Osteochondral Autograft Transplant as a Potential Salvage Procedure for Articular Cartilage Defects of the Lateral Compartment in Lateral Meniscus-Deficient Knees: Results From a Country With Limited Availability of Meniscal Transplant.
Orthop J Sports Med 2020;
8:2325967120962753. [PMID:
33225008 PMCID:
PMC7653291 DOI:
10.1177/2325967120962753]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background:
The treatment of a meniscus-deficient knee is challenging, especially when
patients are young and active and are not favorable candidates for
prosthetic joint replacement.
Hypothesis:
We hypothesized that osteochondral autologous transplant (OAT) alone can be
considered a salvage treatment for patients with cartilage damage of the
lateral compartment of the knee, even with lateral meniscal deficiency, if
the knee alignment is close to neutral.
Study Design:
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
Patients with lateral meniscal deficiency, whose femorotibial angle was 170°
to 180° and who underwent OAT on the lateral compartment of the knee without
concomitant realignment osteotomy, were retrospectively included in this
study. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective
score and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for knee osteoarthritis
(JOA knee score) were recorded. The International Cartilage Repair Society
(ICRS) cartilage repair assessment was used to evaluate the repaired
cartilage at second-look arthroscopy.
Results:
The study included 10 patients (mean ± SD age, 31.7 ± 19.7 years; 3 men and 7
women) who had ICRS grade 4 cartilage lesions (mean size, 3.5 ± 1.7
cm2); the mean follow-up was 73.8 ± 42.5 months. From
preoperative assessment to final follow-up, the mean IKDC subjective score
improved significantly from 53.5 ± 10.0 to 85.4 ± 10.1, and the mean JOA
knee score improved significantly from 81.0 ± 8.4 to 95.6 ± 5.3
(P = .004 for both). One patient with a femorotibial
angle of 170° underwent revision distal femoral osteotomy owing to prolonged
symptoms and progression of the valgus deformity, and 2 other patients with
femorotibial angles of 170° and 171° also exhibited progression of valgus
malalignment or low clinical scores postoperatively. Patients with a
favorable femorotibial angle (174°-178°) exhibited relieved symptoms and
preservation of femorotibial angle alignment within 1° of change at
follow-up. At second-look arthroscopy (n = 8 patients), 6 patients had an
ICRS score of nearly normal or normal.
Conclusion:
In the study patients, for which a meniscal allograft was unavailable, the
OAT procedure was able to relieve the symptoms associated with cartilage
lesions, even with lateral meniscal deficiency, when the femorotibial angle
alignment was close to neutral.
Collapse