Evaluating trajectories of statin adherence after a motivational interviewing intervention

Patient activation and medication adherence in adults

BACKGROUND

Patients' level of medication adherence provides conflicting results in its relationship to patient activation. Multiple factors may be contributing to these mixed results.

OBJECTIVES

The primary purpose was to assess the association of patient activation to medication adherence in adults with chronic health conditions and low health literacy (HL). Secondary objectives were to determine whether age, education, gender, and race were associated with activation.

METHODS

Participants completed self-report questionnaires regarding chronic disease self-management. Patient activation was measured using Hibbard's Patient Activation Measure (PAM). Self-report of medication adherence was determined using the Gonzalez-Lu adherence questionnaire. Block regressions first assessed the relation of demographic variables and education to adherence and then the added relation of patient activation in a second model.

RESULTS

The analyses included 301 participants (mean age 58 years; 53% female; mean chronic conditions of 6.6). Some of the most common chronic conditions included hypertension (60%), arthritis (51%), depression (49%), and hyperlipidemia (43%). The relation of older age to greater medication adherence was significant (P < 0.05) in both models. The addition of PAM was significantly related to better adherence (P < 0.001) and also increased the R squared value from 0.04 to 0.09. This change resulted in a moderate effect size (d = 0.50).

CONCLUSION

Evaluating patient activation at baseline may predict those more likely to be medication adherent in patients with low HL.

A Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial to Test the Efficacy of Nurse-Led Motivational Interviewing for Enhancing Self-Care in Adults with Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

The role of nurse-led motivational interviewing (MI) in improving self-care among patients with heart failure (HF) is promising, even if it still requires further empirical evidence to determine its efficacy. For this reason, this study tested its efficacy in enhancing self-care maintenance (primary endpoint), self-care management, and self-care confidence after three months from enrollment in adults with HF compared to usual care, and assessed changes in self-care over follow-up times (3, 6, 9, and 12 months).

METHODS

A single-center, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, superiority study with two experimental arms and a control group was performed. Allocation was in a 1:1:1 ratio between intervention groups and control.

RESULTS

MI was effective in improving self-care maintenance after three months when it was performed only for patients (arm 1) and for the patients-caregivers dyad (arm 2) (respectively, Cohen's d = 0.92, p-value < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.68, p-value < 0.001). These effects were stable over the one-year follow-up. No effects were observed concerning self-care management, while MI moderately influenced self-care confidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supported the adoption of nurse-led MI in the clinical management of adults with HF.