Team work and collaborative practice agreements among pharmacists and nurse practitioners

A structural equation modelling analysis: interprofessional team collaboration, organizational career management, and post competency of community nurses

BACKGROUND

With the advent of an ageing society and an increase in the prevalence of chronic diseases, the role of primary health care has become increasingly important and reliant on multidisciplinary collaboration. As members of this interprofessional cooperative team, community nurses play a dominant role. Thus, the post competencies of community nurses study deserve our attention. In addition, organizational career management can affect nurses in some ways. This study aims to examine the current situation and relationship among interprofessional team collaboration, organizational career management and post-competency of community nurses.

METHODS

A survey was conducted among 530 nurses in 28 community medical institutions from November 2021 to April 2022 in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China. Descriptive analysis was used for analysis, and a structural equation model was used to hypothesize and verify the model. A total of 88.2% of respondents met the inclusion criteria and did not meet the exclusion criteria. The main reason nurses gave for not participating was that they were too busy.

RESULTS

Among the competencies on the questionnaire, ensuring quality and helping roles scored the lowest. The teaching-coaching and diagnostic functions played a mediating role. Nurses with greater seniority and those who were transferred to administrative departments had lower scores, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). In the structural equation model, CFI = 0.992 and RMSEA = 0.049, which shows that the model fit well, suggesting that organizational career management had no statistically significant effect on post competency (β = -0.006, p = 0.932) but that interprofessional team collaboration had a statistically significant effect on post competency (β = 1.146, p < 0.001) and organizational career management had a statistically significant effect on interprofessional team collaboration (β = 0.684, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Attention should be given to the improvement of community nurses' post competency in ensuring quality and performing helping, teaching-coaching, and diagnostic roles. Moreover, researchers should focus on the decline in community nurses' abilities, particularly for those with greater seniority or in administrative roles. The structural equation model shows that interprofessional team collaboration is a complete intermediary between organizational career management and post competency.

Patient-Reported Barriers and Enablers to Deprescribing Recommendations During a Clinical Trial (Shed-MEDS)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Effective deprescribing requires shared decision making between a patient and their clinician, and should be used when implementing evidence-based deprescribing conversations. As part of the Shed-MEDS clinical trial, this study assessed barriers and enablers that influence patient decision making in deprescribing to inform future implementation efforts and adaptations.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Shed-MEDS, a randomized controlled deprescribing trial, included hospitalized older adults discharging to post-acute care facilities. A trained clinician reviewed each participant's medical history and medication list to identify medications with potential for deprescribing. The study clinician then conducted a semistructured patient-centered deprescribing interview to determine patient (or surrogate) concerns about medications and willingness to deprescribe. Reeve et al.'s (2013) framework was used to categorize barriers and enablers to deprescribing from the patient's perspective, including "appropriateness of cessation," "fear," "dislike of a medication," "influences," and "process of cessation."

RESULTS

Overall, participants/surrogates (N = 177) agreed with 63% (883 total medications) of the study clinician's deprescribing recommendations. Thematic analysis revealed that "appropriateness" of a medication was the most common barrier (88.2%) and enabler (67.3%) to deprescribing. Other deprescribing enablers were in the following domains: "influences" (22.7%), "process" (22.5%), "pragmatic" (19.4%), and "dislike" (5.3%).

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Use of a semistructured deprescribing interview conversation tool allowed study clinicians to elicit individual barriers and enablers to deprescribing from the patient's perspective. Participants in this study expressed more agreement than disagreement with study clinicians' deprescribing recommendations. These results should inform future implementation efforts that incorporate a patient-centered framework during deprescribing conversations.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02979353.

Development and reliability assessment of a tool to assess community pharmacist potential to influence prescriber performance on quality measures

OBJECTIVE

To develop and assess the reliability of a tool that measures community pharmacist potential to influence prescriber quality measure performance.

METHODS

Multidisciplinary, health care subject matter experts were convened to determine the criteria that evaluate the community pharmacist's ability to influence quality measure performance and a scoring mechanism. The draft tool was reviewed by investigators and subject matter experts in various health care professional settings to assess face validity and make refinements. Interrater reliability was assessed by 2 independent reviewers using a random 20% sample of the 2017 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) measure set. Absolute agreement and kappa statistics were calculated, and the tool was iteratively refined based on the results. The tool was then applied to the full 2017 MIPS measure set by 2 reviewers, and interrater reliability was assessed.

RESULTS

The quality measure impact tool-community pharmacy (QMIT-CP) comprised 5 criteria, which assessed the quality measures of the community pharmacist's influence potential. The criteria evaluated whether the quality measures: (1) addressed the use of medications or immunizations; (2) included a condition treatable by medications; (3) treated patients in an outpatient setting; (4) included outcomes; and (5) evaluated whether relevant measure data were available to community pharmacists. All criteria used a dichotomous scale, and the summed scores were used to categorize the pharmacist's influence potential as "high" (4-5), "moderate" (2-3), or "low" (0-1). Kappa statistics ranged from "substantial agreement" (≥0.6) to "almost perfect agreement" (≥0.8) for individual QMIT-CP criteria and overall pharmacist influence potential categorization.

CONCLUSIONS

The QMIT-CP is a reliable tool to identify quality measures and assess the high, moderate, or low influence potential that community pharmacists may have. The QMIT-CP can be used to support innovative team-based care and enhance value-based contracting by identifying relevant measures that community pharmacists have the potential to influence.

Medication Therapy Management: Current Challenges

Medication therapy management (MTM) services have evolved as a means for pharmacists and other providers to assist patients and caregivers in improving therapeutic outcomes and reducing health care expenditures. More than a decade has passed since the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 provided pharmacists with the opportunity to deliver MTM services to Medicare beneficiaries. MTM continues to offer pharmacists the opportunity to use their knowledge; yet, pharmacists have reported challenges with service delivery. Identifying the challenges that affect MTM services in pharmacy practice is necessary in order to seek improvement to MTM delivery. This narrative review explores the current challenges pharmacists face with MTM delivery, summarizes potential solutions for addressing challenges, and seeks to incite further debate, service reconfiguration, and ultimately service improvement of pharmacist-provided MTM services.

The Report of the 2018-2019 Professional Affairs Standing Committee: The Role of Educators in Pharmacy Practice Transformation

The 2018-2019 Professional Affairs Committee examined the potential roles and needs of clinical educators (faculty and preceptors) in leading transformation in pharmacy practice. The committee was charged to (1) discuss the potential roles and responsibilities of faculty and preceptors leading transformation and enhanced patient care services in pharmacy practice; (2) describe factors, including clinician well-being and resilience, which may influence faculty and preceptor involvement in practice transformation and the enhancement of patient care services; and (3) recommend how the efforts and successes of faculty and preceptors involved in pharmacy practice transformation can be replicated and recognized as well as identify the types of continuing professional development (CPD) that should be available to enable the influence and implementation of patient care services. This report provides a framework for addressing the committee charges by examining the roles of advocacy, collaboration, continuing professional development, and clinician resilience and well-being. The committee provides a revision to a current AACP policy regarding continuing professional development as well as several recommendations to AACP and suggestions to colleges and schools of pharmacy pertaining to the committee charges.

Retail clinics colocated with pharmacies: A Delphi study of pharmacist impacts and recommendations for optimization

OBJECTIVES

To identify workforce issues likely to affect pharmacists working in retail clinics (RCs) colocated with community pharmacies and to generate recommendations for optimizing health, cost, and operations outcomes.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

A Delphi expert panel process using researchers with pharmacist workforce research experience was used. Panelists responded to 2 surveys of 3 rounds each. In survey 1, panelists used a 4-point linear numeric scale to rate the importance of 15 impact factors on pharmacists working in the RC/pharmacy setting. In survey 2, panelists used a 3-point linear numeric scale to rate the importance of recommendations for optimal outcomes. Recommendations were structured around elements from collaboration theory, a framework for evaluating critical areas for success in merged operations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Consensus was defined as ≥ 80% rating an impact "very" or "moderately" important (survey 1) and "very" important (survey 2). Impact factors were rank-ordered by ratings and numeric scoring. Selected comments about consensus items were reported.

RESULTS

The 8-person panel had 100% response rates for both surveys. 12 of the 15 impact variables achieved consensus (survey 1). The highest ranking impacts were ability to establish collaborative relationships, relationships with coworkers, including nurse practitioners, and location of the RC relative to the pharmacy. Of 15 recommendations (survey 2), 5 achieved consensus and focused heavily on information sharing and early and ongoing collaboration among all stakeholders.

CONCLUSION

Clinical, economic, health care quality, and patient preference data suggest that RCs colocated with pharmacies are likely to play a permanent role in U.S. health care. RCs can affect pharmacists and pharmacies positively or negatively. Positive impacts are most likely where establishing collaborative partnerships with all stakeholders, including patients, throughout planning, implementation, and operation are emphasized. With only about 3% of pharmacy operations colocated with RCs now, attention and resources should be devoted to developing and testing models based on collaboration principles.

Provider perceptions of pharmacists providing mental health medication support in patient-centered medical homes

OBJECTIVES

To identify primary care providers' (PCPs') comfort level, potential barriers to management of patients with mental health disorders, and attitudes around clinical pharmacist-provided mental health medication-related support.

METHODS

A 16-item cross-sectional survey was completed by PCPs in 14 patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) at 1 academic medical center. Items assessed include PCPs' perceptions of the proportion of patients with a mental health condition, access to psychiatry services, confidence in mental health condition management, clinical pharmacist-provided mental health medication support, and demographics. Checklist, Likert-type-scale agreement statements, and an open-ended question to assess barriers to managing mental health medications were included. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were used.

RESULTS

Respondents (n = 85) included attending physicians (67.1%), resident physicians (24.7%), and advanced practice providers (8.2%). The average number of years in practice was 11 (SD 8.6). The majority perceived that 26% to 50% of their patients had a psychiatric illness (57.7%), referred < 10% of their patients (67.1%) to psychiatry services, and disagreed that access to psychiatric services was acceptably timely (87.0%). Participants felt confident diagnosing a patient with depression (97.6%) and starting antidepressants (94.1%) compared with antipsychotics (11.7%) or mood stabilizers (7.1%). Participants agreed that having the clinical pharmacist in clinic to provide support regarding psychiatric medications would increase their comfort level; increase in comfort level by provider type was not different (P = 0.20). Emerging barriers were lack of knowledge or training, low comfort in diagnosing severe psychiatric conditions, and access to psychiatry services.

CONCLUSION

Outside of the diagnosis and treatment of depression, PCPs indicate a lack of comfort in treating PCMH patients with mental health disorders. Pharmacists can play a key role by providing mental health medication management support to improve access and address PCMH patients' mental health needs.