1
|
Diaz M, Chudsky S, Pentsova E, Miller AM. Clinical applications of cerebrospinal fluid liquid biopsies in central nervous system tumors. Transl Oncol 2024; 41:101881. [PMID: 38218027 PMCID: PMC10825768 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.101881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/15/2024] Open
Abstract
For patients with central nervous system (CNS) malignancies, liquid biopsies of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may offer an unparalleled source of information about the tumor, with much less risk than traditional biopsies. Two techniques have been adapted to CSF in clinical settings: circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). CTCs have been employed mostly as a diagnostic tool for leptomeningeal metastases in epithelial tumors, although they may also have value in the prognostication and monitoring of this disease. The ctDNA technology has been studied in a variety of primary and metastatic brain and spinal cord tumors, where it can be used for diagnosis and molecular classification, with some work suggesting that it may also be useful for longitudinal tracking of tumor evolution or as a marker of residual disease. This review summarizes recent publications on the use of these two tests in CSF, focusing on their established and potential clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Diaz
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sofia Chudsky
- Office of Professional Development, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Hunter College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elena Pentsova
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexandra M Miller
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goldberg M, Mondragon-Soto MG, Altawalbeh G, Meyer B, Aftahy AK. New Breakthroughs in the Diagnosis of Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis: A Review of Liquid Biopsies of Cerebrospinal Fluid. Cureus 2024; 16:e55187. [PMID: 38558729 PMCID: PMC10980855 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis represents a terminal stage and is a devastating complication of cancer. Despite its high incidence, current diagnostic methods fail to accurately detect this condition in a timely manner. This failure to diagnose leads to the refusal of treatment and the absence of clinical trials, hampering the development of new therapy strategies. The use of liquid biopsy is revolutionizing the field of diagnostic oncology. The dynamic and non-invasive detection of tumor markers has enormous potential in cancer diagnostics and treatment. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is a condition where invasive tissue biopsy is not part of the routine diagnostic analysis, making liquid biopsy an essential diagnostic tool. Several elements in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have been investigated as potential targets of liquid biopsy, including free circulating tumor cells, free circulating nucleic acids, proteins, exosomes, and even non-tumor cells as part of the dynamic tumor microenvironment. This review aims to summarize current breakthroughs in the research on liquid biopsy, including the latest breakthroughs in the identification of tumor cells and nucleic acids, and give an overview of future directions in the diagnosis of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Goldberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, DEU
| | | | - Ghaith Altawalbeh
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, DEU
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, DEU
| | - Amir Kaywan Aftahy
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, DEU
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Le Rhun E, Weller M, van den Bent M, Brandsma D, Furtner J, Rudà R, Schadendorf D, Seoane J, Tonn JC, Wesseling P, Wick W, Minniti G, Peters S, Curigliano G, Preusser M. Leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumours: EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101624. [PMID: 37863528 PMCID: PMC10619142 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
•This Clinical Practice Guideline provides recommendations for managing leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumours. •The guideline covers clinical, imaging and cytological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up. •A treatment and management algorithm is provided. •The author panel encompasses a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries in Europe. •Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors’ collective expert opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M van den Bent
- Department of The Brain Tumour Center at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam
| | - D Brandsma
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Furtner
- Research Center for Medical Image Analysis and Artificial Intelligence (MIAAI), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria
| | - R Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - D Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen; University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - J Seoane
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (HUVH), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J-C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University School of Medicine, Munich; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/VUmc and Brain Tumour Center, Amsterdam; Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W Wick
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg; Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuro-Oncology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - G Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli IS, Italy
| | - S Peters
- Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - M Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nguyen A, Nguyen A, Dada OT, Desai PD, Ricci JC, Godbole NB, Pierre K, Lucke-Wold B. Leptomeningeal Metastasis: A Review of the Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Methodology, and Therapeutic Landscape. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:5906-5931. [PMID: 37366925 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30060442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The present review aimed to establish an understanding of the pathophysiology of leptomeningeal disease as it relates to late-stage development among different cancer types. For our purposes, the focused metastatic malignancies include breast cancer, lung cancer, melanoma, primary central nervous system tumors, and hematologic cancers (lymphoma, leukemia, and multiple myeloma). Of note, our discussion was limited to cancer-specific leptomeningeal metastases secondary to the aforementioned primary cancers. LMD mechanisms secondary to non-cancerous pathologies, such as infection or inflammation of the leptomeningeal layer, were excluded from our scope of review. Furthermore, we intended to characterize general leptomeningeal disease, including the specific anatomical infiltration process/area, CSF dissemination, manifesting clinical symptoms in patients afflicted with the disease, detection mechanisms, imaging modalities, and treatment therapies (both preclinical and clinical). Of these parameters, leptomeningeal disease across different primary cancers shares several features. Pathophysiology regarding the development of CNS involvement within the mentioned cancer subtypes is similar in nature and progression of disease. Consequently, detection of leptomeningeal disease, regardless of cancer type, employs several of the same techniques. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis in combination with varied imaging (CT, MRI, and PET-CT) has been noted in the current literature as the gold standard in the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastasis. Treatment options for the disease are both varied and currently in development, given the rarity of these cases. Our review details the differences in leptomeningeal disease as they pertain through the lens of several different cancer subtypes in an effort to highlight the current state of targeted therapy, the potential shortcomings in treatment, and the direction of preclinical and clinical treatments in the future. As there is a lack of comprehensive reviews that seek to characterize leptomeningeal metastasis from various solid and hematologic cancers altogether, the authors intended to highlight not only the overlapping mechanisms but also the distinct patterning of disease detection and progression as a means to uniquely treat each metastasis type. The scarcity of LMD cases poses a barrier to more robust evaluations of this pathology. However, as treatments for primary cancers have improved over time, so has the incidence of LMD. The increase in diagnosed cases only represents a small fraction of LMD-afflicted patients. More often than not, LMD is determined upon autopsy. The motivation behind this review stems from the increased capacity to study LMD in spite of scarcity or poor patient prognosis. In vitro analysis of leptomeningeal cancer cells has allowed researchers to approach this disease at the level of cancer subtypes and markers. We ultimately hope to facilitate the clinical translation of LMD research through our discourse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Nguyen
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Alexander Nguyen
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | | | - Persis D Desai
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Jacob C Ricci
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Nikhil B Godbole
- School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Kevin Pierre
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Brandon Lucke-Wold
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Freret ME, Wijetunga NA, Shamseddine AA, Higginson DS, Schmitt AM, Yamada Y, Lis E, Boire A, Yang JT, Xu AJ. Early Detection of Leptomeningeal Metastases Among Patients Undergoing Spinal Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101154. [PMID: 36845624 PMCID: PMC9943781 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The management of patients with advanced solid malignancies increasingly uses stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Advanced cancer patients are at risk for developing leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), a fatal complication of metastatic cancer. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is routinely collected during computed tomography (CT) myelography for spinal SBRT planning, offering an opportunity for early LM detection by CSF cytology in the absence of radiographic LM or LM symptoms (subclinical LM). This study tested the hypothesis that early detection of tumor cells in CSF in patients undergoing spine SBRT portends a similarly poor prognosis compared with clinically overt LM. Methods and Materials We retrospectively analyzed clinical records for 495 patients with metastatic solid tumors who underwent CT myelography for spinal SBRT planning at a single institution from 2014 to 2019. Results Among patients planned for SBRT, 51 (10.3%) developed LM. Eight patients (1.6%) had subclinical LM. Median survival with LM was similar between patients with subclinical versus clinically evident LM (3.6 vs 3.0 months, P = .30). Patients harboring both parenchymal brain metastases and LM (29/51) demonstrated shorter survival than those with LM alone (2.4 vs 7.1 months, P = .02). Conclusions LM remains a fatal complication of metastatic cancer. Subclinical LM detected by CSF cytology in spine SBRT patients has a similarly poor prognosis compared with standardly detected LM and warrants consideration of central nervous system-directed therapies. As aggressive local therapies are increasingly used for metastatic patients, more sensitive CSF evaluation may further identify patients with subclinical LM and should be evaluated prospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan E. Freret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - N. Ari Wijetunga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Achraf A. Shamseddine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel S. Higginson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Adam M. Schmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eric Lis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Department of Neurology, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan T. Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amy J. Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Diaz M, Fleisher M, Pentsova EI. Cerebrospinal fluid circulating tumor cells for diagnosis, response evaluation, and molecular profiling of leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors. Cancer Biomark 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-824302-2.00007-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
7
|
Mollica L, Leli C, Puglisi S, Sardi S, Sottotetti F. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and breast cancer: a systematic review of current evidence on diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Drugs Context 2021; 10:dic-2021-6-6. [PMID: 34745272 PMCID: PMC8552906 DOI: 10.7573/dic.2021-6-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a rare but challenging manifestation of advanced breast cancer with a severe impact on morbidity and mortality. We performed a systematic review of the evidence published over the last two decades, focusing on recent advances in the diagnostic and therapeutic options of LC. Lobular histology and a triple-negative intrinsic subtype are well-known risk factors for LC. Clinical manifestations are diverse and often aspecific. There is no gold standard for LC diagnosis: MRI and cerebrospinal fluid cytology are the most frequently used modalities despite the low accuracy. Current standard of care involves a multimodal strategy including systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy in combination with brain radiotherapy. Intrathecal chemotherapy has been widely used through the years despite the lack of data from randomized controlled trials and conflicting evidence on patient outcomes. No specific chemotherapeutic agent has shown superiority over others for both intrathecal and systemic treatment. Although endocrine therapy was heuristically considered unable to exert significant control on central nervous system metastatic disease, retrospective data suggest a favourable toxicity profile and even a possible positive impact on survival. In recent years, encouraging data on the use of targeted agents has emerged but further research in this field is required. Palliative treatment in the form of whole brain or stereotactic radiotherapy is associated with improvement in clinical manifestations and quality of life, with no proven impact on survival. The most investigated prognostic factors include performance status, non-triple-negative disease and multimodal treatment. Validation of prognostic scores is necessary to aid clinicians in the identification of patient subgroups that are most likely to benefit from an intensive therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claudia Leli
- Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia Puglisi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Silvia Sardi
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Federico Sottotetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.,Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhu Y, Allard GM, Ericson NG, George TC, Kunder CA, Lowe AC. Identification and characterization of effusion tumor cells (ETCs) from remnant pleural effusion specimens. Cancer Cytopathol 2021; 129:893-906. [PMID: 34171181 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, and patients may have advanced disease when diagnosed. Targeted therapies guided by molecular subtyping of cancer can benefit patients significantly. Pleural effusions are frequently observed in patients with metastatic cancer and are routinely removed for therapeutic purposes; however, effusion specimens have not been recognized as typical substrates for clinical molecular testing because of frequent low tumor cellularity. METHODS Excess remnant pleural effusion samples (N = 25) from 21 patients with and without suspected malignancy were collected at Stanford Health Care between December 2019 and November 2020. Samples were processed into ThinPrep slides and underwent novel effusion tumor cell (ETC) analysis. The ETC results were compared with the original clinical diagnoses for accuracy. A subset of confirmed ETCs was further isolated and processed for molecular profiling to identify cancer driver mutations. All samples were obtained with Institutional Review Board approval. RESULTS The authors established novel quantitative standards to identify ETCs and detected epithelial malignancy with 89.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity in the pleural effusion samples. Molecular profiling of confirmed ETCs (pools of 5 cells evaluated) revealed key pathogenic mutations consistent with clinical molecular findings. CONCLUSIONS In this study, the authors developed a novel ETC-testing assay that detected epithelial malignancies in pleural effusions with high sensitivity and specificity. Molecular profiling of 5 ETCs showed promising concordance with the clinical molecular findings. To promote cancer subtyping and guide treatment, this ETC-testing assay will need to be validated in larger patient cohorts to facilitate integration into cytologic workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yili Zhu
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Grace M Allard
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | | | | | - Christian A Kunder
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Alarice C Lowe
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dankner M, Lam S, Degenhard T, Garzia L, Guiot MC, Petrecca K, Siegel PM. The Underlying Biology and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities of Leptomeningeal Metastases in Adult Solid Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040732. [PMID: 33578853 PMCID: PMC7916586 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastasis to the central nervous system occurs in approximately 20% of patients with advanced solid cancers such as lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. While central nervous system metastases most commonly form in the brain parenchyma, metastatic cancer cells may also reside in the subarachnoid space surrounding the brain and spinal cord to form tumors called leptomeningeal metastases. Leptomeningeal metastasis involves cancer cells that reach the subarachnoid space and proliferate in the cerebrospinal fluid compartment within the leptomeninges, a sequela associated with a myriad of symptoms and poor prognosis. Cancer cells exposed to cerebrospinal fluid in the leptomeninges must contend with a unique microenvironment from those that establish within the brain or other organs. Leptomeningeal lesions provide a formidable clinical challenge due to their often-diffuse infiltration within the subarachnoid space. The molecular mechanisms that promote the establishment of leptomeningeal metastases have begun to be elucidated, demonstrating that it is a biological entity distinct from parenchymal brain metastases and is associated with specific molecular drivers. In this review, we outline the current state of knowledge pertaining to the diagnosis, treatment, and molecular underpinnings of leptomeningeal metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Dankner
- Goodman Cancer Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada; (M.D.); (M.-C.G.)
| | - Stephanie Lam
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada;
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada;
| | - Theresa Degenhard
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada; (T.D.); (K.P.)
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
| | - Livia Garzia
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada;
| | - Marie-Christine Guiot
- Goodman Cancer Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada; (M.D.); (M.-C.G.)
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada; (T.D.); (K.P.)
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
- Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada
| | - Kevin Petrecca
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada; (T.D.); (K.P.)
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
| | - Peter M. Siegel
- Goodman Cancer Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada; (M.D.); (M.-C.G.)
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada;
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada; (T.D.); (K.P.)
- Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada
- Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-514-398-4259; Fax: +1-514-398-6769
| |
Collapse
|