1
|
Jalilvand E, Abollfathi N, Khajehzhadeh M, Hassani-Gangaraj M. Optimization of cervical cage and analysis of its base material: A finite element study. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2022; 236:1613-1625. [DOI: 10.1177/09544119221128467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Nowadays, cervical disorders are common due to human lifestyles. Accordingly, the cage design should be optimized as an essential issue. For an optimal design, an objective function is utilized to calculate the proper geometrical parameters. Additionally, the base material of the cage plays a key role in its functionality and final cost. Novel materials are currently introduced with more compatibility with the bone in terms of mechanical and chemical properties. In this study, a cervical cage was modeled based on PEEK material with three types of tooth designs on its surface. The cervical cage is assumed to be implanted between C6 and C7 vertebrae. The geometric parameters of the cage were optimized to minimize the mass by determining allowable stress and subsidence. The effect of complete cortical removal was investigated as a surgical mistake. Finally, a new composition of PEEK/titanium was introduced as the base material of the cage. Ansys 18.2 was used for FEA. The cage with a straight tooth was chosen due to its lower stress and subsidence compared with other designs. Furthermore, the optimized structures of all three tooth designs were determined. The mass and volume of the optimal cages were reduced by 41.47% and 41.52% respectively. Besides, complete cortical resection should not be carried out during fusion surgery, since it may lead to higher subsidence. The composition of PEEK/titanium was chosen as an appropriate base material due to its better performance compared with PEEK or titanium alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elahe Jalilvand
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nabiolah Abollfathi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohsen Khajehzhadeh
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang H, Wang Z, Wang Y, Li Z, Chao B, Liu S, Luo W, Jiao J, Wu M. Biomaterials for Interbody Fusion in Bone Tissue Engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10:900992. [PMID: 35656196 PMCID: PMC9152360 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.900992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, interbody fusion cages have played an important role in interbody fusion surgery for treating diseases like disc protrusion and spondylolisthesis. However, traditional cages cannot achieve satisfactory results due to their unreasonable design, poor material biocompatibility, and induced osteogenesis ability, limiting their application. There are currently 3 ways to improve the fusion effect, as follows. First, the interbody fusion cage is designed to facilitate bone ingrowth through the preliminary design. Second, choose interbody fusion cages made of different materials to meet the variable needs of interbody fusion. Finally, complete post-processing steps, such as coating the designed cage, to achieve a suitable osseointegration microstructure, and add other bioactive materials to achieve the most suitable biological microenvironment of bone tissue and improve the fusion effect. The focus of this review is on the design methods of interbody fusion cages, a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of various materials, the influence of post-processing techniques and additional materials on interbody fusion, and the prospects for the future development of interbody fusion cages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Zhonghan Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
- Orthopaedic Research Institute of Jilin Province, Changchun, China
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Zuhao Li
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
- Orthopaedic Research Institute of Jilin Province, Changchun, China
| | - Bo Chao
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Shixian Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Wangwang Luo
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jianhang Jiao
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Minfei Wu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
- *Correspondence: Minfei Wu,
| |
Collapse
|