Affordable Care Act's Medicaid Expansion and Use of Regionalized Surgery at High-Volume Hospitals

Racial Disparities in Utilization and Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

We examined racial disparities in (1) cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) utilization and (2) CDA in-hospital outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

ACDF and CDA are established treatments for cervical disc disease. While CDA may offer certain advantages over ACDF, its utilization patterns have not been comprehensively explored.

METHODS

This study of 2012 to 2019 discharges from the National Inpatient Sample included White, Black, and Hispanic patients aged 18 years and older who underwent elective ACDF or CDA. Patient demographics, comorbidities, cervical spine diagnoses, and hospital characteristics were extracted. Survey-weighted logistic regression modeled the adjusted association between race and CDA (vs. ACDF) utilization; an interaction between race and year examined temporal changes in disparities. For CDA outcomes, multivariable logistic regression was used for binary outcomes (nonhome discharge, combined complications, and dysphagia) and linear regression for length of stay.

RESULTS

The cohort included 712,355 weighted procedures (97.6% ACDF; 84.2% White, 9.7% Black, 6.1% Hispanic). CDA utilization increased from 1.0% of the procedures in 2012 to 3.8% in 2019. Black and Hispanic patients had significantly lower odds than White patients of receiving CDA versus ACDF (OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.66-0.89, P=0.001; OR=0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.93, P=0.003) respectively. There was no statistically significant interaction between race and discharge year (P=0.50). For in-hospital CDA-specific outcomes, Black (vs. White) patients were more likely to experience dysphagia (OR=2.70, 95% CI: 1.53-4.78, P=0.001) and combined complications (OR=3.10, 95% CI: 1.91-5.05, P <0.001). There were no significant differences in any CDA outcome for Hispanic versus White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed decreased utilization of CDA versus ACDF in minority patients, a pattern that persisted over time despite overall increasing CDA utilization. In addition, a higher burden of dysphagia and combined complications following CDA in Black patients warrants further examination.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Association Between State Medicaid Policies and Accrual of Black or Hispanic Patients to Cancer Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

It is unknown whether Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or state-level policies mandating Medicaid coverage of the routine costs of clinical trial participation have ameliorated longstanding racial and ethnic disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional difference-in-differences analysis examining the effect of Medicaid expansion on rates of enrollment for Black or Hispanic nonelderly adults in nonobservational, US cancer clinical trials using data from Medidata's Rave platform for 2012-2019. We examined heterogeneity in this effect on the basis of whether states had pre-existing mandates requiring Medicaid coverage of the routine costs of clinical trial participation.

RESULTS

The study included 47,870 participants across 1,353 clinical trials and 344 clinical trial sites. In expansion states, the proportion of participants who were Black or Hispanic increased from 16.7% before expansion to 17.2% after Medicaid expansion (0.5 percentage point [PP] change [95% CI, -1.1 to 2.0]). In nonexpansion states, this proportion increased from 19.8% before 2014 (when the first states expanded eligibility under the ACA) to 20.4% after 2014 (0.6 PP change [95% CI, -2.3 to 3.5]). These trends yielded a nonsignificant difference-in-differences estimate of 0.9 PP (95% CI, -2.6 to 4.4). Medicaid expansion was associated with a 5.3 PP (95% CI, 1.9 to 8.7) increase in the enrollment of Black or Hispanic participants in states with mandates requiring Medicaid coverage of the routine costs of trial participation, but not in states without mandates (-0.3 PP [95% CI, -4.5 to 3.9]).

CONCLUSION

Medicaid expansion was not associated with a significant increase in the proportion of Black or Hispanic oncology trial participants overall, but was associated with an increase specifically in states that mandated Medicaid coverage of the routine costs of trial participation.

Operative management of rotator cuff tears: identifying disparities in access on a national level

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify nationwide disparities in the rates of operative management of rotator cuff tears based on race, ethnicity, insurance type, and socioeconomic status.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with a full or partial rotator cuff tear from 2006 to 2014 were identified in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample database using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes. Bivariate analysis using chi-square tests and adjusted, multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate differences in the rates of operative vs. nonoperative management for rotator cuff tears.

RESULTS

This study included 46,167 patients. When compared with white patients, adjusted analysis showed that minority race and ethnicity were associated with lower rates of operative management for Black (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.33; P < .001), Hispanic (AOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.45-0.52; P < .001), Asian or Pacific Islander (AOR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.61-0.84; P < .001), and Native American patients (AOR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.50-0.86; P = .002). In comparison to privately insured patients, our analysis also found that self-payers (AOR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.07-0.10; P < .001), Medicare beneficiaries (AOR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.72-0.81; P < .001), and Medicaid beneficiaries (AOR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.30-0.36; P < .001) had lower odds of receiving surgical intervention. Additionally, relative to those in the bottom income quartile, patients in all other quartiles experienced nominally higher rates of operative repair; these differences were statistically significant for the second quartile (AOR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03-1.16; P = .004).

CONCLUSION

There are significant nationwide disparities in the likelihood of receiving operative management for rotator cuff tear patients of differing race/ethnicity, payer status, and socioeconomic status. Further investigation is needed to fully understand and address causes of these discrepancies to optimize care pathways.

The Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Early-Stage Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma at High- Versus Low-Volume Facilities

INTRODUCTION

While Medicaid Expansion (ME) has improved healthcare access, disparities in outcomes after volume-dependent surgical care persist. We sought to characterize the impact of ME on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at high-volume (HVF) versus low-volume (LVF) facilities.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection for PDAC were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB; 2011-2018). HVF was defined as ≥20 resections/year. Patients were divided into pre- and post-ME cohorts, and the primary outcome was textbook oncologic outcomes (TOO). Difference-in-difference (DID) analysis was used to assess changes in TOO achievement among patients living in ME versus non-ME states.

RESULTS

Among 33,764 patients who underwent resection of PDAC, 19.1% (n = 6461) were treated at HVF. Rates of TOO achievement were higher at HVF (HVF: 45.7% vs. LVF: 32.8%; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, undergoing surgery at HVF was associated with higher odds of achieving TOO (odds ratio [OR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-1.72) and improved overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.99]. Compared with patients living in non-ME states, individuals living in ME states were more likely to achieve TOO on adjusted DID analysis (5.4%, p = 0.041). Although rates of TOO achievement did not improve after ME at HVF (3.7%, p = 0.574), ME contributed to markedly higher rates of TOO among patients treated at LVF (6.7%, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Although outcomes for PDAC remain volume-dependent, ME has contributed to significant improvement in TOO achievement among patients treated at LVF. These data highlight the impact of ME on reducing disparities in surgical outcomes relative to site of care.

Persistent Disparities in Access to Elective Colorectal Cancer Surgery After Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act: A Multistate Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Despite their higher incidence of colorectal cancer, ethnoracial minority and low-income patients have reduced access to elective colorectal cancer surgery. Although the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion increased screening of colonoscopies, its effect on disparities in elective colorectal cancer surgery remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the effects of Medicaid expansion on elective colorectal cancer surgery rates overall and by race-ethnicity and income.

DESIGN

Using the 2012 to 2015 State Inpatient Databases, a retrospective cohort study was conducted.

SETTINGS

State Inpatient Databases from 3 expansion states (Maryland, New Jersey, and Kentucky) and 2 nonexpansion states (Florida and North Carolina) were used.

PATIENTS

This study examined 22,304 adult patients aged 18 to 64 years who underwent colorectal cancer surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Using interrupted time series analysis, the effect of Medicaid expansion on the odds of elective colorectal cancer surgery was assessed.

RESULTS

Elective vs nonelective surgery rates remained unchanged overall (70.2% vs 70.7%, p = 0.63) and in ethnoracial minorities in expansion states (whites from 72.8% to 73.8% pre to post, p = 0.40 and non-white from 64.0% to 63.1% pre to post, p = 0.67). There was an instantaneous increase in odds of elective surgery in expansion vs nonexpansion states at policy implementation (adjusted OR 1.37; 95% CI, 1.05-1.79; p = 0.02), but it subsequently decreased (combined adjusted OR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99; p = 0.03). Elective surgery rates were also unchanged among ethnoracial minorities (instantaneous changes in expansion states, combined effect 1.06; pre-trend 1.01 vs post-trend 0.98) and low-income persons in expansion states (pre-trend 1.03 vs post-trend 0.97) (for all, p > 0.1).

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited to 5 states. Although patients may have increased access to cancer screening services and surgery after expansion, the State Inpatient Databases only provide information on patients who underwent surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite gains in screening, Medicaid expansion was not associated with reductions in known ethnoracial or income-based disparities in elective colorectal cancer surgery rates. Expanding access to colorectal cancer surgery for underserved populations likely requires attention to provider and health system factors contributing to persistent disparities. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C217 .

DISPARIDADES PERSISTENTES EN EL ACCESO A LA CIRUGA ELECTIVA DEL CNCER COLORRECTAL DESPUS DE LA EXPANSIN DE MEDICAID EN VIRTUD DE LA LEY DEL CUIDADO DE SALUD A BAJO PRECIO UNA EVALUACIN MULTIESTATAL

ANTECEDENTES: A pesar de su mayor incidencia de cáncer colorrectal, los pacientes de minorías etnoraciales y de bajos ingresos tienen un acceso reducido a la cirugía electiva de cáncer colorrectal. Aunque la expansión de Medicaid de la Ley del Cuidado de Salud a Bajo Precio aumentó las colonoscopias de detección, aún se desconoce su efecto sobre las disparidades en la cirugía electiva de cáncer colorrectal.OBJETIVO: Este estudio evaluó los efectos de la expansión de Medicaid en las tasas de cirugía electiva de cáncer colorrectal en general y por raza, etnia e ingresos.DISEÑO: Utilizando las bases de datos estatales de pacientes hospitalizados de 2012-2015, se realizó un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.CONFIGURACIÓN: Se utilizaron bases de datos estatales de pacientes hospitalizados de tres estados en expansión (Maryland, Nueva Jersey, Kentucky) y dos estados sin expansión (Florida, Carolina del Norte).PACIENTES: Este estudio examinó a 22,304 pacientes adultos de 18 a 64 años que se sometieron a cirugía de cáncer colorrectal.RESULTADO PRINCIPAL: Mediante el análisis de series de tiempo interrumpido, se evaluó el efecto de la expansión de Medicaid en las probabilidades de cirugía electiva de cáncer colorrectal.RESULTADOS: Las tasas de cirugía electiva frente a no electiva permanecieron sin cambios en general (70,2% frente a 70,7%, p = 0,63) y en las minorías etnoraciales en los estados de expansión (blancos del 72,8% al 73,8 % antes y después, p = 0,40 y no blancos del 64,0% al 63,1% pre a post, p = 0,67). Hubo un aumento instantáneo en las probabilidades de cirugía electiva en los estados de expansión frente a los de no expansión en la implementación de la política (OR ajustado 1,37, IC del 95%, 1,05-1,79, p = 0,02), pero disminuyó posteriormente (OR ajustado combinado 0,95, 95% IC, 0,92-0,99, p = 0,03). Las tasas de cirugía electiva también se mantuvieron sin cambios entre las minorías etnoraciales (cambios instantáneos en los estados de expansión, efecto combinado 1,06; antes de la tendencia 1,01 frente a la postendencia 0,98) y las personas de bajos ingresos en los estados de expansión (antes de la tendencia 1,03 frente a la postendencia 0,97; para todos, p > 0,1).LIMITACIONES: El estudio se limitó a cinco estados. Si bien los pacientes pueden tener un mayor acceso a los servicios de detección de cáncer y la expansión posterior a la cirugía, la base de datos de pacientes hospitalizados del estado solo brinda información sobre los pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía.CONCLUSIONES: A pesar de los avances en la detección, la expansión de Medicaid no se asoció con reducciones en las disparidades etnoraciales o basadas en los ingresos conocidas en las tasas de cirugía electiva de cáncer colorrectal. Ampliar el acceso a la cirugía del cáncer colorrectal para las poblaciones desatendidas probablemente requiera atención a los factores del proveedor y del sistema de salud que contribuyen a las disparidades persistentes. Consulte el Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C217 . (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia.Rojas-Khalil ).

Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act and Association With Cardiac Care: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The goal of the Affordable Care Act was to improve health outcomes through expanding insurance, including through Medicaid expansion. We systematically reviewed the available literature on the association of Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion with cardiac outcomes.

METHODS

Consistent with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we performed systematic searches in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature using the keywords such as Medicaid expansion and cardiac, cardiovascular, or heart to identify titles published from 1/2014 to 7/2022 that evaluated the association between Medicaid expansion and cardiac outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 14 studies (47%) used a difference-in-difference study design and 10 (33%) used a multiple time series design. The median number of postexpansion years evaluated was 2 (range, 0.5-6) and the median number of expansion states included was 23 (range, 1-33). Commonly assessed outcomes included insurance coverage of and utilization of cardiac treatments (25.0%), morbidity/mortality (19.6%), disparities in care (14.3%), and preventive care (41.1%). Medicaid expansion was generally associated with increased insurance coverage, reduction in overall cardiac morbidity/mortality outside of acute care settings, and some increase in screening for and treatment of cardiac comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Current literature demonstrates that Medicaid expansion was generally associated with increased insurance coverage of cardiac treatments, improvement in cardiac outcomes outside of acute care settings, and some improvements in cardiac-focused prevention and screening. Conclusions are limited because quasi-experimental comparisons of expansion and nonexpansion states cannot account for unmeasured state-level confounders.

Disparities in Clinical Care and Research in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Disparities in cancer screening, prevention, therapy, clinical outcomes, and research are increasingly recognized and pervade all malignancies. In response, several cancer research and clinical care organizations have issued policy statements to acknowledge and address barriers to achieving health equity in cancer care. The increasingly specialized nature of oncology warrants a disease-focused appraisal of existing disparities and potential solutions. Although clear improvements in clinical outcomes have been recently observed for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), these improvements have not been equally shared across diverse populations. This review describes existing RCC cancer disparities and their potential contributing factors and discusses opportunities to improve health equity in clinical research for all patients with RCC.

Impact of Clinician Linkage on Unequal Access to High-Volume Hospitals for Colorectal Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND

Understanding drivers of persistent surgical disparities remains an important area of cancer care delivery and policy. The degree to which clinician linkages contribute to disparities in access to quality colorectal cancer surgery is unknown. Using hospital surgical volume as a proxy for quality, the study team evaluated how clinician linkages impact access to colorectal cancer surgery at high-volume hospitals (HVHs).

STUDY DESIGN

Maryland's Health Services Cost Review Commission was used to evaluate 6,909 patients who underwent colon or rectal cancer operations from 2013 to 2018. Two linkages based on patient sharing were examined separately for colon and rectal cancer surgery: (1) from primary care clinicians to specialists (gastroenterologist or medical oncologist) and (2) from specialists to surgeons (general or colorectal). A referral link was defined as 9 or more shared patients between 2 clinicians. Adjusted regression models examined associations between referral links and odds of receiving colon or rectal cancer operations at HVHs.

RESULTS

The cohort included 5,645 colon and 1,264 rectal cancer patients across 52 hospitals. Every additional referral link between a primary care clinician and a specialist connected to a HVH was associated with a 12% and 14% increased likelihood of receiving colon (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, CI 1.07 to 1.17) and rectal (OR 1.14, CI 1.08 to 1.20]) cancer operations at a HVH, respectively. Every additional referral link between a specialist and a surgeon at a HVH was associated with at least a 25% increased likelihood of receiving colon (OR 1.28, CI 1.20 to 1.36) and rectal (OR 1.25, CI 1.15 to 1.36) cancer operation at a HVH.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients of clinicians with linkages to HVHs are more likely to have their colorectal cancer operations at these hospitals. These findings suggest that policy interventions targeting clinician relationships are an important step in providing equitable surgical care.

Association of the Affordable Care Act with access to highest-volume centers for patients with thyroid cancer

BACKGROUND

Disparities exist in access to high-volume surgeons, who have better outcomes after thyroidectomy. The association of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion with access to high-volume thyroid cancer surgery centers remains unclear.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for all adult thyroid cancer patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2016. Hospital quartiles (Q1-4) defined by operative volume were generated. Clinicodemographics and adjusted odds ratios for treatment per quartile were analyzed by insurance status. An adjusted difference-in-differences analysis examined the association between implementation of the Affordable Care Act and changes in payer mix by hospital quartile.

RESULTS

In total, 241,448 patients were included. Medicaid patients were most commonly treated at Q3-Q4 hospitals (Q3 odds ratios 1.05, P = .020, Q4 1.11, P < .001), whereas uninsured patients were most often treated at Q2-Q4 hospitals (Q2 odds ratios 2.82, Q3 2.34, Q4 2.07, P < .001). After expansion, Medicaid patients had lower odds of surgery at Q3-Q4 compared with Q1 hospitals (odds ratios Q3 0.82, P < .001 Q4 0.85, P = .002) in expansion states, but higher odds of treatment at Q3-Q4 hospitals in nonexpansion states (odds ratios Q3 2.23, Q4 1.86, P < .001). Affordable Care Act implementation was associated with increased proportions of Medicaid patients within each quartile in expansion compared with nonexpansion states (Q1 adjusted difference-in-differences 5.36%, Q2 5.29%, Q3 3.68%, Q4 3.26%, P < .001), and a decrease in uninsured patients treated at Q4 hospitals (adjusted difference-in-differences -1.06%, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid expansion was associated with an increased proportion of Medicaid patients undergoing thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer in all quartiles, with increased Medicaid access to high-volume centers in expansion compared with nonexpansion states.

Simulated Volume-Based Regionalization of Complex Procedures: Impact on Spatial Access to Care

OBJECTIVE

This study simulates the regionalization of pancreatectomies to assess its impact on spatial access in terms of patient driving times.

BACKGROUND

Although policies to regionalize complex procedures to high-volume centers may improve outcomes, the impact on patient access is unknown.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pancreatectomies from 2005 to 2014 were identified from California's statewide database. Round-trip driving times between patients' home ZIP code and hospital addresses were calculated via Google Maps. Regionalization was simulated by eliminating hospitals performing <20 pancreatectomies/yr, and reassigning patients to the next closest hospital that satisfied the volume threshold. Sensitivity analyses were performed for New York and Medicare patients to assess for influence of geography and insurance coverage, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 13,317 pancreatectomies, 6335 (47.6%) were performed by hospitals with <20 cases/yr. Patients traveled a median of 49.8 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) 30.8-96.2] per round-trip. A volume-restriction policy would increase median round-trip driving time by 24.1 minutes (IQR 4.5-53.5). Population in-hospital mortality rates were estimated to decrease from 6.7% to 2.8% (P < 0.001). Affected patients were more likely to be racial minorities (44.6% vs 36.5% of unaffected group, P < 0.001) and covered by Medicaid or uninsured (16.3% vs 9.8% of unaffected group, P < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses revealed a 17.8 minutes increment for patients in NY (IQR 0.8-47.4), and 27.0 minutes increment for Medicare patients (IQR 6.2-57.1).

CONCLUSIONS

A policy that limits access to low-volume pancreatectomy hospitals will increase round-trip driving time by 24 minutes, but up to 54 minutes for 25% of patients. Population mortality rates may improve by 1.5%.

ACA Medicaid expansion reduced disparities in use of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery

BACKGROUND

Early evaluation of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion demonstrated persistent disparities among Medicaid beneficiaries in use of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery. Longer-term effects of expansion remain unknown. This study evaluated the impact of expansion on the use of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery among Medicaid and uninsured patients.

METHODS

State inpatient databases (2012-2017), the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database, and the Area Resource File from the Health Resources and Services Administration, were used to examine 8,264 non-elderly adults who underwent pancreatic surgery in nine expansion and two non-expansion states. High-volume hospitals were defined as performing 20 or more resections/year. Linear probability triple differences models measured pre- and post-Affordable Care Act utilization rates of pancreatic surgery at high-volume hospitals among Medicaid and uninsured patients versus privately insured patients in expansion versus non-expansion states.

RESULTS

The Affordable Care Act's expansion was associated with increased rates of utilization of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery by Medicaid and uninsured patients (48% vs 55.4%, P = .047) relative to privately insured patients in expansion states (triple difference estimate +11.7%, P = .022). A pre-Affordable Care Act gap in use of high-volume hospitals among Medicaid and uninsured patients in expansion states versus non-expansion states (48% vs 77%, P < .0001) was reduced by 15.1% (P = .001) post Affordable Care Act. A pre Affordable Care Act gap between expansion versus non-expansion states was larger for Medicaid and uninsured patients relative to privately insured patients by 24.9% (P < .0001) and was reduced by 11.7% (P = .022) post Affordable Care Act. Rates among privately insured patients remained unchanged.

CONCLUSION

Medicaid expansion was associated with greater utilization of high-volume hospitals for pancreatic surgery among Medicaid and uninsured patients. These findings are informative to non-expansion states considering expansion. Future studies should target understanding referral mechanism post-expansion.

Utilization of High-Volume Hospitals for High-Risk Cancer Surgery in California Following Medicaid Expansion

INTRODUCTION

A primary goal of the recent state and federal health reform is to increase access to care through expanded insurance coverage. We sought to evaluate the effect of Medicaid expansion (ME) on four high-risk cancer operations in California.

METHODS

The California Office of Statewide Health Planning database was used to identify patients who underwent either lung, esophageal, pancreas, or rectal resection for cancer between 2012 and 2016. To include only patients eligible for Medicaid and not Medicare, patients > 65 years were excluded. Trends in insurance coverage rates and utilization of high-volume hospitals were evaluated relative to the pre-policy (2012-2013) versus the post-policy (2014-2016) period.

RESULTS

Overall 10,569 individuals (esophageal: 5.6%; lung: 38%; pancreas: 14.1%; rectal: 42.3%) underwent a cancer operation. Following ME, Medicaid coverage increased from 12.4 to 20.2% (p < 0.001). There were no differences in age, sex, and race of Medicare beneficiaries pre- versus post-policy implementation (all p > 0.05). Of note, following ME, there was an increase in probability of utilization of high-volume hospitals for lung (47.6% vs. 56.3%), rectal (74.0% vs. 77.7%), and pancreas (60.2% vs. 68.5%) (p < 0.05 for all) cancer operations. Overall probability of surgery at a high-volume center after expansion increased by 5.8% among Medicaid beneficiaries versus other patients in the same time period. ME was not associated, however, with improvement in clinical outcomes such as complications, in-hospital mortality, or readmission (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ME was associated with an increase in Medicaid coverage, which resulted in more beneficiaries undergoing cancer operations at high-volume hospitals. While ME was associated with increased access to care, peri-operative outcomes were comparable pre- versus post-ME implementation.

Association of Medicaid Expansion with In-Hospital Outcomes After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVES

Multiple studies have shown improved outcomes and higher utilization of care with the increase of insurance coverage. This study aims to assess whether Medicaid expansion (ME) has changed the utilization and outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in the United States.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

MATERIALS

Data of patients undergoing AAA repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative (2010-2017).

METHODS

Interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis was utilized to evaluate changes in annual trends of postoperative outcomes after elective AAA repair before and after 2014. We also assessed if these trend changes were significant by comparing the changes in states which adopted ME in 2014 versus nonexpansion states (NME), and conducting a difference-in-difference analysis. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and adverse events (bowel and leg ischemia, cardiac, renal, respiratory, stroke and return to the OR).

RESULTS

A total of 19,143 procedures were included (Endovascular: 85.8% and open: 14.2%), of which 40.9% were performed in ME States. Compared to preexpansion trends (P1), there was a 2% annual increase in elective AAA repair in ME states (P1: -1.8% versus P2: +0.2%, P< 0.01) with no significant change in NME (P1: +0.3% versus P2: +0.2%, P = 0.97). Among elective cases, annual trends in the use of EVAR increased by 2% in ME states (95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.1, 4.1, P = 0.06), compared to a 3% decrease in NME States [95%CI = -5.8, -0.6, P = 0.01) (P_MEversusNME < 0.01]. There was no association between ME and in-hospital mortality. Nonetheless, it was associated with a decrease in the annual trends of in-hospital complications (ME: -1.4% (-2.1,-0.8) versus NME: +0.2% (-0.2, +0.8), P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

While no association between ME and increased survival was noted in states which adopted ME, there was a significant increase of elective AAA cases and EVAR utilization and a decrease in in-hospital complications in ME States.

Association Between Medicaid Expansion and the Use of Outpatient General Surgical Care Among US Adults in Multiple States

Importance

The Affordable Care Act expanded access to Medicaid coverage in 2014 for individuals living in participating states. Whether expanded coverage was associated with increases in the use of outpatient surgical care, particularly among underserved populations, remains unknown.

Objective

To evaluate the association between state participation in the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion reform and the use of outpatient surgical care.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This case-control study used a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design to compare the use of outpatient surgical care at the facility and state levels by patient demographic characteristics and payer categories (Medicaid, private insurance, and no insurance). Data from 2013 (before Medicaid expansion reform) and 2015 (after Medicaid expansion reform) were obtained from the State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. The absolute and mean numbers of procedures performed at outpatient surgical centers in 2 states (Michigan and New York) that participated in Medicaid expansion (expansion states) were compared with those performed at outpatient surgical centers in 2 states (Florida and North Carolina) that did not participate in Medicaid expansion (nonexpansion states). The population-based sample included 207 176 patients aged 18 to 64 years who received 4 common outpatient procedures (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, breast lumpectomy, open inguinal hernia repair, and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair). Data were analyzed from May 19 to August 25, 2019.

Interventions

State variation in the adoption of Medicaid expansion before and after expansion reform was implemented through the Affordable Care Act.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Changes in the mean number of procedures performed at the facility level before and after Medicaid expansion reform in states with and without expanded Medicaid coverage.

Results

A total of 207 176 patients (106 395 women [51.35%] and 100 781 men [48.65%]; mean [SD] age, 45.7 [12.4] years) were included in the sample. Overall, 116 752 procedures were performed in Medicaid expansion states and 90 424 procedures in nonexpansion states. A 9.8% increase (95% CI, 0.4%-20.0%; P = .04) in cholecystectomies, a 26.1% increase (95% CI, 9.8%-44.7%; P = .001) in lumpectomies, and a 16.3% increase (95% CI, 2.9%-31.5%; P = .02) in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs were observed at the facility level in expansion states compared with nonexpansion states. Among patients with Medicaid coverage, the mean number of procedures performed in all 4 procedure categories increased between 60.5% (95% CI, 24.7%-106.6%; P < .001) and 79.2% (95% CI, 53.5%-109.2%; P < .001) at the facility level. The increases in the number of Medicaid patients who received treatment exceeded the reductions in the number of uninsured patients who received treatment with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open inguinal hernia repair, and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs in expansion states compared with nonexpansion states. Black patients received more laparoscopic cholecystectomies, lumpectomies, and open inguinal hernia repairs in expansion states than in nonexpansion states.

Conclusions and Relevance

Study results suggest that Medicaid expansion was associated with increases in the use of outpatient surgical care in states that participated in Medicaid expansion. Most of this increase represented patients who were newly treated rather than patients who converted from no insurance to Medicaid coverage.

Mohs Surgery for SEER Registry-Captured Melanoma In Situ and Rare Cutaneous Tumors: Comparing National Utilization Patterns Before and After Implementation of the Affordable Care Act (2010) and Appropriate Use Criteria (2012)

BACKGROUND

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) had the potential to increase utilization rates of MMS for indicated skin cancers, but it is unknown whether this has occurred.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether rates of MMS utilization for head and neck melanoma in situ (MIS) and rare cutaneous tumors (RCTs) increased after the implementation of the ACA and AUC publication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review using data from the SEER database. Melanoma in situ and RCT tumor cases from before and after the ACA and AUC publication were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-four thousand six hundred seventy-eight cases were analyzed. Mohs micrographic surgery utilization for MIS decreased from 13.9% before the ACA to 12.3% after the ACA (odds ratio 0.87; p = .012). There was no significant change in MMS utilization for MIS after publication of the AUC. There was also no significant change in MMS utilization for treatment of RCT after the ACA or AUC publication. Stratification of patients into age groups younger or older than 65 years did not change utilization rates.

CONCLUSION

Rates of MMS for treatment of MIS and RCT have not increased since the advent of the ACA or AUC. This finding highlights the need for continued efforts to improve access to MMS and to increase education of its utility in treating skin cancer.

Association of Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act With Insurance Status, Cancer Stage, and Timely Treatment Among Patients With Breast, Colon, and Lung Cancer

IMPORTANCE

The effect of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion on cancer care delivery and outcomes is unknown. Patients with cancer are a high-risk group for whom treatment delays are particularly detrimental.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between Medicaid expansion and changes in insurance status, stage at diagnosis, and timely treatment among patients with incident breast, colon, and non-small cell lung cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This quasi-experimental, difference-in-differences (DID) cross-sectional study included nonelderly adults (aged 40-64 years) with a new diagnosis of invasive breast, colon, or non-small cell lung cancer from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2016, in the National Cancer Database, a hospital-based registry capturing more than 70% of incident cancer diagnoses in the United States. Data were analyzed from March 8 to August 15, 2019.

EXPOSURES

Residence in a state that expanded Medicaid on January 1, 2014.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were insurance status, cancer stage, and timely treatment within 30 and 90 days of diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 925 543 patients (78.6% women; mean [SD] age, 55.0 [6.5] years; 14.2% black; and 5.7% Hispanic) had a new diagnosis of invasive breast (58.9%), colon (14.6%), or non-small cell lung (26.5%) cancer; 48.3% resided in Medicaid expansion states and 51.7% resided in nonexpansion states. Compared with nonexpansion states, the percentage of uninsured patients decreased more in expansion states (adjusted DID, -0.7 [95% CI, -1.2 to -0.3] percentage points), and the percentage of early-stage cancer diagnoses rose more in expansion states (adjusted DID, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.3 to 1.2] percentage points). Among the 848 329 patients who underwent cancer-directed therapy within 365 days of diagnosis, the percentage treated within 30 days declined from 52.7% before to 48.0% after expansion in expansion states (difference, -4.7 [95% CI, -5.1 to -4.5] percentage points). In nonexpansion states, this percentage declined from 56.9% to 51.5% (difference, -5.4 [95% CI, -5.6 to -5.1] percentage points), yielding no statistically significant DID in timely treatment associated with Medicaid expansion (adjusted DID, 0.6 [95% CI, -0.2 to 1.4] percentage points).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found that, among patients with incident breast, colon, and lung cancer, Medicaid expansion was associated with a decreased rate of uninsured patients and increased rate of early-stage cancer diagnosis; no evidence of improvement or decrement in the rate of timely treatment was found. Further research is warranted to understand Medicaid expansion's effect on the treatment patterns and health outcomes of patients with cancer.