Fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: What we learnt from the explorative clinical trial

The Complex Role of Gut Microbiota in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Lupus Nephritis: From Pathogenetic Factor to Therapeutic Target

The role of gut microbiota (GM) and intestinal dysbiosis in triggering the onset and/or modulating the severity and progression of lupus nephritis (LN) has been the object of intense research over the last few years. Some alterations at the phyla level, such as the abundance of Proteobacteria and reduction in Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio and in α-diversity have been consistently reported in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), whereas a more specific role has been ascribed to some species (Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Ruminococcus gnavus) in LN. Underlying mechanisms include microbial translocation through a "leaky gut" and subsequent molecular mimicry, immune dysregulation (alteration of IFNγ levels and of balance between Treg and Th17 subsets), and epigenetic interactions. Levels of bacterial metabolites, such as butyrate and other short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), appear to play a key role in modulating LN. Beyond bacterial components of GM, virome and mycobiome are also increasingly recognized as important players in the modulation of an immune response. On the other hand, microbiota-based therapy appears promising and includes diet, prebiotics, probiotics, symbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). The modulation of microbiota could correct critical alterations, such as F/B ratio and Treg/Th17 imbalance, and blunt production of autoantibodies and renal damage. Despite current limits, GM is emerging as a powerful environmental factor that could be harnessed to interfere with key mechanisms leading to SLE, preventing flares and organ damage, including LN. The aim of this review is to provide a state-of-the-art analysis of the role of GM in triggering and modulating SLE and LN on the one hand, while exploring possible therapeutic manipulation of GM to control the disease on the other hand.

Single-cell analyses of intestinal epithelium reveal the dysregulation of gut immune microenvironment in systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

The small intestine harbors a rich array of intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) that interact with structural cells to collectively sustain gut immune homeostasis. Dysregulation of gut immune homeostasis was implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple autoimmune diseases, however, whether this homeostasis is disrupted in a lupus autoimmune background remains unclear.

METHODS

We performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analyses to elucidate immune and structural milieu in the intestinal epithelium of MRL/Lpr lupus mice (Lpr mice) and MRL/Mpj control mice (Mpj mice). Comprehensive analyses including unsupervised clustering, trajectories, and cellular communication were performed. The primary findings from scRNA-seq were further validated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), flow cytometry, and in vivo experiments including selenium supplementation.

RESULTS

We observed a significant reduction in CD8αα + IELs, accompanied by a marked increase in CD8αβ + IELs in Lpr mice. Additionally, subsets of CD8 + IELs exhibiting significantly enhanced effector functions were found to be markedly enriched in Lpr mice. Intercellular communication patterns within intestinal epithelial immune and structural cells were found to be specifically altered in Lpr mice. Moreover, scRNA-seq revealed significantly decreased intestinal TCRγδ T cells (γδT) associated with reduced aryl-hydrocarbon receptor repressor (AHRR) expression and subsequent oxidative stress and ferroptosis in Lpr mice. Antioxidant selenium effectively reversed the loss of γδT in Lpr mice, improved the gut barrier, and alleviated lupus symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Our high-resolution single-cell atlas enhances the understanding of the immune and structural milieu of intestinal epithelium in lupus and provides new insights into lupus pathogenesis mediated by intestinal immune dysregulation.

The role of fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is one of the most important methods for treating a wide range of hematologic malignancies and bone marrow failure diseases. However, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a major complication associated with this method, can seriously affect the survival and quality of life of patients. Acute GVHD (aGVHD) occurs within 100 days after transplantation, and gastrointestinal aGVHD (GI-aGVHD) is one of the leading causes of nonrecurrent death after allo-HSCT. In recent years, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been attempted as an emerging treatment method for various diseases, including aGVHD after HSCT. Studies have shown encouraging preliminary clinical results after the application of FMT in aGVHD, particularly steroid-resistant aGVHD. Additionally, several studies have demonstrated that the gut microbiota plays an important immunomodulatory role in the pathogenesis of GVHD. Consensus guidelines recommend FMT as a secondary option for the treatment of aGVHD. This article aims to review FMT treatment for GI-aGVHD after allo-HSCT.

A systematic framework for understanding the microbiome in human health and disease: from basic principles to clinical translation

The human microbiome is a complex and dynamic system that plays important roles in human health and disease. However, there remain limitations and theoretical gaps in our current understanding of the intricate relationship between microbes and humans. In this narrative review, we integrate the knowledge and insights from various fields, including anatomy, physiology, immunology, histology, genetics, and evolution, to propose a systematic framework. It introduces key concepts such as the 'innate and adaptive genomes', which enhance genetic and evolutionary comprehension of the human genome. The 'germ-free syndrome' challenges the traditional 'microbes as pathogens' view, advocating for the necessity of microbes for health. The 'slave tissue' concept underscores the symbiotic intricacies between human tissues and their microbial counterparts, highlighting the dynamic health implications of microbial interactions. 'Acquired microbial immunity' positions the microbiome as an adjunct to human immune systems, providing a rationale for probiotic therapies and prudent antibiotic use. The 'homeostatic reprogramming hypothesis' integrates the microbiome into the internal environment theory, potentially explaining the change in homeostatic indicators post-industrialization. The 'cell-microbe co-ecology model' elucidates the symbiotic regulation affecting cellular balance, while the 'meta-host model' broadens the host definition to include symbiotic microbes. The 'health-illness conversion model' encapsulates the innate and adaptive genomes' interplay and dysbiosis patterns. The aim here is to provide a more focused and coherent understanding of microbiome and highlight future research avenues that could lead to a more effective and efficient healthcare system.

Systemic lupus erythematosus therapeutic strategy: From immunotherapy to gut microbiota modulation

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by a systemic dysfunction of the innate and adaptive immune systems, leading to an attack on healthy tissues of the body. During the development of SLE, pathogenic features, such as the formation of autoantibodies to self-nuclear antigens, caused tissue damage including necrosis and fibrosis, with an increased expression of type Ⅰ interferon (IFN) regulated genes. Treatment of lupus with immunosuppressants and glucocorticoids, which are used as the standard therapy, is not effective enough and causes side effects. As an alternative, more effective immunotherapies have been developed, including monoclonal and bispecific antibodies that target B cells, T cells, co-stimulatory molecules, cytokines or their receptors, and signaling molecules. Encouraging results have been observed in clinical trials with some of these therapies. Furthermore, a chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as the most effective, safe, and promising treatment option for SLE, as demonstrated by successful pilot studies. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests that gut microbiota dysbiosis may play a significant role in the severity of SLE, and the use of methods to normalize the gut microbiota, particularly fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), opens up new opportunities for effective treatment of SLE.

Microbiome dynamics in rheumatic diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rheumatic disease are characterized by their autoimmune nature, frequently affecting joints, bones, muscles, blood vessels, and connective tissues. The onset of these conditions typically unfolds gradually and subtly. It is noteworthy that individuals with rheumatic diseases often experience shifts in their microbiome, specifically on mucosal surfaces. The purpose of this review is to delve into the intricate interplay between the microbiome, encompassing bacteria, viruses and fungi, and its role in the development and aggravation of various rheumatic diseases. Additionally, it aims to offer insights into microbiome-centered therapeutic approaches for patients in the field of rheumatology.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advent of next-generation sequencing has significantly improved our understanding of microbiome changes. Numerous studies have consistently revealed a strong link between rheumatism and the microbiome, especially in the oral and gut microbiota.

SUMMARY

A deeper comprehension of the microbiome's connection to rheumatism holds potential for enhancing disease diagnosis and treatment. Targeted therapeutic approaches, including probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and combination therapies with medications, offer promising avenues for disease management.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Priorities 2023

OBJECTIVES

To identify research priorities in the management, epidemiology, outcome, and pathophysiology of sepsis and septic shock.

DESIGN

Shortly after publication of the most recent Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines, the Surviving Sepsis Research Committee, a multiprofessional group of 16 international experts representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Society of Critical Care Medicine, convened virtually and iteratively developed the article and recommendations, which represents an update from the 2018 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Priorities.

METHODS

Each task force member submitted five research questions on any sepsis-related subject. Committee members then independently ranked their top three priorities from the list generated. The highest rated clinical and basic science questions were developed into the current article.

RESULTS

A total of 81 questions were submitted. After merging similar questions, there were 34 clinical and ten basic science research questions submitted for voting. The five top clinical priorities were as follows: 1) what is the best strategy for screening and identification of patients with sepsis, and can predictive modeling assist in real-time recognition of sepsis? 2) what causes organ injury and dysfunction in sepsis, how should it be defined, and how can it be detected? 3) how should fluid resuscitation be individualized initially and beyond? 4) what is the best vasopressor approach for treating the different phases of septic shock? and 5) can a personalized/precision medicine approach identify optimal therapies to improve patient outcomes? The five top basic science priorities were as follows: 1) How can we improve animal models so that they more closely resemble sepsis in humans? 2) What outcome variables maximize correlations between human sepsis and animal models and are therefore most appropriate to use in both? 3) How does sepsis affect the brain, and how do sepsis-induced brain alterations contribute to organ dysfunction? How does sepsis affect interactions between neural, endocrine, and immune systems? 4) How does the microbiome affect sepsis pathobiology? 5) How do genetics and epigenetics influence the development of sepsis, the course of sepsis and the response to treatments for sepsis?

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge advances in multiple clinical domains have been incorporated in progressive iterations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, allowing for evidence-based recommendations for short- and long-term management of sepsis. However, the strength of existing evidence is modest with significant knowledge gaps and mortality from sepsis remains high. The priorities identified represent a roadmap for research in sepsis and septic shock.