and MRI Lymphedema Staging were calculated. Weighted interobserver agreements on the presence and location of DRS on MRI were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 45 patients in the study, 91.1% (41/45) of patients had history of breast cancer. The average age was 58.4 ± 10.5 years, with a mean symptom duration of 4.7 ± 4.4 years. The mean BMI was 30.5 ± 7.0 kg/m². Interobserver agreement on the presence and the extent of DRS on MRI was 0.93 [95% confidence-interval: 0.80-1]. DRS was present in 97% (32/33) of patients who demonstrated dermal backflow on lymphoscintigraphy. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of DRS were 96.6% [81.7%-99.9%], and 75.0% [47.6%-92.7%], 87.5% [74.9%-94.3%], and 92.3% [63.1%-98.8%]. DRS was associated with severity on ICG lymphography and bioimpedance (both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DRS on non-contrast MRI is highly predictive of dermal backflow and correlates with clinical measures of lymphedema severity. DRS may be used as an independent diagnostic biomarker to identify patients who would benefit from dedicated exams.

[Multidisciplinary approach in the lymphedema patient: From rehabilitation to microsurgery]

Lymphedema is a chronic disease with a high incidence in our society. In this paper, we present a review with the latest advances in imaging techniques and surgical reconstructive treatment of lymphedema (lymphovenous anastomosis, vascularized lymph node transfer, and prophylactic lymphedema surgery). In addition, a protocol is established based on a multidisciplinary team (composed of physiatrists, plastic surgeons, radiologists and nuclear medicine radiologists) to optimize the treatment of these patients.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Lymph Node Dissection, and Lymphedema Management Options in Melanoma

Melanoma tumor thickness and ulceration are the strongest predictors of nodal spread. The recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) have been updated in recent American Joint Committee on Cancer and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines to include tumor thickness ≥0.8 mm or any ulcerated melanoma. Mitotic rate is no longer considered an indicator for determining T category. Improvements in disease-specific survival conferred from SLNB were demonstrated through level I data in the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT) I. The role for completion lymph node dissection has evolved to less surgery in lieu of recent domestic (MSLT II) and international (Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial [DeCOG-SLT]) level I data having similar melanoma-specific survival. Treatment options for the prevention of treatment of lymphedema have progressed to include immediate lymphatic reconstruction, lymphovenous anastomosis, and vascularized lymph node transfer.

Lymphoscintigraphic Evaluation of Systemic Tracer Uptake in Patients With Primary Lymphedema

BACKGROUND

Lymphoscintigraphy is used to confirm the diagnosis of lymphedema. One end point for the test is to ensure a patent thoracic duct by uptake of tracer in the organs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate transit of radiolabeled colloid to the organs to gain insight into the etiopathophysiology of primary lymphedema.

METHODS

Patients treated in our Lymphedema Program between 2009 and 2018 were reviewed. Only subjects with bilateral lower extremity primary lymphedema were included (individuals with unilateral leg lymphedema were excluded because the tracer will reach the venous circulation and organs through the normal extremity). Disease severity and lymphoscintigraphy findings were documented.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were included. Ten subjects had no radiolabeled tracer transit to the inguinal lymph nodes on lymphoscintigraphy. However, 8 of these individuals had tracer uptake to the liver, kidney, and/or bladder, illustrating clearance of tracer into the systemic venous circulation. All 8 patients had infant-onset primary lymphedema and mild disease. The 2 patients who did not have clearance of tracer to the systemic venous circulation developed lymphedema in adolescence and had clinically moderate or severe disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with primary lower extremity lymphedema often have pathways for lymph fluid to reach the venous circulation other than through the inguinal nodes and thoracic duct. Documentation of systemic tracer uptake during lymphoscintigraphy to confirm a patent thoracic duct has limited clinical significance in subjects with primary disease of the legs.

Prognostic Factors of Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphic Findings in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Background: To evaluate the usefulness of quantitative findings of pretherapy lymphoscintigraphy in predicting the effects of complex decongestive therapy (CDT) in patients with upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed patients with unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) who underwent pretherapy lymphoscintigraphy and completed 2 weeks of CDT. A total of 18 patients with unilateral BCRL clinical stage II underwent 30-minute sessions of CDT five times per week for 2 weeks. The quantitative asymmetry index (QAI) of the upper extremity, axillary lymph node (LN) uptake, and axillary plus supraclavicular LN uptake from lymphoscintigraphy were calculated. The volume of lymphedema was calculated by percentage excess volume (PEV) at initial and posttreatment. The CDT response was assessed using percentage reduction in excess volume (PREV). Correlation analyses were conducted using Kendall tau rank correlation. There was positive correlation between upper extremity QAI at 2 hours and initial PEV. Negative correlations were found between axillary LN QAI at 1, 2 hours, and initial PEV, and between axillary plus supraclavicular LN QAI at 1, 2 hours, and initial PEV. The PREV showed a positive correlation with axillary LN QAI at 2 hours after injection (tau-b = 0.354, p = 0.041). Conclusion: Quantitative findings of pretherapy lymphoscintigraphy have potential value for use in predicting the response to CDT in patients with upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. Using QAIs from lymphoscintigraphy, we could estimate the excess volume of lymphedema.

Building a Multidisciplinary Comprehensive Academic Lymphedema Program

Lymphedema is a debilitating clinical condition predominantly affecting survivors of cancer. It adversely affects patients' quality of life and results in substantial cost burdens to both patients and the healthcare system. Specialist lymphedema care is optimally provided within integrated clinical programs that align the necessary specialties to provide patient-focused, multidisciplinary, structured, and coordinated care. This article examines our experience building a specialist lymphedema academic program.

METHODS

We describe the critical components necessary for constructing a multidisciplinary comprehensive academic lymphedema program. Furthermore, lessons learned from our experience building a successful lymphedema program are discussed.

RESULTS

Building a comprehensive academic lymphedema program requires institutional support and engagement of stakeholders to establish the necessary infrastructure for comprehensive patient care. This includes the infrastructure for outpatient clinical assessment, diagnostic investigations, radiological imaging, collection of outcomes metrics, non-surgical treatment delivered by lymphedema-specialist therapists, surgical procedures using specialized equipment, and integration of an outpatient framework for comprehensive patient evaluation during follow-up at standardized time intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

This article examines our experience building a multidisciplinary comprehensive academic lymphedema program and provides a structured roadmap to benefit others that are embarking on this mission.

Preoperative Assessment of Upper Extremity Secondary Lymphedema

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the most commonly used preoperative assessment tools for patients undergoing surgical treatment for secondary upper extremity lymphedema. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study performed at a tertiary cancer center specializing in the treatment of secondary lymphedema. Lymphedema evaluation included limb volume measurements, bio-impedance, indocyanine green lymphography, lymphoscintigraphy, magnetic resonance angiography, lymphedema life impact scale (LLIS) and upper limb lymphedema 27 (ULL-27) questionnaires. Results: 118 patients were evaluated. Limb circumference underestimated lymphedema compared to limb volume. Bioimpedance (L-Dex) scores highly correlated with limb volume excess (r2 = 0.714, p < 0.001). L-Dex scores were highly sensitive and had a high positive predictive value for diagnosing lymphedema in patients with a volume excess of 10% or more. ICG was highly sensitive in identifying lymphedema. Lymphoscintigraphy had an overall low sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of lymphedema. MRA was highly sensitive in diagnosing lymphedema and adipose hypertrophy as well as useful in identifying axillary vein obstruction and occult metastasis. Patients with minimal limb volume difference still demonstrated significantly impaired quality of life. Conclusion: Preoperative assessment of lymphedema is complex and requires multimodal assessment. MRA, L-Dex, ICG, and PROMs are all valuable components of preoperative assessment.

Staging and clinical correlations of lymphoscintigraphy for unilateral gynecological cancer-related lymphedema

BACKGROUND

This study was to investigate the lymphoscintigraphy findings for the diagnosis and severity in unilateral gynecological cancer-related lymphedema (GCRL) and to correlate lymphoscintigraphy stages with the clinical findings.

METHODS

Patients with unilateral GCRL who underwent lymphoscintigraphy were staged using the presence of ileo-inguinal lymph nodes, distal-lymphatic ducts, and dermal backflow findings. Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging (TLS) was divided into three patterns and seven stages: normal drainage (L-0); partial obstruction (P-1, P-2, and P-3); and total obstruction (T4, T-5, and T-6). Correlations between clinical lymphedema severity and TLS were evaluated using analysis of variance and multivariable linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients with unilateral GCRL were divided as follows: 6 (4.3%) in normal drainage, 56 (39.7%) in partial-obstruction, and 79 (56%) in total obstruction. Cellulitis episodes, circumferential difference, and computed tomography (CT) volumetric difference were shown to be statistically different between TLS stages (P < .001 for all). Total obstruction stages were the most significant factors associated with the severity of circumferential difference (β = 19.72, 25.54, 32.42, respectively; P < .05) and CT volumetric difference (β = 36.04, 45.12, 52.78, respectively; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Total lymphatic obstruction was present in 56% of unilateral GCGL. Lymphoscintigraphy stages were statistically correlated with episodes of cellulitis, circumferential difference and CT volumetric difference in unilateral GCRL.

Validity of the Novel Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging and Correlation of Cheng Lymphedema Grading for Unilateral Extremity Lymphedema

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to validate the new Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging, correlate it with Cheng Lymphedema Grading (CLG) and evaluate the treatment outcomes of unilateral extremity lymphedema.

BACKGROUND

No consensus has been reached for diagnosis and staging for patients with lymphedema among medical specialties.

METHODS

We included 285 patients with unilateral extremity lymphedema using lymphoscintigraphy. Lymphoscintigraphy was correlated to clinical symptoms and signs, and classified into normal lymphatic drainage, partial obstruction, and total obstruction. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging, correlation between Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging and clinical findings were conducted. Patients were categorized in "surgical" (n = 154) or "nonsurgical" (n = 131) groups for outcome evaluation.

RESULTS

Lymphoscintigraphy found 11 patients (3.9%) with normal lymphatic drainage, 128 (44.9%) with partial obstruction, and 146 (51.2%) with total obstruction. Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging showed high interobserver agreement [intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.94)], and significantly correlated to computed tomography volumetric difference (r = 0.66, P < 0.001) and CLG [intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.72-0.84)]. At a mean follow-up of 31.2 ± 2.9 months, significant improvement in the circumferential difference (from 23.9% ± 17.6% to 14.6% ± 11.1%; P = 0.03) with a mean circumferential reduction rate of 40.4% ± 4.5% was found in surgical group. At a mean follow-up of 26.6 ± 8.7 months, the nonsurgical group had increase of mean circumferential difference from 24.0% ± 17.2% to 25.3% ± 19.0% (P = 0.09), with a mean circumferential reduction rate was -1.9% ± 13.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging is a reliable diagnostic tool, correlated with clinical findings and CLG, aiding in the selection of the appropriate treatment to achieve favorable long-term outcomes in unilateral extremity lymphedema.

Lymphoscintigraphy for the diagnosis of extremity lymphedema: Current controversies regarding protocol, interpretation, and clinical application

Appropriate diagnosis, staging and a further selection of the best treatment are fundamental for the management of patients with extremity lymphedema. Several clinical and imaging tools have been described for these purposes. Lymphoscintigraphy is still considered the gold standard imaging modality for diagnosing lymphedema. However, protocol variability and poor image resolution can make the interpretation challenging. Here, we reviewed technical aspects of lymphoscintigraphy, interpretation of the lymphoscintigraphy findings, staging, and its clinical application.

68Ga-NOTA-Evans Blue TOF PET/MR Lymphoscintigraphy Evaluation of the Severity of Lower Limb Lymphedema

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the role of Ga-NOTA-Evans Blue (NEB) time-of-flight (TOF) PET/MR in evaluating lower limb lymphedema by visual analysis and novel parameters.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with unilateral lower limb lymphedema were divided into 3 groups according to the clinical severity: minimal (4 patients), moderate (5 patients), and severe (4 patients). All patients underwent Ga-NEB TOF PET/MR lymphoscintigraphy. The ratio of the standardized uptake value (SUV) of superficial lymphatic vessel (SLV) versus SUV of deep lymphatic vessel (DVL) (SUVslv/dlv) was designed to assess the level of lymphedema severity. The correlation between lymphedema severity and lymphoscintigraphy findings was determined using 1-way analysis of variance, the t test, and Pearson correlation analysis.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the SUVslv between the affected limbs and normal limbs in all subjects (affected limbs: 0.57 ± 0.32, normal limbs: 1.86 ± 1.43; P < 0.05), which was not found in the SUVdlv (affected limbs: 0.64 ± 0.39, normal limbs: 0.63 ± 0.31; P > 0.1). The SUVslv/dlv of the affected limbs showed statistical differences within the 3 groups (P < 0.05) (minimal group: 1.91 ± 0.45; moderate group: 0.84 ± 0.16; severe group: 0.42 ± 0.11). The statistical analysis revealed a negative correlation between SUVslv/dlv and the severity of lymphedema (r = -0.899; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Ga-NEB TOF PET/MR lymphoscintigraphy can provide anatomical and functional information of lymphatic vessels to guide surgery plans. SUVslv/dlv was well correlated with clinical lymphedema severity and might be potential in evaluating bilateral lower limb lymphedema.

Correlation of L-Dex Bioimpedance Spectroscopy with Limb Volume and Lymphatic Function in Lymphedema

Background: Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is an established tool for the measurement of extracellular fluid in lymphedema. This study assesses the validity of BIS measurements using the l-Dex^® for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions to treat lymphedema. Measurements are correlated with limb volume, assessment of pitting edema, physiologic measures of lymphatic function, and response to surgical intervention. Three l-Dex BIS metrics are compared. Methods and Results: This retrospective study of prospectively collected data identified consecutive patients with lymphedema. l-Dex BIS measurements, limb volume measurements using perometry, transport index (TI) evaluation using radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy, staging using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent lymphography, and clinical evaluation of degree of pitting edema were compared to examine correlations. l-Dex BIS metrics included the l-Dex ratio, absolute difference between the affected and unaffected extremities, and their unadjusted ratio. The study included 26 patients with 70 sets of evaluations. There were significant correlations between the l-Dex ratio and limb volume ratio (LVR) using perometry, the degree of pitting edema, TI evaluation using lymphoscintigraphy, and staging using ICG lymphography. Of the l-Dex BIS metrics, the l-Dex ratio correlated most closely with all measures (ρ = 0.71-0.94, p < 0.0001). Following complete decongestive therapy, the mean decrease in the l-Dex ratio was 48.3% whereas the corresponding mean reduction in limb volume was 13.8% (ρ = 0.19; p = 0.65); subsequent physiological surgery including lymphovenous bypass and vascularized lymph node transfer resulted in an average reduction in l-Dex ratio of 36.1% and mean limb volume reduction of 25.2% (ρ = 0.38; p = 0.27). Conclusions: L-Dex BIS measurements demonstrate face, construct, and criterion validity, and correlate with clinical assessment, LVR, physiologic measures of lymphatic function, and response to conservative and surgical intervention. The L-Dex ratio correlates most closely with all measures and is the recommended metric when using BIS.

Lymphovenous Anastomosis Bypass Surgery

The field of lymphedema surgery has witnessed tremendous advancements over the years and has been coupled to the rapid growth of supermicrosurgical techniques. A lymphovenous bypass or lymphaticovenular anastomosis is a new technique that requires identification of patent, residual lymphatic channels and performing an anastomosis to a recipient venule, thereby allowing outflow of lymphatic fluid and improvement in a patient's lymphedema. This article provides a summary of the maturation of the technique, as well as the technical aspects of the approach and the current outcomes in the treatment of postmastectomy lymphedema.

Diagnosis and Staging of Lymphedema

Lymphedema often is confused with other causes of extremity edema and enlargement. Understanding the risk factors and physical examination signs of lymphedema can enable the health care practitioner to accurately diagnose patients ∼90% of the time. Confirmatory diagnosis of the disease is made using lymphoscintigraphy. It is important to correctly diagnose patients with lymphedema so that they can be managed appropriately.