The disordered C terminus of ALKBH5 promotes phase separation and paraspeckles assembly

Unveiling the intricacies of paraspeckle formation and function

Paraspeckle nuclear bodies form when the NEAT1 long noncoding RNA is transcribed and bound by multiple RNA-binding proteins. First described 20 years ago, in recent years a growing appreciation of paraspeckle dynamics has led to new understandings, in both structure and function. Structurally, paraspeckles form via distinct physico-chemical domains arising from the composition of key proteins, recruited to different parts of NEAT1. These domains interact, creating a core-shell structured paraspeckle via microphase separation. Functionally, many environmental, chemical, and mechanical triggers can alter paraspeckle abundance, with important consequences depending on the cell type, developmental stage, and trigger identity. Underpinning these insights are new tools for paraspeckle research, including screening assays, proximity-based identification tools, and RNA processing modulators. A picture is emerging of paraspeckles as gene regulatory condensates in many healthy and disease settings. Critically, however, paraspeckle functional importance is generally most apparent when cells and organisms face external stressors.

Unveiling the veil of RNA binding protein phase separation in cancer biology and therapy

RNA-binding protein (RBP) phase separation in oncology reveals a complex interplay crucial for understanding tumor biology and developing novel therapeutic strategies. Aberrant phase separation of RBPs significantly influences gene regulation, signal transduction, and metabolic reprogramming, contributing to tumorigenesis and drug resistance. Our review highlights the integral roles of RBP phase separation in stress granule dynamics, mRNA stabilization, and the modulation of transcriptional and translational processes. Furthermore, interactions between RBPs and non-coding RNAs add a layer of complexity, providing new insights into their collaborative roles in cancer progression. The intricate relationship between RBPs and phase separation poses significant challenges but also opens up novel opportunities for targeted therapeutic interventions. Advancing our understanding of the molecular mechanisms and regulatory networks governing RBP phase separation could lead to breakthroughs in cancer treatment strategies.

The role of phase separation in RNA modification: both cause and effect

Phase separation is a critical mechanism for partitioning cellular functions by specific aggregation of biological macromolecules. Recent studies have found that phase separation is widely contributed in various biological functions, particularly in RNA related processes. Over 170 different post-transcriptional modifications occur in RNA, which is considered to be one of the most important physiological and pathogenic epigenetic mechanisms. Here, we discuss the role of phase separation in regulating RNA modification processing to ensure orderly RNA metabolism and function. Enzymes responsible for RNA modification undergo compartmentalization, enabling them to traffic client RNAs and amplify modifying efficacy. Meanwhile, altered RNA affects the formation, dissolution, and biophysical properties of phase separation conversely. These findings deeper our understanding of the interplay between phase separation and RNAs that governs a wide range of cellular processes. Finally, we concluded pathological roles of phase separation in RNA modification towards clinical applications and outlined perspectives to research RNA modification through the lens of phase separation.

The role of m6A-associated membraneless organelles in the RNA metabolism processes and human diseases

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant post-transcriptional dynamic RNA modification process in eukaryotes, extensively implicated in cellular growth, embryonic development and immune homeostasis. One of the most profound biological functions of m6A is to regulate RNA metabolism, thereby determining the fate of RNA. Notably, the regulation of m6A-mediated organized RNA metabolism critically relies on the assembly of membraneless organelles (MLOs) in both the nucleus and cytoplasm, such as nuclear speckles, stress granules and processing bodies. In addition, m6A-associated MLOs exert a pivotal role in governing diverse RNA metabolic processes encompassing transcription, splicing, transport, decay and translation. However, emerging evidence suggests that dysregulated m6A levels contribute to the formation of pathological condensates in a range of human diseases, including tumorigenesis, reproductive diseases, neurological diseases and respiratory diseases. To date, the molecular mechanism by which m6A regulates the aggregation of biomolecular condensates associated with RNA metabolism is unclear. In this review, we comprehensively summarize the updated biochemical processes of m6A-associated MLOs, particularly focusing on their impact on RNA metabolism and their pivotal role in disease development and related biological mechanisms. Furthermore, we propose that m6A-associated MLOs could serve as predictive markers for disease progression and potential drug targets in the future.

Liquid-liquid phase separation in subcellular assemblages and signaling pathways: Chromatin modifications induced gene regulation for cellular physiology and functions including carcinogenesis

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) describes many biochemical processes, including hydrogel formation, in the integrity of macromolecular assemblages and existence of membraneless organelles, including ribosome, nucleolus, nuclear speckles, paraspeckles, promyelocytic leukemia (PML) bodies, Cajal bodies (all exert crucial roles in cellular physiology), and evidence are emerging day by day. Also, phase separation is well documented in generation of plasma membrane subdomains and interplay between membranous and membraneless organelles. Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) of biopolymers/proteins are the most critical sticking regions that aggravate the formation of such condensates. Remarkably, phase separated condensates are also involved in epigenetic regulation of gene expression, chromatin remodeling, and heterochromatinization. Epigenetic marks on DNA and histones cooperate with RNA-binding proteins through their IDRs to trigger LLPS for facilitating transcription. How phase separation coalesces mutant oncoproteins, orchestrate tumor suppressor genes expression, and facilitated cancer-associated signaling pathways are unravelling. That autophagosome formation and DYRK3-mediated cancer stem cell modification also depend on phase separation is deciphered in part. In view of this, and to linchpin insight into the subcellular membraneless organelle assembly, gene activation and biological reactions catalyzed by enzymes, and the downstream physiological functions, and how all these events are precisely facilitated by LLPS inducing organelle function, epigenetic modulation of gene expression in this scenario, and how it goes awry in cancer progression are summarized and presented in this article.

Liquid-liquid phase separation in diseases

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), an emerging biophysical phenomenon, can sequester molecules to implement physiological and pathological functions. LLPS implements the assembly of numerous membraneless chambers, including stress granules and P-bodies, containing RNA and protein. RNA-RNA and RNA-protein interactions play a critical role in LLPS. Scaffolding proteins, through multivalent interactions and external factors, support protein-RNA interaction networks to form condensates involved in a variety of diseases, particularly neurodegenerative diseases and cancer. Modulating LLPS phenomenon in multiple pathogenic proteins for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases and cancer could present a promising direction, though recent advances in this area are limited. Here, we summarize in detail the complexity of LLPS in constructing signaling pathways and highlight the role of LLPS in neurodegenerative diseases and cancers. We also explore RNA modifications on LLPS to alter diseases progression because these modifications can influence LLPS of certain proteins or the formation of stress granules, and discuss the possibility of proper manipulation of LLPS process to restore cellular homeostasis or develop therapeutic drugs for the eradication of diseases. This review attempts to discuss potential therapeutic opportunities by elaborating on the connection between LLPS, RNA modification, and their roles in diseases.

A LATS2 and ALKBH5 positive feedback loop supports their oncogenic roles

N(6)-methyladenosine (m6A) critically regulates RNA dynamics in various biological processes. The m6A demethylase ALKBH5 promotes tumorigenesis of glioblastoma, while the intricate web that orchestrates its regulation remains enigmatic. Here, we discover that cell density affects ALKBH5 subcellular localization and m6A dynamics. Mechanistically, ALKBH5 is phosphorylated by the large tumor suppressor kinase 2 (LATS2), preventing its nuclear export and enhancing protein stability. Furthermore, phosphorylated ALKBH5 reciprocally erases m6A from LATS2 mRNA, thereby stabilizing this transcript. Unexpectedly, LATS2 depletion suppresses glioblastoma stem cell self-renewal independent of yes-associated protein activation. Additionally, deficiency in either LATS2 or ALKBH5 phosphorylation impedes tumor progression in mouse xenograft models. Moreover, high levels of LATS2 expression and ALKBH5 phosphorylation are associated with tumor malignancy in patients with gliomas. Collectively, our study unveils an oncogenic positive feedback loop between LATS2 and ALKBH5, revealing a non-canonical branch of the Hippo pathway for RNA processing and suggesting potential anti-cancer interventions.