1
|
Fewster KM, Gallagher KM, Callaghan JP. Prolonged Standing-Induced Low Back Pain Is Linked to Extended Lumbar Spine Postures: A Study Linking Lumped Lumbar Spine Passive Stiffness to Standing Posture. J Appl Biomech 2024; 40:201-208. [PMID: 38467122 DOI: 10.1123/jab.2023-0039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
Postural assessments of the lumbar spine lack valuable information about its properties. The purpose of this study was to assess neutral zone (NZ) characteristics via in vivo lumbar spine passive stiffness and relate NZ characteristics to standing lumbar lordosis. A comparison was made between those that develop low back pain during prolonged standing (pain developers) and those that do not (nonpain developers). Twenty-two participants with known pain status stood on level ground, and median lumbar lordosis angle was calculated. Participants were then placed in a near-frictionless jig to characterize their passive stiffness curve and location of their NZ. Overall, both pain developers and nonpain developers stood with a lumbar lordosis angle that was more extended than their NZ boundary. Pain developers stood slightly more extended (in comparison to nonpain developers) and had a lower moment corresponding to the location of their extension NZ boundary. Overall, in comparison to nonpain developers, pain developers displayed a lower moment corresponding to the location of their extension NZ boundary which could correspond to greater laxity in the lumbar spine. This may indicate why pain developers have a tendency to stand further beyond their NZ with greater muscle co-contraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayla M Fewster
- Department of Kinesiology & Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
- School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kaitlin M Gallagher
- Department of Kinesiology & Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
- Department of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
| | - Jack P Callaghan
- Department of Kinesiology & Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liang Z, Mo F, Zheng Z, Li Y, Tian Y, Jiang X, Liu T. Quantitative cervical spine injury responses in whiplash loading with a numerical method of natural neural reflex consideration. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2022; 219:106761. [PMID: 35344767 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Neural reflex is hypothesized as a regulating step in spine stabilizing system. However, neural reflex control is still in its infancy to consider in the previous finite element analysis of head-neck system for various applications. The purpose of this study is to investigate the influences of neural reflex control on neck biomechanical responses, then provide a new way to achieve an accurate biomechanical analysis for head-neck system with a finite element model. METHODS A new FE head-neck model with detailed active muscles and spinal cord modeling was established and globally validated at multi-levels. Then, it was coupled with our previously developed neuromuscular head-neck model to analyze the effects of vestibular and proprioceptive reflexes on biomechanical responses of head-neck system in a typical spinal injury loading condition (whiplash). The obtained effects were further analyzed by comparing a review of epidemiologic data on cervical spine injury situations. RESULT The results showed that the active model (AM) with neural reflex control obviously presented both rational head-neck kinematics and tissue injury risk referring to the previous experimental and epidemiologic studies, when compared with the passive model (PM) without it. Tissue load concentration locations as well as stress/strain levels were both changed due to the muscle activation forces caused by neural reflex control during the whole loading process. For the bony structures, the AM showed a peak stress level accounting for only about 25% of the PM. For the discs, the stress concentrated location was transferred from C2-C6 in the PM to C4-C6 in the AM. For the spinal cord, the strain concentrated locations were transferred from C1 segment to around C4 segment when the effects of neural reflex control were implemented, while the gray matter and white matter peak strains were reduced to 1/3 and 1/2 of the PM, respectively. All these were well correlated with epidemiological studies on clinical cervical spine injuries. CONCLUSION In summary, the present work demonstrated necessity of considering neural reflex in FE analysis of a head-neck system as well as our model biofidelity. Overall results also verified the previous hypothesis and further quantitatively indicated that the muscle activation caused by neural reflex is providing a protection for the neck in impact loading by decreasing the strain level and changing the possible injury to lower spinal cord level to reduce injury severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyang Liang
- College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China; Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China
| | - Fuhao Mo
- College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China.
| | - Zhefen Zheng
- College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China
| | - Yuandong Li
- College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China
| | - Ye Tian
- College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China
| | - Xiaobing Jiang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Guangzhou University of Chinese medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510405, China
| | - Tang Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fewster KM, Barrett JM, Callaghan JP. The Influence of Simulated Low Speed Vehicle Impacts and Posture on Passive Intervertebral Mechanics. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:E362-E369. [PMID: 34431835 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN An in vitro biomechanics investigation exposing porcine functional spinal units (FSUs) to sudden impact loading although in a flexed, neutral, or extended posture. OBJECTIVE To investigate the combined effect of impact severity and postural deviation on intervertebral joint mechanics. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA To date, no in vitro studies have been conducted to explore lumbar tissue injury potential and altered mechanical properties from exposure to impact forces. Typically, after a motor vehicle collision, the cause of a reported acute onset of low back pain is difficult to identify, with potential soft tissue strain injury sites including the intervertebral disc, facet joint and highly innervated facet joint capsule ligament. METHODS Seventy-two porcine functional spinal units (36 C34, 36 C56), consisting of 2 adjacent vertebrae, ligaments, and the intervening intervertebral disc were included in the study. Each specimen was randomized to 1 of 3 experimental posture conditions (neutral, flexed, or extended) and assigned to 1 of 3 impact severities representing motor vehicle accident accelerations (4 g, 8 g, and 11 g). Before impact (pre) and after impact (post) flexion-extension and anterior-posterior shear neutral zone testing was completed. RESULTS A significant two-way interaction was observed between pre-post and impact severity for flexion-extension neutral zone length and stiffness and anterior-posterior shear neutral zone length and stiffness. This was a result of increasedneutral zone range and decreased neutral zone stiffness pre-post for the highest impact severity (11 g), regardless of posture. CONCLUSION Functional spinal units exposed to the highest severity impact (11 g) had significant neutral zone changes, with increases in joint laxity in flexion-extension and anterior-posterior shear and decreased stiffness, suggesting that soft tissue injury may have occurred. Despite observed main effects of impact severity, no influence of posture was observed.Level of Evidence: N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayla M Fewster
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fewster KM, Barrett JM, Callaghan JP. Passive stiffness changes in the lumbar spine following simulated automotive low speed rear-end collisions. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2021; 90:105507. [PMID: 34653878 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Historically, there has been a lack of focus on the lumbar spine during rear impacts because of the perception that the automotive seat back should protect the lumbar spine from injury. As a result, there have been no studies involving human volunteers to address the risk of low back injury in low velocity rear impact collisions. METHODS A custom-built crash sled was used to simulate rear impact collisions. Randomized collisions were completed with and without lumbar support. Measures of passive stiffness were obtained prior to impact (Pre), immediately post impact (Post) and 24 h post impact (Post-24). Low back pain reporting was monitored for 24 h following impact exposure. FINDINGS None of the participants developed clinically significant levels of low back pain after impact. Changes in the passive responses persisted after impact for the length of the low stiffness flexion and extension zone. The length of the low stiffness zone was longer in the Post and Post-24 trial for low stiffness flexion and longer in the Post-24 for low stiffness extension. INTERPRETATION Findings from this investigation demonstrate that during a laboratory-simulation of an 8 km/h rear-impact collision, young healthy adults did not develop low back pain. Changes in the low stiffness zone of the passive flexion/extension curves were observed following impact and persisted for 24 h. Changes in passive stiffness may lead to changes in the loads and load distributions during movement within the passive structures such as the ligaments and intervertebral discs following impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayla M Fewster
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Jeff M Barrett
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Jack P Callaghan
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Corrales MA, Cronin DS. Importance of the cervical capsular joint cartilage geometry on head and facet joint kinematics assessed in a Finite element neck model. J Biomech 2021; 123:110528. [PMID: 34082236 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Finite element human neck models (NMs) aim to predict neck response and injury at the tissue level; however, contemporary models are most often assessed using global response such as head kinematics. Additionally, many NMs are developed from subject-specific imaging with limited soft tissue resolution in small structures such as the facet joints in the neck. Such details may be critical to enable NMs to predict tissue-level response. In the present study, the capsular joint cartilage (CJC) geometry in a contemporary NM was enhanced (M50-CJC) based on literature data. The M50-CJC was validated at the segment and full neck levels and assessed using relative facet joint kinematics (FJK), capsular ligament (CL) and intervertebral disc (IVD) strains, a relative vertebral rotation assessment (IV-NIC) and head kinematics in frontal and rear impact. The validation ratings at the segment level increased from 0.60 to 0.64, with improvements for modes of deformation associated with the facet joints, while no difference was noted at the head kinematic level. The improved CJC led to increased FJK rotation (188%) and IVD strain (152.2%,) attributed to the reduced facet joint gap. Further enhancements of the capsular joint representation or a link between the FJK and CL injury risk are recommended. Enhancements at the tissue level demonstrated a large effect on the IVD strain, but were not apparent in global metrics such as head kinematics. This study demonstrated that a biofidelic and detailed geometrical representation of the CJC contributes significantly to the predicted joint response, which is critical to investigate neck injury risk at the tissue level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Corrales
- Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Canada
| | - D S Cronin
- Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fewster KM, Zehr JD, Barrett JM, Laing AC, Callaghan JP. Exploring the influence of impact severity and posture on vertebral joint mechanics in an in-vitro porcine model. J Biomech 2021; 122:110479. [PMID: 33964574 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
To date, no in vitro studies have been conducted to explore lumbar soft tissue injury potential and altered mechanical properties from exposure to impact forces. After a motor vehicle collision (MVC), the cause of reported acute onset low back pain is difficult to associate with potential soft tissue strain injury sites including the facet joint and innervated facet joint capsule ligament (FJC). Thus, the purpose of this investigation was to quantify intervertebral anterior-posterior (AP) translation and facet joint capsule strain under varying postures and impact severities. Seventy-two porcine spinal units were exposed to three levels of impact severity (4 g, 8 g, 11 g), and posture (Neutral, Flexion, Extension). Impacts were applied using a custom-built impact track that replicated parameters experienced in low to moderate speed rear-end MVCs. Flexion-extension and anterior-posterior shear neutral zone testing were completed prior to impact. AP intervertebral translation and the strain tensor of the facet capsule ligament were measured during impacts. A significant main effect of collision severity was observed for peak AP intervertebral translation (4 g-2.8 ±0.53 mm; 8 g-6.4 ±2.9 mm; 11 g-8.3 ±0.45 mm) and peak FJC shear strain (2.37% strain change from 4 g to 11 g impact severity). Despite observed main effects of impact severity, no influence of posture was observed. This lack of influence of posture and small FJC strain magnitudes suggest that the FJC does not appear to undergo injurious or permanent mechanical changes in response to low-to-moderate MVC impact scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayla M Fewster
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Jackie D Zehr
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Jeff M Barrett
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew C Laing
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Jack P Callaghan
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barker JB, Cronin DS, Chandrashekar N. High Rotation Rate Behavior of Cervical Spine Segments in Flexion and Extension. J Biomech Eng 2014; 136:121004. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4028107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2014] [Accepted: 07/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Numerical finite element (FE) models of the neck have been developed to simulate occupant response and predict injury during motor vehicle collisions. However, there is a paucity of data on the response of young cervical spine segments under dynamic loading in flexion and extension, which is essential for the development or validation of tissue-level FE models. This limitation was identified during the development and validation of the FE model used in this study. The purpose of this study was to measure the high rotation rate loading response of human cervical spine segments in flexion and extension, and to investigate a new tissue-level FE model of the cervical spine with the experimental data to address a limitation in available data. Four test samples at each segment level from C2–C3 to C7–T1 were dissected from eight donors and were tested to 10 deg of rotation at 1 and 500 deg/s in flexion and extension using a custom built test apparatus. There was strong evidence (p < 0.05) of increased stiffness at the higher rotation rate above 4 deg of rotation in flexion and at 8 deg and 10 deg of rotation in extension. Cross-correlation software, Cora, was used to evaluate the fit between the experimental data and model predictions. The average rating was 0.771, which is considered to demonstrate a good correlation to the experimental data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey B. Barker
- Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada e-mail:
| | - Duane S. Cronin
- Professor Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Naveen Chandrashekar
- Associate Professor Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kang YS, Moorhouse K, Herriott R, Bolte JH. Comparison of cervical vertebrae rotations for PMHS and BioRID II in rear impacts. TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION 2013; 14 Suppl:S136-S147. [PMID: 23905990 DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2013.799280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objectives of this study are to propose a new instrumentation technique for measuring cervical spine kinematics, validate it, and apply the instrumentation technique to postmortem human subjects (PMHS) in rear impact sled tests so that cervical motions can be investigated. METHODS First, a new instrumentation and dissection technique is proposed in which instrumentation (3 accelerometers, 3 angular rate sensors) capable of measuring the detailed intervertebral kinematics are installed on the anterior aspects of each vertebral body with minimal muscular damage. The instrumentation was validated by conducting 10 km/h rear impact tests with 2 PMHS in a rigid rolling chair. After this validation, a total of 14 sled tests using 8 male PMHS (175 ± 6.9 cm stature and 78.4 ± 7.7 kg weight) were conducted in 2 moderate-speed rear impacts (8.5 g, 17 km/h; 10.5 g, 24 km/h). A current rear impact dummy, BioRID II, was also tested under the same condition with an angular rate sensor installed on each of the cervical vertebrae so that rotations of the cervical spine of the BioRID II could be compared to those measured from the PMHS. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) biofidelity ranking system was used for quantitative analysis of the BioRID II cervical spine biofidelity. RESULTS Results show that the BioRID II exhibited comparable rotations to the PMHS in the 17 km/h test, but the vertebrae in the lower cervical spine (C5-C7) of the BioRID II showed less rearward rotation than the PMHS. For the 24 km/h test, the vertebrae in the cervical spine of the BioRID II exhibited less rearward rotation than the PMHS at all levels (C2-C7). The average biofidelity score for C2 through C7 was 1.02 for the 17 km/h test, and 2.27 for the 24 km/h test. CONCLUSIONS These results reflect the fact that the fully articulated spine of the BioRID II was designed and tuned to model low speed rear impacts. The intervertebral rotations for both the PMHS and the BioRID II were primarily relative flexion rotations even though the cervical vertebrae rotated rearward with respect to the global coordinate system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun-Seok Kang
- Injury Biomechanics Research Laboratory, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pan CS, Powers JR, Hartsell JJ, Harris JR, Wimer BM, Dong RG, Wu JZ. Assessment of fall-arrest systems for scissor lift operators: computer modeling and manikin drop testing. HUMAN FACTORS 2012; 54:358-372. [PMID: 22768639 DOI: 10.1177/0018720811425024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The current study is intended to evaluate the stability of a scissor lift and the performance of various fall-arrest harnesses/lanyards during drop/fall-arrest conditions and to quantify the dynamic loading to the head/ neck caused by fall-arrest forces. BACKGROUND No data exist that establish the efficacy of fall-arrest systems for use on scissor lifts or the injury potential from the fall incidents using a fall-arrest system. METHOD The authors developed a multibody dynamic model of the scissor lift and a human lift operator model using ADAMS and LifeMOD Biomechanics Human Modeler. They evaluated lift stability for four fall-arrest system products and quantified biomechanical impacts on operators during drop/fall arrest, using manikin drop tests. Test conditions were constrained to flat surfaces to isolate the effect of manikin-lanyard interaction. RESULTS The fully extended scissor lift maintained structural and dynamic stability for all manikin drop test conditions. The maximum arrest forces from the harnesses/lanyards were all within the limits of ANSI Z359.1. The dynamic loading in the lower neck during the fall impact reached a level that is typically observed in automobile crash tests, indicating a potential injury risk for vulnerable participants. CONCLUSION Fall-arrest systems may function as an effective mechanism for fall injury protection for operators of scissor lifts. However, operators may be subjected to significant biomechanical loadings on the lower neck during fall impact. APPLICATION Results suggest that scissor lifts retain stability under test conditions approximating human falls from predefined distances but injury could occur to vulnerable body structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher S Pan
- Division of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
A three-dimensional finite element model of the cervical spine: an investigation of whiplash injury. Med Biol Eng Comput 2010; 49:193-201. [PMID: 21082273 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-010-0708-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2010] [Accepted: 10/21/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Very few finite element models of the cervical spine have been developed to investigate internal stress on the soft tissues under whiplash loading situation. In the present work, an approach was used to generate a finite element model of the head (C0), the vertebrae (C1-T1) and their soft tissues. The global acceleration and displacement, the neck injury criterion (NIC), segmental angulations and stress of soft tissues from the model were investigated and compared with published data under whiplash loading. The calculated acceleration and displacement agreed well with the volunteer experimental data. The peak NIC was lower than the proposed threshold. The cervical S- and C-shaped curves were predicted based on the rotational angles. The highest segmental angle and maximum stress of discs mainly occurred at C7-T1. Greater stress was located in the anterior and posterior regions of the discs. For the ligaments, peak stress was at anterior longitudinal ligaments. Each level of soft tissues experienced the greatest stress at the time of cervical S- and C-shaped curves. The cervical spine was likely at risk of hyperextension injuries during whiplash loading. The model included more anatomical details compared to previous studies and provided an understanding of whiplash injuries.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ivancic PC, Sha D. Comparison of the whiplash injury criteria. ACCIDENT; ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION 2010; 42:56-63. [PMID: 19887145 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2009] [Revised: 06/16/2009] [Accepted: 07/06/2009] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Whiplash injury criteria are based upon the hypothesis that neck injuries are caused by excessive loads, displacements, or head/T1 relative acceleration and velocity. The objectives of this study were to evaluate and compare the whiplash injury criteria (IV-NIC, NIC, Nkm, Nij, and NDC) during simulated rear impacts of a new Human Model of the Neck (HUMON) with and without an active head restraint (AHR). HUMON consisted of a neck specimen mounted to the torso of BioRID II and carrying an anthropometric head stabilized with muscle force replication. HUMON was seated and secured in a Kia Sedona seat with AHR on a sled. Rear impacts (7.1 and 11.1g) were simulated with the AHR in five different positions followed by an impact with no HR. Statistical differences (P < 0.05) were determined in the peak NIC and NDC due to the AHR, as compared to no HR, and in the peak IV-NIC relative to physiologic limits. Linear regression analyses identified correlation between IV-NIC and NIC, Nkm, Nij, and NDC (R(2) > or = 0.35 and P < 0.001). The AHR caused significant decreases in peak NIC and NDC as compared to no HR. The IV-NIC identified significantly increased motion above the physiologic limit at the middle and lower cervical spine with and without the AHR. Correlation was observed between IV-NIC and NIC, Nkm, Nij, and NDC. Extrapolation using the present correlations and the IV-NIC injury thresholds suggests neck injuries may occur at peak NIC of 14.4m(2)/s(2), Nkm of 0.33, or Nij of 0.09. Nonphysiologic spinal rotation at one or more spinal levels may occur even if head/T1 motions are small.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul C Ivancic
- Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, P.O. Box 208071, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rocha R, Sawa AGU, Baek S, Safavi-Abbasi S, Hattendorf F, Sonntag VKH, Crawford NR. Atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation with ligamentous disruption: a biomechanical comparison of current fusion methods. Neurosurgery 2009; 64:ons137-43; discussion ons143-4. [PMID: 19240563 DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000335778.31497.5b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We evaluated the biomechanical effects of 4 instrumented configurations after induced atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation: transarticular screw fixation (T/A) and polyaxial C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw and rod fixation (LC1-PC2) for atlantoaxial arthrodesis with unilateral and bilateral instrumentation. METHODS Three-dimensional intervertebral motion was tracked stereophotogrammetrically while 14 human cadaveric spine specimens underwent nonconstraining pure moment loading. Nondestructive loads were applied quasi-statistically in 0.25-Nm increments to a maximum load of 1.5 Nm during flexion-extension, right and left axial rotation, and right and left lateral bending. Hyperrotation injuries were created using torsional loads applied during left axial rotation until visible failure occurred. RESULTS In the normal condition, the values for angular range of motion, lax zone (zone of ligamentous laxity), and stiff zone (zone of ligamentous stretching) were similar in both groups in all directions of loading, with no significant differences (P > 0.05) between groups at C0-C1 or C1-C2. Both instrumentation systems (bilateral configurations) substantially stabilized angular motion at C1-C2 (P < 0.05) during all loading modes for the T/A group, and during all but right lateral bending (P = 0.072) for the LC1-PC2 group. The mean failure load for both intact and instrumented specimens was slightly greater, but not significant for the LC1-PC2 group compared with the T/A group (P > 0.14). CONCLUSION Both methods fixated atlantoaxial subluxation equally well. Compared with unilateral instrumentation, a bilateral configuration with the LC1-PC2 technique significantly increased stability during extension (P < 0.05). During axial rotation, bilateral T/A screws significantly increased stability compared with unilateral fixation (P < 0.02).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rogério Rocha
- Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the risks of mild traumatic brain injury and neck injury associated with head banging, a popular dance form accompanying heavy metal music. DESIGN Observational studies, focus group, and biomechanical analysis. PARTICIPANTS Head bangers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Head Injury Criterion and Neck Injury Criterion were derived for head banging styles and both popular heavy metal songs and easy listening music controls. RESULTS An average head banging song has a tempo of about 146 beats per minute, which is predicted to cause mild head injury when the range of motion is greater than 75 degrees . At higher tempos and greater ranges of motion there is a risk of neck injury. CONCLUSION To minimise the risk of head and neck injury, head bangers should decrease their range of head and neck motion, head bang to slower tempo songs by replacing heavy metal with adult oriented rock, only head bang to every second beat, or use personal protective equipment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Declan Patton
- School of Risk and Safety Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia 2052
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang QH, Tan SH, Teo EC. Finite element analysis of head-neck kinematics under simulated rear impact at different accelerations. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2008; 222:781-90. [PMID: 18756695 DOI: 10.1243/09544119jeim209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The information on the variation of ligament strains over time after rear impact has been seldom investigated. In the current study, a detailed three-dimensional C0-C7 finite element model of the whole head-neck complex developed previously was modified to include T1 vertebra. Rear impact of half sine-pulses with peak values of 3.5g, 5g, 6.5g and 8g respectively were applied to the inferior surface of the T1 vertebral body to validate the simulated variations of the intervertebral segmental rotations and to investigate the ligament tensions of the cervical spine under different levels of accelerations. The simulated kinematics of the head-neck complex showed relatively good agreement with the experimental data with most of the predicted peak values falling within one standard deviation of the experimental data. Under rear impact, the whole C0-T1 structure formed an S-shaped curvature with flexion at the upper levels and extension at the lower levels at early stage after impact, during which the lower cervical levels might experience hyperextensions. The predicted high resultant strain of the capsular ligaments, even at low impact acceleration compared with other ligament groups, suggests their susceptibility to injury. The peak impact acceleration has a significant effect on the potential injury of ligaments. Under higher accelerations, most ligaments will reach failure strain in a much shorter time immediately after impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Hang Zhang
- School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ivancic PC, Ito S, Panjabi MM. Dynamic sagittal flexibility coefficients of the human cervical spine. ACCIDENT; ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION 2007; 39:688-95. [PMID: 17140545 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2006] [Revised: 10/03/2006] [Accepted: 10/25/2006] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
The goal of the present study was to determine the dynamic sagittal flexibility coefficients, including coupling coefficients, throughout the human cervical spine using rear impacts. A biofidelic whole cervical spine model (n=6) with muscle force replication and surrogate head was rear impacted at 5 g peak horizontal accelerations of the T1 vertebra within a bench-top mini-sled. The dynamic main and coupling sagittal flexibility coefficients were calculated at each spinal level, head/C1 to C7/T1. The average flexibility coefficients were statistically compared (p<0.05) throughout the cervical spine. To validate the coefficients, the average computed displacement peaks, obtained using the average flexibility matrices and the measured load vectors, were statistically compared to the measured displacement peaks. The computed and measured displacement peaks showed good overall agreement, thus validating the computed flexibility coefficients. These peaks could not be statistically differentiated, with the exception of extension rotation at head/C1 and posterior shear translation at C7/T1. Head/C1 was significantly more flexible than all other spinal levels. The cervical spine was generally more flexible in posterior shear, as compared to axial compression. The coupling coefficients indicated that extension moment caused coupled posterior shear translation while posterior shear force caused coupled extension rotation. The present results may be used towards the designs of anthropometric test dummies and mathematical models that better simulate the cervical spine response during dynamic loading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul C Ivancic
- Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Teo EC, Zhang QH, Huang RC. Finite element analysis of head–neck kinematics during motor vehicle accidents: Analysis in multiple planes. Med Eng Phys 2007; 29:54-60. [PMID: 16503183 DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2005] [Revised: 12/12/2005] [Accepted: 01/17/2006] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
In this study, a detailed three-dimensional head-neck (C0-C7) finite element (FE) model developed previously based on the actual geometry of a human cadaver specimen was used. Five simulation analyses were performed to investigate the kinematic responses of the head-neck complex under rear-end, front, side, rear- and front-side impacts. Under rear-end and front impacts, it was predicted that the global and intervertebral rotations of the head-neck in the sagittal plane displayed nearly symmetric curvatures about the frontal plane. The primary sagittal rotational angles of the neck under direct front and rear-end impact conditions were higher than the primary frontal rotational angles under other side impact conditions. The analysis predicted early S-shaped and subsequent C-shaped curvatures of the head-neck complex in the sagittal plane under front and rear-end impact, and in the frontal plane under side impact. The head-neck complex flexed laterally in one direction with peak magnitude of larger than 22 degrees and a duration of about 130 ms before flexing in the opposite direction under both side and rear-side impact, compared to the corresponding values of about 15 degrees and 105 ms under front-side impact. The C0-C7 FE model has reasonably predicted the effects of impact direction in the primary sagittal and frontal segmental motion and curvatures of the head-neck complex under various impact conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ee Chon Teo
- School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering Research Centre, College of Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ivancic PC, Panjabi MM, Ito S. Cervical spine loads and intervertebral motions during whiplash. TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION 2006; 7:389-99. [PMID: 17114097 DOI: 10.1080/15389580600789127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To quantify the dynamic loads and intervertebral motions throughout the cervical spine during simulated rear impacts. METHODS Using a biofidelic whole cervical spine model with muscle force replication and surrogate head and bench-top mini-sled, impacts were simulated at 3.5, 5, 6.5, and 8 g horizontal accelerations of the T1 vertebra. Inverse dynamics was used to calculate the dynamic cervical spine loads at the centers of mass of the head and vertebrae (C1-T1). The average peak loads and intervertebral motions were statistically compared (P < 0.05) throughout the cervical spine. RESULTS Load and motion peaks generally increased with increasing impact acceleration. The average extension moment peaks at the lower cervical spine, reaching 40.7 Nm at C7-T1, significantly exceeded the moment peaks at the upper and middle cervical spine. The highest average axial tension peak of 276.9 N was observed at the head, significantly greater than at C4 through T1. The average axial compression peaks, reaching 223.2 N at C5, were significantly greater at C4 through T1, as compared to head-C1. The highest average posterior shear force peak of 269.5 N was observed at T1. CONCLUSION During whiplash, the cervical spine is subjected to not only bending moments, but also axial and shear forces. These combined loads caused both intervertebral rotations and translations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul C Ivancic
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8071, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ivancic PC, Panjabi MM, Tominaga Y, Malcolmson GF. Predicting multiplanar cervical spine injury due to head-turned rear impacts using IV-NIC. TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION 2006; 7:264-75. [PMID: 16990241 DOI: 10.1080/15389580500488499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Intervertebral Neck Injury Criterion (IV-NIC) hypothesizes that dynamic three-dimensional intervertebral motion beyond physiological limit may cause multiplanar soft-tissue injury. Present goals, using biofidelic whole human cervical spine model with muscle force replication and surrogate head in head-turned rear impacts, were to: (1) correlate IV-NIC with multiplanar injury, (2) determine IV-NIC injury threshold at each intervertebral level, and (3) determine time and mode of dynamic intervertebral motion that caused injury. METHODS Impacts were simulated at 3.5, 5, 6.5, and 8 g horizontal accelerations of T1 vertebra (n = 6; average age: 80.2 years; four male, two female donors). IV-NIC was defined at each intervertebral level and in each motion plane as dynamic intervertebral rotation divided by physiological limit. Three-plane pre- and post-impact flexibility testing measured soft-tissue injury; that is significant increase in neutral zone (NZ) or range of motion (RoM) at any intervertebral level, above baseline. IV-NIC injury threshold was average IV-NIC peak at injury onset. RESULTS IV-NIC extension peaks correlated best with multiplanar injuries (P < 0.001): extension RoM (R = 0.55) and NZ (R = 0.42), total axial rotation RoM (R = 0.42) and NZ (R = 0.41), and total lateral bending NZ (R = 0.39). IV-NIC injury thresholds ranged between 1.1 at C0-C1 and C3-C4 to 2.9 at C7-T1. IV-NIC injury threshold times were attained between 83.4 and 150.1 ms following impact. CONCLUSIONS Correlation between IV-NIC and multiplanar injuries demonstrated that three-plane intervertebral instability was primarily caused by dynamic extension beyond the physiological limit during head-turned rear impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul C Ivancic
- Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Panjabi MM, Ivancic PC, Tominaga Y, Wang JL. Intervertebral neck injury criterion for prediction of multiplanar cervical spine injury due to side impacts. TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION 2005; 6:387-97. [PMID: 16266948 DOI: 10.1080/15389580500257100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Intervertebral Neck Injury Criterion (IV-NIC) is based on the hypothesis that dynamic three-dimensional intervertebral motion beyond physiological limits may cause multiplanar injury of cervical spine soft tissues. Goals of this study, using a biofidelic whole human cervical spine model with muscle force replication and surrogate head in simulated side impacts, were to correlate IV-NIC with multiplanar injury and determine IV-NIC injury threshold for each intervertebral level. METHODS Using a bench-top apparatus, side impacts were simulated at 3.5, 5, 6.5, and 8 g horizontal accelerations of the T1 vertebra. Pre- and post-impact flexibility testing in three-motion planes measured the soft tissue injury, i.e., significant increase (p < 0.05) in neutral zone (NZ) or range of motion (RoM) at any intervertebral level, above corresponding physiological limit. RESULTS IV-NIC in left lateral bending correlated well with total lateral bending RoM (R = 0.61, P < 0.001) and NZ (R = 0.55, P < 0.001). Additionally, the same IV-NIC correlated well with left axial rotation RoM (R = 0.50, P < 0.001). IV-NIC injury thresholds (95% confidence limits) varied among intervertebral levels and ranged between 1.5 (0.6-2.4) at C3-C4 and 4.0 (2.4-5.7) at C7-T1. IV-NIC injury threshold times were attained beginning at 84.5 ms following impact. CONCLUSIONS Present results suggest that IV-NIC is an effective tool for determining multiplanar soft tissue neck injuries by identifying the intervertebral level, mode, time, and severity of injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manohar M Panjabi
- Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8071, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|