1
|
Centeno BA, Saieg M, Siddiqui MT, Perez-Machado M, Layfield LJ, Weynand B, Reid MD, Stelow EB, Lozano MD, Fukushima N, Cree IA, Mehrotra R, Schmitt FC, Field AS, Pitman MB. The World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology: Overview and Summary. Cancer Cytopathol 2024; 132:396-418. [PMID: 38709670 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
The recently published WHO Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology (World Health Organization [WHO] System) is an international approach to the standardized reporting of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology, updating the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology (PSC System). Significant changes were made to the categorization of benign neoplasms, intraductal neoplasms, mucinous cystic neoplasms, and malignant neoplasms considered low grade. Benign neoplasms, such as serous cystadenoma, categorized as Neoplastic: benign in the PSC system, are categorized as Benign/negative for malignancy in the WHO system. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor, categorized as Neoplastic: other in the PSC system, are categorized as Malignant in the WHO System in accord with their classification in the 5th edition WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumours (2019). The two new categories of Pancreaticobiliary Neoplasm Low-risk/grade and Pancreaticobiliary Neoplasm High-risk/grade are mostly limited to intraductal neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms. Low-risk/grade lesions are mucinous cysts, with or without low-grade epithelial atypia. High-risk/grade lesions contain neoplastic epithelium with high-grade epithelial atypia. Correlation with clinical, imaging, and ancillary studies remains a key tenet. The sections for each entity are written to highlight key cytopathological features and cytopathological differential diagnoses with the pathologist working in low resource setting in mind. Each section also includes the most pertinent ancillary studies useful for the differential diagnosis. Sample reports are provided for each category. Finally, the book provides a separate section with risk of malignancy and management recommendations for each category to facilitate decision-making for clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mauro Saieg
- Santa Casa Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Momin T Siddiqui
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Miguel Perez-Machado
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, London, England
| | - Lester J Layfield
- Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Birgit Weynand
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michelle D Reid
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Edward B Stelow
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Hospital, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Maria D Lozano
- Department of Pathology, Clinica University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Noriyoshi Fukushima
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Jichi Medical University Hospital, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Ian A Cree
- International Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC], World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genomic Atlas, Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy Foundation, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Fernando C Schmitt
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- CINTESIS@RISE, Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Andrew S Field
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales Sydney and University of Notre Dame, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martha B Pitman
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang ML, Kwan MC, Pitman MB. Grading Cytologic Epithelial Atypia in Pancreatic Mucinous Cysts Predicts Patient Survival: Correlation With Histologic, Molecular, and Clinical Follow-Up. Mod Pathol 2024; 37:100510. [PMID: 38705280 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
Cytologic examination of epithelial cells in cyst fluids from pancreatic mucinous cysts is the optimal method for identifying high-grade atypia (HGA), which may represent histologic high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or invasive carcinoma and thereby classify the cyst as high risk, warranting surgical resection. Cytologic features of HGA were previously described at our institution in 2013 and implemented thereafter, but performance of grading with these criteria has not yet been reported. In total, 1322 pancreatic cyst fluid specimens (2014-2021) were identified; all pathology reports and relevant clinical data were reviewed in detail; and 230 unique cysts (217 patients) contained neoplastic mucinous epithelium. Of the 230 cysts, 178 had low-grade atypia (LGA), and 52 had HGA. Ninety-seven cysts had histologic follow-up: 77 (79%) were resections and 20 (21%) were diagnostic surgical biopsies only. Moreover, 92 (95%) were confirmed neoplastic mucinous cysts, 3 were adenocarcinomas, and 2 were benign entities. Among histologically confirmed neoplastic mucinous cysts, 58 had low-grade dysplasia (LGD); 34 had HGD, of which 14 also had invasive carcinoma. A significantly higher proportion of cysts with HGA (63%) demonstrated at least HGD on follow-up compared to those with LGA (26%, P < .001). The sensitivity and specificity of HGA for accurately classifying a high-risk cyst were 54% and 81%, respectively. Of the 230 cysts, 146 (64%) cysts had corresponding next-generation sequencing results; 31% of HGA cysts harbored a high-risk mutation (TP53, CDKN2A, and/or SMAD4) vs 7% of LGA cysts (P < .001). Among cysts without histologic confirmation, 25% of HGA cysts had high-risk mutation vs 7% of LGA cysts. The grade of cytologic atypia was predictive of overall survival and recurrence-free survival (P < .001 and P = .020, respectively). Implementation of cytologic criteria for HGA in pancreatic mucinous cysts has relatively low sensitivity but modest specificity for classifying a high-risk cyst. Although high-risk mutations were more commonly found in cysts with HGA, their frequency is overall low. Thus, evaluating the degree of cytologic atypia, which is predictive of patient survival, provides significant value and informs patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lisa Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Melanie C Kwan
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Martha B Pitman
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hsiao WY, Wang Q. Risk of malignancy and overall survival associated with the diagnostic categories in the World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology. Cancer Cytopathol 2024. [PMID: 38944695 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) classification system revised the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. To better stratify intraductal and/or cystic neoplasms by cytologic grade, the neoplastic, other category was replaced by two new categories: pancreaticobiliary neoplasm, low-risk/grade (PaN-Low) and pancreaticobiliary neoplasm, high-risk/grade (PaN-High). Low-grade malignancies were placed in the malignant category, and benign neoplasms were placed in the benign/negative for malignancy category. METHODS An institutional pathology database search identified patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for pancreatic lesions from January 2015 to April 2022. The absolute risk of malignancy (ROM) was determined by histologic and/or clinical follow-up of at least 6 months, and overall survival rates were calculated across diagnostic categories, comparing the WHO and PSC systems. RESULTS In total, 1012 cases were reviewed and recategorized. The ROM for the WHO system was 8.3% for insufficient/inadequate/nondiagnostic, 3.2% for benign/negative for malignancy, 24.6% for atypical, 9.1% for PaN-Low, 46.7% for PaN-High, 75% for suspicious for malignancy, and 100% for malignant. Comparatively, the ROM for the PSC system was 7.4% for nondiagnostic, 3.0% for negative for malignancy, 23.1% for atypical, 0% for neoplastic, benign, 7.3% for neoplastic, other, 75% for suspicious for malignancy, and 100% for malignant. The WHO system demonstrated superior stratification for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS The WHO system significantly improves the stratification of ROM and overall survival across diagnostic categories by introducing the PaN-Low and PaN-High categories and reassigning low-grade malignancies to the malignant category. Analyzing EUS-FNA samples with the WHO system provides critical insights for guiding clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Yu Hsiao
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Qun Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Selvaraj S, Dharmalingam P, Alashetty S, Patil A. Reproducibility assessment of WHO reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology: A single institution experience. Diagn Cytopathol 2024. [PMID: 38860686 DOI: 10.1002/dc.25367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology was released to internationalize the reporting, assisting in correct diagnosis and patient treatment with significant revisions from the previous Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system. The "neoplastic: benign" and "neoplastic: other" categories have mostly been superseded by two new ones: "pancreatic neoplasia-low-grade" (PaN-low) and "pancreatic neoplasia-high-grade" (PaN-high), which classify intermediate neoplastic lesions based on cytological atypia. We aim to assess the reproducibility and risk of malignancy (ROM) for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytopathology by the WHO system in comparison with the PSC system. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study by reviewing archival slides sent for pancreaticobiliary cytological evaluation from June 2021 to June 2023, by two pathologists blinded to each other's findings. Absolute ROM was determined by histopathology/cell block study/clinical follow-up (minimum 6 months)/overtly malignant imaging/metastasis. RESULTS A total of 332 cases from 329 patients met the inclusion criteria, comprising pancreatic, gallbladder, and biliary lesions. The median patient age was 54 years (range, 14-86 years). The overall sensitivity of the test is 74.9% specificity is 93.2%, positive predictive value of 96.8%, negative predictive value of 57.6%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 81.8%. The absolute ROM for each site in all categories was comparable with that of the published data from the WHO system. CONCLUSION Our study highlights the reliability of the WHO system for guiding clinical decision-making and patient management in the context of pancreaticobiliary. However, continual efforts among pathologists are essential to maintain consistent accuracy in cytological interpretations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivaranjani Selvaraj
- Department of Pathology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Priya Dharmalingam
- Department of Pathology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Soumya Alashetty
- Department of Pathology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Akkamahadevi Patil
- Department of Pathology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li Z, Tabbara SO, Nwosu A, Souers RJ, Goyal A, Kurian EM, Lin X, VandenBussche C, Nguyen LN. Pancreaticobiliary Cytology Practice in 2021: Results of a College of American Pathologists Survey. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2024; 148:677-685. [PMID: 37702405 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0167-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— The College of American Pathologists (CAP) surveys provide national benchmarks of pathology practice. OBJECTIVE.— To investigate pancreaticobiliary cytology practice in domestic and international laboratories in 2021. DESIGN.— We analyzed data from the CAP Pancreaticobiliary Cytology Practice Supplemental Questionnaire that was distributed to laboratories participating in the 2021 CAP Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program. RESULTS.— Ninety-three percent (567 of 612) of respondent laboratories routinely evaluated pancreaticobiliary cytology specimens. Biliary brushing (85%) was the most common pancreaticobiliary cytology specimen evaluated, followed by pancreatic fine-needle aspiration (79%). The most used sampling methods reported by 235 laboratories were 22-gauge needle for fine-needle aspiration (62%) and SharkCore needle for fine-needle biopsy (27%). Cell block was the most used slide preparation method (76%), followed by liquid-based cytology (59%) for pancreatic cystic lesions. Up to 95% (303 of 320) of laboratories performed rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) on pancreatic solid lesions, while 56% (180 of 320) performed ROSE for cystic lesions. Thirty-six percent (193 of 530) of laboratories used the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology in 2021. Among all institution types, significant differences in specimen volume, specimen type, ROSE practice, and case sign-out were identified. Additionally, significant differences in specimen type, slide preparation, and ROSE practice were found. CONCLUSIONS.— This is the first survey from the CAP to investigate pancreaticobiliary cytology practice. The findings reveal significant differences among institution types and between domestic and international laboratories. These data provide a baseline for future studies in a variety of practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaibo Li
- From the Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Li)
| | - Sana O Tabbara
- the Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Tabbara)
| | - Ann Nwosu
- Biostatistics, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Nwosu, Souers)
| | - Rhona J Souers
- Biostatistics, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Nwosu, Souers)
| | - Abha Goyal
- the Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York (Goyal)
| | - Elizabeth M Kurian
- the Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (Kurian)
| | - Xiaoqi Lin
- the Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois (Lin)
| | - Christopher VandenBussche
- the Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (VandenBussche)
| | - Lananh N Nguyen
- the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Nguyen)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Verma P, Goyal S, Tyagi R, Ghuman M, Mahajan R, Selhi AK, Kaur H, Selhi PK. Reporting Pancreatic FNAC using the Papanicolaou System: Still a Diagnostic Challenge. J Cytol 2024; 41:123-130. [PMID: 38779600 PMCID: PMC11108040 DOI: 10.4103/joc.joc_90_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology (PSCPC) is a reliable method to classify pancreatic fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) smears. However, it is not without practical problems which can diminish the diagnostic accuracy of the cytological diagnosis. Aims and Objectives To determine the diagnostic pitfalls while reporting cytomorphology of pancreatic lesions according to PSCPC on correlating FNAC findings with histopathology. Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of pancreatic FNAC smears received in the Department of Pathology of our tertiary care institute over a period of 2 years was done. The cytological diagnoses were classified according to the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system of reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology and correlated with histopathology. The reasons of cyto-histological discordance were analyzed. Results Out of 50 cases in which both FNAC and biopsy of pancreatic lesions were done, 34 cases were positive/malignant (Category VI), eight cases were suspicious for malignancy (Category V), three cases were neoplastic (Category IV), two cases were atypical (Category III), two cases were negative for malignancy (Category II), and one case was non-diagnostic (Category I). Out of 50 cases, histopathology was non-diagnostic due to inadequate material in six cases. The cytological diagnoses were compared with histopathology in the remaining 44 cases. Categories III, IV V, and VI were considered as positive for neoplastic pathology. The sensitivity of FNAC to predict neoplastic pathology was 97.5%, while the specificity was 25%. The positive predictive value was 92.9%. Two cases reported as atypical (Category III) turned out to be adenocarcinoma on histopathology. One case reported as neuroendocrine tumor and two cases reported as adenocarcinoma on cytology displayed features of chronic pancreatitis on histology. One case reported as neoplastic mucinous cyst (Category IV) turned out to be adenocarcinoma on histology (limited concordance). Conclusion The cytopathologist needs to be wary of the potential pitfalls to improve the diagnostic accuracy of FNACs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parul Verma
- Department of Pathology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Saloni Goyal
- Department of Pathology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Ruchita Tyagi
- Department of Pathology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Mehar Ghuman
- Department of Pathology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Ramit Mahajan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Arshneet Kaur Selhi
- Department of Pathology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, Connaught Place, New Delhi, India
| | - Harpreet Kaur
- Department of Pathology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Pavneet Kaur Selhi
- Department of Pathology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kundu R, Kollabathula A, Gupta N, Rohilla M, Rana SS, Nada R, Kalra N, Basher RK, Gupta P, Dey P, Gupta R, Dutta U, Srinivasan R. The WHO system versus the Papanicolaou society of cytopathology system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology for risk stratification-which is better? Diagn Cytopathol 2024; 52:145-155. [PMID: 38059418 DOI: 10.1002/dc.25258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed a reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. We applied this classification for pancreatic lesion samples by fine needle aspiration (FNA) and compared the results to the previous classification of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system for risk stratification. METHODS The computerized database was searched for all pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and transabdominal ultrasound-guided FNA (TUS-FNA) samples from 2016 to 2020 and cases were reassigned as per the PSC and the WHO diagnostic categories. Cases with follow-up, clinicoradiological, and/or histopathology were included in the study. The risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated across all diagnostic categories based on clinical data, imaging data, and histopathology wherever available. RESULTS There were a total of 625 pancreatic FNA. In 230 cases, follow-up information was available which included 116 EUS and 114 TUS-FNA samples. The ROM for PSC categories I-VI was 40%, 19.7%, 28.6%, 57.1%, 94.7%, and 97.9% and for the WHO categories (I-VII), it was 60%, 21.3%, and 35.7%, not representative, not applicable, 94.7% and 94.9%. The overall sensitivity and specificity of PSC was 68.2% and 96.2% when categories V and VI were taken as positive and 78.9% and 93.3% for WHO when categories VI and VII were taken as positive. CONCLUSIONS Pancreatic FNA samples reported as per the WHO system showed better sensitivity as compared to the PSC system resulting in better risk stratification and consequently better patient management. The overall high specificity and moderate sensitivity reaffirm the utility of FNA in pancreatic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reetu Kundu
- Department of Cytology and Gynecological Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Arpitha Kollabathula
- Department of Cytology and Gynecological Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Nalini Gupta
- Department of Cytology and Gynecological Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Manish Rohilla
- Department of Cytology and Gynecological Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Surinder Singh Rana
- Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ritambhra Nada
- Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Naveen Kalra
- Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Rajender Kumar Basher
- Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Parikshaa Gupta
- Department of Cytology and Gynecological Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Pranab Dey
- Department of Cytology and Gynecological Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Rajesh Gupta
- Surgical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Usha Dutta
- Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Radhika Srinivasan
- Department of Cytology and Gynecological Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mallik MK, Qadan LR, Mohanty AK, Alali A, Kapila K. Grading pancreatic adenocarcinomas on fine needle aspiration cytology. The outstanding issues. Cytopathology 2024; 35:256-265. [PMID: 38050715 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.13343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The three-tier grading scheme described in "The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) System for reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology" (TPSCRPBC) which remained unchanged following the WHO Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology (WRPBC) was evaluated on pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PACs) reported on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (EUS-FNAC). METHODS The Papanicolaou and May Grunwald Giemsa-stained smears from 116 cases of PACs were graded using the three-tier grading scheme laid down by TPSCRPBC/WRPBC. Cases exhibiting multiple grades were assigned primary, secondary and tertiary grades. Each case was assigned a grade score, either by adding the primary and secondary grades, by adding the primary and tertiary grades when the tertiary grade was 3 or by doubling the grade when only one grade existed. Necrosis was estimated semi-quantitatively. The inter-observer reproducibility in grading was evaluated using Kappa and Kendall's tau-c. Correlations between the various grades, the stage of the tumour and the amount of necrosis were assessed using Spearman rho and Kendall's tau-b. RESULTS 31.89% of cases showed one grade, and 68.11% showed at least two grades. 16.38% showed three grades. The two commonest grade scores were 3 and 5. The inter-observer reproducibility for grading and grade scoring was satisfactory. A positive correlation was noted between the grades and the amount of necrosis. No significant correlation was found between the grades, grade scores and the stage of the tumours. CONCLUSIONS The TPSCRPBC/WRPBC grading scheme can be suitably applied to PACs with good inter-observer reproducibility. Cases often show multiple grades in the same tumour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mrinmay Kumar Mallik
- Cytopathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Mubarak Al Kabeer Hospital, Safat, Kuwait
| | - Laila Rafiq Qadan
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait
| | - Asit Kumar Mohanty
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kuwait Cancer Control Center, Shuwaikh, Kuwait
| | - Ali Alali
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mubarak Al Kabeer Hospital, Safat, Kuwait
| | - Kusum Kapila
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lui SK, Hargett I, Pharaa Z, Aviles M, Botelho S, Feliciano DL, Kim V, Sigel K, Armstrong M, Wilson CE, Shah P, Soares K, Sigel C. The World Health Organization classification of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology stratifies risk of malignancy and outcome for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas. Cancer Cytopathol 2023; 131:762-771. [PMID: 37602886 PMCID: PMC11321709 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently published a classification for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytopathology with differences compared to the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) classification. METHODS Retrospective data were collected from pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations from 2014 to 2017 at a pancreatic cancer center. Absolute risk of malignancy (AROM), relative risk (to benign), performance characteristics, and overall survival were calculated for the entire cohort with comparison of cysts and solid lesions. RESULTS In total, 2562 cases were included: 16% cyst (n = 411) and 84% solid (n = 2151). The histologic confirmation rate was 43% (n = 1101) and the median follow-up (for benign) was 56 months. For WHO I-VII, overall AROM (%) was 23, 22, 62, 13, 65, 97, and 100; cyst AROM was 7, 0, 19, 13, 38, 78, and 100; and solid AROM was 50, 29, 70, 15, 100, 99, and 100. For PSC I-VI, overall AROM (%) was 23, 29, 64, 0 (IVa), 60 (IVb), 97, and 100; cyst AROM was 7, 0, 19, 0, 21, 78, and 100; and solid AROM was 50, 35, 73, 0, 92, 99, and 100. The difference in relative risk for a cyst (vs. solid) overall was 0.38 for WHO and 0.26 for PSC. WHO and PSC categories showed stratification for the probability of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Cystic versus solid lesion type can dramatically affect AROM, particularly for nondiagnostic (I), benign (II), atypical (III), and WHO V categories. WHO IV conveys a similarly low AROM for cystic and solid types. Both classifications stratify the probability of overall survival, including the newly introduced categories WHO IV and WHO V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Kwun Lui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Imani Hargett
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Zaynab Pharaa
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Mariela Aviles
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Stephany Botelho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Dominique L Feliciano
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Veronica Kim
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Keith Sigel
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Misha Armstrong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Christina E Wilson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Pari Shah
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Kevin Soares
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - Carlie Sigel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Field AS, Pitman M, Cree IA, Canberk S, Bubendorf L, Mahrotra R, Schmitt F. The rationale for the development and publication of the World Health Organization reporting systems for cytopathology and a brief overview of the first editions of the lung and pancreaticobiliary systems. Cancer Cytopathol 2023; 131:751-761. [PMID: 37702127 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
The International Academy of Cytology has joined with the International Agency for Research on Cancer and the World Health Organization (WHO) to develop international systems for reporting the cytopathology of lung, pancreas and biliary tract, lymph nodes, soft tissue, liver, breast, and kidney and adrenal gland. The WHO recently published the reporting systems for lung and pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. The objectives of this collaboration are to standardize the reporting of cytopathology; improve the quality of reporting by establishing the key diagnostic cytopathological features of entities and neoplasms; provide detailed best-practice guidelines in sampling techniques, specimen handling and processing, and the use of ancillary techniques; and facilitate communication between cytopathologists and clinicians to improve patient care. Each WHO system has defined specific categories and terminology for reporting cytopathology, and each category has an estimated risk of malignancy as far as the current literature allows and a suggested diagnostic management algorithm to assist clinicians. The WHO systems recognize that local medical and pathology infrastructure will vary, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries, and the WHO systems and their diagnostic management recommendations have been developed to allow them to be applied worldwide in all resource settings. The process of the selection of editors and authors and the writing and editing responsibilities has used the same model as that used for the fifth edition WHO Classification of Tumours, to which the WHO cytopathology systems are directly linked. This review provides the rationale and history of this joint International Academy of Cytology, International Agency for Research on Cancer, and WHO cytopathology project and a brief overview of the WHO reporting systems for lung and pancreaticobiliary cytopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S Field
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, University of New South Wales Sydney and University of Notre Dame Sydney Medical Schools, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martha Pitman
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ian A Cree
- International Agency for Cancer Research, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Sule Canberk
- Health Research and Innovation Institute, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto and Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Lukas Bubendorf
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ravi Mahrotra
- Indian Cancer Genome Atlas, Pune and Founder Center for Health Innovation and Policy, Noida, India
| | - Fernando Schmitt
- Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, Research Center for Health Technologies and Services-Health Research Network, and Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wood LD, Adsay NV, Basturk O, Brosens LAA, Fukushima N, Hong SM, Kim SJ, Lee JW, Luchini C, Noë M, Pitman MB, Scarpa A, Singhi AD, Tanaka M, Furukawa T. Systematic review of challenging issues in pathology of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Pancreatology 2023; 23:878-891. [PMID: 37604731 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are a cystic precursor to pancreatic cancer. IPMNs deemed clinically to be at high-risk for malignant progression are frequently treated with surgical resection, and pathological examination of the pancreatectomy specimen is a key component of the clinical care of IPMN patients. METHODS Systematic literature reviews were conducted around eight topics of clinical relevance in the examination of pathological specimens in patients undergoing resection of IPMN. RESULTS This review provides updated perspectives on morphological subtyping of IPMNs, classification of intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms, nomenclature for high-grade dysplasia, assessment of T stage, distinction of carcinoma associated or concomitant with IPMN, role of molecular assessment of IPMN tissue, role of intraoperative assessment by frozen section, and preoperative evaluation of cyst fluid cytology. CONCLUSIONS This analysis provides the foundation for data-driven approaches to several challenging issues in the pathology of IPMNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura D Wood
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - N Volkan Adsay
- Department of Pathology, Koç University Hospital and Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Olca Basturk
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lodewijk A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Noriyoshi Fukushima
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Seung-Mo Hong
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Joo Kim
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae W Lee
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Claudio Luchini
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy; ARC-Net Research Center, University of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Michaël Noë
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Martha B Pitman
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy; ARC-Net Research Center, University of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mariko Tanaka
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Furukawa
- Department of Investigative Pathology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bor R, Vasas B, Fábián A, Szűcs M, Bősze Z, Bálint A, Rutka M, Farkas K, Tóth T, Resál T, Bacsur P, Molnár T, Szepes Z. Risk Factors and Interpretation of Inconclusive Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2841. [PMID: 37685379 PMCID: PMC10486755 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13172841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The inconclusive cytological findings of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) remain a major clinical challenge and often lead to treatment delays. METHODS Patients who had undergone EUS-FNA sampling for solid pancreas lesions between 2014 and 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. The "atypical" and "non-diagnostic" categories of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System were considered inconclusive and the "negative for malignancy" category of malignancy was suspected clinically. We determined the frequency and predictors of inconclusive cytological finding. RESULTS A total of 473 first EUS-FNA samples were included, of which 108 cases (22.83%) were inconclusive. Significant increases in the odds of inconclusive cytological findings were observed for lesions with a benign final diagnosis (OR 11.20; 95% CI 6.56-19.54, p < 0.001) as well as with the use of 25 G FNA needles (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.09-4.01, p = 0.023) compared to 22 G needles. Furthermore, the use of a single EUS-FNA technique compared to the combined use of slow-pull and standard suction techniques (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.06-2.70, p = 0.027) and less than three punctures per procedure led to an elevation in the risk of inconclusive cytology (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.49-4.14, p < 0.001). Risk reduction in inconclusive cytology findings was observed in lesions between 2-4 cm (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.23-0.68, p = 0.001) and >4 cm (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.08-0.31, p < 0.001) compared to lesions ≤2 cm. CONCLUSIONS The more than two punctures per EUS-FNA sampling with larger-diameter needle (19 G or 22 G) using the slow-pull and standard suction techniques in combination may decrease the probability of inconclusive cytological findings.
Collapse
Grants
- K125377 to TM, K134863 to KF, K143549 to TM National Research, Development and Innovation Office
- UNKP-20-5-SZTE-161 to KF, UNKP-22-3-SZTE-233 to PB, UNKP-22-5-SZTE-545 to RB, UNKP-22-4-SZTE-296 to AF, UNKP-22-3-SZTE-278 to TR New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities, Hungary
- BO/00723/22 to RB Janos Bolyai Research Grant, Hungary
- Géza Hetényi Research Grant by Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renáta Bor
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Béla Vasas
- Department of Pathology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Anna Fábián
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Mónika Szűcs
- Department of Medical Physics and Informatics, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Zsófia Bősze
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Anita Bálint
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Mariann Rutka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Klaudia Farkas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Tibor Tóth
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Tamás Resál
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Péter Bacsur
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Tamás Molnár
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| | - Zoltán Szepes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary; (A.F.); (Z.B.); (A.B.); (M.R.); (K.F.); (T.T.); (T.R.); (P.B.); (T.M.); (Z.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pitman MB, Centeno BA, Reid MD, Saeig M, Siddiqui MT, Layfield LJ, Perez-Machado M, Weynand B, Stelow EB, Lozano MD, Fukushima N, Cree IA, Mehrotra R, Schmitt FC, Field AS. A brief review of the WHO reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2023; 12:243-250. [PMID: 37003924 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO), the International Academy of Cytology, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer have developed an approach to standardized reporting of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. The WHO Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology (WHO System) revises the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology published in 2015 and replaces the 6 PSC categories with 7 categories: "Insufficient/Inadequate/Nondiagnostic"; "Benign/Negative for malignancy"; "Atypical"; "Pancreaticobiliary neoplasm, low risk/grade (PaN-low)"; "Pancreatic neoplasm, high risk/grade (PaN-High)"; "Suspicious for malignancy"; and "Malignant". In the PSC system, there is a single category for "Neoplastic" lesions that includes 2 groups, 1 for benign neoplasms and 1 named "Neoplastic-other", dominated by premalignant intraductal neoplasms primarily intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and low-grade malignant neoplasms (pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN). In the WHO System, benign neoplasms with virtually no risk of malignancy are included in the "Benign" category and low-grade malignancies (PanNET and SPN) are included in the "Malignant" category, as per the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumors, while the non-invasive pre-malignant lesions of the ducts are divided by the cytomorphological grade of the epithelium into PaN-low and PaN-high with distinctly different risks of malignancy. Within each category, key diagnostic cytopathologic features and the ancillary studies for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation, as well as the implications of diagnosis for patient care and management, are outlined. Reporting and diagnostic management options recognize the variations in the availability of diagnostic and prognostic ancillary testing modalities in low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha B Pitman
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | | | - Michelle D Reid
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mauro Saeig
- Santa Casa Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Momin T Siddiqui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Lester J Layfield
- Pathology and Anatomic Science Department, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Miguel Perez-Machado
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, London, England
| | - Birgit Weynand
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Edward B Stelow
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Hospital, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Maria D Lozano
- Department of Pathology, Clinical University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Noriyoshi Fukushima
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Jichi Medical University Hospital, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Ian A Cree
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genomic Atlas, Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy Foundation, Noida, India
| | - Fernando C Schmitt
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Andrew S Field
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, and University of New South Wales Sydney and University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
DuBois JS, Kambadakone A, Wo JY, Zhang ML. Case 19-2022: A 29-Year-Old Woman with Jaundice and Chronic Diarrhea. N Engl J Med 2022; 386:2413-2423. [PMID: 35731657 DOI: 10.1056/nejmcpc2201231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jon S DuBois
- From the Departments of Medicine (J.S.D.), Radiology (A.K.), Radiation Oncology (J.Y.W.), and Pathology (M.L.Z.), Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Departments of Medicine (J.S.D.), Radiology (A.K.), Radiation Oncology (J.Y.W.), and Pathology (M.L.Z.), Harvard Medical School - both in Boston
| | - Avinash Kambadakone
- From the Departments of Medicine (J.S.D.), Radiology (A.K.), Radiation Oncology (J.Y.W.), and Pathology (M.L.Z.), Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Departments of Medicine (J.S.D.), Radiology (A.K.), Radiation Oncology (J.Y.W.), and Pathology (M.L.Z.), Harvard Medical School - both in Boston
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- From the Departments of Medicine (J.S.D.), Radiology (A.K.), Radiation Oncology (J.Y.W.), and Pathology (M.L.Z.), Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Departments of Medicine (J.S.D.), Radiology (A.K.), Radiation Oncology (J.Y.W.), and Pathology (M.L.Z.), Harvard Medical School - both in Boston
| | - M Lisa Zhang
- From the Departments of Medicine (J.S.D.), Radiology (A.K.), Radiation Oncology (J.Y.W.), and Pathology (M.L.Z.), Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Departments of Medicine (J.S.D.), Radiology (A.K.), Radiation Oncology (J.Y.W.), and Pathology (M.L.Z.), Harvard Medical School - both in Boston
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Impact of rapid on-site evaluation on diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: experience from a single center. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:264. [PMID: 35624440 PMCID: PMC9145146 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02330-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of ROSE in EUS-FNA pancreatic lesions is still controversial in many centers. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the contribution of ROSE to the diagnostic accuracy, as well as its assistance to the pathologist/cytopathologist. METHODS 162 EUS-FNA biopsies were included in the study. EUS-FNA cytology results were reported according to the six-tiered system of Papanicolaou Cytopathology Society and compared to their final diagnosis with histopathology and/or clinical follow-ups regarding malignancy. The diagnostic yield, the difference in diagnostic accuracy, and the contribution of ROSE to providing the pathologist with adequate tissue uptake (number of slides and cell blocks) for further examination were compared in the ROSE and non-ROSE patient groups. RESULTS In the non-ROSE group, the diagnostic accuracy according to the final diagnoses was 96% and the sensitivity was 94.44%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 87.50%; while diagnostic accuracy was 97.09%, sensitivity 97.47%, specificity 95.83%, PPV 98.77%, NPV 92% in patients with ROSE. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between those with and without ROSE (p: 0.078). In diagnostic cases, the number of passes, slides and cell blocks were significantly higher in patients with ROSE than those without ROSE (p: 0.003, p: 0.007, p: 0.012, respectively). ROSE was independently associated with diagnostic yield when evaluated by number of passes, slides, cell blocks in regression analysis (p: 0.001, OR: 5.07, confidence interval: 1.89-13.5). CONCLUSION ROSE may increase the acquisition of sufficient tissue, but it does not have an advantage in diagnostic accuracy. ROSE may raise the number of slides, which may assist the pathologist for the diagnosis. If the lesion is solid and/or contains a solid component, diagnostic yield is higher in patients where ROSE is available. Therefore, ROSE still maintains its applicability in terms of increasing the diagnostic efficiency and making the final diagnosis.
Collapse
|
16
|
Ilyas AM, Bohra M, More NM, Naik LP. Papanicolaou society of cytopathology system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology: Risk stratification and cytology scope - 2.5-year study. Cytojournal 2022; 19:33. [PMID: 35673695 PMCID: PMC9168400 DOI: 10.25259/cytojournal_46_2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Diagnosis of pancreatic lesions remains a clinical challenge. Early and accurate diagnosis is extremely important for improving the therapeutic usefulness of pancreatic cancers and Endoscopic ultrasonography - fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology has come up with this advantage. For current study the authors evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNAC by applying PSC system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology and Calculated the malignancy risk associated with the diagnostic categories. Material and Methods: A retrospective study over the period of 2.5 years (April 2017 to Oct 2019) 60 patients in our cohort EUS-FNAC guided unstained fixed and unfixed slides received of pancreatic lesion and were stained with Papanicolau and Giemsa using standard technique and immunocytochemistry, where required Application of Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology Histopathological and clinical follow-up were retrieved. Results: Our study has comparable results with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 92.8%, 100%, 100%, and 92.59%, respectively. Fuurthermore, a diagnostic accuracy of 96.2%. Risk of malignancy is lower for benign and indeterminate category whereas it is higher for suspicious and malignant categories. Conclusion: The application of the new proposed terminology for pancreaticobiliary cytology brings standardization. Final diagnosis can be reached by the multidisciplinary approach of EUS-FNA cytology, cell block preparation, immunocytochemistry, and immunohistochemistry; if required, can be adopted as an alternative approach to biopsy. The present study showed high sensitivity and specificity for EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma, which may influence the treatment plans of both surgeons and oncologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abeer M Ilyas
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India,
| | - Mamta Bohra
- Department of Pathology, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital and Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India,
| | - Nilam M. More
- Department of Pathology, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital and Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India,
| | - Leena P. Naik
- Department of Pathology, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital and Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India,
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hanks M, Ryder S, Zaitoun A. The Role Of Cytology In The Investigation And Management Of Pancreatobiliary Lesions With A Transition Towards A Standardised Reporting System: An Institutional Perspective. Cytopathology 2022; 33:293-300. [PMID: 35231151 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.13115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatobiliary pathology encompasses all benign and malignant disease within the pancreas and biliary tract; pancreatic cancer is currently the seventh leading cause of death worldwide accounting for approximately 466,000 deaths per annum. Cytology has been increasingly used in the physician's toolbox to provide an accurate, non-invasive and cost-effective modality for the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary lesions. The cytological appearance alone may be insufficient to establish the diagnosis and it is crucial for effective clinicopathological correlation in a multidisciplinary setting highlighting, the vital role of the pathologist to ensure effective and quality care. The advent of modern diagnostic techniques has allowed for a less invasive approach to tissue sampling which when combined with routine staining and specialised immunohistochemistry can help guide the diagnosis. The Papanicolaou Classification is comparable to the current C1-C5 system which will enable standardised reporting to help to improve communication with clinical colleagues and subsequent patient management and our article will discuss the criteria used by cytopathologists to determine the grade of both pancreatic and biliary lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Hanks
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK, NG7 2UH
| | - Stephen Ryder
- Clinical Research and Innovation, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK, NG7 2UH
| | - Abed Zaitoun
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK, NG7 2UH
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Diagnostic Performance of Pancreatic Cytology with the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System: A Systematic Review, before Shifting into the Upcoming WHO International System. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23031650. [PMID: 35163571 PMCID: PMC8835850 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) reporting system classifies pancreatobiliary samples into six categories (I–VI), providing guidance for personalized management. As the World Health Organization (WHO) has been preparing an updated reporting system for pancreatobiliary cytopathology, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the risk of malignancy (ROM) of each PSC category, also the sensitivity and specificity of pancreatic FNA cytology using the current PSC system. Five databases were investigated with a predefined search algorithm. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select the eligible studies for subsequent data extraction. A study quality assessment was also performed. Eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis. The ROM of the PSC categories I, II, III, IV, V, VI were in the ranges of 8–50%, 0–40%, 28–100%, 0–31%, 82–100%, and 97–100%, respectively. Notably, the ROM IVB (“neoplastic—benign”) subcategory showed a 0% ROM. Four of the included studies reported separately the ROMs for the IVO subcategory (“neoplastic—other”; its overall ROM ranged from 0 to 34%) with low (LGA) and high-grade atypia (HGA). ROM for LGA ranged from 4.3 to 19%, whereas ROM for HGA from 64 to 95.2%. When the subcategory IVO with HGA was considered as cytologically positive, together with the categories V and VI, there was a higher sensitivity of pancreatic cytology, at minimal expense of the specificity. Evidence suggests the proposed WHO international system changes—shifting the IVB entities into the “benign/negative for malignancy” category and establishing two new categories, the “pancreatic neoplasm, low-risk/grade” and “pancreatic neoplasm, high-risk/grade”—could stratify pancreatic neoplasms more effectively than the current PSC system.
Collapse
|
19
|
Nikas IP, Seide S, Proctor T, Kleinaki Z, Kleinaki M, Reynolds JP. The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: A Meta-Analysis. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12020170. [PMID: 35207658 PMCID: PMC8874476 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The Paris System (TPS) for Reporting Urinary Cytology is a standardized, evidence-based reporting system, comprising seven diagnostic categories: nondiagnostic, negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC), atypical urothelial cells (AUC), suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC), HGUC, low-grade urothelial neoplasm (LGUN), and other malignancies. This study aimed to calculate the pooled risk of high-grade malignancy (ROHM) of each category and demonstrate the diagnostic accuracy of urine cytology reported with TPS. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, while data were extracted and analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. The pooled ROHM was 17.70% for the nondiagnostic category (95% CI, 0.0650; 0.3997), 13.04% for the NHGUC (95% CI, 0.0932; 0.1796), 38.65% for the AUC (95% CI, 0.3042; 0.4759), 12.45% for the LGUN (95% CI, 0.0431; 0.3101), 76.89 for the SHGUC (95% CI, 0.7063; 0.8216), and 91.79% for the HGUC and other malignancies (95% CI, 0.8722; 0.9482). A summary ROC curve was created and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 0.849, while the pooled sensitivity was 0.669 (95% CI, 0.589; 0.741) and false-positive rate was 0.101 (95% CI, 0.063; 0.158). In addition, the pooled DOR of the included studies was 21.258 (95% CI, 14.336; 31.522). TPS assigns each sample into a diagnostic category linked with a specific ROHM, guiding clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilias P. Nikas
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus; (Z.K.); (M.K.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Svenja Seide
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (S.S.); (T.P.)
| | - Tanja Proctor
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (S.S.); (T.P.)
| | - Zoi Kleinaki
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus; (Z.K.); (M.K.)
- Internal Medicine Department, General Hospital of Nikea, 18454 Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Kleinaki
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus; (Z.K.); (M.K.)
| | - Jordan P. Reynolds
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32256, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gonzalez-Mancera MS, Ahmadian SS, Gomez-Fernandez C, Velez-Torres J, Jorda M, García-Buitrago MT. Risk of malignancy associated with the diagnostic categories proposed by the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology for pancreaticobiliary specimens: An institutional experience. Diagn Cytopathol 2021; 50:49-56. [PMID: 34856075 DOI: 10.1002/dc.24910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The guidelines published by the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) intend to unify the reporting language in pancreaticobiliary specimens and improve communication between cytopathologists and clinicians. The six categories in the system will determine the best management for patients. However, there is limited evidence regarding the risk of malignancy (ROM) associated with each category. METHODS A retrospective search was performed for pancreaticobiliary fine-needle aspiration (FNA) reports with corresponding surgical follow-up. Cases were reclassified according to the PSC. The ROM, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for each category. RESULTS A total of 297 cases were identified and reclassified as: 30 nondiagnostic (category I), 45 negative for malignancy (II), 20 atypical (III), 42 neoplastic: other (IVB), 19 suspicious for malignancy (V), and 141 malignant (VI). The absolute ROM was 10% for category I, 8.9% for category II, 60% for category III, 4.8% for category IV when the neoplasms were not characterized as malignant, and 100% when categorized as malignant; 100% for category V, and 95.7% for category VI. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for neoplasia and malignancy, including categories IV to VI, were 96.6%, 88.4%, 97.5%, and 84.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The categories developed by the PSC stratify the ROM. Aspirates designated as categories V and VI had the highest ROM. Our rate of atypical category complies with the recommended rate of <10%. This scheme provides valuable information to clinicians treating patients with pancreatic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel S Gonzalez-Mancera
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Saman S Ahmadian
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Jackson Health System, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Carmen Gomez-Fernandez
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jaylou Velez-Torres
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Merce Jorda
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Monica T García-Buitrago
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nishith N, Rao RN, Rai P. Cytologic Categorization with Risk Stratification of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration from Pancreatic Lesions Based on Guidelines of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology: 12-Year Tertiary Care Experience. Discoveries (Craiova) 2021; 9:e134. [PMID: 34816002 PMCID: PMC8605790 DOI: 10.15190/d.2021.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pancreatic malignancy is an important cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) plays a crucial role in the pre-operative diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. In this study, we have analyzed the cytological spectrum of pancreatic lesions in the Indian population over 12 years, categorized them according to the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology (PSCPC), and assessed the risk of malignancy (ROM) for each of the categories. METHODS: A computerized data search from January 2008 to December 2019 revealed 581 pancreatic EUS-FNA samples, among which surgical follow-up was available for 73 cases. All cytological specimens were reviewed and prospectively classified into one of the six diagnostic categories proposed by the PSCPC. Subsequently, a cytohistological correlation was performed and the ROM was calculated for each category. RESULTS: The cytologic diagnoses included 50 nondiagnostic (category I), 175 negative for malignancy (category II), 19 atypical (category III), 27 neoplastic:benign (category IVA), 30 neoplastic:other (category IVB), 26 suspicious (category V), and 254 malignant (category VI) cases. ROM for non-diagnostic aspirates, nonneoplastic benign specimens, atypical cases, neoplastic:benign, neoplastic:other, suspicious for malignancy, and the malignant category was 16.7%, 7.1%, 33.3%, 0.0%, 20.0%, 100%, and 78.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We document an increased risk of malignancy from category I to category VI of the PSCPC. The malignancy risk for category VI (malignant) was statistically significant in our study but was lower in comparison to the values reported by other authors. Nonetheless, such an approach would establish transparent communication between the pathologist and the clinician, as well as aid the clinician in decision making, particularly in intermediate categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilay Nishith
- Department of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, UP, India
| | - Ram Nawal Rao
- Department of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, UP, India
| | - Praveer Rai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, UP, India
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Layfield LJ, Zhang T, Esebua M. Diagnostic sensitivity and risk of malignancy for bile duct brushings categorized by the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. Diagn Cytopathol 2021; 50:24-27. [PMID: 34800330 DOI: 10.1002/dc.24901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Papanicolaou Society of cytopathology developed a six-category system for pancreaticobiliary cytology specimens. Each category is associated with a definition, diagnostic criteria, estimated risk of malignancy and management recommendations. Risks of malignancy are well defined for specimens obtained by fine-needle aspiration but are less well defined for brushing specimens. METHODS Diagnoses of 232 brushing specimens of the pancreatic and bile ducts were correlated with diagnoses from subsequent surgical or cytologic specimens. Sensitivity for the brushing technique was calculated. Risk of malignancy was calculated for each category using the original definitions for nondiagnostic and negative categories and for those of a modified system. RESULTS Diagnostic sensitivity was 60%-64%. Risk of malignancy for the nondiagnostic, negative, atypical, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant categories was 28%, 28%, 61%, 91%, and 91%, respectively, when the original category definitions were used. CONCLUSIONS Diagnostic sensitivity for duct brushings is low in comparison to fine-needle aspiration. Risk of malignancy is comparable to that of needle aspiration for the negative, atypical and suspicious categories but lower for the malignant category. There is a stepwise increase in malignancy risk as one moves from the negative to the atypical to the suspicious for malignancy categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lester J Layfield
- Department of Pathology & Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Pathology & Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Magda Esebua
- Department of Pathology & Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hoda RS, Arpin RN, Rosenbaum MW, Pitman MB. Risk of malignancy associated with diagnostic categories of the proposed World Health Organization International System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology. Cancer Cytopathol 2021; 130:195-201. [PMID: 34623767 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed an updated international classification system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology. Substantial changes to the prior Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system have been recommended. Chiefly, the "neoplastic: benign" and "neoplastic: other" categories have been replaced by 2 new categories-"pancreatic neoplasia-low-grade" (PaN-Low) and "pancreatic neoplasia-high-grade" (PaN-High)-stratifying neoplastic mucinous cysts by cytological atypia. Low-grade malignancies are placed in the "malignant" category and benign serous cystadenoma in the "benign/negative" category. Risk of malignancy (ROM) associated with the diagnostic categories of the WHO system has yet to be defined. METHODS All patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for a pancreatic lesion at a single institution from January 2016 to December 2016, prospectively classified using the PSC system, were reclassified using the WHO system. Absolute ROM was determined by histologic outcome and/or clinical follow-up of at least 6 months. RESULTS A total of 334 EUS-FNA samples from 322 patients were reviewed and reclassified. Absolute ROM for the WHO system was 7.7% for "insufficient/inadequate/nondiagnostic" category, 1.0% for "benign/negative for malignancy," 28.0% for "atypical," 4.8% for "PaN-Low," 60.0% for "PaN-High," 100% for "suspicious for malignancy," and 100% for "malignant;" the absolute ROM for the same cohort using the PSC system was 7.7% for "nondiagnostic" category, 1.0% for "negative (for malignancy)," 28.0% for "atypical," 0.0% for "neoplastic: benign," 30.3% for "neoplastic: other," 100% for "suspicious (for malignancy)," and 100% for "positive or malignant." CONCLUSIONS The WHO international system achieves improved stratification by associated ROM compared to the PSC system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raza S Hoda
- Robert J. Tomsich Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ronald N Arpin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew W Rosenbaum
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Martha B Pitman
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
HooKim K, Reid MD. Atypical cells in fine needle aspiration biopsies of pancreas: Causes, work-up, and recommendations for management. Diagn Cytopathol 2021; 50:196-207. [PMID: 34378874 DOI: 10.1002/dc.24848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a sensitive and specific method for diagnosing cancer in solid pancreatic masses. However, some cases receive indeterminate atypical diagnoses, which creates management dilemmas. In the 2014 Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) standardized guidelines for pancreatobiliary cytology, specimens in the "Atypical" category show a spectrum of architectural and/or cellular changes beyond normal or reactive, but, quantitatively or qualitatively, insufficient for classification as neoplastic (benign/other), suspicious or positive for malignancy. Implementation of the PSC system decreased atypical diagnoses, particularly for cystic lesions, and redistributed many cases into benign and neoplastic categories. Because no set cytologic criteria exist for the "Atypical" category there is wide variability in its use, and its frequency ranges from 0%-16% (mean 6%). It consists of a heterogeneous mix of cases that occur because of preanalytic, lesion-specific (low cellularity, necrosis, cystic, reactive and premalignant changes), to pathologist-dependent factors (experience, expertise, training and institutional case volume). Outcomes of atypical diagnoses in solid pancreatic masses range from benign to premalignant and malignant and include reactive atypia in pancreatitis, well differentiated adenocarcinoma, and non-ductal malignancies. The associated risk of malignancy (ROM) ranges from 28%-100%, with an overall intermediate ROM in large-scale studies. Cytopathologists and institutions should monitor and keep their personal and/or laboratory's atypical rates low by judiciously using rapid onsite evaluation, ancillary studies, consensus or expert review, as well as correlation with clinical and radiologic findings. Early repeat EUS-FNA is indicated for unresolved cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim HooKim
- Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michelle D Reid
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Reid MD. Cytologic Assessment of Cystic/Intraductal Lesions of the Pancreatobiliary Tract. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 146:280-297. [PMID: 33836534 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0553-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Because of new and improved imaging techniques, cystic/intraductal pancreatobiliary tract lesions are increasingly being discovered, and brushings or endoscopic ultrasound/computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies from these lesions have become an integral part of pathologists' daily practice. Because patient management has become increasingly conservative, accurate preoperative diagnosis is critical. Cytologic distinction of low-risk (pseudocysts, serous cystadenoma, lymphoepithelial cysts, and squamoid cysts of the pancreatic duct) from high-risk pancreatic cysts (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and mucinous cystic neoplasm) requires incorporation of clinical, radiologic, and cytologic findings, in conjunction with chemical and molecular analysis of cyst fluid. Cytopathologists must ensure appropriate specimen triage, along with cytologic interpretation, cyst classification, and even grading of some (mucinous) cysts. Epithelial atypia in mucinous cysts (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and mucinous cystic neoplasm) has transitioned from a 3-tiered to a 2-tiered classification system, and intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms and intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms have been separately reclassified because of their distinctive clinicopathologic characteristics. Because these lesions may be sampled on brushing or fine-needle aspiration biopsy, knowledge of their cytomorphology is critical. OBJECTIVE.— To use an integrated, multidisciplinary approach for the evaluation of cystic/intraductal pancreatobiliary tract lesions (incorporating clinical, radiologic, and cytologic findings with [chemical/molecular] cyst fluid analysis and ancillary stains) for definitive diagnosis and classification. DATA SOURCES.— Review of current literature on the cytopathology of cystic/intraductal pancreatobiliary tract lesions. CONCLUSIONS.— Our knowledge/understanding of recent updates in cystic/intraductal pancreatobiliary lesions can ensure that cytopathologists appropriately triage specimens, judiciously use and interpret ancillary studies, and incorporate the studies into reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle D Reid
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology: A Retrospective Review. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/jmp2020010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the introduction of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology, much experience has been gained and published concerning the utility of the diagnostic categories, malignancy risk of the categories and reproducibility of the system. This new information has resulted in modifications to the system which will become part of the World Health Organization (WHO) System for Reporting Pancreatic Cytology. Herein we report our experience with the system and information from the published literature.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ozretić L, Simonović AV, Rathbone ML, Young MPA, Perez-Machado MA. The benefits of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for reporting pancreatobiliary cytology: A 2-year review from a single academic institution. Cytopathology 2021; 32:227-232. [PMID: 33415845 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an essential tool in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cytology from EUS-FNA, to correlate the results with the corresponding histopathological diagnoses and to analyse the impact of retrospective assignment of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) reporting system categories. METHODS All pancreatic FNA specimens reported at the Royal Free Hospital during a 2-year period were retrospectively collected and assigned to the PSC system categories. Any available corresponding histological samples were assessed for concordance. RESULTS In total, 236 cytology specimens from 223 patients were identified, of which 108 (45.8%) had corresponding histology samples. The main reason for cyto-histological discrepancy was sampling error. Interpretive error was identified in one case. Overall, sensitivity was 92.5%, specificity was 100%, diagnostic accuracy of cytology was 95%, false-positive rate was 0% and false-negative rate was 7.5%. The implementation of the new reporting system reduced the number of cases in the atypical category. All cases previously categorised as suspicious or malignant remained in the same category. CONCLUSIONS EUS-FNA is an accurate method for evaluating pancreatobiliary lesions. The implementation of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology diagnostic system enhances standardisation of the reporting terminology and reduces the number of samples in the non-standardised and equivocal atypical category.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luka Ozretić
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - Martin P A Young
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mallik MK, Qadan LR, Al Naseer A, AlAli A, Al Ansari T, Naquib SAI, Das DK, Kapila K. The applicability of Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system on reporting endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens of pancreatic lesions in situations with limited availability of ancillary tests. Experience at a single laboratory. Cytopathology 2020; 31:564-571. [PMID: 32535975 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system of reporting pancreatobiliary cytology is a standardised reporting nomenclature that uses a six-tiered scheme of diagnostic categories utilising routine microscopy and ancillary tests such as biochemical and molecular analysis of cyst fluids and immunochemistry. The objective of this study was to determine the applicability of the PSC system on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology samples reported at the cytopathology laboratory, Mubarak Al Kabeer Hospital, in Kuwait with special emphasis on situations with limited availability of ancillary tests. METHODS In total, 132 cases of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology samples from pancreatic lesions were categorised according to PSC system guidelines after examining the glass slides and reviewing the clinical, imaging and ancillary test findings. These review diagnoses were compared with the diagnoses rendered during initial reporting. Correlation with histopathology reports was done wherever available. RESULTS In 23 (17.42%) of 132 cases, re-categorisation was necessary between initial and reviewed diagnoses. In 16 cases, re-categorisations were because of non-analogous categories between initial and reviewed diagnosis. In the remaining seven, they were due to identification of newer cytomorphological and imaging findings or because of issues arising from unavailability of sufficient material for ancillary investigations. CONCLUSION All cases could be categorised using the PSC system with a moderate number of re-categorisations between initial and reviewed diagnoses. In certain circumstances, limited availability of ancillary tests, resulted in non-diagnostic categories whereas in other such circumstances, diagnostic categories could be assigned with certain conceptual modifications to the PSC guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laila Rafiq Qadan
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait
| | - Abdullah Al Naseer
- Department of gastroenterology and hepatology, Mubarak Al Kabeer Hospital, Hawally, Kuwait
| | - Ali AlAli
- Department of gastroenterology and hepatology, Mubarak Al Kabeer Hospital, Hawally, Kuwait
| | - Taiba Al Ansari
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Mubarak Al Kabeer Hospital, Hawally, Kuwait
| | | | - Dilip Kumar Das
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait
| | - Kusum Kapila
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Saieg M, Pitman MB. Experience and future perspectives on the use of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Terminology System for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2020; 48:494-498. [PMID: 32031332 DOI: 10.1002/dc.24393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology developed a set of guidelines for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology in 2014 (PB System), with a six-tiered system: Nondiagnostic, Negative, Atypical, Neoplastic (Benign or Other), Suspicious, and Positive. This proposed scheme incorporates ancillary testing such as biochemical testing of cyst fluids for diagnosis and provides terminology that standardizes the category of the various diseases of the pancreas, some of which are difficult to diagnose specifically by cytology alone. Since its initial publication five and half years ago, several groups have published their experiences on the use of the PB System and have shown that most objectives proposed by the original publication have been achieved. They have shown that there is a better understanding and definition of the diagnostic categories with an associated distribution and risk of malignancy. The diagnostic categories of Neoplastic: Other, Suspicious, and Malignant show a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of malignancy. The System also provides a multi-specialist view of pancreatic lesions, with biochemical and radiological findings being incorporated into the final pathological report. The present review summarizes these findings and discusses the future perspectives and foreseen changes that are to be incorporated to a second edition of the reporting System.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Saieg
- Department of Pathology, Santa Casa Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.,Department of Pathology, A C Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Martha B Pitman
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sung S, Del Portillo A, Gonda TA, Kluger MD, Tiscornia‐Wasserman PG. Update on risk stratification in the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology categories: 3‐Year, prospective, single‐institution experience. Cancer Cytopathol 2019; 128:29-35. [DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Sung
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York
| | - Armando Del Portillo
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York
| | - Tamas A. Gonda
- Department of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York
| | - Michael D. Kluger
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York
| | | |
Collapse
|