Maximizing range of motion of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using design optimization techniques

The effect of the central post and screw constructs on the Univers Revers Total Shoulder System

BACKGROUND

The use of lateralized glenoid components in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is increasing to avoid scapular notching and improve strength and impingement-free range of motion. However, maximizing glenoid lateralization increases stress at the bone-baseplate interface. The ideal type and length of central fixation remains a subject of debate. The purpose of this study was to compare baseplate micromotion and load to failure in a biomechanical model with either a central or post for fixation of a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty baseplate. The primary hypothesis was that bicortical post or screw placement would improve baseplate stability compared with fixation contained within the vault. Secondary hypotheses were that larger amounts of construct lateralization would increase micromotion and decrease baseplate stability, regardless of the central fixation method.

METHODS

Based on previously published work with similar methods and reported measures, a power analysis determined an adequate sample size of n = 6 for statistical comparisons between 6 groups, with an α of 0.05 and a power of 0.8. Thirty-six shoulder scapulae (12 pcf Sawbones; Pacific Research Laboratories) were implanted with a nonaugmented baseplate, glenosphere, and 4 peripheral screws as well as either a central screw or post. The post groups were either contained within the glenoid or penetrated the vault (bicortical). All groups with a central screw were bicortical. Lateralization was tested at both 4 mm and 8 mm. All implants (Univers Revers Total Shoulder System; Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL, USA) were placed using a glenoid-specific guide for optimal and consistent positioning of the central guide pin and confirmed by both X-ray and computed tomography analysis. Cyclic testing was performed with increasing load until baseplate micromotion exceeded 150 μm. Load to failure testing was performed with failure defined as a baseplate displacement of 1000 μm or scapula fracture. Analysis of variance testing was performed to evaluate for statistical significance between groups (P < .05).

RESULTS

There was no difference in micromotion testing in all 6 groups (P = .390). Lateralization at 4 mm or 8 mm did not significantly affect micromotion testing. Test groups with 4 mm of lateralization and a central post contained within the vault (P = .01) and 4 mm of lateralization with a central bicortical screw (P = .005) had statistically significantly greater load to failure than the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

With a nonaugmented glenoid baseplate and 4-8 mm of lateralization, central posts within the vault, central posts exiting the vault, and bicortical screw fixation were equivocal in terms of micromotion. Load to failure was highest with 4 mm of lateralization and a central post contained within the glenoid vault or a bicortical screw. With 8 mm of lateralization and the use of 4 peripheral screws, there is no difference between a central post exiting the vault, post within the vault, and bicortical screw fixation.

Optimizing stability and motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° neck-shaft-angle: a computer model study of standard versus retentive humeral inserts

Background

There has been a trend to shift from a 155° and 145° neck-shaft-angle (NSA) to a more "anatomical" reverse shoulder arthroplasty with less distalization and a 135° NSA. Multiple studies have shown that a 135° NSA is beneficial for motion. There are some concerns about primary implant stability with a 135° NSA. When instability is detected, increasing the tension with thicker inlays or changing the NSA to 145° are possible solutions. A retentive 135° (Ret135) inlay may be an alternative to avoiding increased distalization; however, retentive liners are widely regarded as salvage options reducing range of motion (ROM) and avoided by most surgeons. The hypothesis of this study was that a retentive 135° insert of the tested implant system may not have drawbacks for impingement-free ROM compared to a standard 145° insert (Sta145).

Methods

In this computer model study, 22 computed tomographic scans (11 males/11 females) were used to create models with a constant humeral stem (Perform/Stryker) and +3 mm lateralized baseplate +36 mm glenosphere for females and +6 mm lateralized baseplate +39 mm glenosphere for males using Blueprint software (Imascap, Brest, France). A Ret135, standard 135° (Sta135), and Sta145 (+10°) insert were compared for adduction (ADD), extension (EXT), external rotation (ER), and internal rotation (IR) all with the arm at the side as well as for combined IR (CIR = EXT + IR) and combined notching relevant (CNR) ROM (EXT + ER + IR + ADD).

Results

Sta135 showed significantly better ROM for ER, IR, ADD, EXT, CNR ROM, and CIR compared to Ret135 (P < .05) and significantly better EXT and ADD compared to Sta145 (P < .0001). Comparison of Ret135 and Sta145 showed equivalent ROM performance, which was slightly better but nonsignificant for ADD (P = .16), EXT (P = .31), CNR ROM (P = .7), and CIR (P = .54) in favor of Ret135. Isolated IR (P = .39) and ER (P = .32) were slightly better but nonsignificant in favor of a Sta145.

Conclusion

For this implant system tested in a computer model, a 135° standard liner offers the best ROM. A 135° retentive liner maintains at least equivalent CIR and motion to prevent notching compared to a standard 145° liner. 135° retentive liners are more than salvage options and may help to prevent distalization and overtensioning by increased liner thickness.

Design and analysis of a compatible exoskeleton rehabilitation robot system based on upper limb movement mechanism

Rehabilitation robots are used to promote structural and functional recovery of the nervous system with repetitive, task-oriented training and have been gradually applied to clinical rehabilitation training. This paper proposes an upper limb exoskeleton rehabilitation robot system that could realize shoulder-elbow-wrist joint rehabilitation training. Firstly, a motion equivalent model was established based on the upper limb movement mechanism, the robot mechanism configuration was designed, and the optimization algorithm and spatial mechanism theory were used to optimize and analyze the structural parameters and human-machine compatibility of the robot, which will guide the design of the robot's model. Then, the robot kinematics were solved, and its maximum motion range, dexterity distribution, and daily motion trajectory were simulated. Finally, a system prototype was built to test the maximum range of robot-assisted human upper limb training by laser tracker, while the pressure of human-machine interaction during training was captured and analyzed by flexible sensors. The results show that the proposed rehabilitation robot could nearly completely cover the range of motion of upper limb joints and meet the needs of trajectory training, and the linear velocity dexterity and angular velocity dexterity in the motion space are maximum 0.55 and 0.89, and the human-machine interaction pressures during the training process are all less than 10 kPa. Besides, this paper also conducted a system evaluation based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model, and the evaluation result was 0.39, with an excellent evaluation grade, it indirectly indicates that the robot's overall performance was good.

High and low performers in internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biplane fluoroscopic study

BACKGROUND

Internal rotation in adduction is often limited after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but the origins of this functional deficit are unclear. Few studies have directly compared individuals who can and cannot perform internal rotation in adduction. Little data on underlying 3D humerothoracic, scapulothoracic, and glenohumeral joint relationships in these patients are available.

METHODS

Individuals >1-year postoperative to rTSA were imaged with biplane fluoroscopy in resting neutral and internal rotation in adduction poses. Subjects could either perform internal rotation in adduction with their hand at T12 or higher (high, N = 7), or below the hip pocket (low, N = 8). Demographics, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and scapular notching grade were recorded. Joint orientation angles were derived from model-based markerless tracking of the scapula and humerus relative to the torso. The 3D implant models were aligned to preoperative computed tomography models to evaluate bone-implant impingement.

RESULTS

The Simple Shoulder Test was highest in the high group (11 ± 1 vs. 9 ± 2, P = .019). Two subjects per group had scapular notching (grades 1 and 2), and 3 high group and 4 low group subjects had impingement below the glenoid. In the neutral pose, the scapula had 7° more upward rotation in the high group (P = .100), and the low group demonstrated 9° more posterior tilt (P = .017) and 14° more glenohumeral elevation (P = .047). In the internal rotation pose, axial rotation was >45° higher in the high group (P ≤ .008) and the low group again had 11° more glenohumeral elevation (P = .058). Large rotational differences within subject groups arose from a combination of differences in the resting neutral and maximum internal rotation in adduction poses, not only the terminal arm position.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals who were able to perform high internal rotation in adduction after rTSA demonstrated differences in joint orientation and anatomic biases versus patients with low internal rotation. The high rotation group had 7° more resting scapular upward rotation and used a 15°-30° change in scapular tilt to perform internal rotation in adduction versus patients in the low group. The combination of altered resting scapular posture and restricted scapulothoracic range of motion could prohibit glenohumeral rotation required to reach internal rotation in adduction. In addition, inter-patient variation in humeral torsion may contribute substantially to postoperative internal rotation differences. These data point toward modifiable implant design and placement factors, as well as foci for physical therapy to strengthen and mobilize the scapula and glenohumeral joint in response to rTSA surgery.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Alters Humerothoracic, Scapulothoracic, and Glenohumeral Motion During Weighted Scaption

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) typically restores active arm elevation. Prior studies in patients with rTSA during tasks that load the arm had limitations that obscured underlying three-dimensional (3D) kinematic changes and the origins of motion restrictions. Understanding the scapulothoracic and glenohumeral contributions to loaded arm elevation will uncover where functional deficits arise and inform strategies to improve rTSA outcomes.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In a cohort of patients who had undergone rTSA and a control cohort, we asked: (1) Is there a difference in maximum humerothoracic elevation when scapular plane elevation (scaption) is performed with and without a handheld weight? (2) Is maximum humerothoracic elevation related to factors like demographics, patient-reported outcome scores, isometric strength, and scapular notching (in the rTSA group only)? (3) Are there differences in underlying 3D scapulothoracic and glenohumeral motion during scaption with and without a handheld weight?

METHODS

Ten participants who underwent rTSA (six males, four females; age 73 ± 8 years) were recruited at follow-up visits if they were more than 1 year postoperative (24 ± 11 months), had a BMI less than 35 kg/m 2 (29 ± 4 kg/m 2 ), had a preoperative CT scan, and could perform pain-free scaption. Data from 10 participants with a nonpathologic shoulder, collected previously (five males, five females; age 58 ± 7 years; BMI 26 ± 3 kg/m 2 ), were a control group with the same high-resolution quantitative metrics available for comparison. Participants in both groups performed scaption with and without a 2.2-kg handheld weight while being imaged with biplane fluoroscopy. Maximum humerothoracic elevation and 3D scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics across their achievable ROM were collected via dynamic imaging. In the same session the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and isometric strength were collected. Data were compared between weighted and unweighted scaption using paired t-tests and linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

When compared with unweighted scaption, maximum humerothoracic elevation decreased during weighted scaption for patients who underwent rTSA (-25° ± 30°; p = 0.03) but not for the control group (-2° ± 5°; p = 0.35). In the rTSA group, maximum elevation correlated with the ASES score (r = 0.72; p = 0.02), and weighted scaption correlated with BMI (r = 0.72; p = 0.02) and the SST (r = 0.76; p = 0.01). Scapular notching was observed in three patients after rTSA (Grades 1 and 2). Four of 10 patients who underwent rTSA performed weighted scaption to less than 90° humerothoracic elevation using almost exclusively scapulothoracic motion, with little glenohumeral contribution. This manifested as changes in the estimated coefficient representing mean differences in slopes in the humerothoracic plane of elevation (-12° ± 2°; p < 0.001) and true axial rotation (-16° ± 2°; p < 0.001), scapulothoracic upward rotation (7° ± 1°; p < 0.001), and glenohumeral elevation (-12° ± 1°; p < 0.001), plane of elevation (-8° ± 3°; p = 0.002), and true axial rotation (-11° ± 2°; p < 0.001). The control group demonstrated small differences between scaption activities (< |2°|), but a 10° increase in humerothoracic and glenohumeral axial rotation (both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

After rTSA surgery, maximum humerothoracic elevation decreased during weighted scaption by up to 88° compared with unweighted scaption, whereas 4 of 10 patients could not achieve more than 90° of elevation. These patients exhibited appreciable changes in nearly all scapulothoracic and glenohumeral degrees of freedom, most notably a near absence of glenohumeral elevation during weighted scaption. Patients with rTSA have unique strategies to elevate their arms, often with decreased glenohumeral motion and resultant compensation in scapulothoracic motion. In contrast, the control group showed few differences when lifting a handheld weight.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Functional deficiency in activities that load the shoulder after rTSA surgery can affect patient independence, and they may be prevalent but not captured in clinical studies. Pre- or postoperative rehabilitation to strengthen scapular stabilizers and the deltoid should be evaluated against postoperative shoulder function. Further study is required to determine the etiology of deficient glenohumeral motion after rTSA, and the most effective surgical and/or rehabilitative strategies to restore deficient glenohumeral motion after rTSA.