Surgeon Volume and Risk of Reoperation after Laparoscopic Primary Ventral Hernia Repair: A Nationwide Register-Based Study

Adhesions After Laparoscopic IPOM-How Serious Is the Problem?

Although laparoscopic IPOM is still the gold standard in ventral hernia repair, it is subject of a slow but constant decline, while new minimally invasive techniques are increasingly used, as well as open retromuscular repairs. One of the reasons are the intraperitoneal mesh position and its suspected higher risk for creating intraabdominal adhesions, compared to extraperitoneal mesh positions. In potential subsequent operations (e.g., in recurrent ventral hernia repair) adhesions usually must be taken down, which is a known risk factor for complications such as inadvertent enterotomies, surgical site infections and prolonged hospital stay. In this review we evaluate the incidence of intraabdominal adhesions after ventral hernia repair and their potential impact on surgical outcome in subsequent operations. Special attention is paid to the impact of mesh position in developing adhesions.

Is surgeon annual case volume related with intra and postoperative complications after ventral hernia repair? Uni- and multivariate analysis of prospective registry-based data

BACKGROUND

Literature on a potential relationship between surgeon case volume and intra- or postoperative complications after ventral hernia repair remains scarce.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ventral hernia repair between 2011 and 2023 were selected from the prospectively maintained French Hernia-Club Registry. Outcome variables were: intraoperative events, postoperative general complications, surgical site occurrences, surgical site infections, length of intensive care unit (ICU), and patient-reported scar bulging during follow-up. Surgeons' annual case volume was categorized as 1-5, 6-50, 51-100, 101-125, and > 125 cases, and its association with outcome volume was evaluated using uni- and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 199 titular or temporary members registered 15,332 ventral hernia repairs, including 7869 primary, 6173 incisional, and 212 parastomal hernia repairs. In univariate analysis, surgeons' annual case volume was significantly related with all the postoperative studied outcomes. After multivariate regression analysis, annual case volume remained significantly associated with intra-operative complications, postoperative general complications and length of ICU stay. A primary repair was independently associated with fewer intra- and post-operative complications.

CONCLUSION

In the present multivariable analysis of a large registry on ventral hernia repairs, higher surgeon annual case volume was significantly related with fewer postoperative general complications and a shorter length of stay, but not with fewer surgical site occurrences, nor with less patient-reported scar bulging. Factors in the surgeons' case mix such as the type of hernia have significant impact on complication rates.

Hernia Formation: Risk Factors and Biology

The incidence of ventral hernias in the United States is in increasing. Herein, the author details the etiology of congenital and acquired ventral hernias as well as the risk factors associated with the development of each of these types of ventral hernias.

Risk of Reoperation for Recurrence After Elective Primary Groin and Ventral Hernia Repair by Supervised Residents

Importance

Surgical training involves letting residents operate under supervision. Since hernia repair is a common procedure worldwide, it is a frequent part of the surgical curriculum.

Objective

To assess the risk of reoperation for recurrence after elective primary groin and ventral hernia repair performed by supervised residents compared with that by specialists.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This nationwide register-based cohort study included data from January 2016 to September 2021. Patients were followed up until reoperation, emigration, death, or the end of the study period. The study used data from the Danish Inguinal and Ventral Hernia Databases linked with data from the Danish Patient Safety Authority's Online Register via surgeons' unique authorization ID. The cohort included patients aged 18 years or older who underwent primary elective hernia repairs performed by supervised residents or specialists for inguinal, femoral, epigastric, or umbilical hernias. Hernia repairs were divided into the following 4 groups: Lichtenstein groin, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) groin, open ventral, and laparoscopic ventral.

Exposures

Hernia repairs performed by supervised residents vs specialists.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Reoperation for recurrence, analyzed separately for all 4 groups.

Results

A total of 868 specialists and residents who performed 31 683 primary groin and 7777 primary ventral hernia repairs were included in this study. The median age of patients who underwent hernia repair was 60 years (IQR, 48-70 years), and 33 424 patients (84.7%) were male. There was no significant difference in the adjusted risk of reoperation after Lichtenstein groin hernia repair (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 0.99-1.59), laparoscopic groin hernia repair (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.73-1.40), open ventral hernia repair (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.61-1.29), and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 0.99-8.84) performed by supervised residents compared with those by specialists. There was, however, a slightly increased unadjusted, cumulative reoperation rate after Lichtenstein repairs performed by supervised residents compared with those by specialists (4.8% vs 4.2%; P = .048).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this study suggest that neither open nor laparoscopic repair of groin and ventral hernias performed by supervised residents appeared to be associated with a higher risk of reoperation for recurrence compared with the operations performed by specialists. This indicates that residents may safely perform elective hernia repair when supervised as part of their training curriculum.

Description of the Current Da Vinci® Training Pathway for Robotic Abdominal Wall Surgery by the European Hernia Society

Background: Robot assisted laparoscopic abdominal wall surgery (RAWS) has seen a rapid adoption in recent years. The safe introduction of the robot platform in the treatment of abdominal wall hernias is important to safeguard the patient from harm during the learning curve. The scope of this paper is to describe the current European training curriculum in RAWS. Methods and Analysis: The pathway to competence in RAWS will depend on the robot platform, experience in other abdominal procedures (novice to expert) and experience in the abdominal wall repair techniques. An overview of the learning curve effect in the initial case series of several early adopters in RAWS was reviewed. In European centres, current training for surgeons wanting to adopt RAWS is managed by the specific technology-based training organized by the company providing the robot. It consists of four phases where phases I and II are preclinical, while phases III and IV focus on the introduction of the robotic platform into surgical practice. Conclusion: On behalf of the Robotic Surgery Task Force of the European Hernia Society (EHS) we believe that the EHS should play an important role in the clinical phases III and IV training. Courses organized in collaboration with the robot provider on relevant surgical anatomy of the abdominal wall and procedural steps in complex abdominal wall reconstruction like transversus abdominis release are essential. Whereas the robot provider should be responsible for the preclinical phases I and II to gain familiarity in the specific robot platform.