Formation of a statewide community pharmacy practice-based research network: Pharmacist opinions on research participation and engagement

Feasibility of pharmacy-based research opportunity to enhance community testing and surveillance

BACKGROUND

Approximately 89% of the US population lives within five miles of a community pharmacy, which provides a network of geographically distributed recruitment nodes for testing and surveillance of infection and disease.

OBJECTIVES

Establish feasibility of Pharmacy-based Research Opportunities To Enhance Community Testing and Surveillance in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a community pharmacy setting with University of Kentucky serving as the coordinating center and research hub for sample analysis.

METHODS

Two community pharmacies in Kentucky served as community-based recruitment sites to assess SARS-CoV-2 exposure through longitudinal (5 visits over 56 days) collection of nasal swabs and blood samples from subjects.

RESULTS

Fifty subjects were recruited between May 2022 and December 2023 for longitudinal sample collection. Three phases of recruitment were investigated by first establishing standard operating procedures in an urban pharmacy, then expanding recruitment at a second pharmacy in a rural setting, and finally increasing recruitment at the urban pharmacy. During the first phase of recruitment, 12 participants were recruited. Of these participants, two never scheduled a visit after the initial screening. The median time for study completion from first to last visit within this phase was 59 days (interquartile range: 56-68 days). During the second phase of recruitment, eight of nine participants completed all five visits. The median time to complete all visits was 105 days (interquartile range: 98-112 days). During the ongoing third phase, 29 subjects were recruited, and 19 participants completed all required visits and the remainder continue to schedule follow-up appointments.

CONCLUSION

Community pharmacies have a significant role in promoting public health. The geographic distribution of community pharmacies makes them appealing locations for recruitment of outpatient cohorts for local surveillance of infections and chronic inflammatory conditions with opportunities for broad implementation of this project for clinical trials in underserved communities.

Factors influencing French community pharmacists' willingness to participate in research projects: a mixed method study

BACKGROUND

French community pharmacists are facing an increasing demand to provide a wider range of services to meet the needs of the population. These new missions must be evaluated by primary care research studies. This study aims to explore the factors that influence French community pharmacists' willingness to participate in research projects.

METHODS

A mixed-method design was adopted for this study, comprising an initial quantitative online survey followed by semi-directed interviews. The investigation was conducted at two French faculties of pharmacy, Angers and Nantes, involving students in their 6th and final year of pharmacy education, and their community pharmacist tutors. The survey items were based on a study by Saini et al. and participants responded using five-point Likert scales. The semi-directed interviews were conducted after the quantitative analysis, only with volunteer and already graduated community pharmacists.

RESULTS

A total of 131 people participated in the quantitative analysis, comprising 75 students and 56 pharmacists. Pharmacists and students agreed on the significance of two key aspects: the research must possess a clear and meaningful purpose, and researchers must keep the pharmacists informed about the study's results. Among the 27 proposed items, only three showed significantly different results between students and pharmacists. Moreover, 11 semi-structured interviews were conducted. Research in the community pharmacy domain is relatively new for many pharmacists. Despite limited training, their willingness to participate is contingent on being actively involved from the outset, receiving appropriate support and training. However, the research should be seamlessly integrated into their daily practice, without being too time-consuming and administratively burdensome. Time constraints emerged as the main obstacle, along with concerns about the availability of human resources. Pharmacists expressed strong motivation driven by the research topic's relevance, and its potential impact on patients or the profession. While financial compensation is desirable, it did not appear to be the main criterion for participation in a study.

CONCLUSIONS

French pharmacists are willing to participate in research projects to improve patient care and develop the profession. Research teams must guide and involve from the project's inception.

A community pharmacy practice-based research network: A protocol for a realist evaluation

BACKGROUND

Community pharmacists' active participation in research is essential to build a robust, translatable evidence base. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) have been established to support collaborative research and knowledge translation in community pharmacies. However, PBRNs' effectiveness in supporting research engagement and knowledge translation remains unexplored. A new PBRN will be implemented in southeast Queensland, Australia. This realist evaluation seeks to explain whether, how, why, for whom, in what context and over what duration the PBRN supports community pharmacists to engage in research.

OBJECTIVES

1. to generate transferable knowledge about the different circumstances in which-and the mechanisms by which-a PBRN influences research engagement outcomes for different community pharmacists, in the form of a program theory. 2. To use the program theory to develop evidence-informed recommendations for use by PBRN stakeholders.

METHODS

A realist evaluation will be conducted in four iterative phases: (1) theory development, (2) hypothesis generation, (3) observations, and (4) theory refinement. A two-year multi-method study will be conducted, including interviews with pharmacists, surveys, participatory and observational data collection. The evidence will be used to confirm, refute, and/or refine the program theory. The evaluation will adhere to the Realist And Meta-Narrative Evidence Synthesis (RAMESES) publication and quality standards.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluation will contribute to the body of knowledge by generating a realist program theory to explain how, why, for whom, in what contexts, to what extent, in what respects, and over what duration the PBRN supports community pharmacists to engage in research. The findings will support the broader implementation of PBRNs and future network activities.

Patients' opinions on participation in patient-centered outcomes research in community pharmacies: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) often brings patient voices, thoughts, and opinions into the research process, allowing patients to have a say in the research process from project inception to dissemination of results. Community pharmacy teams are well-situated to engage patients in their own health and in research, given their trusting relationships with patients and access in communities.

OBJECTIVE

To gather patients' opinions on participation in PCOR at their local community pharmacy.

METHODS

Four regional focus groups representing western, central, northeastern, and southeastern Pennsylvania were conducted. A single community pharmacy in each region recruited patients to participate in each focus group. A focus group discussion guide was developed and reviewed by a Stakeholder Advisory Board that consisted patients, pharmacists, and researchers. Questions focused on patients' relationships with their pharmacy and pharmacist, perceptions of research occurring at their local pharmacy, and patient engagement methods. Focus group sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and independently coded by 2 investigators. Coding discrepancies were reconciled through discussion, and a qualitative inductive thematic analysis was conducted by the research team.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients participated in one of 4 focus groups. Patients provided insights into what would make them more likely to participate in PCOR at their local community pharmacy. Four themes emerged from the discussions: (1) Understanding the impact to one's health or community affects participation; (2) Patients prefer to schedule research activities at times outside of prescription pick-up or drop-off; (3) Trusted relationships can be leveraged for recruitment; and (4) Face-to-face engagement is preferred for participant recruitment.

CONCLUSION

Patients want to engage in research in a way that is respectful of their time and matters to them. Strong patient-pharmacist relationships are essential for patient engagement in and acceptance of PCOR opportunities in community pharmacies. Community pharmacies may be rich locations to engage patients in PCOR.