Dual Kidney Transplantation from Donors at the Extremes of Age

Preoperative donor urinary UDP-Glc as an independent risk factor for delayed graft function

Background

Expanded criteria donors (ECD) have the potential to greatly increase the donor organ pool but pose a higher risk of delayed graft function (DGF) post-transplantation. Uridine diphosphate-glucose (UDP-Glc) plays a significant role in extracellular signaling related to tissue damage and retains stability for detection. Donor urinary UDP-Glc level may be an appropriate and effective biomarker for predicting DGF.

Methods

Recipients who underwent successful kidney transplantation, with corresponding collection of donor urine samples, between June 2023 and August 2024 were included. We measured preoperative donor urinary UDP-Glc levels and analyzed their correlation with graft recovery. The study was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry (no. NCT06707272).

Results

Preoperative donor urinary UDP-Glc levels were different between immediated, slowed, and delayed graft function subgroups (7.23 vs. 9.04 vs. 10.13 ug/mL, p < 0.001). Donor urinary UDP-Glc level was an independent risk factor for DGF (odds ratio [OR] = 1.741, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.311-2.312, p < 0.001). Furthermore, donor urinary UDP-Glc showed a better predictive value for DGF (AUROC = 0.791, 95% CI: 0.707-0.875, p < 0.001), and combining donor urinary UDP-Glc and donor terminal serum creatinine improved the model predictive value for DGF (AUROC = 0.832, 95% CI: 0.756-0.908, Youden index = 0.56, sensitivity = 0.81, specificity = 0.75, PPV = 0.72, NPV = 0.83, p < 0.001). Additionally, the donor urinary UDP-Glc level was related to the recipient serum creatinine level at 1 month post-transplantation (rs = 0.475, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Donor urinary UDP-Glc level is an independent risk factor for DGF and can provide surgeons with a novel strategy to predict DGF earlier and more accurately without invasive procedures.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT06707272 identifier.

Mitochondria Transplantation Mitigates Damage in an In Vitro Model of Renal Tubular Injury and in an Ex Vivo Model of DCD Renal Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

To test whether mitochondrial transplantation (MITO) mitigates damage in 2 models of acute kidney injury (AKI).

BACKGROUND

MITO is a process where exogenous isolated mitochondria are taken up by cells. As virtually any morbid clinical condition is characterized by mitochondrial distress, MITO may find a role as a treatment modality in numerous clinical scenarios including AKI.

METHODS

For the in vitro experiments, human proximal tubular cells were damaged and then treated with mitochondria or placebo. For the ex vivo experiments, we developed a non-survival ex vivo porcine model mimicking the donation after cardiac death renal transplantation scenario. One kidney was treated with mitochondria, although the mate organ received placebo, before being perfused at room temperature for 24 hours. Perfusate samples were collected at different time points and analyzed with Raman spectroscopy. Biopsies taken at baseline and 24 hours were analyzed with standard pathology, immunohistochemistry, and RNA sequencing analysis.

RESULTS

In vitro, cells treated with MITO showed higher proliferative capacity and adenosine 5'-triphosphate production, preservation of physiological polarization of the organelles and lower toxicity and reactive oxygen species production. Ex vivo, kidneys treated with MITO shed fewer molecular species, indicating stability. In these kidneys, pathology showed less damage whereas RNAseq analysis showed modulation of genes and pathways most consistent with mitochondrial biogenesis and energy metabolism and downregulation of genes involved in neutrophil recruitment, including IL1A, CXCL8, and PIK3R1.

CONCLUSIONS

MITO mitigates AKI both in vitro and ex vivo.

Single center experience and literature review of kidney transplantation from non-ideal donors with acute kidney injury: Risk and reward

INTRODUCTION

There is limited experience transplanting kidneys from either expanded criteria donors (ECD) or donation after circulatory death (DCD) deceased donors with terminal acute kidney injury (AKI).

METHODS

AKI kidneys were defined by a donor terminal serum creatinine level >2.0 mg/dL whereas non-ideal deceased donor (NIDD) kidneys were defined as AKI/DCD or AKI/ECDs.

RESULTS

From February 2007 to March 2023, we transplanted 266 single AKI donor kidneys including 29 from ECDs, 29 from DCDs (n = 58 NIDDs), and 208 from brain-dead standard criteria donors (SCDs). Mean donor age (43.7 NIDD vs. 33.5 years SCD), KDPI (66% NIDD vs. 45% SCD), and recipient age (57 NIDD vs. 51 years SCD) were higher in the NIDD group (all p < .01). Mean waiting times (17.8 NIDD vs. 24.2 months SCD) and dialysis duration (34 NIDD vs. 47 months SCD) were shorter in the NIDD group (p < .05). Delayed graft function (DGF, 48%) and 1-year graft survival (92.7% NIDD vs. 95.9% SCD) was similar in both groups. Five-year patient and kidney graft survival rates were 82.1% versus 89.9% and 82.1% versus 75.2% (both p = NS) in the NIDD versus SCD groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of kidneys from AKI donors can be safely liberalized to include selected ECD and DCD donors.

En Bloc Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Study of an 18-year Experience in a Single Institution

Background

Renal transplantation is facing a shortage of grafts. En bloc kidney transplantation (EBKT) from pediatric donors could increase the number of available grafts.

Objective

To describe the surgical technique as well as the long-term functional and morphological results of EBKT.

Design setting and participants

We performed a retrospective study of all the EBKT procedures performed in Lyon between 2002 and 2020. Electronic medical records were checked with an analysis of demographics, and peri- and postoperative results.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

A descriptive analysis of donor and recipient characteristics, perioperative data, complications, and renal function was performed.

Results and limitations

Between 2002 and 2020, 21 EBKT procedures were performed. Donors had a mean weight of 8.6 kg and a mean age of 12 mo, with a mean cold ischemia time of 11 h and 30 min. Receivers had a mean age of 30 yr and a body mass index of 20. The mean follow-up time was 62 mo, with patient survival of 100% and graft survival of 95%. There were 13 reinterventions comprising one early unilateral transplantectomy for thrombosis. Renal function was excellent, and the morphological findings described an important growth in size in the first 2 yr before attaining the adult size. This study's limitations include its retrospective nature and a small number of participants.

Conclusions

The present study reports excellent results with EBKT and supports the pursuit and spread of this technique.

Patient summary

In this report, we describe the technique and results of en bloc kidney transplantation. We found that results are excellent for renal function and patient survival. We conclude that en bloc kidney transplantation should be considered to increase the number of grafts.

Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant: Risk Factors, Consequences and Prevention Strategies

Background. Delayed graft function is a frequent complication of kidney transplantation that requires dialysis in the first week posttransplant. Materials and Methods. We searched for the most relevant articles in the National Institutes of Health library of medicine, as well as in transplantation, pharmacologic, and nephrological journals. Results. The main factors that may influence the development of delayed graft function (DGF) are ischemia–reperfusion injury, the source and the quality of the donated kidney, and the clinical management of the recipient. The pathophysiology of ischemia–reperfusion injury is complex and involves kidney hypoxia related to the duration of warm and cold ischemia, as well as the harmful effects of blood reperfusion on tubular epithelial cells and endothelial cells. Ischemia–reperfusion injury is more frequent and severe in kidneys from deceased donors than in those from living donors. Of great importance is the quality and function of the donated kidney. Kidneys from living donors and those with normal function can provide better results. In the peri-operative management of the recipient, great attention should be paid to hemodynamic stability and blood pressure; nephrotoxic medicaments should be avoided. Over time, patients with DGF may present lower graft function and survival compared to transplant recipients without DGF. Maladaptation repair, mitochondrial dysfunction, and acute rejection may explain the worse long-term outcome in patients with DGF. Many different strategies meant to prevent DGF have been evaluated, but only prolonged perfusion of dopamine and hypothermic machine perfusion have proven to be of some benefit. Whenever possible, a preemptive transplant from living donor should be preferred.

The use of marginal kidneys in dual kidney transplantation to expand kidney graft utilization

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to chronicle the history of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) and identify opportunities to improve utilization of marginal deceased donor (MDD) kidneys through DKT.

RECENT FINDINGS

The practice of DKT from adult MDDs dates back to the mid-1990s, at which time the primary indication was projected insufficient nephron mass from older donors. Multiple subsequent studies of short- and long-term success have been reported focusing on three major aspects: Identifying appropriate selection criteria/scoring systems based on pre- and postdonation factors; refining technical aspects; and analyzing longer-term outcomes. The number of adult DKTs performed in the United States has declined in the past decade and only about 60 are performed annually. For adult deceased donor kidneys meeting double allocation criteria, >60% are ultimately not transplanted. MDDs with limited renal functional capacity represent a large proportion of potential kidneys doomed to either discard or nonrecovery.

SUMMARY

DKT may reduce organ discard and optimize the use of kidneys from MDDs. New and innovative technologies targeting ex vivo organ assessment, repair, and regeneration may have a major impact on the decision whether or not to use recovered kidneys for single or DKT.

Dual kidney transplants from adult marginal donors: Review and perspective

The practice of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) from adult marginal deceased donors (MDDs) dates back to the mid-1990s with initial pioneering experiences reported by the Stanford and Maryland groups, at which time the primary indication was estimated insufficient nephron mass from older donors. Multiple subsequent studies of short and long-term success have been reported focusing on three major aspects of DKT: Identifying appropriate selection criteria and developing scoring systems based on pre- and post-donation factors; refining technical aspects; and analyzing mid-term outcomes. The number of adult DKTs performed in the United States has declined in the past decade and only about 60 are performed annually. For adult deceased donor kidneys meeting double allocation criteria, >60% are ultimately not transplanted. Deceased donors with limited renal functional capacity represent a large proportion of potential kidneys doomed to either discard or non-recovery. However, DKT may reduce organ discard and optimize the use of kidneys from MDDs. In an attempt to promote utilization of MDD kidneys, the United Network for Organ Sharing introduced new allocation guidelines pursuant to DKT in 2019. The purpose of this review is to chronicle the history of DKT and identify opportunities to improve utilization of MDD kidneys through DKT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Patient and Graft Survival After Dual Kidney Transplantation With Marginal Donors in Comparison to Matched Control Groups

BACKGROUND

Postmortal organ donor rates remain low in Germany, whereas donor age has been increasing considerably in the last decades. As a consequence of low donation rates older and more marginal donor kidneys are accepted for transplantation. However, procured kidneys from very old a/o marginal donors may be considered as not suitable for transplantation as a single organ and subsequently be discarded. However, dual transplantation of both kidneys from such donors may provide an opportunity to nevertheless use these organs for renal transplantation, thereby providing the twofold nephron mass as a single kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We compared in this retrospective analysis the outcome of 10 recipients of a dual kidney transplantation (DKT) with 40 matched recipients of a single kidney transplantation (SKT). Recipients were matched for donor and recipient age (ie, a maximum age difference of ±10 years in a ratio of 1:4 for DKT vs SKT recipients). In addition, a second SKT control group of 10 SKT recipients being transplanted immediately before each DKT recipient with a kidney from a donor aged ≥65 years was used for comparison. All renal transplant recipients were observed for up to 3 years or until July 31, 2020.

RESULTS

Mean donor and recipient age was 77.2 ± 4.6/75.1 ± 6.6/82.1 ± 7.9 and 66.4 ± 5.8/66.1 ± 6.0/64.8 ± 8.4 for SKT group 1/SKT group 2/DKT, respectively. Procurement serum creatinine concentrations were significantly higher in the DKT group in comparison to the SKT control group 1 (P = .019) as was the rate of transplant artery atherosclerosis (P = .021). Furthermore, Kidney Donor Profile Index, and Kidney Donor Risk Index were significantly higher (P = .0138/P = .064, and P < .001/P = .038) in the DKT group than in SKT group 1 and 2. Rates of acute rejection and delayed graft function were not significantly different between groups, though biopsy-proven acute rejection was numerically higher in the SKT groups. Patient survival and overall and death-censored graft survival rates were also not significantly different between groups, although they tended to be higher after DKT.

CONCLUSIONS

DKT provides an opportunity to successfully use postmortal kidneys even from donors aged >80 years and a Kidney Donor Profile Index ≥95% for renal transplantation. DKT may thereby increase the available pool of donors to better serve patients with end-stage renal disease on the waiting list.

Survival Benefit of En Bloc Transplantation of Small Pediatric Kidneys in Children

BACKGROUND

En bloc transplantation of small pediatric kidneys in children may help expand the existing deceased donor pool; however, studies examining the long-term outcomes of en bloc transplantation in children are few.

METHODS

We used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to identify 149 pediatric en bloc recipients transplanted from October 1, 1987 to December 31, 2017. We used propensity scores to match 148 en bloc with 581 non-en bloc deceased donor recipients (matching variables: transplant age, gender, race, pretransplant dialysis, transplant center, and year). We evaluated patient and graft survival using Kaplan-Meier and Fleming-Harrington weighted log-rank test and examined survival benefit of en bloc transplantation versus remaining on the waiting list using the sequential Cox approach. We divided the study period into three 10-y intervals to assess the effect of era on outcomes.

RESULTS

Compared with non-en bloc recipients, en bloc recipients had lower 1-y graft survival (78.9% versus 88.9%; P = 0.007); however, when stratified by transplant era, lower 1-y survival was only observed in the oldest era (1987-1997). En bloc recipients had superior 10-y patient (89.0% versus 80.4%; P = 0.04) and graft survival (51.6% versus 39.9%; P = 0.04) compared with non-en bloc recipients. After multivariate adjustment, en bloc transplantation was associated with superior patient survival compared with remaining on the waiting list (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.58; 95% confidence interval: 0.36-0.95; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

En bloc transplantation of small pediatric kidneys in children is associated with superior long-term patient and graft survival. The increased risk of 1-y graft loss among en bloc recipients only appeared in the oldest era.

Utilization and Outcomes of Single and Dual Kidney Transplants from Older Deceased Donors in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Kidneys from elderly deceased donors are often discarded after procurement if the expected outcomes from single kidney transplantation are considered unacceptable. An alternative is to consider them for dual kidney transplantation. We aimed to examine the utilization of kidneys from donors aged ≥60 years in the United Kingdom and compare clinical outcomes of dual versus single kidney transplant recipients.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Data from the United Kingdom Transplant Registry from 2005 to 2017 were analyzed. We examined utilization rates of kidneys retrieved from deceased donors aged ≥60 years, and 5-year patient and death-censored graft survival of recipients of dual and single kidney transplants. Secondary outcomes included eGFR. Multivariable analyses and propensity score analysis were used to correct for differences between the groups.

RESULTS

During the study period, 7841 kidneys were procured from deceased donors aged ≥60 years, of which 1338 (17%) were discarded; 356 dual and 5032 single kidneys were transplanted. Donors of dual transplants were older (median, 73 versus 66 years; P<0.001) and had higher United States Kidney Donor Risk Indices (2.48 versus 1.98; P<0.001). Recipients of dual transplants were also older (64 versus 61 years; P<0.001) and had less favorable human leukocyte antigen matching (P<0.001). After adjusting for confounders, dual and single transplants had similar 5-year graft survival (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.12). No difference in patient survival was demonstrated. Similar findings were observed in a matched cohort with a propensity score analysis method. Median 12-month eGFR was significantly higher in the dual kidney transplant group (40 versus 36 ml/min per 1.73 m²; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Recipients of kidneys from donors aged ≥60 years have similar 5-year graft survival and better graft function at 12 months with dual compared with single deceased donor kidney transplants.