Computational modeling of a right-sided Fontan assist device: Effectiveness across patient anatomies and cannulations

In vitro investigation of axial mechanical support devices implanted in the novel convergent cavopulmonary connection Fontan

OBJECTIVES

The 2 opposing inflows and 2 outflows in a total cavopulmonary connection make mechanical circulatory support (MCS) extremely challenging. We have previously reported a novel convergent cavopulmonary connection (CCPC) Fontan design that improves baseline characteristics and provides a single inflow and outflow, thus simplifying MCS. This study aims to assess the feasibility of MCS of this novel configuration using axial flow pumps in an in vitro benchtop model.

METHODS

Three-dimensional segmentations of 12 single-ventricle patients (body surface area 0.5-1.75 m2) were generated from cardiovascular magnetic resonance images. The CCPC models were designed by connecting the inferior vena cava and superior vena cava to a shared conduit ascending to the pulmonary arteries, optimized in silico. The 12 total cavopulmonary connection and their corresponding CCPC models underwent in vitro benchtop characterization. Two MCS devices were used, the Impella RP® and the PediPump.

RESULTS

MCS successfully and symmetrically reduced the pressure in both vena cavae by >20 mmHg. The devices improved the hepatic flow distribution balance of all CCPC models (Impella RP®P = 0.045, PediPump P = 0.055).

CONCLUSIONS

The CCPC Fontan design provides a feasible MCS solution for a failing Fontan by balancing hepatic flow distribution and symmetrically decompressing the central venous pressure. Cardiac index may also improve with MCS. Additional studies are needed to evaluate this concept for managing Fontan failure.

Engineering Perspective on Cardiovascular Simulations of Fontan Hemodynamics: Where Do We Stand with a Look Towards Clinical Application

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular simulations for patients with single ventricles undergoing the Fontan procedure can assess patient-specific hemodynamics, explore surgical advances, and develop personalized strategies for surgery and patient care. These simulations have not yet been broadly accepted as a routine clinical tool owing to a number of limitations. Numerous approaches have been explored to seek innovative solutions for improving methodologies and eliminating these limitations.

PURPOSE

This article first reviews the current state of cardiovascular simulations of Fontan hemodynamics. Then, it will discuss the technical progress of Fontan simulations with the emphasis of its clinical impact, noting that substantial improvements have been made in the considerations of patient-specific anatomy, flow, and blood rheology. The article concludes with insights into potential future directions involving clinical validation, uncertainty quantification, and computational efficiency. The advancements in these aspects could promote the clinical usage of Fontan simulations, facilitating its integration into routine clinical practice.

Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation of an Intra-Atrial Fontan Connection

Simple Summary

A fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation of an intra-atrial Fontan connection was performed. Power loss and pressure drop results fluctuated less during the FSI simulation than during the simulation run with rigid walls, but there were no observable differences in time-averaged pressure drop, connection power loss or hepatic flow distribution. These results suggested that employing a rigid wall is a reasonable assumption when evaluating time-averaged hemodynamic quantities of the Fontan connection under resting breath-held flow conditions.

Abstract

Total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) hemodynamics has been hypothesized to be associated with long-term complications in single ventricle heart defect patients. Rigid wall assumption has been commonly used when evaluating TCPC hemodynamics using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. Previous study has evaluated impact of wall compliance on extra-cardiac TCPC hemodynamics using fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation. However, the impact of ignoring wall compliance on the presumably more compliant intra-atrial TCPC hemodynamics is not fully understood. To narrow this knowledge gap, this study aims to investigate impact of wall compliance on an intra-atrial TCPC hemodynamics. A patient-specific model of an intra-atrial TCPC is simulated with an FSI model. Patient-specific 3D TCPC anatomies were reconstructed from transverse cardiovascular magnetic resonance images. Patient-specific vessel flow rate from phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the Fontan pathway and the superior vena cava under resting condition were prescribed at the inlets. From the FSI simulation, the degree of wall deformation was compared with in vivo wall deformation from phase-contrast MRI data as validation of the FSI model. Then, TCPC flow structure, power loss and hepatic flow distribution (HFD) were compared between rigid wall and FSI simulation. There were differences in instantaneous pressure drop, power loss and HFD between rigid wall and FSI simulations, but no difference in the time-averaged quantities. The findings of this study support the use of a rigid wall assumption on evaluation of time-averaged intra-atrial TCPC hemodynamic metric under resting breath-held condition.