1
|
Burgher T, Shepherd V, Nollett C. Effective approaches to public involvement in care home research: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2023; 9:38. [PMID: 37268986 PMCID: PMC10234794 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00453-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public involvement (often referred to as patient and public involvement or PPI) integrates the voices of the public in health and care research. However, groups such as care home residents are often excluded from involvement opportunities due to the complexities of involving people with additional care and communication needs. Despite a range of approaches being used, there is little understanding about how best to incorporate their experiences, and those of other care home stakeholders, into the design and conduct of research. OBJECTIVE A systematic review was conducted to identify PPI methods that better meet the specific needs of care home stakeholders. This was undertaken by (1) outlining effective PPI approaches used in care home research and the key stakeholders involved; (2) describing the role of PPI in different care home contexts and (3) identifying stakeholders' experiences and attitudes towards PPI in care homes. METHODS Databases CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Scopus were searched for English language papers from inception to November 2021. A narrative synthesis approach was utilised to organise the extracted data into five themes. RESULTS The search initially yielded 2314 articles (following de-duplication), with 27 meeting the inclusion criteria. Articles reported a range of input from stakeholders (including residents, staff, relatives and community stakeholders), with the impact of PPI varying according to the type of care establishment and research context. The experiences and reflections of stakeholders' about their involvement in care home research varied, with some studies offering first-hand accounts compared with summaries from researchers. Some articles explicitly evaluated the effectiveness of the PPI approach using specific outcome measures whilst others indirectly described the impact of their approach. Five themes were identified as characterising an effective PPI approach: (1) valuing stakeholders' perspectives, (2) awareness of the multi-faceted research context, (3) ensuring inclusivity and transparency, (4) maintaining flexibility and adaptability and (5) utilising resources and wider support. CONCLUSION Effective PPI in care home research requires researchers to create person-centred opportunities to adequately involve groups with physical and cognitive impairments. The findings led to the creation of evidence-based practical recommendations to support future involvement opportunities and help researchers develop strategies for inclusive opportunities for involvement. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION The review was prospectively registered on PROPSERO (CRD42021293353).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Victoria Shepherd
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, 4Th Floor, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Claire Nollett
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, 4Th Floor, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zimmerman S, Resnick B, Ouslander J, Levy C, Gaugler JE, Sloane PD, Mor V. Pragmatic Trials and Improving Long-Term Care: Recommendations From a National Institutes of Health Conference. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2022; 23:323-327. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
3
|
Zimmerman S, Resnick B, Ouslander J, Levy C, Gaugler JE, Sloane PD, Mor V. Pragmatic Trials and Improving Long-Term Care: Recommendations From a National Institutes of Health Conference. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:688-694. [PMID: 35195278 PMCID: PMC8915540 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sheryl Zimmerman
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and Schools of Social Work and Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA,Address correspondence to Sheryl Zimmerman, PhD, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Campus Box 7590, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590, USA. (S. Zimmerman)
| | - Barbara Resnick
- University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph Ouslander
- Department of Integrated Medical Sciences, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Cari Levy
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, and University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Joseph E. Gaugler
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Philip D. Sloane
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Vincent Mor
- Center of Innovation in Long-term Services and Supports, Providence VA Medical Center; Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wiles LK, Kay D, Luker JA, Worley A, Austin J, Ball A, Bevan A, Cousins M, Dalton S, Hodges E, Horvat L, Kerrins E, Marker J, McKinnon M, McMillan P, Pinero de Plaza MA, Smith J, Yeung D, Hillier SL. Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0261808. [PMID: 35085276 PMCID: PMC8794088 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
To assess the effects of consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services. We updated a review published in 2006 and 2009 and revised the previous search strategies for key databases (The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; EMBASE; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Web of Science) up to February 2020. Selection criteria included randomised controlled trials assessing consumer engagement in developing health care policy, research, or health services. The International Association for Public Participation, Spectrum of Public Participation was used to identify, describe, compare and analyse consumer engagement. Outcome measures were effects on people; effects on the policy/research/health care services; or process outcomes. We included 23 randomised controlled trials with a moderate or high risk of bias, involving 136,265 participants. Most consumer engagement strategies adopted a consultative approach during the development phase of interventions, targeted to health services. Based on four large cluster-randomised controlled trials, there is evidence that consumer engagement in the development and delivery of health services to enhance the care of pregnant women results in a reduction in neonatal, but not maternal, mortality. From other trials, there is evidence that involving consumers in developing patient information material results in material that is more relevant, readable and understandable for patients, and can improve knowledge. Mixed effects are reported of consumer-engagement on the development and/or implementation of health professional training. There is some evidence that using consumer interviewers instead of staff in satisfaction surveys can have a small influence on the results. There is some evidence that consumers may have a role in identifying a broader range of health care priorities that are complementary to those from professionals. There is some evidence that consumer engagement in monitoring and evaluating health services may impact perceptions of patient safety or quality of life. There is growing evidence from randomised controlled trials of the effects of consumer engagement on the relevance and positive outcomes of health policy, research and services. Health care consumers, providers, researchers and funders should continue to employ evidence-informed consumer engagement in their jurisdictions, with embedded evaluation. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018102595.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise K. Wiles
- Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Debra Kay
- Health Consumer Advocate/Representative, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Julie A. Luker
- Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Anthea Worley
- Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jane Austin
- Health Performance Council, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Allan Ball
- National Disability Insurance Agency, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Alan Bevan
- Health Consumer Advocate/Representative, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Sarah Dalton
- The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Agency for Clinical Innovation, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ellie Hodges
- Lived Experience Representative, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lidia Horvat
- Safer Care Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ellen Kerrins
- SAHMRI Community Advisory Group, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Julie Marker
- Health Consumer Advocate/Representative, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Penelope McMillan
- Health Consumer Advocate/Representative, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Maria Alejandra Pinero de Plaza
- Health Consumer Advocate/Representative, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Judy Smith
- Royal District Nursing Service, Keswick, South Australia, Australia
| | - David Yeung
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- SA Pathology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Susan L. Hillier
- Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zimmerman S, Resnick B, Ouslander J, Levy C, Gaugler JE, Sloane PD, Mor V. Pragmatic trials and improving long-term care: Recommendations from a national institutes of health conference. Geriatr Nurs 2022; 44:288-292. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
6
|
Lowe D, Ryan R, Schonfeld L, Merner B, Walsh L, Graham-Wisener L, Hill S. Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 9:CD013373. [PMID: 34523117 PMCID: PMC8440158 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013373.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health services have traditionally been developed to focus on specific diseases or medical specialties. Involving consumers as partners in planning, delivering and evaluating health services may lead to services that are person-centred and so better able to meet the needs of and provide care for individuals. Globally, governments recommend consumer involvement in healthcare decision-making at the systems level, as a strategy for promoting person-centred health services. However, the effects of this 'working in partnership' approach to healthcare decision-making are unclear. Working in partnership is defined here as collaborative relationships between at least one consumer and health provider, meeting jointly and regularly in formal group formats, to equally contribute to and collaborate on health service-related decision-making in real time. In this review, the terms 'consumer' and 'health provider' refer to partnership participants, and 'health service user' and 'health service provider' refer to trial participants. This review of effects of partnership interventions was undertaken concurrently with a Cochrane Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) entitled Consumers and health providers working in partnership for the promotion of person-centred health services: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership, as an intervention to promote person-centred health services. SEARCH METHODS We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases from 2000 to April 2019; PROQUEST Dissertations and Theses Global from 2016 to April 2019; and grey literature and online trial registries from 2000 until September 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and cluster-RCTs of 'working in partnership' interventions meeting these three criteria: both consumer and provider participants meet; they meet jointly and regularly in formal group formats; and they make actual decisions that relate to the person-centredness of health service(s). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened most titles and abstracts. One review author screened a subset of titles and abstracts (i.e. those identified through clinical trials registries searches, those classified by the Cochrane RCT Classifier as unlikely to be an RCT, and those identified through other sources). Two review authors independently screened all full texts of potentially eligible articles for inclusion. In case of disagreement, they consulted a third review author to reach consensus. One review author extracted data and assessed risk of bias for all included studies and a second review author independently cross-checked all data and assessments. Any discrepancies were resolved by discussion, or by consulting a third review author to reach consensus. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the small number of included trials and their heterogeneity; we synthesised results descriptively by comparison and outcome. We reported the following outcomes in GRADE 'Summary of findings' tables: health service alterations; the degree to which changed service reflects health service user priorities; health service users' ratings of health service performance; health service users' health service utilisation patterns; resources associated with the decision-making process; resources associated with implementing decisions; and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS We included five trials (one RCT and four cluster-RCTs), with 16,257 health service users and more than 469 health service providers as trial participants. For two trials, the aims of the partnerships were to directly improve the person-centredness of health services (via health service planning, and discharge co-ordination). In the remaining trials, the aims were indirect (training first-year medical doctors on patient safety) or broader in focus (which could include person-centredness of health services that targeted the public/community, households or health service delivery to improve maternal and neonatal mortality). Three trials were conducted in high income-countries, one was in a middle-income country and one was in a low-income country. Two studies evaluated working in partnership interventions, compared to usual practice without partnership (Comparison 1); and three studies evaluated working in partnership as part of a multi-component intervention, compared to the same intervention without partnership (Comparison 2). No studies evaluated one form of working in partnership compared to another (Comparison 3). The effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership compared to usual practice without partnership are uncertain: only one of the two studies that assessed this comparison measured health service alteration outcomes, and data were not usable, as only intervention group data were reported. Additionally, none of the included studies evaluating this comparison measured the other primary or secondary outcomes we sought for the 'Summary of findings' table. We are also unsure about the effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership as part of a multi-component intervention compared to the same intervention without partnership. Very low-certainty evidence indicated there may be little or no difference on health service alterations or health service user health service performance ratings (two studies); or on health service user health service utilisation patterns and adverse events (one study each). No studies evaluating this comparison reported the degree to which health service alterations reflect health service user priorities, or resource use. Overall, our confidence in the findings about the effects of working in partnership interventions was very low due to indirectness, imprecision and publication bias, and serious concerns about risk of selection bias; performance bias, detection bias and reporting bias in most studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The effects of consumers and providers working in partnership as an intervention, or as part of a multi-component intervention, are uncertain, due to a lack of high-quality evidence and/or due to a lack of studies. Further well-designed RCTs with a clear focus on assessing outcomes directly related to partnerships for patient-centred health services are needed in this area, which may also benefit from mixed-methods and qualitative research to build the evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianne Lowe
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Rebecca Ryan
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Lina Schonfeld
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Bronwen Merner
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Louisa Walsh
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | | | - Sophie Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Spinewine A, Evrard P, Hughes C. Interventions to optimize medication use in nursing homes: a narrative review. Eur Geriatr Med 2021; 12:551-567. [PMID: 33751478 PMCID: PMC8149362 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-021-00477-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Polypharmacy, medication errors and adverse drug events are frequent among nursing home residents. Errors can occur at any step of the medication use process. We aimed to review interventions aiming at optimization of any step of medication use in nursing homes. METHODS We narratively reviewed quantitative as well as qualitative studies, observational and experimental studies that described interventions, their effects as well as barriers and enablers to implementation. We prioritized recent studies with relevant findings for the European setting. RESULTS Many interventions led to improvements in medication use. However, because of outcome heterogeneity, comparison between interventions was difficult. Prescribing was the most studied aspect of medication use. At the micro-level, medication review, multidisciplinary work, and more recently, patient-centered care components dominated. At the macro-level, guidelines and legislation, mainly for specific medication classes (e.g., antipsychotics) were employed. Utilization of technology also helped improve medication administration. Several barriers and enablers were reported, at individual, organizational, and system levels. CONCLUSION Overall, existing interventions are effective in optimizing medication use. However there is a need for further European well-designed and large-scale evaluations of under-researched intervention components (e.g., health information technology, patient-centered approaches), specific medication classes (e.g., antithrombotic agents), and interventions targeting medication use aspects other than prescribing (e.g., monitoring). Further development and uptake of core outcome sets is required. Finally, qualitative studies on barriers and enablers for intervention implementation would enable theory-driven intervention design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Spinewine
- Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 72/B1.72.02, Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
- Pharmacy Department, CHU UCL Namur, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.
| | - Perrine Evrard
- Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 72/B1.72.02, Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Carmel Hughes
- School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Owen R, Berry K, Brown LJE. Enhancing Older Adults' Well-Being and Quality of Life through Purposeful Activity: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2021; 62:e317-e327. [PMID: 33558898 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnab017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Population aging represents a significant challenge for health and social care services. Older adults who engage in activities that offer a sense of purpose have significantly better physical and psychological health outcomes. However, age-related functional limitations and losses of social roles can present barriers to engaging in purposeful activity, especially for those older adults within the 'oldest old' age range (i.e. 80 years and over). This review aimed to determine the nature and effectiveness of purposeful activity interventions in older adults, aged ≥80 years, with respect to well-being and quality of life outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Three databases were searched from their inception to April 2020. The search yielded 8,916 records, which resulted in eight eligible studies. RESULTS The interventions were divided into two groups: (1) interventions that gave participants a specific functional role, such as volunteer or mentor (n=5); (2) interventions that supported participants to develop a new skill (n=3). The quality of the evidence was variable. The strongest evidence was for interventions that assigned a functional role, which appeared to be somewhat effective in improving well-being outcomes. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS There is preliminary evidence that purposeful activity interventions, particularly those that involved taking on a functional role, can improve well-being and quality of life outcomes in older adults aged 80 years and over. These findings have implications for professionals and carers to support older adults to access more purposeful social roles and create opportunities for helping and reciprocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Owen
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, UK
| | - Katherine Berry
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, UK
| | - Laura J E Brown
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Maenhout A, Cornelis E, Van de Velde D, Desmet V, Gorus E, Van Malderen L, Vanbosseghem R, De Vriendt P. The relationship between quality of life in a nursing home and personal, organizational, activity-related factors and social satisfaction: a cross-sectional study with multiple linear regression analyses. Aging Ment Health 2020; 24:649-658. [PMID: 30724580 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1571014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate quality of life in nursing home residents and the relationship with personal, organizational, activity-related factors and social satisfaction.Methods: In a cross-sectional survey study in 73 nursing homes in Flanders, Belgium, 171 cognitively healthy residents were randomly recruited (mean age 85.40 years [±5.88]; 27% men, 73% women). Quality of life, as the dependent/response variable, was measured using anamnestic comparative self-assessment (range -5 to +5). Multiple linear regression (forward stepwise selection) was used (1) to investigate which factors were significantly related to nursing home residents' quality of life and (2) to model the relationship between the variables by fitting a linear equation to the observed data.Results: Nursing home residents reported a quality of life score of 2.12 (±2.16). Mood, self-perceived health status, social satisfaction and educational level were withheld as significant predictors of the anamnestic comparative self-assessment score (p < 0.001), explaining 38.1% of the variance in quality of life.Conclusions: Results suggest that a higher quality of life in nursing homes can be pursued by strategies to prevent depression and to improve nursing home residents' subjective perception of health (e.g. offering good care) and social network. It is recommended that nursing homes prepare for future generations, who will be more educated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelies Maenhout
- Research Group Zorginnovatie, Artevelde University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Elise Cornelis
- Research Group Zorginnovatie, Artevelde University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.,Frailty in Ageing Research Group (FRIA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Geriatrics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dominique Van de Velde
- Research Group Zorginnovatie, Artevelde University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Valerie Desmet
- Frailty in Ageing Research Group (FRIA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ellen Gorus
- Frailty in Ageing Research Group (FRIA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Geriatrics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Gerontology (GERO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lien Van Malderen
- Frailty in Ageing Research Group (FRIA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Gerontology (GERO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ruben Vanbosseghem
- Frailty in Ageing Research Group (FRIA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Patricia De Vriendt
- Research Group Zorginnovatie, Artevelde University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.,Frailty in Ageing Research Group (FRIA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Gerontology (GERO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ahouah M, Rothan-Tondeur M. End-Users and Caregivers' Involvement in Health Interventional Research Carried Out in Geriatric Facilities: A Systematic Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16162812. [PMID: 31394752 PMCID: PMC6719053 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16162812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Public involvement (PI) is of great interest. However, little is known about this topic in the design, development, and/or implementation of health interventions in geriatric facilities. This study aimed to provide a critical overview of the involvement of caregivers and end-users in interventions in these facilities, based on Rifkin’s analytical framework. This systematic review, supplemented by a questionnaire to the corresponding authors, covered non-drug intervention reports targeting nurses, doctors, residents, and their relatives. Articles were published in Pubmed, Medline, Scopus, and Cinahl, from January 2016 to April 2018. Ninety-seven articles were included. The review shows a low level or partial PI in geriatric facilities where it exists. These results are further supported by the authors’ responses to the questionnaire. PI remains uncommon in geriatric institutions and consists of a consumerist model, suggesting the need for improved practices. More efforts are needed to experiment with recommendations to meet the challenges of PI and enhance the public ownership of interventions. The protocol was registered on Prospero under the number CRD42018098504.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Ahouah
- University Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Nursing Sciences Research chair, Laboratory Educations and Health Practices (LEPS), (EA 3412), UFR SMBH, F-93017 Bobigny, France.
| | - Monique Rothan-Tondeur
- University Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Nursing Sciences Research chair, Laboratory Educations and Health Practices (LEPS), (EA 3412), UFR SMBH, F-93017 Bobigny, France
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP HP), Nursing sciences Research Chair, 75004 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Holihan JL, Cherla D, Blair KJ, Chua SS, Hasapes JP, Matta EJ, Shiralkar KG, Surabhi VR, Tammisetti VS, Ko TC, Liang MK. Computed tomography in ventral hernia diagnosis: have we improved? A quality improvement initiative. J Surg Res 2017; 224:97-101. [PMID: 29506858 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.11.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies suggest that agreement between readers of computed tomography (CT) scans for the diagnosis of a ventral hernia (VH) is poor (32% agreement, κ = 0.21). Recommendations were developed by surgeons and radiologists after determining common reasons for disagreement among CT reviewers; however, the long-term effect of adoption of these recommendations has not been assessed. The aim of this quality improvement (QI) project was to determine whether the incorporation of recommendations developed by surgeons and radiologists improves agreement among reviewers of CT scans in diagnosing a VH. METHODS A prospective cohort of patients, with a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis in the past 1 y, attending a surgery clinic at a single institution was enrolled. Enrolled subjects underwent a standardized physical examination by a trained hernia surgeon to determine the likelihood of a clinical VH (no, indeterminate, or yes). The QI intervention was the distribution and implementation of previously described recommendations. After a year of intervention, independent radiologists assessed patients' CT scans for the presence or absence of a VH. Percent agreement and kappa were calculated to determine interobserver reliability. In-person discussion on scans with disagreement was held, and the results were used as a "gold standard" to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values for CT scan diagnosis of a VH. RESULTS A total of 79 patients were included in the study. After QI intervention, seven radiologists agreed on 43% of the scans, and κ was 0.50 (P < 0.001). Agreement was highest among patients with a high clinical likelihood of a VH and lowest among patients with an indeterminate clinical likelihood. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.369 and 0.833, respectively. CONCLUSIONS After the implementation of recommendations, there is improved agreement among radiologists reading CT scans for the diagnosis of a VH. However, there is substantial room for improvement, and CT scans for the diagnosis of VH is not ready for widespread use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie L Holihan
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.
| | - Deepa Cherla
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Katherine J Blair
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven S Chua
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Joseph P Hasapes
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Eduardo J Matta
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Kaustubh G Shiralkar
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Venkateswar R Surabhi
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Varaha S Tammisetti
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Tien C Ko
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Mike K Liang
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|