Analysis of Plasma Products for Cellular Contaminants: Comparing Standard Preparation Methods

Deleterious effects of plasma-derived cellular debris in a porcine model of hemorrhagic shock

BACKGROUND

Recent studies identify large quantities of inflammatory cellular debris within Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP). As FFP is a mainstay of hemorrhagic shock resuscitation, we used a porcine model of hemorrhagic shock and ischemia/reperfusion to investigate the inflammatory potential of plasma-derived cellular debris administered during resuscitation.

METHODS

The porcine model of hemorrhagic shock included laparotomy with 35 % hemorrhage (Hem), 45 min of ischemia from supraceliac aortic occlusion with subsequent clamp release (IR), followed by protocolized resuscitation for 6 h. Cellular debris (Debris) was added to the resuscitation phase in three groups. The four groups consisted of Hem + IR (n = 4), Hem + IR + Debris (n = 3), Hem + Debris (n = 3), and IR + Debris (n = 3). A battery of laboratory, physiologic, cytokine, and outcome data were compared between groups.

RESULTS

As expected, the Hem + IR group showed severe time dependent decrements in organ function and physiologic parameters. All animals that included both IR and Debris (Hem + IR + Debris or IR + Debris) died prior to the six-hour end point, while all animals in the Hem + IR and Hem + Debris survived. Cytokines measured at 30-60 min after initiation of resuscitation revealed significant differences in IL-18 and IL-1β between all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ischemia and reperfusion appear to prime the immune system to the deleterious effects of plasma-derived cellular debris. In the presence of ischemia and reperfusion, this model showed the equivalency of 100 % lethality when resuscitation included quantities of cellular debris at levels routinely administered to trauma patients during transfusion of FFP. A deeper understanding of the immunobiology of FFP-derived cellular debris is critical to optimize resuscitation for hemorrhagic shock.

Current challenges and best practices for cell-free long RNA biomarker discovery

The analysis of biomarkers in biological fluids, also known as liquid biopsies, is seen with great potential to diagnose complex diseases such as cancer with a high sensitivity and minimal invasiveness. Although it can target any biomolecule, most liquid biopsy studies have focused on circulating nucleic acids. Historically, studies have aimed at the detection of specific mutations on cell-free DNA (cfDNA), but recently, the study of cell-free RNA (cfRNA) has gained traction. Since 2020, a handful of cfDNA tests have been approved for therapy selection by the FDA, however, no cfRNA tests are approved to date. One of the main drawbacks in the field of RNA-based liquid biopsies is the low reproducibility of the results, often caused by technical and biological variability, a lack of standardized protocols and insufficient cohorts. In this review, we will identify the main challenges and biases introduced during the different stages of biomarker discovery in liquid biopsies with cfRNA and propose solutions to minimize them.

A Comparison of Growth Factors and Cytokines in Fresh Frozen Plasma and Never Frozen Plasma

BACKGROUND

Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) contains proinflammatory mediators released from cellular debris during frozen storage. In addition, recent studies have shown that transfusion of never-frozen plasma (NFP), instead of FFP, may be superior in trauma patients. We hypothesized that FFP would have higher levels of inflammatory mediators when compared to NFP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

FFP (n = 8) and NFP (n = 8) samples were obtained from an urban, level 1 trauma center blood bank. The cytokines in these samples were compared using a Milliplex (Milliplex Sigma) human cytokine magnetic bead panel multiplex assay for 41 different biomarkers.

RESULTS

Growth factors that were higher in NFP included platelet-derived growth factor-AA (PDGF-AA; 8.09 versus 108.00 pg/mL, P < 0.001) and PDGF-AB (0.00 versus 215.20, P= 0.004). Soluble CD40-ligand (sCD40L), a platelet activator and pro-coagulant, was higher in NFP (31.81 versus 80.45 pg/mL, P< 0.001). RANTES, a leukocyte chemotactic cytokine was higher in NFP (26.19 versus 1418.00 pg/mL, P< 0.001). Interleukin-4 (5.70 versus 0.00 pg/mL, P= 0.03) and IL-8 (2.20 versus 0.52 pg/ml, P= 0.03) levels were higher in were higher in FFP.

CONCLUSIONS

Frozen storage of plasma may result in decrease of several growth factors and/or pro-coagulants found in NFP. In addition, the freezing and thawing process may induce release of pro-inflammatory chemokines. Further studies are needed to determine if these cytokines result in improved outcomes with NFP over FFP in transfusion of trauma patients.

Single Institution Trial Comparing Whole Blood vs Balanced Component Therapy: 50 Years Later

BACKGROUND

Early close ratio transfusion with balanced component therapy (BCT) has been associated with improved outcomes in patients with severe hemorrhage; however, this modality is not comparable with whole blood (WB) constituents. We compared use of BCT vs WB to determine if one yielded superior outcomes in patients with severe hemorrhage. We hypothesized that WB would lead to reduced in-hospital mortality and blood product volume if given in the first 24 hours of admission.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a 1-year, single institution, prospective, observational study comparing BCT with WB in adult (18+y) trauma patients with active hemorrhage who required blood transfusion upon arrival at the emergency department. Primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints included 24-hour transfusion volumes, in-hospital clinical outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 253 patients were included; 71.1% received BCT and 29.9% WB. The WB cohort had significantly more penetrating trauma (64.4% vs 48.9%; p = 0.03) and higher Shock Index (1.12 vs 0.92; p = 0.04). WB patients received significantly fewer units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) (p < 0.001) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (p = 0.04), with a lower incidence of ARDS (p = 0.03) and fewer ventilator days (p = 0.03). Kaplan Meier survival analysis revealed no difference in survival between the 2 transfusion strategies (p = 0.80). When adjusted for various markers of injury severity and critical illness in Cox regression analysis, WB remained unassociated with mortality (hazard ratio 1.25; 95% CI 0.60-2.58; p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in survival rates when comparing BCT with WB. In the WB group, the incidence of ARDS, duration of mechanical ventilation, massive transfusion protocol (MTP) activation, and transfusion volumes were significantly reduced. Further research should be directed at analyzing whether there is a true hemorrhage-related pathophysiologic benefit of WB when compared with BCT.