Effects of Staff Training on Nursing Home Residents' End-Of-Life Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Improving End-of-Life Care for Nursing Home Residents Using an Interprofessional Approach

Interprofessional collaboration enhances quality end-of-life care leading to a dignified death. Hospice care uses an interdisciplinary approach to optimize quality of life and mitigate impacts of serious illness. Interventions to improve hospice care delivery have been proven to be effective, but little is known about nursing home staff preparedness, implementation of hospice education, and interprofessional communication. Research is limited on how hospice care can be implemented into the nursing home setting. The purpose of this study was to determine if education combined with a communication tool improved nursing home staff knowledge and improved communication with the hospice team. The descriptive study invited participants to take a preseminar and postseminar survey to assess end-of-life preparedness in terms of willingness, capability, and resilience. A communication tool was implemented to measure collaboration with the hospice team over 3 months. The results from this study suggest education combined with interprofessional communication improves end-of-life care.

A Systematic Review of the Effects of Advance Care Planning Interventions in Nursing Homes

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning (ACP) interventions are implemented to achieve outcomes such as improving end-of-life care and increasing goal-concordant care. ACP has been studied across various settings, but it is important to study the impacts of ACP in nursing homes.

OBJECTIVE

To review and evaluate the outcomes of ACP interventions in nursing homes.

DESIGN

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

A search was last performed on March 27, 2023, using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials that studied the impact of ACP interventions in nursing homes with residents over the age of 18. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 was used to determine the studies' risk of bias. The ACP Outcomes Framework was utilized to organize the results into 5 domains: Process, Action, Quality of Care, Health Status, and Health Care Utilization. No meta-analysis was possible because of heterogeneity in study interventions and outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies met criteria for inclusion in this review. Most studies were at low or medium risk of bias. The study interventions included resident and family education, staff education, structured discussions, communication with primary medical teams, and use of specialists. A slight majority of Action and Process outcomes were positive, whereas Quality of Care outcomes were mixed. A minority of Health Care Utilization and Health Status outcomes were positive. Multi-component interventions and interventions featuring staff education were often successful.

CONCLUSIONS

ACP interventions in nursing homes yield beneficial outcomes in some domains. Limitations to this review include the presence of heterogeneity in types of study interventions and outcomes, as well as underpowering of many study outcomes. Further work is needed to improve ACP implementation, identify which interventions are most beneficial, and ensure sustainability of beneficial interventions.

Reducing unplanned hospital admissions from care homes: a systematic review

Background

Care homes predominantly care for older people with complex health and care needs, who are at high risk of unplanned hospital admissions. While often necessary, such admissions can be distressing and provide an opportunity cost as well as a financial cost.

Objectives

Our objective was to update a 2014 evidence review of interventions to reduce unplanned admissions of care home residents. We carried out a systematic review of interventions used in the UK and other high-income countries by synthesising evidence of effects of these interventions on hospital admissions; feasibility and acceptability; costs and value for money; and factors affecting applicability of international evidence to UK settings.

Data sources

We searched the following databases in December 2021 for studies published since 2014: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; Health Management Information Consortium; Medline; PsycINFO; Science and Social Sciences Citation Indexes; Social Care Online; and Social Service Abstracts. 'Grey' literature (January 2022) and citations were searched and reference lists were checked.

Methods

We included studies of any design reporting interventions delivered in care homes (with or without nursing) or hospitals to reduce unplanned hospital admissions. A taxonomy of interventions was developed from an initial scoping search. Outcomes of interest included measures of effect on unplanned admissions among care home residents; barriers/facilitators to implementation in a UK setting and acceptability to care home residents, their families and staff. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. We used published frameworks to extract data on intervention characteristics, implementation barriers/facilitators and applicability of international evidence. We performed a narrative synthesis grouped by intervention type and setting. Overall strength of evidence for admission reduction was assessed using a framework based on study design, study numbers and direction of effect.

Results

We included 124 publications/reports (30 from the UK). Integrated care and quality improvement programmes providing additional support to care homes (e.g. the English Care Homes Vanguard initiatives and hospital-based services in Australia) appeared to reduce unplanned admissions relative to usual care. Simpler training and staff development initiatives showed mixed results, as did interventions aimed at tackling specific problems (e.g. medication review). Advance care planning was key to the success of most quality improvement programmes but do-not-hospitalise orders were problematic. Qualitative research identified tensions affecting decision-making involving paramedics, care home staff and residents/family carers. The best way to reduce end-of-life admissions through access to palliative care was unclear in the face of inconsistent and generally low-quality evidence.

Conclusions

Effective implementation of interventions at various stages of residents' care pathways may reduce unplanned admissions. Most interventions are complex and require adaptation to local contexts. Work at the interface between health and social care is key to successful implementation.

Limitations

Much of the evidence identified was of low quality because of factors such as uncontrolled study designs and small sample size. Meta-analysis was not possible.

Future work

We identified a need for improved economic evidence and the evaluation of integrated care models of the type delivered by hospital-based teams. Researchers should carefully consider what is realistic in terms of study design and data collection given the current context of extreme pressure on care homes.

Study registration

This study is registered as PROSPERO database CRD42021289418.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (award number NIHR133884) and will be published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 11, No. 18. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Association between advanced care planning and emergency department visits: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning can help provide optimal medical care according to a patient's wishes as a part of patient-centered discussions on end-of-life care. This can prevent undesired transfers to emergency departments. However, the effects of advance care planning on emergency department visits and ambulance calls in various settings or specific conditions remain unclear.

AIM

To evaluate whether advanced care planning affected the frequency of emergency department visits and ambulance calls.

DESIGN

Systematic review. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022340109). We assessed risk of bias using RoB 2.0, ROBINS-I, and ROBINS-E.

DATA SOURCES

We searched the PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases from their inception until September 22, 2022 for studies comparing patients with and without advanced care planning and reported the frequency of emergency department visits and ambulance calls as outcomes.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included. Regarding settings, two studies on patients in nursing homes showed that advanced care planning significantly reduced the frequency of emergency department visits and ambulance calls. However, two studies involving several medical care facilities reported inconclusive results. Regarding patient disease, a study on patients with depression or dementia showed that advanced care planning significantly reduced emergency department visits; in contrast, two studies on patients with severe respiratory diseases and serious illnesses showed no significant reduction. Seven studies showed a high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced care planning may lead to reduced emergency department visits and ambulance calls among nursing home residents and patients with depression or dementia. Further research is warranted to identify the effectiveness of advanced care planning in specific settings and diseases.

Implementation and evaluation of an end-of-life care education program for oncology nurses working in medical-surgical wards: A quasi-experimental study

Background

The issue of a good death for cancer patients is becoming more prevalent. Hence, nurses' end-of-life work performance and stress levels in medical-surgical wards can significantly impact the quality of life of cancer patients and their caregivers. This study aimed to develop an end-of-life care education program for nurses taking care of cancer patients in medical-surgical ward and verify the program's preliminary effect.

Method

Quasi-experimental research using a one-group pretest-posttest design was carried out for this study. The end-of-life care manual for nurses in general wards were developed through expert validation. Initial in-person and follow-on online self-education sessions were conducted based on the end-of-life care manual. A total of 70 nurses participated in the end-of-life care education program. End-of-life care stress and end-of-life care performance were measured as preliminary program effects. An online survey was conducted before the initial in-person education and after the follow-up online education.

Results

The end-of-life care education program effectively improved general ward nurses' end-of-life care performance. This performance was improved in the physical and psychological domains. However, this program did not improve the nurses' performance in end-of-life care in the spiritual domain. Furthermore, it did not effectively reduce the stress on end-of-life care, indicating that improvements should be made.

Conclusions

The improvement of effective end-of-life care education programs for nurses caring for cancer patients in general wards is required. Most importantly, efforts at the hospital organization level are necessary to reduce the stress of end-of-life care by improving the working environment. Additionally, it is necessary to conduct preemptive tailored intervention programs for nurses, such as a resilience improvement program.

Noticing Acute Changes in Health in Long-Term Care Residents

PURPOSE

Early signs of acute conditions and increased fall risk often go unrecognized in patients in long-term care facilities. The aim of this study was to examine how healthcare staff identify and act on changes in health status in this patient population.

DESIGN

A qualitative study design was used for this study.

METHODS

Six focus groups across two Department of Veterans Affairs long-term care facilities were conducted with 26 interdisciplinary healthcare staff members. Using thematic content analysis, the team preliminarily coded based on interview questions, reviewed and discussed emerging themes, and agreed on the resultant coding scheme for each category with additional independent scientist review.

RESULTS

Themes included describing and explaining how "normal" or expected behavior is identified by staff, noticing changes in a resident, determining the significance of the change, hypothesizing reasons for an observed change, response to an observed change, and resolution of the clinical change.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite limited training in formal assessment methods, long-term care staff have developed methods to conduct ongoing assessments of the residents. This technique, individual phenotyping, often identifies acute changes; however, the lack of formal methods, language, or tools to communicate the changes means that these assessments are not often formalized in a manner that informs the residents' changing care needs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE TO THE PRACTICE OF REHABILITATION NURSING

More formal objective measures of health change are needed to assist long-term care staff in expressing and interpreting the subjective phenotype changes into objective, easily communicated health status changes. This is particularly important for acute health changes and impending falls, both of which are associated with acute hospitalization.

The Effect of Advance Care Planning Intervention on Hospitalization Among Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of advance care planning (ACP) interventions on the hospitalization of nursing home residents.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Nursing homes and nursing home residents.

METHODS

A literature search was systematically conducted in 6 electronic databases (Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, AgeLine, and the Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collection), in addition to hand searches and reference list checking; the articles retrieved were those published from 1990 to November 2021. The eligible studies were randomized controlled trials, controlled trials, and pre-post intervention studies describing original data on the effect of ACP on hospitalization of nursing home residents; these studies had to be written in English. Two independent reviewers appraised the quality of the studies and extracted the relevant data using the Joanna Briggs Institute abstraction form and critical appraisal tools. A study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022301648).

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 744 studies. Nine studies involving a total of 57,180 residents were included in the review. The findings showed that the ACP reduced the likelihood of hospitalization [relative risk (RR) 0.54, 95% CI 0.47-0.63; I² = 0%)], it had no effect on emergency department (ED) visits (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.31-1.42; I² = 99), hospice enrollment (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88-1.10; I² = 0%), mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.68-1.00; I² = 4%), and satisfaction with care (standardized mean difference: -0.04, 95% CI -0.14 to -0.06; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

ACP reduced hospitalizations but did not affect the secondary outcomes, namely, ED visits, hospice enrollment, mortality, and satisfaction with care. These findings suggest that policy makers should support the implementation of ACP programs in nursing homes. More robust studies are needed to determine the effects of ACP on ED visits, hospice enrollment, mortality, and satisfaction with care.

Evaluation of IMproving Palliative care Education and Training Using Simulation in Dementia (IMPETUS-D) a staff simulation training intervention to improve palliative care of people with advanced dementia living in nursing homes: a cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

People with dementia have unique palliative and end-of-life needs. However, access to quality palliative and end-of-life care for people with dementia living in nursing homes is often suboptimal. There is a recognised need for nursing home staff training in dementia-specific palliative care to equip them with knowledge and skills to deliver high quality care.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a simulation training intervention (IMPETUS-D) aimed at nursing home staff on reducing unplanned transfers to hospital and/or deaths in hospital among residents living with dementia.

DESIGN

Cluster randomised controlled trial of nursing homes with process evaluation conducted alongside.

SUBJECTS & SETTING

One thousand three hundred four people with dementia living in 24 nursing homes (12 intervention/12 control) in three Australian cities, their families and direct care staff.

METHODS

Randomisation was conducted at the level of the nursing home (cluster). The allocation sequence was generated by an independent statistician using a computer-generated allocation sequence. Staff from intervention nursing homes had access to the IMPETUS-D training intervention, and staff from control nursing homes had access to usual training opportunities. The predicted primary outcome measure was a 20% reduction in the proportion of people with dementia who had an unplanned transfer to hospital and/or death in hospital at 6-months follow-up in the intervention nursing homes compared to the control nursing homes.

RESULTS

At 6-months follow-up, 128 (21.1%) people with dementia from the intervention group had an unplanned transfer or death in hospital compared to 132 (19.0%) residents from the control group; odds ratio 1.14 (95% CI, 0.82-1.59). There were suboptimal levels of staff participation in the training intervention and several barriers to participation identified.

CONCLUSION

This study of a dementia-specific palliative care staff training intervention found no difference in the proportion of residents with dementia who had an unplanned hospital transfer. Implementation of the intervention was challenging and likely did not achieve adequate staff coverage to improve staff practice or resident outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12618002012257 . Registered 14 December 2018.