The RNA-binding protein AUF1 facilitates Akt phosphorylation at the membrane

Synergistic RAS-MAPK and AKT Activation in MYC-Driven Tumors via Adjacent PVT1 Rearrangements

MYC-driven (MYC+) cancers are aggressive and often fatal. MYC dysregulation is a key event in these cancers, but overexpression of MYC alone is not always enough to cause cancer. Plasmocytoma Variant Translocation 1 (PVT1), a long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) adjacent to MYC on chromosome 8 is a rearrangement hotspot in many MYC+ cancers. In addition to being co-amplified with MYC, the genomic rearrangement at PVT1 involves translocation, which has had obscure functional consequences. We report that translocation at the PVT1 locus cause asymmetric enrichment of 5'-PVT1 and loss of 3'-PVT1. Despite being classified as a non-coding RNA, the retained 5' region of PVT1 generates a circular RNA (CircPVT1) that codes for the novel peptide we call Firefox (FFX). FFX augments AKT signaling and synergistically activates MYC and mTORC1 in these cells. Further, the 3' end of PVT1, which is lost during the translocation, codes for a tumor-suppressing micropeptide we named as Honeybadger (HNB). We demonstrate that HNB interacts with KRAS and disrupts the activation of KRAS effectors. Loss of HNB leads to activation of RAS/MAPK signaling pathway, and enhances MYC stability by promoting phosphorylation of MYC at Ser62. These findings identify PVT1 as a critical node that synchronizes MYC, AKT, and RAS-MAPK activities in cancer. Our study thus identifies a key mechanism by which rearrangements at the PVT1 locus activate additional oncogenic pathways that synergize with MYC to exacerbate the aggressiveness of MYC+ cancers. This newfound understanding explains the poor prognosis associated with MYC+ cancers and offers potential therapeutic targets that could be leveraged in treatment strategies for these cancers.

Regulation of HNRNP family by post-translational modifications in cancer

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (HNRNPs) represent a large family of RNA-binding proteins consisting of more than 20 members and have attracted great attention with their distinctive roles in cancer progression by regulating RNA splicing, transcription, and translation. Nevertheless, the cancer-specific modulation of HNRNPs has not been fully elucidated. The research of LC-MS/MS technology has documented that HNRNPs were widely and significantly targeted by different post-translational modifications (PTMs), which have emerged as core regulators in shaping protein functions and are involved in multiple physiological processes. Accumulating studies have highlighted that several PTMs are involved in the mechanisms of HNRNPs regulation in cancer and may be suitable therapeutic targets. In this review, we summarize the existing evidence describing how PTMs modulate HNRNPs functions on gene regulation and the involvement of their dysregulation in cancer, which will help shed insights on their clinical impacts as well as possible therapeutic tools targeting PTMs on HNRNPs.

RNA-binding proteins that preferentially interact with 8-oxoG-modified RNAs: our current understanding

Cells encounter a variety of stresses throughout their lifetimes. Oxidative stress can occur via a myriad of factors, including exposure to chemical toxins or UV light. Importantly, these stressors induce chemical changes (e.g. chemical modifications) to biomolecules, such as RNA. Commonly, guanine is oxidized to form 8-oxo-7,8-hydroxyguanine (8-oxoG) and this modification can disrupt a plethora of cellular processes including messenger RNA translation and stability. Polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D (HNRPD/Auf1), poly(C)-binding protein (PCBP1/HNRNP E1), and Y-box binding protein 1 (YB-1) have been identified as four RNA-binding proteins that preferentially bind 8-oxoG-modified RNA over unmodified RNA. All four proteins are native to humans and PNPase is additionally found in bacteria. Additionally, under oxidative stress, cell survival declines in mutants that lack PNPase, Auf1, or PCBP1, suggesting they are critical to the oxidative stress response. This mini-review captures the current understanding of the PNPase, HNRPD/Auf1, PCBP1, and YB-1 proteins and the mechanism that has been outlined so far by which they recognize and interact with 8-oxoG-modified RNAs.

Enterovirus evolution reveals the mechanism of an RNA-targeted antiviral and determinants of viral replication

Selective pressures on viruses provide opportunities to establish target site specificity and mechanisms of antivirals. Enterovirus (EV)-A71 with resistant mutations in the stem loop (SL) II internal ribosome entry site (IRES) (SLIIresist) were selected at low doses of the antiviral dimethylamiloride (DMA)-135. The EV-A71 mutants were resistant to DMA-135 at concentrations that inhibit replication of wild-type virus. EV-A71 IRES structures harboring resistant mutations induced efficient expression of Luciferase messenger RNA in the presence of noncytotoxic doses of DMA-135. Nuclear magnetic resonance indicates that the mutations change the structure of SLII at the binding site of DMA-135 and at the surface recognized by the host protein AU-rich element/poly(U)-binding/degradation factor 1 (AUF1). Biophysical studies of complexes formed between AUF1, DMA-135, and either SLII or SLIIresist show that DMA-135 stabilizes a ternary complex with AUF1-SLII but not AUF1-SLIIresist. This work demonstrates how viral evolution elucidates the (DMA-135)-RNA binding site specificity in cells and provides insights into the viral pathways inhibited by the antiviral.

The mTORC2 signaling network: targets and cross-talks

The mechanistic target of rapamycin, mTOR, controls cell metabolism in response to growth signals and stress stimuli. The cellular functions of mTOR are mediated by two distinct protein complexes, mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTORC2. Rapamycin and its analogs are currently used in the clinic to treat a variety of diseases and have been instrumental in delineating the functions of its direct target, mTORC1. Despite the lack of a specific mTORC2 inhibitor, genetic studies that disrupt mTORC2 expression unravel the functions of this more elusive mTOR complex. Like mTORC1 which responds to growth signals, mTORC2 is also activated by anabolic signals but is additionally triggered by stress. mTORC2 mediates signals from growth factor receptors and G-protein coupled receptors. How stress conditions such as nutrient limitation modulate mTORC2 activation to allow metabolic reprogramming and ensure cell survival remains poorly understood. A variety of downstream effectors of mTORC2 have been identified but the most well-characterized mTORC2 substrates include Akt, PKC, and SGK, which are members of the AGC protein kinase family. Here, we review how mTORC2 is regulated by cellular stimuli including how compartmentalization and modulation of complex components affect mTORC2 signaling. We elaborate on how phosphorylation of its substrates, particularly the AGC kinases, mediates its diverse functions in growth, proliferation, survival, and differentiation. We discuss other signaling and metabolic components that cross-talk with mTORC2 and the cellular output of these signals. Lastly, we consider how to more effectively target the mTORC2 pathway to treat diseases that have deregulated mTOR signaling.

The Hexosamine Biosynthesis Pathway: Regulation and Function

The hexosamine biosynthesis pathway (HBP) produces uridine diphosphate-N-acetyl glucosamine, UDP-GlcNAc, which is a key metabolite that is used for N- or O-linked glycosylation, a co- or post-translational modification, respectively, that modulates protein activity and expression. The production of hexosamines can occur via de novo or salvage mechanisms that are catalyzed by metabolic enzymes. Nutrients including glutamine, glucose, acetyl-CoA, and UTP are utilized by the HBP. Together with availability of these nutrients, signaling molecules that respond to environmental signals, such as mTOR, AMPK, and stress-regulated transcription factors, modulate the HBP. This review discusses the regulation of GFAT, the key enzyme of the de novo HBP, as well as other metabolic enzymes that catalyze the reactions to produce UDP-GlcNAc. We also examine the contribution of the salvage mechanisms in the HBP and how dietary supplementation of the salvage metabolites glucosamine and N-acetylglucosamine could reprogram metabolism and have therapeutic potential. We elaborate on how UDP-GlcNAc is utilized for N-glycosylation of membrane and secretory proteins and how the HBP is reprogrammed during nutrient fluctuations to maintain proteostasis. We also consider how O-GlcNAcylation is coupled to nutrient availability and how this modification modulates cell signaling. We summarize how deregulation of protein N-glycosylation and O-GlcNAcylation can lead to diseases including cancer, diabetes, immunodeficiencies, and congenital disorders of glycosylation. We review the current pharmacological strategies to inhibit GFAT and other enzymes involved in the HBP or glycosylation and how engineered prodrugs could have better therapeutic efficacy for the treatment of diseases related to HBP deregulation.