The need for bone biopsies in the diagnosis of new bone lesions in patients with a known primary malignancy: A comparative review of 117 biopsy cases

Pseudolesions involving bone and soft tissue regarding orthopedic oncology

Pseudolesions in bone and muscle are encountered mostly incidentally in routine imaging studies, especially due to the recent advancements on many different imaging modalities. These lesions can be categorized into the following categories: normal variants; congenital; iatrogenic; degenerative; and postoperative. In this review, we discuss the many different radiological characteristics of musculoskeletal pseudolesions that appear on imaging, which can prevent non-essential additional studies.

Resection of Renal Cell and Prostate Carcinoma Sternum Metastases with Long-Term Follow-Up: A Report of 2 Cases

Introduction

Rarely solitary sternum metastases are addressed by resection. Two additional cases are presented as they are interesting because of their long-term follow-up.

Case Presentation

Case 1: A renal cell carcinoma was treated by transabdominal nephrectomy at age 64. Right iliac bone and sternum metastases were diagnosed 7 months later and treated by internal hemipelvectomy followed by sternum metastasectomy 6 weeks after the internal hemipelvectomy. At 12-year follow-up, the patient appears disease free. Case 2: Prostate cancer was treated by prostatectomy at age 67. A subsequent solitary sternum metastasis was resected 10 years later for persistent PSA-activity despite repeated radiotherapy. The patient remains asymptomatic for 3 years now.

Conclusion

Resection of sternum metastases may have curative potential and should be considered in tumours known to be rather resistant to chemo- and/or radiotherapy.

The Importance of Awaiting Biopsy Results in Solitary Pathological Proximal Femoral Fractures : Do We Need to Biopsy Solitary Pathological Fractures?

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical treatment for patients presenting with (impending and complete) pathological proximal femoral fractures is predicated on prognosis. Guidelines recommend a preoperative biopsy to exclude sarcomas, however no evidence confirms a benefit.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the diagnostic accuracy, morbidity and sarcoma incidence of biopsy results in these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients (n = 153) presenting with pathological proximal femoral fractures between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients after inadvertent surgery (n = 25) were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the accuracy and morbidity of diagnostic biopsies.

RESULTS

Of 112/128 patients who underwent biopsy, nine (8%) biopsies were unreliable either due to being inconclusive (n = 5) or because the diagnosis changed after resection (n = 4). Of impending fractures, 32% fractured following needle core biopsy. Median time from diagnosis to surgery was 30 days (interquartile range 21-46). The overall biopsy positive predictive value (PPV) to differentiate between sarcoma and non-sarcoma was 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.00). In patients with a previous malignancy (n = 24), biopsy (n = 23) identified the diagnosis in 83% (PPV 0.91, 95% CI 0.71-0.99), of whom five (24%) patients had a new diagnosis. In patients without a history of cancer (n = 61), final diagnosis included carcinomas (n = 24, 39.3%), sarcomas (n = 24, 39.3%), or hematological malignancies (n = 13, 21.3%). Biopsy (n = 58) correctly identified the diagnosis in 66% of patients (PPV 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.90).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the importance of a preoperative biopsy in solitary pathological proximal femoral fractures due to the risk of sarcoma in patients with and without a history of cancer. However, biopsy delays the time to definite surgery, results can be inconclusive or false, and it risks completion of impending fractures.

Advances in The Application and Research of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in The Musculoskeletal System

Magnetic resonance diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) is an emerging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique that can reflect microstructural changes in tissue through non-Gaussian diffusion of water molecules. Compared to traditional diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), the DKI model has shown greater sensitivity for diagnosis of musculoskeletal diseases and can help formulate more reasonable treatment plans. Moreover, DKI is an important auxiliary examination for evaluation of the motor function of the musculoskeletal system. This article briefly introduces the basic principles of DKI and reviews the application and research of DKI in the evaluation of disorders of the musculoskeletal system (including bone tumors, soft tissue tumors, spinal lesions, chronic musculoskeletal diseases, musculoskeletal trauma, and developmental disorders) as well as the normal musculoskeletal tissues. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: 1.

MRI-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of solitary metastasis and solitary primary tumor in the spine

BACKGROUND

Differentiating between solitary spinal metastasis (SSM) and solitary primary spinal tumor (SPST) is essential for treatment decisions and prognosis. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an MRI-based radiomics nomogram for discriminating SSM from SPST.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-five patients with solitary spinal tumors were retrospectively studied and the data set was divided into two groups: a training set (n = 98) and a validation set (n = 37). Demographics and MRI characteristic features were evaluated to build a clinical factors model. Radiomics features were extracted from sagittal T1-weighted and fat-saturated T2-weighted images, and a radiomics signature model was constructed. A radiomics nomogram was established by combining radiomics features and significant clinical factors. The diagnostic performance of the three models was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves on the training and validation sets. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was performed to assess the calibration capability of radiomics nomogram, and we used decision curve analysis (DCA) to estimate the clinical usefulness.

RESULTS

The age, signal, and boundaries were used to construct the clinical factors model. Twenty-six features from MR images were used to build the radiomics signature. The radiomics nomogram achieved good performance for differentiating SSM from SPST with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.980 in the training set and an AUC of 0.924 in the validation set. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test and decision curve analysis demonstrated the radiomics nomogram outperformed the clinical factors model.

CONCLUSIONS

A radiomics nomogram as a noninvasive diagnostic method, which combines radiomics features and clinical factors, is helpful in distinguishing between SSM and SPST.

Minimally Invasive Interventional Procedures for Metastatic Bone Disease: A Comprehensive Review

Metastases are the main type of malignancy involving bone, which is the third most frequent site of metastatic carcinoma, after lung and liver. Skeletal-related events such as intractable pain, spinal cord compression, and pathologic fractures pose a serious burden on patients’ quality of life. For this reason, mini-invasive treatments for the management of bone metastases were developed with the goal of pain relief and functional status improvement. These techniques include embolization, thermal ablation, electrochemotherapy, cementoplasty, and MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. In order to achieve durable pain palliation and disease control, mini-invasive procedures are combined with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery, or analgesics. The purpose of this review is to summarize the recently published literature regarding interventional radiology procedures in the treatment of cancer patients with bone metastases, focusing on the efficacy, complications, local disease control and recurrence rate.

[Alternatives of histological material collection - When and how is histological confirmation by ultrasound (US), computer tomography (CT) or endosonography (EUS) useful?]

Histological classifications of tumorous lesions together with adequate staging are necessary for stage-appropriate and personalized therapies. The indications, technical possibilities, and limitations as well as potential complications of image-guided needle biopsy by ultrasound, computed tomography, and endosonography are described. Which procedure for which organ and which lesion?

What's new in the management of metastatic bone disease

Metastatic bone disease is a common complication of malignant tumours. As cancer treatment improves the overall survival of patients, the number of patients with bone metastases is expected to increase. The treatments for bone metastases include surgery, radiotherapy, and bone-modifying agents, with patients with a short expected prognosis requiring less invasive treatment. Patients with metastatic bone disease show greatly varying primary tumour histology, metastases sites and numbers, and comorbidities. Therefore, randomised clinical trials are indispensable to compare treatments for these patients. This editorial reviews recent findings on the diagnosis and prognosis prediction and discusses the current treatment of patients with metastatic bone disease.

Current Overview of Treatment for Metastatic Bone Disease

The number of patients with bone metastasis increases as medical management and surgery improve the overall survival of patients with cancer. Bone metastasis can cause skeletal complications, including bone pain, pathological fractures, spinal cord or nerve root compression, and hypercalcemia. Before initiation of treatment for bone metastasis, it is important to exclude primary bone malignancy, which would require a completely different therapeutic approach. It is essential to select surgical methods considering the patient’s prognosis, quality of life, postoperative function, and risk of postoperative complications. Therefore, bone metastasis treatment requires a multidisciplinary team approach, including radiologists, oncologists, and orthopedic surgeons. Recently, many novel palliative treatment options have emerged for bone metastases, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, radiopharmaceuticals, vertebroplasty, minimally invasive spine stabilization with percutaneous pedicle screws, acetabuloplasty, embolization, thermal ablation techniques, electrochemotherapy, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. These techniques are beneficial for patients who may not benefit from surgery or radiotherapy.

Bone biopsy results in patients with a history of malignancy: a case series of 378 patients

OBJECTIVE

The value of a bone biopsy in patients who present with a bone lesion and past medical history of malignancy is uncertain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of bone biopsies in patients with a history of a malignancy undergoing bone biopsy of a lesion in a regional bone tumour unit. Secondary outcomes include the assessment of survival in the different outcome groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients, with a previous malignancy and suspicious bone lesions, who underwent bone biopsy for final diagnosis between March 2010 and September 2019. Results of the biopsy were summarized into 3 groups: confirmed original malignancy, confirmed benign diagnosis, and confirmed new malignancy. Survival analysis of each group was also undertaken.

RESULTS

A total of 378 patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age 64 years, 216 females (57%)). In 250 cases (66%), the original malignancy was confirmed on the bone biopsy; in 128 cases, an alternative diagnosis was confirmed (benign diagnosis in 69 (18%)), and 59 had a new malignancy (16%). Survival was significantly greater for those in whom a benign diagnosis was confirmed (logrank test p = 0.0100).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that for patients presenting with a suspicious bone lesion, together with a history of malignancy, in a third of cases, the bone biopsy will confirm an alternative diagnosis of a benign lesion or a new malignancy. Survival of these patients will vary significantly depending on the biopsy outcome.

Skeletal sarcoidosis; an uncommon mimic of metastatic disease

A 66-year-old man with pulmonary sarcoidosis was referred to the urology team for assessment of troublesome lower urinary tract symptoms. An elevated blood serum prostate-specific antigen raised concern for prostate cancer. An MRI of the prostate demonstrated a potentially aggressive prostate lesion, along with low T1 signal skeletal lesions, suggestive of metastatic disease. Subsequent bone scan and MRI whole spine demonstrated further skeletal lesions. In cases of known prostate cancer, sometimes a presumptive diagnosis of skeletal metastases is made without histological diagnosis from the skeletal lesions. However, there were certain factors in this case whereby skeletal biopsy was deemed prudent prior to further therapy. Factors included atypical MRI signal characteristics for metastatic disease, absence of a positive tissue diagnosis from the prostate and the clinical background of sarcoidosis. The biopsy confirmed skeletal sarcoid rather than metastatic disease, thereby avoiding inappropriate and potentially toxic treatment for the patient.

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MR and diffusion kurtosis imaging for discriminating atypical bone metastasis from benign bone lesion

Objectives:

To investigate the feasibility of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion MR and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in discriminating atypical bone metastasis from benign bone lesion in patients with tumors.

Methods:

Patients with bone lesions in lower extremity suspected of metastases were enrolled in this prospective study. IVIM diffusion MR and DKI were performed before biopsy. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusion (D), perfusion fraction (f) and perfusion-related pseudodiffusion (D*) were generated with IVIM, while mean kurtosis (MK) and mean diffusion (MD) generated with DKI. Two radiologists blinded to pathology results separately measured these parameters for each lesion through drawing region of interest. Intraclass correlation coefficient was used to determine the inter-reader viability in measurement. The patients with pathology-confirmed metastasis or benign lesion were analyzed. The Mann–Whitney test was used to compare IVIM and DKI parameters between metastasis group and benign lesion group. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate the ability of discrimination.

Results:

Bone lesions from 28 patients (metastasis, n = 15; benign lesion, n = 13; mean age = 55 years; age range, 34~77) were analyzed with IVIM and DKI. Intraclass correlation coefficient was greater than 0.8 for all parameters. ADC, D and MD were significantly lower in metastases versus benign lesions (p<0.05). MK and f value were significantly higher in metastases versus benign lesions (p<0.05). D* was not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.05). Areas under curve for ADC, D, f, MK and MD were 0.935, 0.939, 0.891, 0.840 and 0.844 respectively.

Conclusions:

IVIM and DKI derived parameters distinguish between atypical bone metastasis and benign bone lesion in selected patients with tumors.

Advances in knowledge:

Bone metastasis and benign bone lesion differ in water molecular diffusion.

Intravoxel incoherent motion derived true diffusion distinguishes between atypical bone metastasis and benign lesion.