The clinical utility of professional continuous glucose monitoring by pharmacists for patients with type 2 diabetes

Continuous Glucose Monitoring User-Wear Experience Fosters Empathy and Learning

OBJECTIVES

To determine if a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) user-wear experience brings value to an advanced diabetes elective course by assessing impact on empathy and knowledge.

METHODS

This was a quasi-experimental pre-post intervention study, conducted over two offerings of an advanced diabetes elective course. Third-year pharmacy students participated in a two-part didactic education and user-wear experience involving CGM devices. Students completed a survey at three pre-specified time points to assess empathy and knowledge (foundational and counseling knowledge). Empathy was assessed using the Kiersma-Chen Empathy Scale. Knowledge was assessed using pre-defined multiple-choice questions. Statistical tests include repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni tests for overall and subsection scores on the empathy and knowledge surveys. A partial eta squared was also used to measure effect size for the repeated measures ANOVA test.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine out of the thirty-six enrolled students completed all three surveys. Compared to a traditional lecture, the CGM user-wear experience demonstrated a significant increase in student self-perceived empathy and in counseling knowledge. No change in foundational knowledge was observed.

CONCLUSION

A CGM user-wear experience provides educational value beyond a traditional lecture. Our study showed that educational outcomes such as empathy and counseling knowledge can be achieved by implementing a CGM user-wear experience. An advanced diabetes elective course provides an ideal environment to optimize CGM learning outcomes with a user-wear experience.

Determinants of implementation of continuous glucose monitoring for patients with Insulin-Treated type 2 diabetes: a national survey of primary care providers

OBJECTIVES

To identify determinants of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) implementation from primary care providers' (PCPs') perspectives and examine the associations of these determinants with both PCP intent to discuss CGM with eligible patients and facility-level uptake of CGM.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

A survey about CGM implementation for patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin was distributed to all PCPs in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health system from October 2023-April 2024. Multi-item scales measured perceived clinical benefits of CGM, workload capacity, knowledge about CGM, access to CGM resources, and support from leadership and other services. Responses were on a 5-point Likert scale from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree". An item asked about likelihood of initiating discussions about starting CGM. Facility-level uptake was measured using VA administrative data. Multivariable regression models assessed the relationship between determinants of CGM implementation and both PCP intent to discuss CGM and facility-level uptake.

RESULTS

Of 1373 respondents, most perceived clinical benefits of CGM (79% "Agree" + "Strongly Agree"). Very few indicated sufficient access to resources (8%) and support from leadership & other services (5%). After adjustment for respondent characteristics, the scale most strongly associated with PCP intent to discuss CGM was PCP Knowledge About CGM (B = 0.54, P <.001). Facility uptake of CGM was associated with Clinical Benefits of CGM (B = 0.10, P =.026) and Support from Leadership & Other Services (B = 0.18, P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PCPs perceive benefits to CGM but lack sufficient knowledge, resources, and workload capacity to manage it alone. PCP education about CGM use and interprofessional support for uptake may increase the likelihood that eligible patients use CGM.

7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Clinical Pharmacy Specialist Collaborative Management and Prescription of Diabetes Medications with Cardiovascular Benefit

Background: Involvement of Clinical Pharmacy Specialists (CPS) in the care of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) has been demonstrated to be beneficial. Whether this positive impact applies to increased use of cardiovascular risk-reducing medications is less well established. Objective: To determine the association of CPS co-management on the prescription of diabetes medications with proven cardiovascular benefits for patients with DM and established cardiovascular disease in the primary care setting. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients in a Veterans Affairs health-system in primary care settings from February 1, 2019, through January 31, 2020. Patients were included if they had type 2 DM treated with at least one medication and had CVD. Patients were grouped into two cohorts for comparison, those with CPS co-management and those without. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in each group with new prescriptions for empagliflozin or liraglutide initiated during the study timeframe. Results: In total, 8058 patients were found eligible for inclusion in the study. Clinical co-management by a CPS was provided to 2099 patients. Study medications were prescribed, approved, and initiated in 596 patients during the study period, including 391 (18.6%) in the CPS group and 205 (3.4%) in the non-CPS group (P < .001). Conclusion: This study showed CPS involvement is associated with increased prescribing of diabetes medications with proven cardiovascular benefits.

7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Pharmacist-driven continuous glucose monitoring in community and ambulatory care pharmacy practice: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices improve clinical outcomes and facilitate achieving patient-specific goals. However, opportunities and barriers to implementation of pharmacist-driven CGM services are not well-described.

OBJECTIVES

This scoping review was conducted to identify opportunities and barriers to implementing pharmacist-driven CGM services in the community and ambulatory care setting. Clinical outcomes resulting from pharmacist-driven CGM were also explored.

METHODS

A health librarian searched Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts using keywords and subject headings from inception through December 2, 2022 to identify studies describing pharmacist or pharmacy-based CGM programs. No publication type, date limits, language restrictions, or other filters were applied. The database search was supplemented by a search of Google Scholar and a citation search of preselected gold standard articles.

RESULTS

The scoping review initially identified 942 citations of which 249 passed abstract screening and 11 were included in the review. Among studies, the most common design was retrospective, populations varied, control groups were not consistently used, follow-up was primarily short, and sample sizes were small. One study evaluated pharmacist-driven CGM in a community pharmacy setting. Ten studies took place in the ambulatory care setting. Barriers to initiating pharmacist-driven CGM as a clinical service include educational, logistical, workflow, and financial incentive. Beneficial outcomes from pharmacist-driven CGM include improved quality of life, increased empowerment, and improved glycemic control.

CONCLUSION

There is lack of strong evidence to support pharmacist-driven CGM in the community pharmacy setting. However, small studies suggest pharmacist-driven CGM is feasible and beneficial in the ambulatory care setting. Further exploration of how educational, logistical, workflow, and financial barriers can be overcome is warranted, given potential for improved clinical outcomes.

Evaluating the Clinical Effect of Personal Continuous Glucose Monitoring in a Diverse Population With Type 2 Diabetes

Objective: To determine the clinical effect of personal continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in a diverse population with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Research Design and Methods: A report was created from the electronic health record identifying adults prescribed CGM at an urban family medicine clinic between January 1, 2019, and February 23, 2022. An "index date" was identified as the start of CGM. The closest hemoglobin A1c (A1c) 6 months or more after the index date was identified as the "follow-up date." The primary outcome of this study was to compare the percentage of individuals meeting the MN Community Measure (MNCM) D5 HbA1c goal of <8% at the follow-up date versus the index date. Results: Seventy-two patients were identified after the exclusion criteria were applied. Approximately one-third of patients required utilization of an interpreter and 76% of patients were of a racial or ethnic minority. The mean HbA1c prior to CGM use was 9.8%, with 16.7% of the population meeting the MNCM D5 A1c goal of <8%. At the follow-up date, the mean A1c was 8.4% (mean difference -1.4%; p < 0.001), with 41.7% of the population meeting goal (mean difference +25%; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses affirm that the results of the primary outcome were sustained despite insulin use status. Conclusion: A diverse population with T2D had a significant reduction in A1c and was more likely to meet the MNCM D5 A1c goal of <8% after an average of 6 months using personal CGM.

7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Programs: Improving Treatment Adherence and Patient Outcomes

The health and economic burden of diabetes mellitus across the United States and the world is such that effective care is crucial to improving outcomes, including macro and microvascular complications, and lowering health care costs. Pharmacists are well placed within communities to provide the critical care necessary for patients with diabetes and have a unique skillset that has demonstrated clear benefits in clinical and non-clinical outcomes. Here, we will provide a narrative review of the literature including the role of the pharmacist in different care models, outcomes associated with pharmacist care, and future directions and opportunities for pharmacist-managed diabetes.