Defining the medial-lateral axis of the femur: Medical imaging, conventional and functional calibration methods lead to differences in hip rotation kinematics for children with torsional deformities

How reliable are femoropelvic kinematics during deep squats? The influence of subject-specific skeletal modelling on measurement variability

BACKGROUND

Biplanar radiography displays promising results in the production of subject-specific (S.specific) biomechanical models. However, the focus has predominantly centred on methodological investigations in gait analysis. Exploring the influence of such models on the analysis of high range of motion tasks linked to hip pathologies is warranted. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of S.Specific modelling techniques on the reliability of deep squats kinematics in comparison to generic modelling.

METHODS

8 able-bodied male participants attended 5 motion capture sessions conducted by 3 observers and performed 5 deep squats in each. Prior to each session a biplanar scan was acquired with the reflective-markers attached. Inverse kinematics of pelvis and thigh segments were calculated based on S.specific and Generic model definition. Agreement between the two models femoropelvic orientation in standing was assessed with Bland-Altman plots and paired t- tests. Inter-trial, inter-session, inter-observer variability and observer/trial difference and ratio were calculated for squat kinematic data derived from the two modelling approaches.

RESULTS

Compared to the Generic model, the S.Specific model produced a calibration trial that is significantly offset into more posterior pelvis tilt (-2.8±2.7), hip extension (-2.2±3.8), hip abduction (-1.2±3.6) and external rotation (-13.8±11.4). The S.specific model produced significantly different squat kinematics in the sagittal plane of the pelvis (entire squat cycle) and hip (between 40 % and 60 % of the squat cycle). Variability analysis indicated that the error magnitude between the two models was comparable (difference<2°). The S.specific model exhibited a lower variability in the observer/trial ratio in the sagittal pelvis and hip, the frontal hip, but showed a higher variability in the transverse hip.

SIGNIFICANCE

S.specific modelling appears to introduce a calibration offset that primarily translates into an effect in the sagittal plane kinematics. However, the clinical added value of S.specific modelling in terms of reducing experimental sources of kinematic variability was limited.

On the accuracy of the Conventional gait Model: Distinction between marker misplacement and soft tissue artefact errors

There is a lack of knowledge about the accuracy of the Conventional Gait Model (CGM), compared to the true bone motion. Accuracy is hindered by both marker misplacement and soft-tissue artefact (STA). The effect of the lateral knee marker (KNE) misplacement and STA was determined from a secondary analysis of 13 subjects equipped with a total knee prothesis for which simultaneous dual-plane fluoroscopy and marker-based motion capture was available. In average, STA alone led to 3.3°, 2.9° and 6.7° errors for knee flexion, knee abduction, and the absolute hip rotation respectively. In comparison, marker misplacement led to 0.9°, 4.0° and 12.3° errors for the same kinematics. We showed that STA alone may lead to knee flexion-adduction cross-talk. This finding has clinical repercussions for the use of knee cross talk as a qualitative indicator of knee axis alignment. Our study showed that cumulative effects of marker misplacement and STA affect the transverse plane angles, making challenging to track internal/external rotation with less than 5° of errors.

The effect of functional calibration methods on gait kinematics in adolescents with idiopathic rotational deformity of the femur

BACKGROUND

Due to anatomical deviations, assumptions of the conventional calibration method for gait analysis may be violated in individuals with rotational deformities of the femur. Functional calibration methods were compared with conventional methods in this group for 1) localization of the hip joint center and orientation of the knee axis, and 2) gait kinematics.

METHODS

Twenty-four adolescents with idiopathic rotational deformity of the femur underwent gait analysis and a CT scan. During standing, distance between hip joint centers and knee axis orientation were compared between calibration methods, with CT serving as reference for hip joint center estimation. Gait kinematics were compared using statistical parametric mapping.

FINDINGS

The conventional calibration method estimated the hip joint center closer to the CT reference (4±12 mm more lateral) than the functional calibration method (26 ± 20 mm more lateral). Orientation of the knee joint axis was 2.6° less internal in the functional calibration method. During gait, statistical parametric mapping revealed significantly more hip flexion, less external hip rotation during the swing phase, less knee varus-valgus motion, and larger knee flexion angles when applying the functional method.

INTERPRETATION

Functional calibration methods were less accurate in determining the hip joint center location than the conventional calibration method and resulted in a knee joint axis that was less internally rotated. Importantly, there was less knee joint angle crosstalk during gait when using the functional method. Although differences between methods on gait kinematics were within clinically acceptable limits for the sagittal plane, relatively larger differences on transversal hip kinematics may hold clinical importance.

Are we overestimating internal rotation gait by conventional modelling?

BACKGROUND

The determination of the knee joint axis (KJA) via specific calibration movements has become a promising alternative to the conventional approach to determine this axis based on regression equations or directly via marker placement on bony landmarks of the knee. Since the orientation of the KJA may differ between methods, it has direct influence on hip rotation and may therefore influence clinical decision making in context of transverse plane gait deviations.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does a functional KJA calibration lead to clinically relevant differences in hip rotation estimates during gait compared to the conventional method?

METHODS

95 subjects (age: 19.9 years; BMI: 21.1 kg/m²), including 71 patients with potential rotation malalignment, were prospectively examined and underwent 3D gait analysis. For the conventional approach the KJA was determined by applying a knee alignment device, for the functional approach subjects were asked to perform two different calibration movements. Each procedure was performed twice. Mean hip rotation in stance (mHipRotSt) was determined following the conventional and the functional KJA calibration.

RESULTS

Deming regression analysis for the comparison of conventional and functionally measured hip rotation revealed a systematic and substantial difference between methods (slope: 0.63; intercept: 0.31°). Measurement repetition with the knee alignment device revealed typical errors around 5°, whereas the functional methods lead to profoundly smaller errors around 1-2° with slightly inferior results for SQUAT compared to FLEX. However, when compared to conventional frontal plane video-taping, the conventional method seemed to reflect the more consistent results.

SIGNIFICANCE

The systematic linear discrepancy in mHipRotSt obtained by a functional approach as compared to the conventional approach appears critical since patients with severe internal or external rotation gait may be misjudged in function when receiving corrective procedures such as femoral derotation osteotomy.

Impact of scaling errors of the thigh and shank segments on musculoskeletal simulation results

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal simulations are widely used in the research community. The locations of surface markers are mostly used to scale a generic model to the participant's anthropometry. Marker-based scaling approaches include errors due to inaccuracies in marker placements.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How do scaling errors of the thigh and shank segments influence simulation results?

METHODS

Motion capture data and magnetic resonance images from a child with cerebral palsy and a typically developing child were used to create a subject-specific reference model for each child. These reference models were modified to mimic scaling errors due to inaccurately placed lateral epicondyle markers, which are frequently used to scale the thigh and shank segments. The thigh length was altered in 1 % steps from the original length and the shank length was accordingly adjusted to keep the total leg length constant. Thirty additional models were created, which included models with an altered thigh length of ±15 %. Subsequently, musculoskeletal simulations with OpenSim were performed with all models. Joint kinematics, joint kinetics, muscle forces and joint contact forces (JCF) were compared between the reference and altered models.

RESULTS

The investigated scaling error influenced joint kinematics and joint kinetics by up to 9.4° (hip flexion angle) and 0.15 Nm/kg (knee flexion moment), respectively. Maximum muscle and JCF differences of 46 % (medial gastrocnemius) and 72 % (hip JCF) bodyweight, respectively, were observed between the reference and altered models. Scaling errors mainly changed the magnitude but not the shape of most analyzed parameters. The influence of scaling errors on simulation results were similar in both participants.

SIGNIFICANCE

Scaling errors of the thigh segment influence simulation results at all joints due to the global optimization approach used in musculoskeletal simulations. Our findings can be used to estimate potential errors due to marker-based scaling approaches in previous and future studies.

Can the fusion of motion capture and 3D medical imaging reduce the extrinsic variability due to marker misplacements?

In clinical gait analysis, measurement errors impede the reliability and repeatability of the measurements. This extrinsic variability can potentially mislead the clinical interpretation of the analysis and should thus be minimised. Skin marker misplacement has been identified as the largest source of extrinsic variability between measurements. The goal of this study was to test whether the fusion of motion capture and 3D medical imaging could reduce extrinsic variability due to skin marker misplacement. The fusion method consists in using anatomical landmarks identified with 3D medical imaging to correct marker misplacements. To assess the reduction of variability accountable to the fusion method, skin marker misplacements were voluntarily introduced in the measurement of the pelvis and hip kinematics during gait for two patients scheduled for unilateral hip arthroplasty and two patients that underwent unilateral hip arthroplasty. The root mean square deviation was reduced by -78 ± 15% and the range of variability by -80 ± 16% for the pelvis and hip kinematics in average. These results showed that the fusion method could significantly reduce the extrinsic variability due to skin marker misplacement and thus increase the reliability and repeatability of motion capture measurements. However, the identification of anatomical landmarks via medical imaging is a new source of extrinsic variability that should be assessed before considering the fusion method for clinical applications.

Correcting lower limb segment axis misalignment in gait analysis: A simple geometrical method

BACKGROUND

Obtaining precise and repeatable measurements is essential to clinical gait analysis. However, defining the thigh medial-lateral axis segment remains a challenge, with particular implications for the hip rotation profile. Thigh medial-lateral axis misalignment modifies the hip rotation profile and can result in a phenomenon called crosstalk, which increases knee adduction-abduction amplitude artificially.

RESEARCH QUESTION

This study proposes an a posteriori geometrical method based solely on segment anatomy that aims to correct the thigh medial-lateral axis definition and crosstalk-related error.

METHODS

The proposed method considers the thigh medial-lateral axis as the normal to the mean sagittal plane of the lower limb defined by hip, knee and ankle joint centres during one gait cycle. Its performance was compared to that of an optimisation method which repositions the axis to reduce knee abduction-adduction variance. An existing dataset was used: 75 patients with a knee prosthesis undergoing gait analysis three months and one-year post-surgery. Three-dimensional hip and knee angles were computed for two gait analysis sessions. Crosstalk was quantified using both the coefficient of determination (r²) between knee flexion-extension and adduction-abduction and the amplitude of knee adduction-abduction. The reproducibility of hip internal-external rotation was also quantified using the inter-trial, inter-session and inter-subject standard deviations and the intraclass coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Crosstalk was significantly reduced from r² = 0.67 to r² = 0.51 by the geometrical method but remained significantly higher than with the optimisation method with a r² < 0.01.

SIGNIFICANCES

Both methods allowed to improve the hip internal-external reproducibility from poor to moderate (original data: ICC = 0.34, geometrical method: ICC = 0.65, optimisation method ICC = 0.73). One advantage of the geometrical method is that, unlike the optimisation method, it does not require much movement, making it suitable for a wider range of patients.

Hip- and patellofemoral-joint loading during gait are increased in children with idiopathic torsional deformities

BACKGROUND

Torsional deformities of the femur and tibia are associated with gait impairments and joint pain. Several studies have investigated these gait deviations in children with cerebral palsy. However, relatively little is known about gait deviations in children with idiopathic torsion and debate ensues about the management of these patients.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the effects of idiopathic increased femoral neck anteversion and external tibial torsion on lower-limb kinematics, kinetics and joint loading during gait in children and adolescents.

METHODS

Patient-specific musculoskeletal models were created for 12 children/adolescents (mean age of 14 years) with torsional deformities using low-dose biplane radiographic imaging and 3D gait analysis. Comparisons of joint motion and net joint torques during gait were made to an age-matched control group with no torsional deformities. The effects of torsional deformities on muscle and joint contact forces were investigated using two personalised musculoskeletal models: one with normal torsion and another with patient-specific torsion.

RESULTS

Femoral neck anteversion and external tibial torsion for the patients were (mean ± SD) 38° ± 9° and 40° ± 10°, respectively. Patients had increased internal hip rotation and external knee rotation as well as increased pelvic tilt during gait. Additionally, the efficacy of the plantarflexor-knee extension mechanism was diminished. Hip joint contact force was higher in the model with patient-specific torsion. The mediolateral component of the patellofemoral joint contact force was also increased despite the magnitude of the resultant patellofemoral contact force being unchanged.

SIGNIFICANCE

It has been previously established that idiopathic lower-limb torsional deformities alter gait kinematics. However, this study also showed that loading of the hip and patellofemoral joints are increased. This is an important insight for the clinical management of these patients and highlights that idiopathic lower-limb torsional deformities are not a purely cosmetic issue.

Computation of hip rotation kinematics retrospectively using functional knee calibration during gait

BACKGROUND

Hip rotation kinematics during gait is a key parameter to support clinical decision making, for example in children with lower limb torsional deformities. However, hip rotation kinematics is also one of the least repeatable parameter because it is difficult to locate the position of the medio-lateral axis of the femur. Functional knee calibration provides an alternative to locate the medio-lateral axis of the femur and may be performed retrospectively, using the movement of the knee joint during gait. Although not necessarily more anatomically accurate, functional calibration may lead to increased repeatability between sessions, which would be useful to compare gait analysis data from sessions pre- and post-treatment, or to reprocess data in large gait databases.

METHODS

This study presents a workflow to perform knee functional calibration using knee kinematics during gait and update hip rotation kinematics accordingly. The workflow was applied to investigate the inter-subject, inter-session and inter-trial variance components of multiple calibration methods in a group a 10 typically developing children.

RESULTS

Results indicated that one or two degrees of freedom functional calibration methods were more repeatable inter-session (SD: 1.8°) than conventional calibration using the knee alignment device (SD: 4.7°). However, simulated reduced range of movement at the knee during gait increased inter-session variance for the functional calibration algorithms. Functional calibration did not provide any improvement over the conventional calibration when knee range of movement was reduced and flexion greater than 20° during gait, i.e. 'crouch gait'.

SIGNIFICANCE

The workflow presented allows the re-processing of gait analysis data using knee kinematics during gait only. The workflow may also be used to investigate functional axes of other joints, for example the ankle.