Academic detailing increases prescription drug monitoring program use among primary care practices

Bridging the continuity: Practice-enhancing publications about the ambulatory care medication-use process in 2021

PURPOSE

This article identifies, prioritizes, and summarizes published literature on the ambulatory care medication-use process (ACMUP) from calendar year 2021 that can impact ambulatory pharmacy practice. The MUP is the foundational system that provides the framework for safe medication utilization within the healthcare environment and was reimagined to focus on new innovations and advancements in ambulatory pharmacy practice. The ACMUP is defined in this article as having the following components: transitions of care, prescribing and collaborative practice, accessing care, adherence, and monitoring and quality. Articles evaluating at least one step of the ACMUP were assessed for their usefulness toward practice improvement.

SUMMARY

A PubMed search was conducted in January 2022 for the year 2021 using targeted Medical Subject Headings keywords and the tables of contents of selected pharmacy journals were also searched, providing a total of 6,026 articles. A thorough review identified 86 potentially practice-enhancing articles: 10 for transitions of care, 9 for prescribing and collaborative practice, 20 for adherence, 17 for accessing care, 18 for monitoring and quality, and 12 for monitoring and medication therapy management. Ranking of the articles for importance by peers led to the selection of key articles from each category. The highest ranked articles are briefly summarized, with a mention of why each article is important. The other articles are listed for further review and evaluation.

CONCLUSION

It is important to routinely review the published literature and to incorporate significant findings into daily practice. This article continues a series of articles defining and evaluating the currently published literature around the ACMUP. As healthcare continues to advance and care shifts to ambulatory settings, the ACMUP will continue to be a crucial process to evaluate.

Combatting opioid misuse, overuse and abuse: a systematic review of pharmacists' services and outcomes

Aim: To examine the range of services pharmacists provide and their impact on patient outcomes, harm reduction, and appropriate opioid use.Methods: Six databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, CENTRAL and Cochrane Methodology Register) from inception to March 2023. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023401895).Results: Twenty-nine studies identified five key areas of pharmacist interventions in opioid management-naloxone programs and opioid de-escalation, patient and primary healthcare providers' education and motivational interview, prescription monitoring and opioid risk screening, clinical pharmacy interventions (pharmacotherapy, medication review, prescribing, adherence monitoring), and collaborative healthcare approaches to promote optimal opioid use. Outcomes assessment indicated harm reduction, improved safety, increased non-opioid analgesic use, decreased opioid consumption, and enhanced pain management.Conclusion: This review underscores pharmacists' vital role in tackling opioid misuse, overuse and abuse, providing a foundation for evidence-based policies to minimize harm and promote optimal opioid use.

Impact evaluation of a brief online training module on physician use of the Maryland, USA, Prescription Drug Monitoring Program

Background

Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) are electronic databases that track controlled substance prescriptions in a state. They are underused tools in preventing opioid abuse. Most PDMP education research measures changes in knowledge or confidence rather than behavior.

Objective

To evaluate the impact of online case-based training on healthcare provider use of the Maryland (USA) PDMP.

Methods

We used e-mail distribution lists to recruit providers to complete a brief educational module. Using a pre-training and post-training survey in the module, we measured self-reported PDMP use patterns and perceived PDMP value in specific clinical situations and compared pre- and post-training responses. Within the module, we presented three fictional pain cases and asked participants how they would manage each, both before, and then after presenting prescription drug history simulating a PDMP report. We measured changes in the fictional case treatment plans before and after seeing prescription history. Finally, we measured and compared how often each participant accessed the Maryland PDMP database before and after completing the educational module. We used multivariate logistic regression to measure the effect of the intervention on actual PDMP use frequency.

Results

One hundred and fifty participants enrolled and completed the training module, and we successfully retrieved real-world PDMP use data of 137 of them. Participants’ decisions to prescribe opioids changed significantly after reviewing PDMP data in each of the fictional cases provided in the module. In the months following the training, the rate of PDMP use increased by a median of four use-cases per month among providers in practice for less than 20 years (p = 0.039) and two use-cases per month among infrequent opioid prescribers (p = 0.014).

Conclusion

A brief online case-based educational intervention was associated with a significant increase in the rate of PDMP use among infrequent opioid prescribers and those in practice less than 20 years.