Dual-task and anticipation impact lower limb biomechanics during a single-leg cut with body borne load

Effects of Anticipation and Dual-Tasking on Lower Limb Biomechanics While Performing Change-of-Direction Tasks in Physically Active Individuals: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are highly prevalent in team sport athletes and often occur while performing change-of-direction (COD) tasks in combination with high cognitive demands, such as decision making or divided attention. Given the expanding body of research in this field, an updated literature review is warranted, as the most recent meta-analysis on this topic included original studies published up to November 2020.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effects of anticipation and/or dual-tasking on lower limb biomechanics during COD tasks in healthy individuals.

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus from inception until February 2024. The included studies examined the effects of anticipation and/or dual-tasking on knee kinetics and kinematics in the frontal and sagittal planes during COD tasks.

METHODS

A multilevel meta-analysis was performed to aggregate the results of studies comparing unanticipated versus anticipated CODs on lower limb biomechanics. Due to the limited available literature on dual-task versus single-task conditions, this aspect was analyzed qualitatively.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 17 studies involving 355 individuals from different sports (e.g., soccer, American Football). No statistically significant differences were found between unanticipated and anticipated CODs for knee abduction and flexion moments as well as knee abduction angles (p > 0.05). Significantly higher knee flexion angles were found in unanticipated CODs (SMD = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.30-1.19; p < 0.01). Qualitative analyses of six studies including 171 individuals provided initial evidence for higher knee abduction moments and flexion angles during anticipated CODs while performing a secondary task concurrently.

CONCLUSION

Findings from quantitative and qualitative analyses indicate that anticipation and dual-tasking during COD performance have an impact on injury-related aspects of lower limb biomechanics. Hence, cognitive challenges should be implemented in injury risk screening and preventive strategies. Further studies with high methodological quality are needed to improve the understanding of the biomechanical and cognitive interplay in injury-threatening situations.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023433074.

DATE OF REGISTRATION

13.10.2023.

The Influence of Cognitive Dual Tasking on the Outcomes of the Triple Hop Test Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Introduction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction involves prolonged rehabilitation, with Return to Sport (RTS) as a key goal for athletes. Integrating Dual Task (DT) strategies, which combine cognitive and physical tasks, is critical, as multitasking mirrors real-world and sports-specific demands. Assessing how distractions affect performance is essential to optimize RTS outcomes for both the reconstructed and healthy limbs.

Purpose

To analyze the influence of DT on the performance of the Triple Hop Test for distance (THD) in individuals' status post ACL reconstruction.

Study type

Cross Sectional.

Materials and Methods

Seventeen patients post-ACL were recruited and performed THD under two conditions: single task (standard condition) and dual task (with an added neurocognitive task). Assessments were conducted on both the healthy and the previously injured limb over six meters, measured via a standard measuring tape. Paired t-tests and Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon or Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied to investigate differences. Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared tests.

Results

There was a significant difference in average distance between single task performances in the healthy and previously operated limbs, with a difference of 20.71 cm (p=0.016). A significant difference was also observed in DT performance, with a distance variation of 10.41 cm (p=0.038). Comparing performances, both the healthy and the ACL-reconstructed limbs showed performance deterioration under DT conditions, with a greater percentage decline in the healthy limb.

Conclusions

Dual Task conditions appear to hinder performance in the THD in both the healthy and post-ACL reconstructed limbs.

Level Of Evidence

3b.

Relationship between Cognitive Demands and Biomechanical Indicators Associated with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury during contact sports has a high incidence that has not been reduced despite the immense resources devoted to understanding its aetiology. A neurocognitive approach could increase knowledge of the mechanisms contributing to ACL injury enabling practitioners to address and minimise future risk.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the influence of manipulating cognitive demands during motor tasks (i.e. degree of uncertainty) on biomechanical variables associated with ACL injury risk.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions by searching the major sporting electronic databases. The search strategy included four groups of terms and was conducted by two authors independently. All studies were screened using unique inclusion criteria, with the included studies assessed for risk of bias.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies were identified from 2031 records and included into the review process. During the experimental conditions where cognitive demands were higher, most biomechanical indicators associated with a greater risk of ACL injury during landing and cutting tasks were significantly enhanced compared with conditions with low or no cognitive demands.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in task complexity through cognitive load significantly leads to changes in mechanisms associated with ACL injury during single-leg landings and cutting movements. Consequently, coaches and exercise professionals should consider inclusion of dual-task paradigms or uncertainty during injury risk assessment scenarios and injury prevention programs to help identify athletes at risk of ACL injury and reduce ACL injury frequency.

REGISTRATION

This protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO ) in May 2022, with the registration number CRD42022315795.

Which Functional Tests and Self-Reported Questionnaires Can Help Clinicians Make Valid Return to Sport Decisions in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability? A Narrative Review and Expert Opinion

Lateral ankle sprain is the most common injury in sports, with up to 40% of patients developing chronic ankle instability (CAI). One possible cause underlying this high rate of recurrence or feeling of giving way may be a premature return to sport (RTS). Indeed, except for time-based parameters, there are no specific criteria to guide clinicians in their RTS decisions in patients with CAI. A recent international consensus highlighted the relevance and importance of including patient-reported ankle function questionnaires combined with functional tests targeting ankle impairments in this population. Thus, the aim of this narrative review and expert opinion was to identify the most relevant functional performance tests and self-reported questionnaires to help clinicians in their RTS decision-making process following recurrent ankle sprains or surgical ankle stabilization. The PubMed (MEDLINE), PEDro, Cochrane Library and ScienceDirect databases were searched to identify published articles. Results showed that the single leg stance test on firm surfaces, the modified version of the star excursion balance test, the side hop test and the figure-of-8 test appeared to be the most relevant functional performance tests to target ankle impairments in patients with CAI. A combination of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Ankle Ligament Reconstruction-Return to Sport after Injury (ALR-RSI) questionnaires were the most relevant self-reported questionnaires to assess patient function in the context of CAI. Although these functional tests and questionnaires provide a solid foundation for clinicians to validate their RTS decisions in patient with CAI, objective scientific criteria with cut-off scores are still lacking. In addition to the proposed test cluster, an analysis of the context, in particular characteristics related to sports (e.g., fatigue, cognitive constraints), to obtain more information about the patient's risk of recurrent injury could be of added value when making a RTS decision in patients with CAI. In order to evaluate the strength of evertors under ecological conditions, it would also be interesting to assess the ability to control weight-bearing ankle inversion in a unipodal stance. Further studies are needed to assess the relevance of this proposed test cluster in RTS decision-making following lateral ankle sprain injury and CAI.

Cognitive Load Impairs Time to Initiate and Complete Shooting Tasks in ROTC Members

INTRODUCTION

Multitasking typically requires an individual to simultaneously process cognitive information while performing a motor task. Cognitive motor interference (CMi) is encountered when cognitive challenges negatively impact motor task performance. Military personnel encounter cognitively taxing situations, especially during combat or other tactical performance scenarios, which may lead to injury or motor performance deficits (i.e., shooting inaccuracy, delayed stimulus-response time, and slowed movement speed). The purpose of the current study was to develop four cognitive motor shooting paradigms to determine the effects of cognitive load on shooting performance in healthy Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) cadets.

METHODS

Thirty-two healthy collegiate ROTC members (24 male and 8 female; 20.47 ± 1.24 years, 174.95 ± 10.58 cm, and 77.99 ± 13.90 kg) were recruited to complete four simulated shooting tasks with additional "motor" challenge (180° turn, gait, weighted, and unweighted landing) and with and without a "cognitive" decision-making challenge requiring response selection and inhibition to both auditory and visual stimuli, totaling eight multi-task cognitive motor shooting conditions. The current study was approved by the university's Institutional Review Board. Task initiation (seconds), task completion (seconds), and number of misses were calculated to determine marksmanship efficiency and accuracy. For each task, a multivariate repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted for the combined dependent variables. If the overall multivariate repeated-measures ANOVA was significant, follow-up univariate ANOVAs were conducted for each dependent variable. Alpha was set at α = 0.05 for all analyses.

RESULTS

Task initiation increased for the cognitive condition for the 180° turn (4.29 ± 1.22 seconds baseline, 5.09 ± 1.39 seconds cognitive; P < .05), gait (2.76 ± .60 seconds baseline, 3.93 ± .62 seconds cognitive; P < .05), unweighted (1.27 ± .57 seconds baseline, 3.39 ± .63 seconds cognitive; P < .05), and weighted landing (1.46 ± .72 seconds baseline, 3.35 ± .60 seconds cognitive; P < .05). Task completion time increased for the cognitive condition for the 180° turn (3.48 ± 1.53 seconds baseline, 4.85 ± 1.24 seconds cognitive; P < .05), gait (7.84 ± 2.07 seconds baseline, 9.23 ± 1.76 seconds cognitive; P < .05), unweighted (5.98 ± 1.55 seconds baseline, 7.45 ± 1.51 seconds cognitive; P < .05), and weighted landing (6.09 ± 1.42 seconds baseline, 7.25 ± 1.79 seconds cognitive; P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences in the number of misses for any of the tasks between conditions (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a cognitive load increased both task initiation and task completion times during cognitive motor simulated shooting. Adding cognitive loads to tactical performance tasks can result in CMi and negatively impact tactical performance. Thus, consideration for additional cognitive challenges into training may be warranted to reduce the potential CMi effect on tactical performance.

DUAL-TASK ASSESSMENT IMPLICATIONS FOR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Background

Several systematic reviews have evaluated the role of dual-task assessment in individuals with concussion. However, no systematic reviews to date have investigated dual-task protocols with implications for individuals with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury or ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

Purpose

To systematically review the evidence on dual-task assessment practices applicable to those with ACL deficiency/ACLR, specifically with the aim to identify motor-cognitive performance costs.

Study Design

Systematic review.

Methods

A systematic literature review was undertaken on those with ACL-deficient or ACL-reconstructed knees performing dual-task activities. The following databases were searched from inception to June 8, 2018 including CINAHL, PsychInfo, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and gray literature. Three primary search categories (knee, cognition, and motor task) were included. Only one reviewer independently performed the database search, data extraction, and scored each article for quality. All studies were assessed for quality and pertinent data were extracted, examined and synthesized.

Results

Ten studies were included for analysis, all of which were published within the prior ten years. Performance deficits were identified in those with either ACL deficiency or ACLR while dual-tasking, such as prioritization of postural control at the expense of cognitive performance, impaired postural control in single limb stance, greater number of cognitive errors, and increased step width coefficient of variation while walking. No studies examined those with prior ACL injury or ACLR during tasks that mimicked ACL injury mechanisms such as jump-landing or single-leg cutting.

Conclusion

The results of the current systematic review suggests that postural control, gait, and/or cognitive deficits exist when evaluated under a dual-task paradigm in those with ACL deficiency or ACLR. This systematic review highlights the need for future research on dual-task assessment for individuals who have sustained an ACL injury or undergone ACLR, specifically utilizing more difficult athletic movements.

Level of Evidence

Level 3a.

The Effect of Divided Attention with Bounce Drop Jump on Dynamic Postural Stability

This study determined the effect of divided attention on controlling postural stability during a drop vertical jump task. In total, 30 participants were tested for drop vertical jumps from a 30-cm high platform and landing on a single leg with or without divided attention tasks. Three-dimensional marker trajectories and ground reaction forces were collected simultaneously. Vertical ground reaction force, loading rate, and dynamic postural stability index were analyzed with or without divided attention tasks. The paired sample t test indicated a significantly low knee flexion angle, high vertical ground reaction force, and increased loading rate in the divided attention task. Moreover, participants showed an increased vertical stability index and dynamic postural stability index in the divided attention task than in the nondivided attention task. Thus, results demonstrated that the divided attention task could affect posture control, leading to poor dynamic posture stability and possibly increasing lower extremity injury risk. The influence of the divided attention task on movement quality likely indicates that an athlete can no longer focus his attention on the bounce drop jump maneuver. Therefore, the bounce drop jump combined with dynamic postural stability index could be used in posture stability screening.

Sex and limb impact biomechanics associated with risk of injury during drop landing with body borne load

Increasing lower limb flexion may reduce risk of musculoskeletal injury for military personnel during landing. This study compared lower limb biomechanics between sexes and limbs when using normal and greater lower limb flexion to land with body borne load. Thirty-three participants (21 male, 12 female, age: 21.6±2.5 years, height: 1.7±0.1 m, weight: 74.5±9.0 kg) performed normal and flexed lower limb landings with four body borne loads: 20, 25, 30 and 35 kg. Hip and knee biomechanics, peak vertical ground reaction force (GRF), and the magnitude and direction of the GRF vector in frontal plane were submitted to two separate repeated measures ANOVAs to test the main and interaction effects of sex, load, and landing, as well as limb, load, and landing. Participants increased GRFs (between 5 and 10%) and hip and knee flexion moments when landing with body borne load, but decreased vertical GRF 19% and hip adduction and knee abduction joint range of motion and moments during the flexed landings. Both females and the non-dominant limb presented greater risk of musculoskeletal injury during landing. Females exhibited larger GRFs, increased hip adduction range of motion, and greater knee abduction moments compared to males. Whereas, the non-dominant limb increased knee abduction moments and exhibited a more laterally-directed frontal plane GRF vector compared to the dominant limb during the loaded landings. Yet, increasing lower limb flexion during landing does not appear to produce similar reductions in lower limb biomechanics related to injury risk for both females and the non-dominant limb during landing.