Characterization of actions taken during the delivery of medication therapy management: A time-and-motion approach

Incorporating medication therapy management into community pharmacy workflows

Medication Therapy Management (MTM) is a group of pharmacist-provided services that optimize individual patients' drug therapy outcomes. Since community pharmacies' primary business platform is the dispensing of medications, and providing MTM services is a secondary source of revenue, pharmacies with limited resources are operationally challenged when trying to efficiently deliver both types of services. To address this problem, we follow a queueing network approach to develop an operational model of a community pharmacy workflow. Through our model, we derive structural results to determine conditions for a pharmacy to achieve economies of scope when providing both prescription and MTM services. We also develop a process simulation to compare different scenarios according to our economies of scope model, varying in provided services, personnel, service demand, and other operational variables. Outcomes examined include profitability, service rate, and sensitivity of some operation variables to profitability. Based on our results, we provide practical insights to help community pharmacy administrators and healthcare policy makers in their decision process.

Positive deviants for medication therapy management: A mixed-methods comparative case study of community pharmacy practices

BACKGROUND

To optimize medication use in older adults, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) launched Medication Therapy Management (MTM) services as part of Medicare Part D policy; however, strategies for achieving high quality MTM outcomes are not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to generate hypotheses for strategies contributing to community pharmacies' high performance on policy-relevant MTM quality measures.

METHODS

This mixed-methods comparative case study was guided by the Positive Deviance approach and Chronic Care Model. The study population consisted of pharmacy staff employed by a Midwestern division of a national supermarket-community pharmacy chain. Data consisted of demographics and qualitative data from semi-structured interviews. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed deductively and inductively or using descriptive statistics, respectively. MTM quality measures used to evaluate participant pharmacies' MTM performance mirrored select 2017 Medicare Part D Plans' Star Rating measures.

RESULTS

Thirteen of 18 selected case pharmacies (72.2%) participated in this study, of which 5 were categorized as high performers, 4 moderate performers, and 4 low performers. Eleven pharmacists, 11 technicians, and 3 student interns participated in interviews. Eight strategies were hypothesized as contributing to MTM performance: Strong pharmacy staff-provider relationships and trust, Inability to address patients' social determinants of health (negatively contributing), Technician involvement in MTM, Providing comprehensive medication reviews in person vs. phone alone, Placing high priority on MTM, Using available clinical information systems to identify eligible patients, Technicians using clinical information systems to collect/document information for pharmacists, Faxing prescribers adherence medication therapy problems (MTPs) and calling on indication MTPs.

CONCLUSIONS

Eight strategies were hypothesized as contributing to community pharmacies' performance on MTM quality measures. Findings from this work can inform MTM practice and Medicare Part D MTM policy changes to positively influence patient outcomes. Future research should test hypotheses in a larger representative sample of pharmacies.

Evaluation of a modified and abbreviated scale for assessing chronic illness care for medication therapy management practice

BACKGROUND

The central goals of MTM align with those of the Chronic Care Model (CCM). However, reliable and valid assessments are needed to estimate the extent to which components of MTM care delivery are consistent with the CCM. The Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) is a 34-item scale for administration in primary care offices to estimate the extent to which chronic care delivery aligns with the six elements of the CCM. The ACIC appears to be responsive for care delivery interventions aimed at improving various chronic illnesses. However, the potential value of the ACIC as a measure for evaluating MTM delivery is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

A modified and abbreviated version of the ACIC could be a useful evaluation tool for pharmacist-provided medication therapy management (MTM). The objective of this study was to assess the construct and criterion-related validity, and internal consistency, of the abbreviated (12-item) "MTM ACIC."

METHODS

The abbreviated MTM ACIC was administered to pharmacists employed at 27,560 community pharmacies. Construct validity and internal consistency were estimated through principal components analysis, item-to-total correlations, and Cronbach's alpha estimate of internal consistency. To assess criterion-related validity, a univariate negative binomial model estimated the association between ACIC scores and pharmacy-level MTM completion rates.

RESULTS

A one-component model accounted for 64% of the variance, and Cronbach's alpha was 0.95. Scores on the abbreviated MTM ACIC were associated with MTM completion rates (rate ratio: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.03).

CONCLUSION

The abbreviated MTM ACIC exhibited acceptable construct and criterion-related validity and internal consistency and could serve as a valuable tool for evaluating chronic illness care within the MTM setting.

Strategy to Improve Efficiency of Comprehensive Medication Reviews in a Community Pharmacy

Background: Comprehensive medication reviews (CMRs) provide opportunities for pharmacists to perform clinical services to their patients. However, pharmacists are often not able to perform CMRs due to time constraints. Studies have shown that incorporating support staff into the CMR workflow may lead to increases in the completion of CMRs. Objective: The primary objective was to examine the change in the number of CMRs completed at the pharmacy after a new strategy was implemented to perform and prepare for CMRs. The secondary objective was to examine the changes in the revenue generated from CMRs. Methods: This study was a pre-post retrospective, observational study performed at an independent pharmacy. Data were collected and analyzed 10 months before and after implementation of a new strategy. The new strategy called for pharmacy interns to use a template for working up patients prior to CMRs. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were run on IBM SPSS, Version 24.0, to determine the significance of the changes. Results that generated P values <.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The total number of CMRs completed increased from 29 before the intervention to 158 after the intervention (P = .009). The revenue generated from CMRs improved statistically (P = .007). Conclusions: Implementing a strategic workflow that uses pharmacy interns and a patient workup template can significantly increase the number of CMRs completed in a community pharmacy. Appropriate delegation of such tasks may allow more time for pharmacists to deliver more CMRs. Additional benefits include increased compensation from delivering more CMRs.

Variation in Medication Therapy Management Delivery: Implications for Health Care Policy

BACKGROUND

Medication therapy management (MTM) program evaluations have revealed mixed outcomes, with some studies finding favorable outcomes and others finding no differences between patients who received MTM versus those who did not. One possible reason for outcomes variability is differences in delivery of MTM programs. The Chronic Care Model (CCM) provides a framework for how health care organizations can improve care for the chronically ill through 6 elements: organization of health care, delivery system design, clinical information systems, decision support, self-management, and linkages to community resources.

OBJECTIVE

To apply the CCM to understand variation in MTM delivery and formulate policy recommendations.

METHODS

This study used a mixed-methods descriptive analysis of MTM delivery. Investigators conducted visits to a purposeful sample of MTM practices to observe MTM and interview participants. The pharmacists and staff of these practices completed a modified Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC). Pairs of investigators analyzed interview transcripts to identify themes. Demographics and ACIC scores were summarized using descriptive statistics. After analysis, investigators discussed overarching themes and policy implications organized by CCM elements.

RESULTS

Seven practices participated, and 87 participants were interviewed. Based on ACIC scores, MTM patient volume, and payer mix, practices were categorized as Early Maturity Level or Later Maturity Level. From the model, organization of health care themes included whether MTM was the practice's core competence, belief/confidence in the MTM process, lack of formal rewards, and the influence of organizational goals and external environment. Delivery system design themes pertained to the extent that MTM processes were formalized. Clinical information systems themes were the extent to which systems were influenced by payers, efficiency strategies, and the accuracy and availability of information. In considering clinical decision support themes, alert design limitations and variation in user approaches to alerts based on experience were noted. We observed strong support for patient self-management; when present, barriers were attributed to the patient, MTM provider, or payer. Referral to community resources was minimal. Numerous policy implications were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Our research identified numerous ways by which MTM delivery varies, particularly by MTM practice maturity level. These findings provide evidence for several policy changes that could be considered to optimize MTM delivery, encourage alignment with the CCM, and promote practice maturation.

DISCLOSURES

This research and a portion of Snyder's salary were supported by grant number K08HS022119 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Snyder reports consulting fees from Westat for an evaluation of the CMS Enhanced MTM program. The other authors have nothing to disclose. Portions of this research have been presented as abstracts at the following conferences: (a) 2017 Academy Health Annual Research Meeting; June 25-27, 2017; New Orleans, LA; (b) 2015 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Clinical Midyear Meeting; December 4-8, 2015; New Orleans, LA; and